When React schedules a rendering task, it passes a `timeout` option
based on its expiration time. This is intended to avoid starvation
by other React updates. However, it also affects the relative priority
of React tasks and other Scheduler tasks at the same level, like
data processing.
This adds a feature flag to disable passing a `timeout` option to
Scheduler. React tasks will always append themselves to the end of
the queue, without jumping ahead of already scheduled tasks.
This does not affect the order in which React updates within a single
root are processed, but it could affect updates across multiple roots.
This also doesn't remove the expiration from Scheduler. It only means
that React tasks are not given special treatment.
Previously, the suspense priority warning was fired even if the Root wasn't suspended. Changed the warning to fire only when the root is suspended.
Also refactored the suspense priority warning so it's easier to read.
The clean-up function of a passive effect (`useEffect`) usually fires
in a post-commit task, after the browser has painted. However, there is
an exception when the component (or its parent) is deleted from the
tree. In that case, we fire the clean-up function during the
synchronous commit phase, the same phase we use for layout effects.
This is a concession to implementation complexity. Calling it in the
passive effect phase would require either traversing the children of the
deleted fiber again, or including unmount effects as part of the fiber
effect list.
Because the functions are called during the sync phase in this case,
the Scheduler priority is Immediate (the one used for layout) instead
of Normal. We may want to reconsider this trade off later.
If there are adjacent updates we bail out of rendering the suspense list
at all but we may still complete the node. We need to reset the render
state in that case.
I restructured so that this is in the same code path so we don't forget it
in the future.
* Add a feature flag to disable legacy context
* Address review
- invariant -> warning
- Make this.context and context argument actually undefined
* Increase test coverage for lifecycles
* Also disable it on the server is flag is on
* Make this.context {} when disabled, but function context is undefined
* Move checks inside
* [act] Wrap IsThisRendererActing in DEV check
So that it doesn't leak into the production bundle. Follow-up to #16240.
* Disable Suspense fallback test in prod
* Bugfix: Priority when effects are flushed early
The priority of passive effects is supposed to be the same as the
priority of the render. This fixes a bug where the priority is sometimes
wrong if the effects are flushed early.
But the priority should really never be higher than Normal Priority.
I'll change that in the next commit.
* Effects never have higher than normal priority
Effects currently have the same priority as the render that spawns them.
This changes the behavior so that effects always have normal priority,
or lower if the render priority is lower (e.g. offscreen prerendering).
The implementation is a bit awkward because of the way `renderRoot`,
`commitRoot`, and `flushPassiveEffects` are split. This is a known
factoring problem that I'm planning to address once 16.9 is released.
In this PR, for tests (specifically, code inside an `act()` scope), we immediately trigger work that would have otherwise required a timeout. This makes it simpler to tests loading/spinner states, and makes tests resilient to changes in React.
For some of our tests(specifically, ReactSuspenseWithNoopRenderer-test.internal), we _don't_ want fallbacks to immediately trigger, because we're testing intermediate states and such. Added a feature flag `flushSuspenseFallbacksInTests` to disable this behaviour on a per case basis.
Concurrent/Batched mode tests should always be run with a mocked scheduler (v17 or not). This PR adds a warning for the same. I'll put up a separate PR to the docs with a page detailing how to mock the scheduler.
Adds experimental flag to yield many times per frame using a message
event loop, instead of the current approach of guessing the next vsync
and yielding at the end of the frame.
This new approach forgoes a `requestAnimationFrame` entirely. It posts a
message event and performs a small amount of work (5ms) before yielding
to the browser, regardless of where it might be in the vsync cycle. At
the end of the event, if there's work left over, it posts another
message event.
This should keep the main thread responsive even for really high frame
rates. It also shouldn't matter if the hardware frame rate changes after
page load (our current heuristic only detects if the frame rate
increases, not decreases).
The main risk is that yielding more often will exacerbate main thread
contention with other browser tasks.
Let's try it and see.
* Do not hyphenate custom CSS property
* Move check into the processStyleName fn
* Formatting
* add test
* Put isCustomProperty check after conditional return
* add test to `ReactDOMServerIntegration` and supress warning
* Don't indexOf twice
* Simpler fix
Not returning the value of flushPassiveEffects() in flushWork() meant that with async act, we wouldn't flush all work with cascading effects. This PR fixes that oversight, and adds some tests to catch this in the future.
The Scheduler implementation uses browser APIs like `MessageChannel`,
`requestAnimationFrame`, and `setTimeout` to schedule work on the main
thread. Most of our tests treat these as implementation details;
however, the sequence and timing of these APIs are not precisely
specified, and can vary wildly across browsers.
To prevent regressions, we need the ability to simulate specific edge
cases that we may encounter in various browsers.
This adds a new test suite that mocks all browser methods used in our
implementation. It assumes as little as possible about the order and
timing of events. The only thing it assumes is that
requestAnimationFrame is passed a frame time that is equal to or less
than the time returned by performance.now. Everything else can be
controlled at will.
It also includes Scheduler-specific invariants, e.g. only one rAF
callback can be scheduled at a time.
It overlaps slightly with the existing SchedulerDOM-test suite, which
also mocks the browser APIs, but exposes a higher-level set of testing
primitives. I will consolidate the two suites in a follow-up.
This adds a 'SuspenseCallback' feature flag. When the property is set on
a suspense component it will be called during the commit phase with a
set of the immediate thenable for this component. This will allow user
code to build runtime tracing of the cause for a suspense boundary.
Given this snippet:
```jsx
TestRenderer.act(() => {
TestUtils.act(() => {
TestRenderer.create(<Effecty />);
});
});
```
We want to make sure that all work is only flushed on exiting the outermost act().
Now, naively doing this based on actingScopeDepth would work with a mocked scheduler, where flushAll() would flush all work across renderers.
This doesn't work without mocking the scheduler though; and where flushing work only works per renderer. So we disable this behaviour for a non-mocked scenario. This seems like an ok tradeoff.
Noticed when looking at the performance profiler with Luna that it's
hard to tell which event causes `performWorkUntilDeadline` to fire
because these functions are anonymous.
Always sets `isRAFLoopRunning` back to false when an animation frame is
scheduled. Fixes a bug where two rAFs fire in the same frame, but the
second one exits and fails to schedule a new rAF.
Fixes bug observed in Safari.
Prevents Spacebar from scrolling the window.
Prevents Enter from triggering a navigation if preventDefault is true.
Fixes the emulated mouse events test.
Improved warning whenever lower priority events (ex. data fetching, page load) happen during a high priority update (ex. hover/click events) to include:
1.) Name of component that triggered the high priority update or
2.) Information that the update was triggered on the root
Scheduler uses `requestAnimationFrame` to post tasks to the browser.
If this happens at the beginning of a frame, the callback might not
fire until the subsequent frame, even if the main thread is idle.
Our theory was that this wouldn't be an issue in practice, because once
the first rAF fires, we schedule the next rAF as early as possible in
that frame. Combined with our heuristic for computing frame deadlines,
we shouldn't get any idle time in between frames — only before the
*first* frame.
This reasoning holds true when you have a small number of large tasks,
such as the ones posted by React. The idle time before the task starts
is negligible relative to the lifetime of the entire task.
However, it does not hold if you have many small tasks posted over a
span of time, perhaps spawned by a flurry of IO events. In this case,
instead of single, contiguous rAF loop preceded by an idle frame, you
get many rAF loops preceded by many idle frames. Our new theory is that
this is contributing to poor main thread utilization during page loads.
To try to reclaim as much idle time as possible, this PR adds two
experimental flags. The first one adds a `requestIdleCallback` call to
start the rAF loop, which will fire before rAF if there's idle time left
in the frame. (We still call rAF in case there isn't. We start working
in whichever event fires first.)
The second flag tries a similar strategy using `setTimeout(fn, 0)`. If
the timer fires before rAF, we'll assume that the main thread is idle.
If either `requestIdleCallback` or `setTimeout` fires before rAF, we'll
immediately peform some work. Since we don't have a real frame time that
we can use to compute the frame deadline, we'll do an entire frame
length of work. This will probably push us past the vsync, but this is
fine because we can catch up during the next frame, by which point a
real rAF will have fired and the loop can proceed the same way it
does today.
Test plan: Try this on Facebook to see if it improves load times