The loading state tracking for suspensey CSS is too complicated. Prior
to this change it had a state it could enter into where a stylesheet was
already in the DOM but the loading state did not know it was inserted
causing a later transition to try to insert it again.
This fix is to add proper tracking of insertions on the codepaths that
were missing it. It also modifies the logic of when to suspend based on
whether the stylesheet has already been inserted or not.
This is not 100% correct semantics however because a prior commit could
have inserted a stylesheet and a later transition should ideally be able
to wait on that load before committing. I haven't attempted to fix this
yet however because the loading state tracking is too complicated as it
is and requires a more thorough refactor. Additionally it's not
particularly valuable to delay a transition on a loading stylesheet when
a previous commit also relied on that stylesheet but didn't wait for it
b/c it was sync. I will follow up with an improvement PR later
fixes: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/27585
DiffTrain build for [a9985529f1](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/a9985529f1aa55477f0feafe2398d36707cf6108)
I neglected to update the "last" pointer of the action queue. Since the
queue is circular, rather than dropping the update, the effect was to
add the update to the front of the queue instead of the back. I didn't
notice earlier because in my demos/tests, the actions would either
resolve really quickly or the actions weren't order dependent (like
incrementing a counter).
DiffTrain build for [b8e47d988e](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/b8e47d988eb3ba547c102c0b12c351250ed955e0)
When we postpone a prerender in the shell, we should just leave an empty
prelude and resume from the root. While preserving any options passed
in.
Since we haven't flushed anything we can't assume we've already emitted
html/body tags or any resources tracked in the resumable state. This
introduces a resetResumableState function to reset anything we didn't
flush.
This is a bit hacky. Ideally, we probably shouldn't have tracked it as
already happened until it flushed or something like that.
Basically, it's like restarting the prerender with the same options and
then immediately aborting. When we add the preload headers, we'd track
those as preload() being emitted after the reset and so they get readded
to the resumable state in that case.
DiffTrain build for [05fbd1aab0](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/05fbd1aab036ecbd14469d6376024439bc931f68)
By default, partial hydration is given the lowest possible priority,
because until a tree is updated, the server-rendered HTML is assumed to
match the final resolved HTML.
However, this isn't completely true because a component may choose to
"upgrade" itself upon hydration. The simplest example is a component
that calls setState in a useEffect to switch to a richer implementation
of the UI. Another example is a component that doesn't have a server-
rendered implementation, so it intentionally suspends to force a client-
only render.
useDeferredValue is an example, too: the server only renders the first
pass (the initialValue) argument, and relies on the client to upgrade to
the final value.
What we should really do in these cases is emit some information into
the Fizz stream so that Fiber knows to prioritize the hydration of
certain trees. We plan to add a mechanism for this in the future.
In the meantime, though, we can at least ensure that the priority of the
upgrade task is correct once it's "discovered" during hydration. In this
case, the priority of the task spawned by useDeferredValue should have
Transition priority, not Offscreen priority.
DiffTrain build for [779d59374e](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/779d59374e8e852ce00728d895156a7574e1b456)
During a popstate event, we attempt to render updates synchronously even
if they are transitions, to preserve scroll position if possible. We do
this by entangling the transition lane with the Sync lane.
However, if rendering the transition spawns additional transition
updates (e.g. a setState inside useEffect), there's no reason to render
those synchronously, too. We should use the normal transition behavior.
This fixes an issue where useDeferredValue during a popstate event would
spawn a transition update that was itself also synchronous.
DiffTrain build for [6db7f4209e](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/6db7f4209e6f32ebde298a0b7451710dd6aa3e19)
Now that we no longer support Server Context, we can now deduplicate
objects. It's not completely safe for useId but only in the same way as
it's not safe if you reuse elements on the client, so it's not a new
issue.
This also solves cyclic object references.
The issue is that we prefer to inline objects into a plain JSON format
when an object is not going to get reused. In this case the object
doesn't have an id. We could potentially serialize a reference to an
existing model + a path to it but it bloats the format and complicates
the client.
In a smarter flush phase like we have in Fizz we could choose to inline
or outline depending on what we've discovered so far before a flush. We
can't do that here since we use native stringify. However, even in that
solution you might not know that you're going to discover the same
object later so it's not perfect deduping anyway.
Instead, I use a heuristic where I mark previously seen objects and if I
ever see that object again, then I'll outline it. The idea is that most
objects are just going to be emitted once and if it's more than once
it's fairly likely you have a shared reference to it somewhere and it
might be more than two.
The third object gets deduplicated (or "detriplicated").
It's not a perfect heuristic because when we write the second object we
will have already visited all the nested objects inside of it, which
causes us to outline every nested object too even those weren't
reference more than by that parent. Not sure how to solve for that.
If we for some other reason outline an object such as if it suspends,
then it's truly deduplicated since it already has an id.
DiffTrain build for [f172fa7461](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/f172fa74610df623f1e82997ba66337452deeaa1)
Float methods can hang on to a reference to a Request after the request
is closed due to AsyncLocalStorage. If a Float method is called at this
point we do not want to attempt to flush anything. This change updates
the closing logic to also call `stopFlowing` which will ensure that any
checks against the destination properly reflect that we cannot do any
writes. In addition it updates the enqueueFlush logic to existence check
the destination inside the work function since it can change across the
work scheduling gap if it is async.
fixes: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/27540
DiffTrain build for [601e5c3850](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/601e5c38505ebc0ee099d8666b2f7a8b03159ac4)
### Based on #27509
Revealing a prerendered tree (hidden -> visible) is considered the same
as mounting a brand new tree. So, when an initialValue argument is
passed to useDeferredValue, and it's prerendered inside a hidden tree,
we should first prerender the initial value.
After the initial value has been prerendered, we switch to prerendering
the final one. This is the same sequence that we use when mounting new
visible tree. Depending on how much prerendering work has been finished
by the time the tree is revealed, we may or may not be able to skip all
the way to the final value.
This means we get the benefits of both prerendering and preview states:
if we have enough resources to prerender the whole thing, we do that. If
we don't, we have a preview state to show for immediate feedback.
DiffTrain build for [75c1bd7ee7](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/75c1bd7ee7e4a87a4dd0f560e157c57957ef823b)
### Based on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27505
If a parent render spawns a deferred task with useDeferredValue, but the
parent render suspends, we should not wait for the parent render to
complete before attempting to render the final value.
The reason is that the initialValue argument to useDeferredValue is
meant to represent an immediate preview of the final UI. If we can't
render it "immediately", we might as well skip it and go straight to the
"real" value.
This is an improvement over how a userspace implementation of
useDeferredValue would work, because a userspace implementation would
have to wait for the parent task to commit (useEffect) before spawning
the deferred task, creating a waterfall.
DiffTrain build for [b2a68a65c8](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/b2a68a65c84b63ac86930d88ae5c84380cbbdeb6)
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Changes `before before` to `before` in error messages.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
I want to improve error logs
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
DiffTrain build for [67cc9ba878](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/67cc9ba8789335b9da0838a446137c1be62adbcd)
A small refactor to how the lane entanglement mechanism works. We can
now distinguish between the lane that "spawned" a render task (i.e. a
new update) versus the lanes that it's entangled with. Both the update
lane and the entangled lanes will be included while rendering, but by
keeping them separate, we don't lose the original priority.
In practical terms, this means we can now entangle a low priority update
with a higher priority lane while rendering at the lower priority.
To do this, lanes that are entangled at the root are now tracked using
the same variable that we use to track the "base lanes" when revealing a
previously hidden tree — conceptually, they are the same thing. I also
renamed this variable (from subtreeLanes to entangledRenderLanes) to
better reflect how it's used.
My primary motivation is related to useDeferredValue, which I'll address
in a later PR.
DiffTrain build for [309c8ad968](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/309c8ad9688c491e5b17beb07ab01d65594914ce)
This is the same problem as we had with keyPath before where if the
element itself suspends, we have to restore the replay node to what it
was before, however, if something below the element suspends we
shouldn't pop it because that will pop it back up the stack.
Instead of passing replay as an argument to every renderElement
function, I use a hack to compare if the node is still the same as the
one we tried to render, then that means we haven't stepped down into the
child yet. Maybe this is not quite correct because in theory you could
have a recursive node that just renders itself over and over until some
context bails out.
This solves an issue where if you suspended in an element it would retry
trying to replay from that element but using the postponed state from
the root.
DiffTrain build for [09fbee89d6](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/09fbee89d62bc1c4a00e64474346cb9bc87682cb)
The `enableCustomElementPropertySupport` flag changes React's handling
of custom elements in a way that is more useful that just treating every
prop as an attribute. However when server rendering we have no choice
but to serialize props as attributes. When this flag is on and React
supports more prop types on the client like functions and objects the
server implementation needs to be a bit more naunced in how it renders
these components. With this flag on `false`, function, and object props
are omitted entirely and `true` is normalized to `""`. There was a bug
however in the implementation which caused children more complex than a
single string to be omitted because it matched the object type filter.
This change reorganizes the code a bit to put these filters in the
default prop handline case, leaving children, style, and innerHTML to be
handled via normal logic.
fixes: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/27286
DiffTrain build for [bb778528d1](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/bb778528d1ca22b44dad832f0258aaa4c0e6d4a4)
Adds a second argument to useDeferredValue called initialValue:
```js
const value = useDeferredValue(finalValue, initialValue);
```
During the initial render of a component, useDeferredValue will return
initialValue. Once that render finishes, it will spawn an additional
render to switch to finalValue.
This same sequence should occur whenever the hook is hidden and revealed
again, i.e. by a Suspense or Activity, though this part is not yet
implemented.
When initialValue is not provided, useDeferredValue has no effect during
initial render, but during an update, it will remain on the previous
value, then spawn an additional render to switch to the new value. (This
is the same behavior that exists today.)
During SSR, initialValue is always used, if provided.
This feature is currently behind an experimental flag. We plan to ship
it in a non-breaking release.
DiffTrain build for [be67db46b6](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/be67db46b60d94f9fbefccf2523429af25873e5b)
## Summary
Currently when cloning nodes in Fabric, we reset a node's children on
each clone, and then repeatedly call appendChild to restore the previous
list of children (even if it was quasi-identical to before). This causes
unnecessary invalidation of the layout state in Fabric's ShadowNode data
(which in turn may require additional yoga clones) and extra JSI calls.
This PR adds a feature flag to pass in the children as part of the clone
call, so Fabric always has a complete view of the node that's being
mutated.
This feature flag requires matching changes in the react-native repo:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/39817
## How did you test this change?
Unit test added demonstrates the new behaviour
```
yarn test -r www-modern ReactFabric-test
yarn test ReactFabric-test.internal
```
Tested a manual sync into React Native and verified core surfaces render
correctly.
DiffTrain build for [151e75a128](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/151e75a128d0fd436dce365335b96c5686f704d4)
The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile.
We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an
error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null
but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new
then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have
an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places.
This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse
problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call
captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second
boundary won't get a stack.
We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along
the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object.
This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady
event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming
because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if
we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm.
Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a
resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's
blocked.
DiffTrain build for [0fba3ecf73](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/0fba3ecf73900a1b54ed6d3b0617462ac92d2fef)
This adds back the `experimental_`-prefixed Server Actions APIs to the
experimental builds only, so that apps that use those don't immediately
break when upgrading. The APIs will log a warning to encourage people to
move to the unprefixed version, or to switch to the canary release
channel.
We can remove these in a few weeks after we've given people a chance to
upgrade.
This does not affect the canary builds at all, since they never had the
prefixed versions to begin with.
DiffTrain build for [ca237d6f0a](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/ca237d6f0ab986e799f192224d3066f76d66b73b)
### Based on #27453
If optimistic state is updated, and there's no startTransition on the
stack, there are two likely scenarios.
One possibility is that the optimistic update is triggered by a regular
event handler (e.g. `onSubmit`) instead of an action. This is a mistake
and we will warn.
The other possibility is the optimistic update is inside an async
action, but after an `await`. In this case, we can make it "just work"
by associating the optimistic update with the pending async action.
Technically it's possible that the optimistic update is unrelated to the
pending action, but we don't have a way of knowing this for sure because
browsers currently do not provide a way to track async scope. (The
AsyncContext proposal, if it lands, will solve this in the future.)
However, this is no different than the problem of unrelated transitions
being grouped together — it's not wrong per se, but it's not ideal.
Once AsyncContext starts landing in browsers, we will provide better
warnings in development for these cases.
DiffTrain build for [88d56b8e81](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/88d56b8e818d0c48eb6642303169c1fadeb99d59)
I found a bug where if an optimistic update causes a component to
rerender, and there are no other state updates during that render, React
bails out without applying the update.
Whenever a hook detects a change, we must mark the component as dirty to
prevent a bailout. We check for changes by comparing the new state to
`hook.memoizedState`. However, when implementing optimistic state
rebasing, I incorrectly reset `hook.memoizedState` to the incoming base
state, even though I only needed to reset `hook.baseState`. This was
just a mistake on my part.
This wasn't caught by the existing tests because usually when the
optimistic state changes, there's also some other state that marks the
component as dirty in the same render.
I fixed the bug and added a regression test.
DiffTrain build for [85c2b519b5](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/85c2b519b54269811002d26f4f711809ef68f123)
Fixes#26876 for real?
In 18.2.0 (last stable), we set .checked unconditionally:
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/v18.2.0/packages/react-dom/src/client/ReactDOMInput.js#L129-L135
This is important because if we are updating two radios' checkedness
from (false, true) to (true, false), we need to make sure that
input2.checked is explicitly set to false, even though setting
`input1.checked = true` already unchecks input2.
I think this fix is not complete because there is no guarantee that all
the inputs rerender at the same time? Hence the TODO. But in practice
they usually would and I _think_ this is comparable to what we had
before.
Also treating function and symbol as false like we used to and like we
do on initial mount.
DiffTrain build for [4f4c52a3c8](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/4f4c52a3c8f9c8a2d8133c654841fee257c37249)
## Summary
This is part of an effort to align the event loop in React Native with
its behavior on the Web. In this case, we're going to test enabling
microtasks in React Native (Fabric) and we need React to schedule work
using microtasks if available there. This just adds a feature flag to
configure that behavior at runtime.
## How did you test this change?
* Reviewed the generated code, which looks ok.
* Did a manual sync of this PR to Meta's internal infra and tested it
with my changes to enable microtasks in RN/Hermes.
DiffTrain build for [54baa7997c](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/54baa7997c7b0bbd456460ead6e051655ea43790)
The `resumeElement` function wasn't actually doing the correct thing
because it was resuming the element itself but what the child slot means
is that we're supposed to resume in the direct child of the element.
This is difficult to check for since it's all the possible branches that
the element can render into, so instead we just check this in
renderNode. It means the hottest path always checks the task which is
unfortunate.
And also, resuming using the correct nextSegmentId.
Fixes two bugs surfaced by this test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Story <josh.c.story@gmail.com>
DiffTrain build for [a6ed60a8eb](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/a6ed60a8eb0626e5f84d0bdbb62c0b61219150d3)
I do this by simply renaming the secret export name in the "subset"
bundle and this renamed version is what the FlightServer uses.
This requires us to be more diligent about always using the correct
instance of "react" in our tests so there's a bunch of clean up for
that.
DiffTrain build for [c7ba8c0988](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/c7ba8c098889b6dc47fa9c807bbba3975a658584)
This adds a regression test and fix for a case where a sync update
triggers selective hydration, which then leads to a "Maximum update
depth exceeded" error, even though there was only a single update. This
happens when a single sync update flows into many sibling dehydrated
Suspense boundaries.
This fix is, if a commit was the result of selective hydration, we
should not increment the nested update count, because those renders
conceptually are not updates.
Ideally, they wouldn't even be in a separate commit — we should be able
to hydrate a tree and apply an update on top of it within the same
render phase. We could do this once we implement resumable context
stacks.
DiffTrain build for [d900fadbf9](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/d900fadbf9017063fecb2641b7e99303b82a6f17)
`performSyncWorkOnRoot` has only a single caller, and the caller already
computes the next lanes (`getNextLanes`) before deciding to call the
function. So we can pass them as an argument instead of computing the
lanes again.
There was already a TODO comment about this, but it was mostly perf
related. However, @rickhanlonii noticed a discrepancy where the inner
`getNextLanes` call was not being passed the current work-in- progress
lanes. Usually this shouldn't matter because there should never be
work-in-progress sync work; it should finish immediately. There is one
case I'm aware of where we exit the work loop without finishing a sync
render, which is selective hydration, but even then it should switch to
the sync hydration lane, not the normal sync lane. So something else is
probably going on. I suspect it might be related to the
`enableUnifiedSyncLane` experiment.
This is likely related to a regression found internally at Meta. We're
still working on getting a proper regression test; I can come up with a
contrived one but I'm not confident it'll be the same as the actual
regression until we get a better repro.
DiffTrain build for [13d0225c7d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/13d0225c7d4715d98772a85d8deb26d244921287)
As agreed, we're removing Server Context. This was never official
documented.
We've found that it's not that useful in practice. Often the better
options are:
- Read things off the url or global scope like params or cookies.
- Use the module system for global dependency injection.
- Use `React.cache()` to dedupe multiple things instead of computing
once and passing down.
There are still legit use cases for Server Context but you have to be
very careful not to pass any large data, so in generally we recommend
against it anyway.
Yes, prop drilling is annoying but it's not impossible for the cases
this is needed. I would personally always pick it over Server Context
anyway.
Semantically, Server Context also blocks object deduping due to how it
plays out with Server Components that can't be deduped. This is much
more important feature.
Since it's already in canary along with the rest of RSC, we're adding a
warning for a few versions before removing completely to help migration.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Story <josh.c.story@gmail.com>
DiffTrain build for [1ebedbec2b](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/1ebedbec2bec08e07c286ea6c3cff62737a0fd3a)
Currently when we SSR a Flight response we do not emit any resources for
module imports. This means that when the client hydrates it won't have
already loaded the necessary scripts to satisfy the Imports defined in
the Flight payload which will lead to a delay in hydration completing.
This change updates `react-server-dom-webpack` and
`react-server-dom-esm` to emit async script tags in the head when we
encounter a modules in the flight response.
To support this we need some additional server configuration. We need to
know the path prefix for chunk loading and whether the chunks will load
with CORS or not (and if so with what configuration).
DiffTrain build for [701ac2e572](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/701ac2e57290f913502c6012c15e815f412f84b7)
Refactors Resources to have a more compact and memory efficient
struture. Resources generally are just an Array of chunks. A resource is
flushed when it's chunks is length zero. A resource does not have any
other state.
Stylesheets and Style tags are different and have been modeled as a unit
as a StyleQueue. This object stores the style rules to flush as part of
style tags using precedence as well as all the stylesheets associated
with the precedence. Stylesheets still need to track state because it
affects how we issue boundary completion instructions. Additionally
stylesheets encode chunks lazily because we may never write them as html
if they are discovered late.
The preload props transfer is now maximally compact (only stores the
props we would ever actually adopt) and only stores props for
stylesheets and scripts because other preloads have no resource
counterpart to adopt props into. The ResumableState maps that track
which keys have been observed are being overloaded. Previously if a key
was found it meant that a resource already exists (either in this render
or in a prior prerender). Now we discriminate between null and object
values. If map value is null we can assume the resource exists but if it
is an object that represents a prior preload for that resource and the
resource must still be constructed.
DiffTrain build for [49eba01930](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/49eba01930e9e1f331b34967fca65d5a0ba62846)
This fixes so that you can postpone in a fallback. This postpones the
parent boundary. I track the fallbacks in a separate replay node so that
when we resume, we can replay the fallback itself and finish the
fallback and then possibly later the content. By doing this we also
ensure we don't complete the parent too early since now it has a render
task on it.
There is one case that this surfaces that isn't limited to
prerender/resume but also render/hydrateRoot. I left todos in the tests
for this.
If you postpone in a fallback, and suspend in the content but eventually
don't postpone in the content then we should be able to just skip
postponing since the content rendered and we no longer need the
fallback. This is a bit of a weird edge case though since fallbacks are
supposed to be very minimal.
This happens because in both cases the fallback starts rendering early
as soon as the content suspends. This also ensures that the parent
doesn't complete early by increasing the blocking tasks. Unfortunately,
the fallback will irreversibly postpone its parent boundary as soon as
it hits a postpone.
When you suspend, the same thing happens but we typically deal with this
by doing a "soft" abort on the fallback since we don't need it anymore
which unblocks the parent boundary. We can't do that with postpone right
now though since it's considered a terminal state.
I think I'll just leave this as is for now since it's an edge case but
it's an annoying exception in the model. Makes me feel I haven't quite
nailed it just yet.
DiffTrain build for [bff6be8eb1](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/bff6be8eb1d77980c13f3e01be63cb813a377058)
We currently abort a stream either it's explicitly told to abort (e.g.
by an abortsignal). In this case we still finish writing what we have as
well as instructions for the client about what happened so it can
trigger fallback cases and log appropriately.
We also abort a request if the stream itself cancels. E.g. if you can't
write anymore. In this case we should not write anything to the outgoing
stream since it's supposed to be closed already now. However, we should
still abort the request so that more work isn't performed and so that we
can log the reason for it to the onError callback.
We should also not do any work after aborting.
There we need to stop the "flow" of bytes - so I call stopFlowing in the
cancel case before aborting.
The tests were testing this case but we had changed the implementation
to only start flowing at initial read (pull) instead of start like we
used to. As a result, it was no longer covering this case. We have to
call reader.read() in the tests to start the flow so that we need to
cancel it.
We also were missing a final assertion on the error logs and since we
were tracking them explicitly the extra error was silenced.
DiffTrain build for [d9e00f795b](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/d9e00f795b77676fb14f2a3c6f421f48f73bec2a)
The key is that instead of storing different tags of resumable points,
we just store if a replay node has any resumable slots and if that's at
the root `number` or if it has resumable slots by index.
This is a simpler and more compact format because we don't have to
separate the three Resume forms.
This helps deal with Postpone in fallbacks because it doesn't just
double all the cases.
DiffTrain build for [47fed6961f](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/47fed6961f79e8c8388f5f11fe1a531b194bb4af)
Fixes#26876, I think. Review each commit separately (all assertions
pass in main already, except the last assertInputTrackingIsClean in
"should control radio buttons").
I'm actually a little confused on two things here:
* All the isCheckedDirty assertions are true. But I don't think we set
.checked unconditionally? So how does this happen?
* https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/26876#issuecomment-1611662862
claims that
https://github.com/facebook/react/compare/d962f35ca...1f248bdd7 contains
the faulty change, but it doesn't appear to change the restoration logic
that I've touched here. (One difference outside restoration is that
updateProperties did previously set `.checked` when `nextProp !==
lastProp` whereas the new logic in updateInput is to set it when
`node.checked !== !!checked`.)
But it seems to me like we need this call here anyway, and if it fixes
it then it fixes it? I think technically speaking we probably should do
all the updateInput() calls and then all the updateValueIfChanged()
calls—in particular I think if clicking A changed the checked radio
button from B to C then the code as I have it would be incorrect, but
that also seems unlikely so idk whether to care.
cc @zhengjitf @Luk-z who did some investigation on the original issue
DiffTrain build for [3c27178a2f](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/3c27178a2f2c74f14d90613028e3929e1f06d830)
To support MPA-style form submissions, useFormState sends down a key
that represents the identity of the hook on the page. It's based on the
key path of the component within the React tree; for deeply nested
hooks, this keypath can become very long. We can hash the key to make it
shorter.
Adds a method called createFastHash to the Stream Config interface.
We're not using this for security or obfuscation, only to generate a
more compact key without sacrificing too much collision resistance.
- In Node.js builds, createFastHash uses the built-in crypto module.
- In Bun builds, createFastHash uses Bun.hash. See:
https://bun.sh/docs/api/hashing#bun-hash
I have not yet implemented createFastHash in the Edge, Browser, or FB
(Hermes) stream configs because those environments do not have a
built-in hashing function that meets our requirements. (We can't use the
web standard `crypto` API because those methods are async, and yielding
to the main thread is too costly to be worth it for this particular use
case.) We'll likely use a pure JS implementation in those environments;
for now, they just return the original string without hashing it. I'll
address this in separate PRs.
DiffTrain build for [2b3d582683](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/2b3d5826836ac59f8446281976762d594e55d97e)
## Summary
Currently `ReactFizzServer.abort` allows you to pass in the a `reason`
error, which then gets passed to the `onError` handler for each task
that ends up getting aborted. This adds in the ability to pass down that
same `reason` error to `ReactDOMServerFB.abortStream` as well.
## How did you test this change?
Added a test case to ReactDOMServerFB-test.internal.js
DiffTrain build for [1f4936660d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/1f4936660dcaba2e5722013f0ad12d7369543a9f)
Moves writing queues to renderState.
We shouldn't need the resource tracking's value. We just need to know if
that resource has already been emitted. We can use a Set for this. To
ensure that set is directly serializable we can just use a
dictionary-like object with no value.
See individual commits for special cases.
DiffTrain build for [b775564d35](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/b775564d35d6fe9f9acead0f380bbc86bb6bdd2c)
Originally the intension was to have React assign an ID to a user
rendered DOM node inside a `fallback` while it was loading. If there
already were an explicit `id` defined on the DOM element we would reuse
that one instead. That's why this was a DOM Config option and not just
built in to Fizz.
This became tricky since it can load late and so we'd have to transfer
it down and detect it only once it finished rendering and if there is no
DOM element it doesn't work anyway. So instead, what we do in practice
is to always use a `<template>` tag with the ID. This has the downside
of an extra useless node and shifting child CSS selectors.
Maybe we'll get around to fixing this properly but it might not be worth
it.
This PR just gets rid of the SuspenseBoundaryID concept and instead we
just use the same ID number as the root segment ID of the boundary to
refer to the boundary to simplify the implementation.
This also solves the problem that SuspenseBoundaryID isn't currently
serializable (although that's easily fixable by itself if necessary).
DiffTrain build for [2807d781a0](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/2807d781a08db8e9873687fccc25c0f12b4fb3d4)
Based on #27385.
When we error or abort during replay, that doesn't actually error the
component that errored because that has already rendered. The error only
affects any child that is not yet completed. Therefore the error kind of
gets thrown at the resumable point.
The resumable point might be a hole in the replay path, in which case
throwing there errors the parent boundary just the same as if the replay
component errored. If the hole is inside a deeper Suspense boundary
though, then it's that Suspense boundary that gets client rendered. I.e.
the child boundary. We can still finish any siblings.
In the shell all resumable points are inside a boundary since we must
have finished the shell. Therefore if you error in the root, we just
simply just turn all incomplete boundaries into client renders.
DiffTrain build for [925c66a647](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/925c66a6472a61e7174dabf6c697a9a320ebc170)
The idea for this check is that we shouldn't flush anything before we
flush the shell. That may or may not hold true in future formats like
RN.
It is a problem for resuming because with resuming it's possible to have
root tasks that are used for resuming but the shell was already flushed
so we can have completed boundaries before the shell has fully resumed.
What matters is whether the parent has already flushed or not.
It's not technically necessary to bail early because there won't be
anything in partialBoundaries or completedBoundaries because nothing
gets added there unless the parent has already flushed.
It's not exactly slow to have to check the length of three arrays so
it's probably not a big deal.
Flush partials in an early preamble needs further consideration
regardless.
DiffTrain build for [df061b3966](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/df061b396644bb7c27ea76bb27ae09784ce6444b)
This forks Task into ReplayTask and RenderTask.
A RenderTask is the normal mode and it has a segment to write into.
A ReplayTask doesn't have a segment to write into because that has
already been written but instead it has a ReplayState which keeps track
of the next set of paths to follow. Once we hit a "Resume" node we
convert it into a RenderTask and continue rendering from there.
We can resume at either an Element position or a Slot position. An
Element pointing to a component doesn't mean we resume that component,
it means we resume in the child position directly below that component.
Slots are slots inside arrays.
Instead of statically forking most paths, I kept using the same path and
checked for the existence of a segment or replay state dynamically at
runtime.
However, there's still quite a bit of forking here like retryRenderTask
and retryReplayTask. Even in the new forks there's a lot of duplication
like resumeSuspenseBoundary, replaySuspenseBoundary and
renderSuspenseBoundary. There's opportunity to simplify this a bit.
DiffTrain build for [a5fc797db1](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/a5fc797db14c6e05d4d5c4dbb22a0dd70d41f5d5)
kassens
gnoff
acdlite
sebmarkbage
hoxyq
sophiebits
javache
rubennorte
mofeiZ