Our runtime results are still bogus, but so far this tweak let's the llm use the tools a little more intelligently.
example:
---
```js
import React from 'react';
function App() {
const [count, setCount] = React.useState(0);
const [data, setData] = React.useState([]);
React.useEffect(() => {
const processData = () => {
console.log("Processing data...");
const newData = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {
newData.push({ id: i, value: Math.random() * count });
}
return newData;
};
const processedData = processData();
setData(processedData);
}, [count]);
return (
<div>
<p>Count: {count}</p>
<p>Data Length: {data.length}</p>
<ul>
{data.slice(0, 5).map((item) => (
<li key={item.id}>Item {item.id}: {item.value.toFixed(2)}</li>
))}
</ul>
</div>
);
};
```
why is this component slow? use the react tools to figure this out.
> I'll analyze why this component is slow using the React tools. Let's first evaluate the performance of the original code.
[review-react-runtime ...]
The performance measurement tool timed out, which is a strong indication of just how severe the performance issue is in this component. Let's now try to compile the code to see if React Compiler can identify any issues:
[compile...]
Now I understand the issue. Let's analyze why this component is extremely slow:
Main Performance Issues:
Massive Data Processing: The component is trying to create an array with a billion (1,000,000,000) objects in the processData function. This is an enormous amount of data that will:
Consume massive amounts of memory
Take an extremely long time to process
Likely crash the browser
Unnecessary Recalculation: The effect depends on [count], meaning every time the count changes, it will reprocess this enormous dataset.
Inefficient Data Handling: Even though only 5 items are displayed, the component processes a billion items.
Let's fix these issues:
[compile...]
Now let's check if our modified code performs better:
[review-react-runtime...]
Excellent! The performance has dramatically improved. Now let's check the React documentation to make sure we're following the best practices:
[query-react-dev-docs...]
Since we use esbuild we need to correctly move dependencies that are
required at runtime into `dependencies` and other packages that are only
used in development in to `devDependencies`. This ensures the correct
packages are included in the build.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33101).
* #33085
* #33084
* #33083
* #33082
* __->__ #33101
Since we use esbuild we need to correctly move dependencies that are required at runtime into `dependencies` and other packages that are only used in development in to `devDependencies`. This ensures the correct packages are included in the build.
Because we now decided whether to outline in the flushing phase, when
we're writing the preamble we don't yet know if we will make that
decision so we don't know if it's safe to omit the external runtime.
However, if you are providing an external runtime it's probably a pretty
safe bet you're streaming something dynamically that's likely to need it
so we can always include it.
The main thing is that this makes it hard to test it because it affects
our tests in ways it wouldn't otherwise so we have to add a bunch of
conditions.
Stacked on #33076.
This fixes a bug where we used the "complete" status but the
DOMContentLoaded event. This checks for not "loading" instead.
We also add a new status where the boundary has been marked as complete
by the server but has not yet flushed either due to being throttled,
suspended on CSS or animating.
Stacked on #33073.
React semantics is that Suspense boundaries reveal with a throttle
(300ms). That helps avoid flashing reveals when a stream reveals many
individual steps back to back. It can also improve overall performance
by batching the layout and paint work that has to happen at each step.
Unfortunately we never implemented this for SSR streaming - only for
client navigations. This is highly noticeable on very dynamic sites with
lots of Suspense boundaries. It can look good with a client nav but feel
glitchy when you reload the page or initial load.
This fixes the Fizz runtime to be throttled and reveals batched into a
single paint at a time. We do this by first tracking the last paint
after the complete (this will be the first paint if `rel="expect"` is
respected). Then in the `completeBoundary` operation we queue the
operation and then flush it all into a throttled batch.
Another motivation is that View Transitions need to operate as a batch
and individual steps get queued in a sequence so it's extra important to
include as much content as possible in each animated step. This will be
done in a follow up for SSR View Transitions.
Stacked on #33066 and #33068.
Currently we're passing `errorDigest` to `completeBoundary` if there is
a client side error (only CSS loading atm). This only exists because of
`completeBoundaryWithStyles`. Normally if there's a server-side error
we'd emit the `clientRenderBoundary` instruction instead. This adds
unnecessary code to the common case where all styles are in the head.
This is about to get worse with batching because client render shouldn't
be throttled but complete should be.
The first commit moves the client render logic inline into
`completeBoundaryWithStyles` so we only pay for it when styles are used.
However, the approach I went with in the second commit is to reuse the
`$RX` instruction instead (`clientRenderBoundary`). That way if you have
both it ends up being amortized. However, it does mean we have to emit
the `$RX` (along with the `$RC` helper if any
`completeBoundaryWithStyles` instruction is needed.
Stacked on #33065.
The runtime is about to be a lot more complicated so we need to start
sharing some more code.
The problem with sharing code is that we want the inline runtime to as
much as possible be isolated in its scope using only a few global
variables to refer across runtimes.
A problem with Closure Compiler is that it refuses to inline functions
if they have closures inside of them. Which makes sense because of how
VMs work it can cause memory leaks. However, in our cases this doesn't
matter and code size matters more. So we can't use many clever tricks.
So this just favors writing the source in the inline form. Then we add
an extra compiler pass to turn those global variables into local
variables in the external runtime.
We weren't treating terminal operands as eligible for memoization in PruneNonEscapingScopes, which meant that they could end up un-memoized. Terminal operands can also be compound ReactiveValues like SequenceExpressions, so part of the fix is to make sure we don't just recurse into compound values but record the full aliasing information we would for top-level instructions.
Still WIP, this needs to handle terminals other than for..of.
ghstack-source-id: 09a2923051
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/33062
## Summary
Fix babel presets, and add a bit more context to the tool so that it is
more reliable
## How did you test this change?
Manually tested the mcp integrated with claude desktop
We normally expect the segment to exist whatever the client does while
streaming. However, when hydration errors at the root of the shell for a
whole document render, then we clear nodes from body which can include
our segments. We don't need them anymore because we switched to client
rendering.
It triggers an error accessing parent node which can safely be ignored.
This just helps avoid confusion in this scenario.
This also covers up the error in #33067. Which doesn't actually cause
any visible problems other than error logging. However, ideally we
wouldn't emit completeBoundary instructions if the boundary is inside a
cancelled fallback.
```js
function Component() {
useEffect(() => {
let hasCleanedUp = false;
document.addEventListener(..., () => hasCleanedUp ? foo() : bar());
// effect return values shouldn't be typed as frozen
return () => {
hasCleanedUp = true;
}
};
}
```
### Problem
`PruneHoistedContexts` currently strips hoisted declarations and
rewrites the first `StoreContext` reassignment to a declaration. For
example, in the following example, instruction 0 is removed while a
synthetic `DeclareContext let` is inserted before instruction 1.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted
let x = 4;
x = 5;
// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 4
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```
Currently, we don't account for `DeclareContext let`. As a result, we're
rewriting to insert duplicate declarations.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted
let x;
x = 5;
// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] DeclareContext Let 'x'
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```
### Solution
Instead of always lowering context variables to a DeclareContext
followed by a StoreContext reassign, we can keep `kind: 'Const' | 'Let'
| 'Reassign' | etc` on StoreContext.
Pros:
- retain more information in HIR, so we can codegen easily `const` and
`let` context variable declarations back
- pruning hoisted `DeclareContext` instructions is simple.
Cons:
- passes are more verbose as we need to check for both `DeclareContext`
and `StoreContext` declarations
~(note: also see alternative implementation in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32745)~
### Testing
Context variables are tricky. I synced and diffed changes in a large
meta codebase and feel pretty confident about landing this. About 0.01%
of compiled files changed. Among these changes, ~25% were [direct
bugfixes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800029094).
The [other
changes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800028575)
were primarily due to changed (corrected) mutable ranges from
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/33047. I tried to represent most
interesting changes in new test fixtures
`
Fixes an edge case in React Compiler's effects inference model.
Returned values should only be typed as 'frozen' if they are (1) local
and (2) not a function expression which may capture and mutate this
function's outer context. See test fixtures for details
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33047).
* #32765
* #32747
* __->__ #33047
## Summary
Add a way for the agent to get some data on the performance of react
code
## How did you test this change?
Tested function independently and directly with claude desktop app
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <sebastian.silbermann@vercel.com>
Same principle as #33029 but for Flight.
We pretty aggressively create separate rows for things in Flight (every
Server Component that's an async function create a microtask). However,
sync Server Components and just plain Host Components are not. Plus we
should ideally ideally inline more of the async ones in the same way
Fizz does.
This means that we can create rows that end up very large. Especially if
all the data is already available. We can't show the parent content
until the whole thing loads on the client.
We don't really know where Suspense boundaries are for Flight but any
Element is potentially a point that can be split.
This heuristic counts roughly how much we've serialized to block the
current chunk and once a limit is exceeded, we start deferring all
Elements. That way they get outlined into future chunks that are later
in the stream. Since they get replaced by Lazy references the parent can
potentially get unblocked.
This can help if you're trying to stream a very large document with a
client nav for example.
Adds Fragment Ref support to RN through the Fabric config, starting with
`observeUsing`/`unobserveUsing`. This is mostly a copy from the
implementation on DOM, and some of it can likely be shared in the future
but keeping it separate for now and we can refactor as we add more
features.
Added a basic test with Fabric, but testing specific methods requires so
much mocking that it doesn't seem valuable here.
I built Fabric and ran on the Catalyst app internally to test with
intersection observers end to end.
Stacked on #32736.
That way you can find the owner stack of each component that rerendered
for context.
In addition to the JSX callsite tasks that we already track, I also
added tracking of the first `setState` call before rendering.
We then run the "Update" entries in that task. That way you can find the
callsite of the first setState and therefore the "cause" of a render
starting by selecting the "Update" track.
Unfortunately this is blocked on bugs in Chrome that makes it so that
these stacks are not reliable in the Performance tab. It basically just
doesn't work.
lauren
Jan Kassens
Sebastian Markbåge
Joe Savona
Jorge Cabiedes
mofeiZ
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
Jack Pope