followup to
* https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32069
* https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32163
* https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32224
in react-dom in Dev we validate that the tag nesting is valid. This is
motivated primarily because while browsers are tolerant to poor HTML
there are many cases that if server rendered will be hydrated in a way
that will break hydration.
With the changes to singleton scoping where the document body is now the
implicit render/hydration context for arbitrary tags at the root we need
to adjust the validation logic to allow for valid programs such as
rendering divs as a child of a Document (since this div will actually
insert into the body).
While modern DOM implementations all support getRootNode if you are
running React in a runtime which does not the fallback logic which uses
`.ownerDocument` works everywhere except when the container is a
Document itself. This change corrects this by returning the container
intsance if it is a Document type.
We have this really old (5+ years) feature for inspecting native styles
of React Native Host components.
We also have a custom Cache implementation in React DevTools, which was
forked from React at some point. We know that this should be removed,
but it spans through critical parts of the application, like fetching
and caching inspected element.
Before this PR, this was also used for caching native style and layouts
of RN Host components. This approach is out of date, and was based on
the presence of Suspense boundary around inspected element View, which
we have removed to speed up element inspection -
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/30555.
Looks like I've introduced a regression in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/31956:
- Custom Cache implementation will throw thenables and suspend.
- Because of this, some descendant Suspense boundaries will not resolve
for a long time, and React will throw an error
https://react.dev/errors/482.
I've switched from a usage of this custom Cache implementation to a
naive fetching in effect and keeping the layout and style in a local
state of a Context, which will be propagated downwards. The race should
be impossible, this is guaranteed by the mechanism for queueing messages
through microtasks queue.
The only downside is the UI. If you quickly switch between 2 elements,
and one of them has native style, while the other doesn't, UI will feel
jumpy. We can address this later with a Suspense boundary, if needed.
3 years ago we partially disabled comment nodes as valid containers.
Some unflagged support was left in due to legacy APIs like
`unmountComponentAtNode` and `unstable_renderSubtreeIntoContainer` but
these were since removed in React 19. This update flags the remaining
uses of comments as containers.
follow up to https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32163
This continues the work of making Suspense workable anywhere in a
react-dom tree. See the prior PRs for how we handle server rendering and
client rendering. In this change we update the hydration implementation
to be able to locate expected nodes. In particular this means hydration
understands now that the default hydration context is the document body
when the container is above the body.
One case that is unique to hydration is clearing Suspense boundaries.
When hydration fails or when the server instructs the client to recover
an errored boundary it's possible that the html, head, and body tags in
the initial document were written from a fallback or a different primary
content on the server and need to be replaced by the client render.
However these tags (and in the case of head, their content) won't be
inside the comment nodes that identify the bounds of the Suspense
boundary. And when client rendering you may not even render the same
singletons that were server rendered. So when server rendering a
boudnary which contributes to the preamble (the html, head, and body tag
openings plus the head contents) we emit a special marker comment just
before closing the boundary out. This marker encodes which parts of the
preamble this boundary owned. If we need to clear the suspense boundary
on the client we read this marker and use it to reset the appropriate
singleton state.
This implements `findSourceMapURL` in react-server-dom-parcel, enabling
source maps for replayed server errors on the client. It utilizes a new
endpoint in the Parcel dev server that returns the source map for a
given bundle/file. The error overlay UI has also been updated to handle
these stacks. See https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/pull/10082
Also updated the fixture to the latest Parcel canary. A few APIs have
changed. We do have a higher level library wrapper now (`@parcel/rsc`
added in https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/pull/10074) but I left
the fixture using the lower level APIs directly here since it is easier
to see how react-server-dom-parcel is used.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Contributing to https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32240, this
change adds the tsconfig, tsup config, and estree type declarations that
will be needed for that plugin's typescript migration.
Hacky retry pipeline for when transforming `fire(...)` calls encounters
validation, todo, or memoization invariant bailouts. Would love feedback
on how we implement this to be extensible to other compiler
non-memoization features (e.g. inlineJSX)
Some observations:
- Compiler "front-end" passes (e.g. lower, type, effect, and mutability
inferences) should be shared for all compiler features -- memo and
otherwise
- Many passes (anything dealing with reactive scope ranges, scope blocks
/ dependencies, and optimizations such as ReactiveIR #31974) can be left
out of the retry pipeline. This PR hackily skips memoization features by
removing reactive scope creation, but we probably should restructure the
pipeline to skip these entirely on a retry
- We should maintain a canonical set of "validation flags"
Note the newly added fixtures are prefixed with `bailout-...` when the
retry fire pipeline is used. These fixture outputs contain correctly
inserted `useFire` calls and no memoization.
## Summary
When lookup `Parent`, `HostRoot` and `HostPortal` should be merged,
because when creating a `Portal`, it will also include
`containerInfo`(So we can directly use this `containerInfo` to delete
the real DOM nodes.), so there is no need to handle them separately.
## How did you test this change?
No behavior changes, all existing tests pass.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Contributing to https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32240, this
change adds the dev dependencies needed to support the migration of the
plugin to typescript.
Addresses https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/32244.
### Chromium
We will use
[chrome.permissions](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/reference/api/permissions)
for checking / requesting `clipboardWrite` permission before copying
something to the clipboard.
### Firefox
We will keep `clipboardWrite` as a required permission, because there is
no reliable and working API for requesting optional permissions for
extensions that are extending browser DevTools:
- `chrome.permissions` is unavailable for devtools pages -
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1796933
- You can't call `chrome.permissions.request` from background, because
this instruction has to be executed inside user-event callback,
basically only initiated by user.
I don't really want to come up with solutions like opening a new tab
with a button that user has to click.
When a named ViewTransition component unmounts in one place and mounts
in a different place we need to match these up so we know a pair has
been created. Since the unmounts are tracked in the snapshot phase we
need some way to track the mounts before that.
Originally the way I did that is by reusing the render phase since there
was no other phase in the commit before that. However, that's not quite
correct. Just because something is visited in render doesn't mean it'll
commit. E.g. if that tree ends up suspending or erroring. Which would
lead to a false positive on match. The unmount shouldn't animate in that
case.
(Un)fortunately we have already added a traversal before the snapshot
phase for tracking suspensey CSS. The `accumulateSuspenseyCommit` phase.
This needs to find new mounts of Suspensey CSS or if there was a
reappearing Offscreen boundary it needs to find any Suspensey CSS
already inside that tree. This is exactly the same traversal we need to
find newly appearing View Transition components. So we can just reuse
that.
I just noticed that we don't actually need to let the devtools build
finish first because the e2e tests don't use those built files. We can
decouple them to allow them to run in paralllel.
Building DevTools is currently the long pole for the runtime CI job.
Let's see if we can get the overall runtime for runtime build and test
down by speeding this one step up.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32266).
* #32267
* __->__ #32266
## Summary
`fastAddProperties` has shown some perf benefits when used for creating
props payload for new components. In this PR we'll try to use it for
diffing props for existing components.
It would be good enough if it simply doesn't regress perf. We'll be able
to delete the old `addProperties`, and make `fastAddProperties` the
default behaviour.
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn lint
yarn flow native
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer -r=xplat --variant=false
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer -r=xplat --variant=true
```
## Summary
We're adding support for `Document` instances in React Native (as
`ReactNativeDocument` instances) in
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49012 , which requires the
React Fabric renderer to handle its lifecycle.
This modifies the renderer to create those document instances and
associate them with the React root, and provides a new method for React
Native to access them given its containerTag / rootTag.
## How did you test this change?
Tested e2e in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49012
manually syncing these changes.
This is a follow up to https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32069
In the prior change I updated Fizz to allow you to render Suspense
boundaries at any level within a react-dom application by treating the
document body as the default render scope. This change updates Fiber to
provide similar semantics. Note that this update still does not deliver
hydration so unifying the Fizz and Fiber implementations in a single App
is not possible yet.
The implementation required a rework of the getHostSibling and
getHostParent algorithms. Now most HostSingletons are invisible from a
host positioning perspective. Head is special in that it is a valid host
scope so when you have Placements inside of it, it will act as the
parent. But body, and html, will not directly participate in host
positioning.
Additionally to support flipping to a fallback html, head, and body tag
in a Suspense fallback I updated the offscreen hiding/unhide logic to
pierce through singletons when lookin for matching hidable nod
boundaries anywhere (excluding hydration)
Corresponding Parcel PR:
https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/pull/10073
Parcel avoids [cascading cache
invalidation](https://philipwalton.com/articles/cascading-cache-invalidation/)
by injecting a bundle manifest containing a mapping of stable bundle ids
to hashed URLs. When using an HTML entry point, this is done (as of the
above PR) via a native import map. This means that if a bundle's hash
changes, only that bundle will be invalidated (plus the HTML itself
which typically has a short caching policy), not any other bundles that
reference it.
For RSCs, we cannot currently use native import maps because of client
side navigations, where a new HTML file is not requested. Eventually,
multiple `<script type="importmap">` elements will be supported
(https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10528) ([coming Chrome
133](https://chromestatus.com/feature/5121916248260608)), at which point
React could potentially inject them. In the meantime, I've added some
APIs to Parcel to polyfill this. With this change, an import map can be
sent along with a client reference, containing a mapping for any dynamic
imports and URL dependencies (e.g. images) that are referenced by the JS
bundles. On the client, the import map is extended with these new
mappings prior to executing the referenced bundles. This preserves the
caching advantages described above while supporting client navigations.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
I wrote this a couple summers back as an experiment to see how easily we could translate the compiler to Rust. We make extensive use of in-place mutation of the IR, and the experiment proved that this we can get reasonable ergonomics for this in Rust which was cool. We've since ended up using some of the code here for Relay, allowing Relay Compiler to parse JS files to do more fine-grained extraction of data. For React Compiler though, we plan to continue using JavaScript and explore lightweight native wrappers for things like OXC and SWC plugins. We're also working with the Hermes team to eventually compile the compiler with Static Hermes.
As Tomo always says: always bet on JavaScript.
ghstack-source-id: c5770a2efc
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32219
## Summary
This fixes#30659 , the issue was how the state was preserved and needed
special cases for the forward and memo, have also added tests related to
the same.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn test packages/react-refresh/src/__tests__/ReactFresh-test.js`
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Our [LlamaIndex](https://www.llamaindex.ai/) Product is blocked by this
bug
Fixes: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/32137
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
Jack Pope
Ruslan Lesiutin
Josh Story
Ricky
Devon Govett
lauren
michael faith
inottn
mofeiZ
Wick
Timothy Yung
David Michael Gregg
Sebastian Markbåge
Dmytro Rykun
Rubén Norte
Eli White
Jeremy JIANG
Joe Savona
Sophie Alpert
BIKI DAS
Jordan Brown
Alex Yang
藍+85CD
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann