Rename "Suspended" commit to "Suspended on CSS" since that's the only
reason for this particular branch. This will not hold true because with
suspended images and with view transitions those can also be the reason.
So in the future we need to add those.
Only log "Blocked" in the components track if we yield for 3ms or
longer. It's common to have like 1-2ms yield times for various reasons
going on which is not worth the noise to consider "blocking".
Rename "Blocked" to "Update" in the Blocking/Transition tracks. This is
when a setState happens and with stack traces it's where you should look
for the stack trace of the setState. So we want to indicate that this is
the "Update".
I only added the "Blocked" part if we're blocked for more than 5ms
before we can start rendering - indicating that some other track was
working at the same time and preventing us from rendering.
This can happen for example if you have duplicate names in the "old"
state. This errors the transition before the updateCallback is invoked
so we haven't yet applied mutations etc.
This runs through those phases after the error to get us back to a
consistent state.
The problem with setting both `children` or `dangerouslySetInnerHTML`
and also using a ref on a DOM node to either manually append children or
using it as a Container for `createRoot` or `createPortal` is that it's
ambiguous which children should win. Ideally you use one of the four
options to control children. Meaning that ideally you always use a leaf
container for refs like this.
Unfortunately it's very common to use a React owned thing with children
as a Container of a Portal. For example `document.body` can have both
regular React children and be used as a Portal container. This isn't
really fully supported and has some undefined behavior like relative
order isn't guaranteed but still very common.
It is extra bad if the children are a `string`/`number` or if
`dangerouslySetInnerHTML` is set. Because then when ever that reactively
updates it'll clear out any manually added DOM nodes. When this happens
isn't guaranteed. It's always happening as far as the reactivity is
concerned. See https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/31600
Therefore, we should warn for this specific pattern. This still allows
non-text children as a compromise even though that behavior is also
somewhat undefined.
Stacked on #32793.
This is meant to model the intended semantics of `addTransitionType`
better. The previous hack just consumed all transition types when any
root committed so it could steal them from other roots. Really each root
should get its own set. Really each transition lane should get its own
set.
We can't implement the full ideal semantics yet because 1) we currently
entangle transition lanes 2) we lack `AsyncContext` on the client so for
async actions we can't associate a `addTransitionType` call to a
specific `startTransition`.
This starts by modeling Transition Types to be stored on the Transition
instance. Conceptually they belong to the Transition instance of that
`startTransition` they belong to. That instance is otherwise mostly just
used for Transition Tracing but it makes sense that those would be able
to be passed the Transition Types for that specific instance.
Nested `startTransition` need to get entangled. So that this
`addTransitionType` can be associated with the `setState`:
```js
startTransition(() => {
startTransition(() => {
addTransitionType(...)
});
setState(...);
});
```
Ideally we'd probably just use the same Transition instance itself since
these are conceptually all part of one entangled one. But transition
tracing uses multiple names and start times. Unclear what we want to do
with that. So I kept separate instances but shared `types` set.
Next I collect the types added during a `startTransition` to any root
scheduled with a Transition. This should really be collected one set per
Transition lane in a `LaneMap`. In fact, the information would already
be there if Transition Tracing was always enabled because it tracks all
Transition instances per lane. For now I just keep track of one set for
all Transition lanes. Maybe we should only add it if a `setState` was
done on this root in this particular `startTransition` call rather
having already scheduled any Transition earlier.
While async transitions are entangled, we don't know if there will be a
startTransition+setState on a new root in the future. Therefore, we
collect all transition types while this is happening and if a new root
gets startTransition+setState they get added to that root.
```js
startTransition(async () => {
addTransitionType(...)
await ...;
setState(...);
});
```
Stacked on #32792.
It's tricky to associate a specific `addTransitionType` call to a
specific `startTransition` call because we don't have `AsyncContext` in
browsers yet. However, we can keep track if there are any async
transitions running at all, and if not, warn. This should cover most
cases.
This also errors when inside a React render which might be a legit way
to associate a Transition Type to a specific render (e.g. based on props
changing) but we want to be a more conservative about allowing that yet.
If we wanted to support calling it in render, we might want to set which
Transition object is currently rendering but it's still tricky if the
render has `async function` components. So it might at least be
restricted to sync components (like Hooks).
Stacked on #32788.
Normally we track `addTransitionType` globally because of the async gap
that can happen in Actions where we lack AsyncContext to associate it
with a particular Transition. This unfortunately also means it's
possible to call outside of `startTransition` which is something we want
to warn for.
We need to be able to distinguish whether `addTransitionType` is for a
regular Transition or a Gesture Transition though.
Since `startGestureTransition` is only synchronous we can track it
within that execution scope and move it to a separate set. Since we know
for sure which call owns it we can properly associate it with that
specific provider's `ScheduledGesture`.
This does not yet handle calling `addTransitionType` inside the render
phase of a gesture. That would currently still be associated with the
next Transition instead.
When different animations in a View Transition have different durations,
we shouldn't stretch them out to run the full range of swipe. Because
then they wouldn't line up the same way as when played using plain time.
This adjusts the range start/end to be what it would've been when played
by time. Except since we are playing animations in reverse, the
animation-delay is actually applied from the range end and then the
duration from there to get closer to the start.
Reverse the range if the original animation was reversed.
Interestingly, the range it takes can be adjusted by what is in the
viewport since if a long duration animation is excluded then everything
else adjusts too.
I left some todos too. We really should also handle if the original
animation has multiple iterations. Currently we only play those once.
Stacked on #32785.
This is now replaced by `startGestureTransition` added in #32785.
I also renamed the flag from `enableSwipeTransition` to
`enableGestureTransition` to correspond to the new name.
Stacked on #32783. This will replace [the `useSwipeTransition`
API](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32373).
Instead, of a special Hook, you can make updates to `useOptimistic`
Hooks within the `startGestureTransition` scope.
```
import {unstable_startGestureTransition as startGestureTransition} from 'react';
const cancel = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimistic(...);
}, options);
```
There are some downsides to this like you can't define two directions as
once and there's no "standard" direction protocol. It's instead up to
libraries to come up with their own conventions (although we can suggest
some).
The convention is still that a gesture recognizer has two props `action`
and `gesture`. The `gesture` prop is a Gesture concept which now behaves
more like an Action but 1) it can't be async 2) it shouldn't have
side-effects. For example you can't call `setState()` in it except on
`useOptimistic` since those can be reverted if needed. The `action` is
invoked with whatever side-effects you want after the gesture fulfills.
This is isomorphic and not associated with a specific renderer nor root
so it's a bit more complicated.
To implement this I unify with the `ReactSharedInternal.T` property to
contain a regular Transition or a Gesture Transition (the `gesture`
field). The benefit of this unification means that every time we
override this based on some scope like entering `flushSync` we also
override the `startGestureTransition` scope. We just have to be careful
when we read it to check the `gesture` field to know which one it is.
(E.g. I error for setState / requestFormReset.)
The other thing that's unique is the `cancel` return value to know when
to stop the gesture. That cancellation is no longer associated with any
particular Hook. It's more associated with the scope of the
`startGestureTransition`. Since the schedule of whether a particular
gesture has rendered or committed is associated with a root, we need to
somehow associate any scheduled gestures with a root.
We could track which roots we update inside the scope but instead, I
went with a model where I check all the roots and see if there's a
scheduled gesture matching the timeline. This means that you could
"retain" a gesture across roots. Meaning this wouldn't cancel until both
are cancelled:
```
const cancelA = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimisticOnRootA(...);
}, options);
const cancelB = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimisticOnRootB(...);
}, options);
```
It's more like it's a global transition than associated with the roots
that were updated.
Optimistic updates mostly just work but I now associate them with a
specific "ScheduledGesture" instance since we can only render one at a
time and so if it's not the current one, we leave it for later.
Clean up of optimistic updates is now lazy rather than when we cancel.
Allowing the cancel closure not to have to be associated with each
particular update.
This is some overdue refactoring. The two types never made sense. It
also should be defined by isomorphic since it defines how it should be
used by renderers rather than isomorphic depending on Fiber.
Clean up hidden classes to be consistent.
Fix missing name due to wrong types. I choose not to invoke the
transition tracing callbacks if there's no name since the name is
required there.
This was a template for the 19 beta. Since 19 has been stable for a
while now, we can clean this up. Any bug report for React 19 should use
the standard bug report template.
Portals and `<ViewTransition>` are tricky because they leave the React
tree. You might think of a Portal's container conceptually as also being
part of a React tree but that's not quite how they're modeled today.
They're more like their own roots. So instead, of trying to find a
conceptual place in the React tree we treat Portals as their own root.
We have two ways of tracking whether an update to a ViewTransition
boundary has occurred. Either a DOM mutation has happened within it, or
a resize of a child has caused it to potentially relayout its parent.
Normally that just follows the tree structure of React, but not when
it's a Portal.
When it's a Portal we don't know which DOM parent it might have
affected. For all we know it's at the root (and in fact, in most cases
that's where Portals go).
With this PR we mark the root as having been affected by a mutation or
resize. This means that the whole document will animate and we can't
optimize away from it. This ensures that a mutation to the root of a
Portal doesn't go unanimated with other things are animating such as its
parent.
You can regain this optimization by adding a `<ViewTransition>` boundary
directly inside the Portal itself so it owns its own animation. If that
DOM node is also absolutely positioned it doesn't leak.
Conversely this also means that a mutation inside a Portal doesn't
affect its React parent so it won't trigger its parent's animation if
this was the only thing animating. That could be unfortunate if this
container is actually inside the same React parent. However, because
this would have been an update we would've marked it for "maybe
animating" and updates can't only get their animations cancelled if the
root is cancelled, in practice this will actually animate anyway.
Accidentally broke this when migrating our test runner to use the
bundled build https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32758
The fix is pretty simple. File watcher should listen for changes in
`packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler` instead of `cwd`, which is now
`packages/snap`.
From what we can see, `build-info.json` is a vestigal file that we were
previously including in builds but are no longer since 2022 (see
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/23257, which removes
`build-info.json` which would have broken
scripts/release/build-release-locally-commands/add-build-info-json.js).
Since this file is no longer built, instead of looking it up we default
to the `version` that was passed in as an argument to
scripts/release/prepare-release-from-npm.js. Since `version` is what is
pulled from npm, there should only be 1 consistent version for all the
packages that are pulled. Therefore, only 1 version (eg canary) needs to
be replaced to the new stable version.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32778).
* __->__ #32778
* #32777
Currently, inferred effect dependencies are considered a
"compiler-required" feature. This means that untransformed callsites
should escalate to a build error.
`ValidateNoUntransformedReferences` iterates 'special effect' callsites
and checks that the compiler was able to successfully transform them.
Prior to this PR, this relied on checking the number of arguments passed
to this special effect.
This obviously doesn't work with `noEmit: true`, which is used for our
eslint plugin (this avoids mutating the babel program as other linters
run with the same ast). This PR adds a set of `babel.SourceLocation`s to
do best effort matching in this mode.
Typically we mark the name of things that might animate in the snapshot
phase. At the same time we track that should call startViewTransition
too. However, we don't do this for "enter" since they're only marked
later. Leading to having just an "enter" not to animate unless there's
at least another update too.
This tracks if there's a ViewTransitionComponent in the tree that
enters. Luckily we know that from the static flag so we don't have to
traverse it.
Stacked on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32734
In React a ViewTransition class of `"none"` doesn't just mean that it
has no class but also that it has no ViewTransition name. The default
(`null | undefined`) means that it has no specific class but should run
with the default built-in animation. This adds this as an explicit
string called `"auto"` as well.
That way you can do `<ViewTransition default="foo" enter="auto">` to
override the "foo" just for the "enter" trigger to be the default
built-in animation. Where as if you just specified `null` it would be
like not specifying enter at all which would trigger "foo".
It was always confusing that this is not a CSS class but a
view-transition-class.
The `className` sticks out a bit among its siblings `enter`, `exit`,
`update` and `share`. The idea is that the most specific definition
override is the class name that gets applied and this prop is really
just the fallback, catch-all or "any" that is applied if you didn't
specify a more specific one.
It has also since evolved not just to take a string but also a map of
Transition Type to strings.
The "class" is really the type of the value. We could add a suffix to
all of them like `defaultClass`, `enterClass`, `exitClass`,
`updateClass` and `shareClass`. However, this doesn't necessarily make
sense with the mapping of Transition Type to string. It also makes it a
bit too DOM centric. In React Native this might still be called a
"class" but it might be represented by an object definition. We might
even allow some kind of inline style form for the DOM too. Really this
is about picking which "animation" that runs which can be a string or
instance. "Animation" is too broad because there's also a concept of a
CSS Animation and these are really sets of CSS animations (group,
image-pair, old, new). It could maybe be `defaultTransition`,
`enterTransition`, etc but that seems unnecessarily repetitive and still
doesn't say anything about it being a class.
We also already have the name "default" in the map of Transition Types.
In fact you can now specify a default for default:
```
<ViewTransition default={{"navigation-back": "slide-out", "default": "fade-in"}}>
```
One thing I don't like about the name `"default"` is that it might be
common to just apply a named class that does it matching to
enter/exit/update in the CSS selectors (such as the `:only-child` rule)
instead of doing that mapping to each one using React. In that can you
end up specifying only `default={...}` a lot and then what is it the
"default" for? It's more like "all". I think it's likely that you end up
with either "default" or the specific forms instead of both at once.
Starting a View Transition is an async sequence. Since React can get a
sync update in the middle of sequence we sometimes interrupt that
sequence.
Currently, we don't actually cancel the View Transition so it can just
run as a partial. This ensures that we fully skip it when that happens,
as well as warn.
However, it's very easy to trigger this with just a setState in
useLayoutEffect right now. Therefore if we're inside the preparing
sequence of a startViewTransition, this delays work that would've
normally flushed in a microtask. ~Maybe we want to do the same for
Default work already scheduled through a scheduler Task.~ Edit: This was
already done.
`flushSync` currently will still lead to an interrupted View Transition
(with a warning). There's a tradeoff here whether we want to try our
best to preserve the guarantees of `flushSync` or favor the animation.
It's already possible to suspend at the root with `flushSync` which
means it's not always 100% guaranteed to commit anyway. We could treat
it as suspended. But let's see how much this is a problem in practice.
Currently, `babel-plugin-react-compiler` is bundled with (almost) all
external dependencies. This is because babel traversal and ast logic is
not forward-compatible. Since `babel-plugin-react-compiler` needs to be
compatible with babel pipelines across a wide semvar range, we (1) set
this package's babel dependency to an early version and (2) inline babel
libraries into our bundle.
A few other packages in `react/compiler` depend on the compiler. This PR
moves `snap`, our test fixture compiler and evaluator, to use the
bundled version of `babel-plugin-react-compiler`. This decouples the
babel version used by `snap` with the version used by
`babel-plugin-react-compiler`, which means that `snap` now can test
features from newer babel versions (see
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32742).
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32758).
* #32759
* __->__ #32758
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32529 added a dynamic flag for
this, but that breaks tests since the flags are not defined everywhere.
However, this is a static value and the flag is only for supporting
existing tests. So we can override it in the test config, and make it
static at built time instead.
This adds early logging when two ViewTransitions with the same name are
mounted at the same time. Whether they're part of a View Transition or
not.
This lets us include the owner stack of each one. I do two logs so that
you can get the stack trace of each one of the duplicates.
It currently only logs once for each name which also avoids the scenario
when you have many hits for the same name in one commit. However, we
could also possibly log a stack for each of them but seems noisy.
Currently we don't log if a SwipeTransition is the first time the pair
gets mounted which could lead to a View Transition error before we've
warned. That could be a separate improvement.
This got moved into the functional component and class component case
statements here:
https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/0de1233fd180969f7ffdfc98151922f2466ceb1f.
So that we could separate the error case for class components.
However, due to a faulty rebase this got restored at the top as well.
Leading to double component renders being logged.
In the other offscreen reconnect passes we don't do this in each case
statement but still once at the top. The reason this doesn't matter is
because use the PerformedWork flag and that is only set for function and
class components. Although maybe it should be set for expensive DOM
components too and then we have to remember this.
Casing was incorrect.
Tested by running locally with a PAT.
```
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=2d40460cf768071d3a70b4cdc16075d23ca1ff25
Command failed: gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react
Error: failed to fetch attestations from facebook/react: HTTP 404: Not Found (https://api.github.com/repos/facebook/react/attestations/sha256:23d05644f9e49e02cbb441e3932cc4366b261826e58ce222ea249a6b786f0b5f?per_page=30)
`gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react` (exited with error code 1)
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=2d40460cf768071d3a70b4cdc16075d23ca1ff25 --noVerify
⠼ Downloading artifacts from GitHub for commit 2d40460cf7) 5% 0.1m, estimated 1.6m
✓ Downloading artifacts from GitHub for commit 2d40460cf7) 9.5 secs
An experimental build has been downloaded!
You can download this build again by running:
scripts/download-experimental-build.js --commit=2d40460cf768071d3a70b4cdc16075d23ca1ff25
```
We now generate attestations in `process_artifacts_combined` so we can
verify the provenance of the build later in other workflows. However,
this requires `write` permissions for `id-token` and `attestations` so
PRs from forks cannot generate this attestation.
To get around this, I added a `--no-verify` flag to
scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js. This flag is only passed
in `runtime_build_and_test.yml` for the sizebot job, since 1) the
workflow runs in the `pull_request` trigger which has read-only
permissions, and 2) the downloaded artifact is only used for sizebot
calculation, and not actually used.
The flag is explicitly not passed in `runtime_commit_artifacts.yml`
since there we actually use the artifact internally. This is fine as
once a PR lands on main, it will then run the build on that new commit
and generate an attestation.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32738).
* #32739
* __->__ #32738
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
1. Having a development build for FB will be convenient for fb internal
feature development
2. Add a new checkbox to toggle new internal features added to React
Devtools.
## How did you test this change?
1. yarn test
2. set extra env variables in bash profile and build an internal version
with the new script.
3. toggle on/off the new checkbox, the value is stored in local storage
correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aohua Mu <muaohua@fb.com>
Uses https://cli.github.com/manual/gh_attestation_verify to verify that
the downloaded artifact matches the attestation generated during the
build process in runtime_commit_artifacts.
Example:
On a workflow run of runtime_build_and_test.yml with no attestations:
```
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=ea5f065745b777cb41cc9e54a3b29ed8c727a574
Command failed: gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react
Error: failed to fetch attestations from facebook/react: HTTP 404: Not Found (https://api.github.com/repos/facebook/react/attestations/sha256:7adba0992ba477a927aad5a07f95ee2deb7d18427c84279d33fc40a3bc28ebaa?per_page=30)
`gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react` (exited with error code 1)
```
On one which does:
```
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=12e85d74c1c233cdc2f3228a97473a4435d50c3b
✓ Downloading artifacts from GitHub for commit 12e85d74c1) 10.5 secs
An experimental build has been downloaded!
You can download this build again by running:
scripts/download-experimental-build.js --commit=12e85d74c1c233cdc2f3228a97473a4435d50c3b
```
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32728).
* #32729
* __->__ #32728
Sebastian Markbåge
Matt Carroll
Jack Pope
Matt Carroll
lauren
mofeiZ
Rodrigo FariaandRodrigo Faria
Ricky
MU AOHUAandAohua Mu
Sam Zhou