Showing how to create a form without labeling inputs is an accessibility anti-pattern. This change adds labels to the examples to address that. Codepen may still need to be updated depending on how that example is created.
* Update tutorial.md
Is it possible to be more clear here?
This implies that we are removing the constructor from GAME, and not board (which is what I believe the author is trying to say).
It took me several reads to understand.
With this edit, it is now clear that the adjustment is being made to -Board- and not to -Game-
* also remove "for Board earlier"
* Remove spread operator
I believe what was meant here was to express that you would create the new player object with all the previous properties of the existing player object in addition to now updating the score value. That being said, this is a simple example, and the player object clearly has no other values. Objects are not (by default) iterable using this operator, so this little piece does more harm than good. I believe the new example to be much clearer.
* Using Object.assign()
* Tweak wording
This traverses parent based on the type of internal instance it is passed.
If it is a Fiber it may have to traverse multiple steps until it finds a
HostComponent.
This will allow us to use the event system with Fiber.
This adds precaching to ReactDOMFiber. I.e. adding a handle from the DOM
node to the internal Fiber. This means that we need to expose an internal
handle to the reconciler.
We use duck typing to figure out if it is a Fiber or Stack instance.
The new failing tests are failing because this is now able to actually
fire events onto Fibers and then the result of those events are
incorrect where as they were ignored before.
* Reapply Check for event listener in props instead of bank (#8192)
This reverts the previous revert.
* Don't throw on falsy event listeners
Some code relies on passing null. This restores the earlier behavior.
This matches Stack behavior.
Had to rewrite a test that used Simulate because Fiber doesn't support events yet.
Also changed tests for componentDidUpdate() since Fiber intentionally doesn't pass prevContext argument.
We can avoid recreating the merged context object if the context provider work was reused. This is essential to avoid allocations for deep setState() calls.
As per discussion, this is better because then this code only runs for the class type of work. We will still need to fix bailouts for deep setState calls.
It is error-prone to push and pop context in begin or complete phases because of all the bailouts. Scheduler has enough knowledge to see if pushing is necessary because it knows when we go inside or outside the tree.
I'll plan to change all of our console.error and component-tree expects to expectDev. It's a little annoying that we need to make sure tests don't throw (see my change to normalizeCodeLocInfo) but any alternative would seem to require two separate test runs or a much more cumbersome syntax.
* Handles risky callbacks on setState. Fixes#8238
* Updates try-catch to cover `callback` when context is not present.
* Updates code to trapErrors instead of swallowing them.
* Fixes flow errors
* Incorporates review comments
* Traps only the first error.
Removes `callbackWasCalled` and updates fiber tests.
I came up with a contrived case of where nested controlled events could
fire within the same batch - but on different targets.
I think we came to the conclusion that controlled values typically cannot
use preventDefault so it is ok that they don't flush until after the event
has finished. So therefore we accumulate a queue of all the nested targets
within a batch and then restore state on all of them.
I'm still skeptical that this is the correct way to do controlled values.
The reason we have to do them in a single event loop is because when you
type, the sequence of values that get accepted or not can matter. I wonder
if there is a scenario we can come up with where you can fire multiple
inner events in an event loop and end up with batching causing problems.
This effectively just reimplements asap again but with no allocations for
a single target and no closure allocations.
* Make the Shallow Rendering example clearer
I was reading through the documentation, and I found that the `render` call on the `renderer` was missing.
* Use a regular function to define MyComponent
* Use _hostContainerInfo to track test renderer options
The transaction is not available when unmounting or updating the
instance, so we track it using _hostContainerInfo
* Throw if hostContainerInfo is not populated in getPublicInstance
* Linting fixes
* Remove transaction from ref lifecycle code path
We don't need to pass the transaction around anymore since we store the
test options on _hostContainerInfo instead
* Remove unused argument
Ben Alpert
Dan Abramov
Kevin Lacker
Marcy Sutton
Dave Voyles
Tanner
Sebastian Markbåge
Sebastian Markbage
tomocchino
Andrew Clark
Brandon Dail
Ben Alpert
Anastasia A
yuntao.qyt
Ankeet Maini
Samuel Scheiderich
Michele Bertoli