lifter: fix Cyrillic homoglyph in resolveTargetedThemidaR9 identifier (#119)

The identifier 'resolveTargetedThemid\u0430R9' (declared in LifterClass_Concolic.hpp)
contained U+0430 (Cyrillic small letter a) instead of U+0061 (Latin a)
between 'Themid' and 'R9'. Every in-tree reference mirrored the
Cyrillic form, but prose mentions and merge titles (e.g. PR #115 title)
used ASCII, so an ASCII grep for 'resolveTargetedThemidaR9' returned
zero hits. This was a silent discoverability hazard for future sessions
and grep-based tooling.

Rename to pure ASCII across the single declaration, the single
caller in getLatestValueForKey, the six test entry points in
lifter/test/Tester.hpp, and the four references in
docs/LOOP_HANDLING.md. No behavior change.

Verified:
  - python test.py micro: all instruction microtests passed
    (including the three targeted_themida_r9_override_* cases)
  - Themida reference sample (../testthemida/example2-virt.bin @
    0x140001000): 2544 instructions lifted, 0 warnings, 0 errors

Co-authored-by: yusufcanislek <yusuf.canislek@meetdandy.com>

docs/LOOP_HANDLING.md

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ When the lifter is in loop mode (`currentBlockUsesGeneralizedLoopState() == true
 | `retrieve_generalized_loop_target_slot_value(addr, bytes)` | Phi of canonical/backedge values for a recognized target slot. |
 | `retrieve_generalized_loop_phi_address_value(load, bytes, orgLoad)` | Phi of loaded values when the load's address is a phi of two concrete addresses derived from canonical/backedge. |
 | `retrieve_generalized_loop_local_phi_address_value(load, bytes, orgLoad)` | Same as above for loop-local stack-buffer addresses. |
-| `resolveTargetedThemidаR9(value)` | At three hardcoded Themida instruction addresses, replaces R9 with `(canonicalControl + offset, backedgeControl + offset)` phi. See [Hardcoded reference-sample addresses](#hardcoded-reference-sample-addresses). |
+| `resolveTargetedThemidaR9(value)` | At three hardcoded Themida instruction addresses, replaces R9 with `(canonicalControl + offset, backedgeControl + offset)` phi. See [Hardcoded reference-sample addresses](#hardcoded-reference-sample-addresses). |
 
 `computePossibleValues` (in `lifter/memory/GEPTracker.ipp`) also has a `PHINode` case that unions every incoming's value set, so callers downstream of these phis get the full possible-value enumeration instead of an empty fallback.
 
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static constexpr std::array<uint64_t, 3> kSupportedGeneralizedControlFieldOffset
     0x6ULL, 0xAULL, 0xCULL};
 ```
 
-`resolveTargetedThemidаR9` adds three hardcoded `(instruction-address, control-offset)` pairs:
+`resolveTargetedThemidaR9` adds three hardcoded `(instruction-address, control-offset)` pairs:
 
 | Instruction address | Control offset | Verified hit count on reference sample |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ Loop handling has roughly thirty microtests in `lifter/test/Tester.hpp`. The mos
 | `pending_generalized_loop_*` | Same guards in the `pendingLoopGeneralizationAddresses` lifecycle. |
 | `generalized_loop_restore_*` | Backedge flag-state and register-state merging across `load_generalized_backup`. |
 | `generalized_loop_*_creates_phi` | Each `retrieve_generalized_loop_*` helper produces the expected phi shape (control slot, control slot displacement, target slot, control field load, local phi address). |
-| `targeted_themida_r9_override_produces_phi` | All three hardcoded `(address, offset)` pairs in `resolveTargetedThemidаR9`. |
+| `targeted_themida_r9_override_produces_phi` | All three hardcoded `(address, offset)` pairs in `resolveTargetedThemidaR9`. |
 | `compute_possible_values_*` | The PHI handler unions incomings (also covers cast-width preservation and rolled-arithmetic-chain enumeration). |
 
 When changing loop handling, run at minimum:
@@ -197,6 +197,6 @@ and inspect `output_diagnostics.json` for `lift_stats.instructions_lifted == 254
 |---|---|
 | `REP`/`REPE`/`REPNE`-prefixed `SCAS` | Rejected as `not_implemented`; needs a model for repeated-scan termination. |
 | `INT 2` continuation under VMP 3.6 | Naive architectural fallthrough is wrong; recovery requires modeling the dispatcher / exception-mediated control flow. See `VMP_TESTING_NOTES.md`. |
-| Hardcoded `(address, offset)` pairs in `resolveTargetedThemidаR9` | Only fire on the reference Themida sample. See [Hardcoded reference-sample addresses](#hardcoded-reference-sample-addresses). |
+| Hardcoded `(address, offset)` pairs in `resolveTargetedThemidaR9` | Only fire on the reference Themida sample. See [Hardcoded reference-sample addresses](#hardcoded-reference-sample-addresses). |
 | Loop unrolling / loop-invariant code motion | Not implemented. The lifter relies on LLVM's downstream optimization passes for this once the IR is in shape. |
 | Multi-way backedges (≥3 paths to the same header) | Not exercised by the current generalized-loop machinery; the canonical/backedge model assumes exactly two incoming paths. |

lifter/core/LifterClass_Concolic.hpp

@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ public:
     }
   }
 
-  llvm::Value* resolveTargetedThemidаR9(llvm::Value* value) {
+  llvm::Value* resolveTargetedThemidaR9(llvm::Value* value) {
     auto* state = getMostRecentGeneralizedLoopState();
     if (this->liftProgressDiagEnabled && this->current_address >= 0x140023500ULL &&
         this->current_address <= 0x140023800ULL) {
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ public:
       std::cout << "\n";
     }
     if (key == Register::R9) {
-      return resolveTargetedThemidаR9(value);
+      return resolveTargetedThemidaR9(value);
     }
     return value;
   }

lifter/test/Tester.hpp

@@ -2040,8 +2040,8 @@ bool runSolvePathResolvesGeneralizedPhiLoadTarget(std::string& details) {
   }
 
 
-  bool runTargetedThemidаR9OverrideProducesPhi(std::string& details) {
-    // resolveTargetedThemidаR9 hardcodes three instruction addresses where a
+  bool runTargetedThemidaR9OverrideProducesPhi(std::string& details) {
+    // resolveTargetedThemidaR9 hardcodes three instruction addresses where a
     // Themida cursor-derived R9 value must be rematerialized as a phi over
     // canonical/backedge control bases with a per-address offset.  Verify
     // all three cases, not just one, so a regression that silently drops or
@@ -2124,8 +2124,8 @@ bool runSolvePathResolvesGeneralizedPhiLoadTarget(std::string& details) {
   }
 
 
-  bool runTargetedThemidаR9OverrideDoesNotFireAtAdjacentAddress(std::string& details) {
-    // The switch in resolveTargetedThemidаR9 is exact-address.  A regression
+  bool runTargetedThemidaR9OverrideDoesNotFireAtAdjacentAddress(std::string& details) {
+    // The switch in resolveTargetedThemidaR9 is exact-address.  A regression
     // that accidentally broadened it to a range (e.g. `addr >= 0x140023500 &&
     // addr <= 0x140023800`) would silently produce a phi at every R9 read in
     // that window, corrupting samples that rely on exact-match behavior.
@@ -2171,7 +2171,7 @@ bool runSolvePathResolvesGeneralizedPhiLoadTarget(std::string& details) {
     return true;
   }
 
-  bool runTargetedThemidаR9OverrideFallsThroughWithoutLoopState(std::string& details) {
+  bool runTargetedThemidaR9OverrideFallsThroughWithoutLoopState(std::string& details) {
     // Before any generalized-loop backup has been created,
     // getMostRecentGeneralizedLoopState() returns null and the override must
     // fall through to the ordinary R9 value instead of attempting to build a
@@ -3077,7 +3077,7 @@ bool runComputePossibleValuesOnRolledArithmeticChain(std::string& details) {
     runCustom("generalized_loop_restore_merges_backedge_flag_state",
              &InstructionTester::runGeneralizedLoopRestoreMergesBackedgeFlagState);
     runCustom("targeted_themida_r9_override_produces_phi",
-             &InstructionTester::runTargetedThemidаR9OverrideProducesPhi);
+             &InstructionTester::runTargetedThemidaR9OverrideProducesPhi);
     runCustom("generalized_loop_restore_merges_backedge_register_state",
              &InstructionTester::runGeneralizedLoopRestoreMergesBackedgeRegisterState);
     runCustom("set_register_value_zero_extends_32bit_writes",
@@ -3105,9 +3105,9 @@ bool runComputePossibleValuesOnRolledArithmeticChain(std::string& details) {
     runCustom("compute_possible_values_trunc_to_i1_preserves_width",
              &InstructionTester::runComputePossibleValuesTruncToI1PreservesWidth);
     runCustom("targeted_themida_r9_override_does_not_fire_at_adjacent_address",
-             &InstructionTester::runTargetedThemidаR9OverrideDoesNotFireAtAdjacentAddress);
+             &InstructionTester::runTargetedThemidaR9OverrideDoesNotFireAtAdjacentAddress);
     runCustom("targeted_themida_r9_override_falls_through_without_loop_state",
-             &InstructionTester::runTargetedThemidаR9OverrideFallsThroughWithoutLoopState);
+             &InstructionTester::runTargetedThemidaR9OverrideFallsThroughWithoutLoopState);
     runCustom("generalized_loop_control_field_load_creates_phi",
              &InstructionTester::runGeneralizedLoopControlFieldLoadCreatesPhi);
     runCustom("solve_path_prefers_mapped_target_over_null_for_indirect_jump",