* Warn when suspending at wrong priority
Adds a warning when a user-blocking update is suspended.
Ideally, all we would need to do is check the current priority level.
But we currently have no rigorous way to distinguish work that was
scheduled at user- blocking priority from work that expired a bit and
was "upgraded" to a higher priority. That's because we don't schedule
separate callbacks for every level, only the highest priority level per
root. The priority of subsequent levels is inferred from the expiration
time, but this is an imprecise heuristic.
However, we do store the last discrete pending update per root. So we
can reliably compare to that one. (If we broaden this warning to include
high pri updates that aren't discrete, then this won't be sufficient.)
My rationale is that it's better for this warning to have false
negatives than false positives.
Potential follow-ups:
- Bikeshed more on the message. I don't like what I landed on that much
but I think it's good enough to start.
- Include the names of the components that updated. (The ideal place to
fire the warning is during the setState call but we don't know if
something will suspend until the next update. Maybe we could be clever
and warn during a subsequent update to the same component?)
* Move Suspense priority check to throwException
* Fixes a bug in the cancellation logic. The cancel events are now correctly listened to on the root.
* Fixes cancellation in Safari by using the dragstart event as a proxy for cancellation (i.e., the event dispatched when move-during-press occurs on an anchor tag)
* [React Native] Inline calls to FabricUIManager in shared code
* Call global.nativeFabricUIManager directly as short term fix
* Add flow types
* Add nativeFabricUIManager global to eslint config
* Adding eslint global to bundle validation script
Called when focus visibility changes. Focus is only considered visible if a
focus event occurs after keyboard navigation. This provides a way for people to
provide visual focus styles for keyboard accessible UIs without those styles
appearing if focus is triggered by mouse, touch, pen.
This patch fixes an issue related to determining whether the end event occurs
within the responder region. Previously we only checked if the event target was
within the responder region for moves, otherwise we checked if the target was
within the event component. Since the dimensions of the child element can
change after activation, we need to recalculate the responder region before
deactivation as well if the target is not within the event component.
* ADD: disablePictureInPicture attribute for HTML5 videos
* ADD: disablePictureInPicture as DOMProperty and attribute
* Update: Replace camelCase with lowercase and vice-versa
* FIX: Missing comma on attribute (prettier)
https://webpack.js.org/plugins/define-plugin/
Webpack's DefinePlugin has the ability to replace `typeof expr` to a constant in compile-time, which should lead to better dead-code-elimination.
Bugfix for `inferPriorityFromExpirationTime` function. It happened to
work in our existing tests because we use virtual time.
Flow would have caught this if expiration times were an opaque type. We
should consider that in the future. (The downside of opaque types is
that all operations would have to go through helper functions, which may
or may not get inlined by Closure.)
Fixes a bug where the timeout passed to `scheduleCallback` represented
an absolute timestamp, instead of the amount of time until that
timestamp is reached. The solution is to subtract the current time
from the expiration.
The bug wasn't caught by other tests because we use virtual times that
default to 0, and most tests don't advance time.
I also moved the `initialTimeMs` offset to the
`SchedulerWithReactIntegration` module so that we don't have to remember
to subtract the offset every time. (We should consider upstreaming this
to the Scheduler package.)
The implementation is wrong, but also it's not that useful for
debugging. Implementing it properly would involve tracking more
information than we do currently. Perhaps including the priority
of the callback in the message would be helpful, but not sure. For now
I'll just remove it.
