The docs site is in a separate repo, but this gives us a semi-automated
way to update the docs about our lint rules. The script generates
markdown files from the rule definitions which we can then manually
copy/paste into the docs site somewhere. In the future we can automate
this fully.
DiffTrain build for [425ba0ad6d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/425ba0ad6d3ebd1779f6a658dcbf5c666d054948)
NOTE: this is a merged version of @mofeiZ's original PR along with my
edits per offline discussion. The description is updated to reflect the
latest approach.
The key problem we're trying to solve with this PR is to allow
developers more control over the compiler's various validations. The
idea is to have a number of rules targeting a specific category of
issues, such as enforcing immutability of props/state/etc or disallowing
access to refs during render. We don't want to have to run the compiler
again for every single rule, though, so @mofeiZ added an LRU cache that
caches the full compilation output of N most recent files. The first
rule to run on a given file will cause it to get cached, and then
subsequent rules can pull from the cache, with each rule filtering down
to its specific category of errors.
For the categories, I went through and assigned a category roughly 1:1
to existing validations, and then used my judgement on some places that
felt distinct enough to warrant a separate error. Every error in the
compiler now has to supply both a severity (for legacy reasons) and a
category (for ESLint). Each category corresponds 1:1 to a ESLint rule
definition, so that the set of rules is automatically populated based on
the defined categories.
Categories include a flag for whether they should be in the recommended
set or not.
Note that as with the original version of this PR, only
eslint-plugin-react-compiler is changed. We still have to update the
main lint rule.
## Test Plan
* Created a sample project using ESLint v9 and verified that the plugin
can be configured correctly and detects errors
* Edited `fixtures/eslint-v9` and introduced errors, verified that the w
latest config changes in that fixture it correctly detects the errors
* In the sample project, confirmed that the LRU caching is correctly
caching compiler output, ie compiling files just once.
Co-authored-by: Mofei Zhang <feifei0@meta.com>
DiffTrain build for [7d29ecbeb2](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/7d29ecbeb24327fdcd889fe184311bbeb0f04c30)
Hints are meant as additional information to present to the developer
about an error. The first use-case here is for the suggestion to name
refs with "-Ref" if we encounter a mutation that looks like it might be
a ref. The original error printing used a second error detail which
printed the source code twice, a hint with just extra text is less
noisy.
DiffTrain build for [6ffcac8558](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/6ffcac8558efbd204c7df5d52787a90e507dd8d7)
If you have a ref that the compiler doesn't know is a ref (say, a value
returned from a custom hook) and try to assign its `.current = ...`, we
currently fail with a generic error that hook return values are not
mutable. However, an assignment to `.current` specifically is a very
strong hint that the value is likely to be a ref. So in this PR, we
track the reason for the mutation and if it ends up being an error, we
use it to show an additional hint to the user. See the fixture for an
example of the message.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34125).
* #34126
* __->__ #34125
* #34124
DiffTrain build for [724b324b96](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/724b324b966343f08ff0cb16ec9d8013e3891dfd)
Stacked on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/34069
Same basic semantics as the react-dom for determining document position
of a Fragment compared to a given node. It's simpler here because we
don't have to deal with inserted nodes or portals. So we can skip a
bunch of the validation logic.
The logic for handling empty fragments is the same so I've split out
`compareDocumentPositionForEmptyFragment` into a shared module. There
doesn't seem to be a great place to put shared DOM logic between Fabric
and DOM configs at the moment. There may be more of this coming as we
add more and more DOM APIs to RN.
For testing I've written Fantom tests internally which pass the basic
cases on this build. The renderer we have configured for Fabric tests in
the repo doesn't support the Element APIs we need like
`compareDocumentPosition`.
DiffTrain build for [45a6532a08](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/45a6532a088432010c40cbcac1fb6b6f8d56dd69)
Found a couple of issues while integrating
FragmentInstance#compareDocumentPosition into Fabric.
1. Basic checks of nested host instances were inaccurate. For example,
checking the first child of the first child of the Fragment would not
return CONTAINED_BY.
2. Then fixing that logic exposed issues with Portals. The DOM
positioning relied on the assumption that the first and last top-level
children were in the same order as the Fiber tree. I added additional
checks against the parent's position in the DOM, and special cased a
portaled Fragment by getting its DOM parent from the child instance,
rather than taking the instance from the Fiber return. This should be
accurate in more cases. Though its still a guess and I'm not sure yet
I've covered every variation of this. Portals are hard to deal with and
we may end up having to push more results towards
IMPLEMENTATION_SPECIFIC if accuracy is an issue.
DiffTrain build for [a96a0f3903](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/a96a0f3903ea0a9d45ff7c30a3fd9efe830c4628)
For "render" and "commit" phases we don't give any specific stack atm.
This tries to always provide something useful to say the cause of the
render.
For normal renders this will now show the same thing as the "Event" and
"Update" entries already showed. We stash the task that was used for
those and use them throughout the render and commit phases.
For Suspense (Retry lane) and Idle (Offscreen lane), we don't have any
updates. Instead for those there's a component that left work behind in
previous passes. For those I use the debugTask of the `<Suspense>` or
`<Activity>` boundary to indicate that this was the root of the render.
Similarly when an Action is invoked on a `<form action={...}>` component
using the built-in submit handler, there's no actionable stack in user
space that called it. So we use the stack of the JSX for the form
instead.
DiffTrain build for [4c9c109cea](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/4c9c109cea9be3622d9d70f81f96e72528bdad16)
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Fixes `await`-ing and returning temporary references in `async`
functions. These two operations invoke `.then()` under the hood if it is
available, which currently results in an "Cannot access then on the
server. You cannot dot into a temporary client reference..." error. This
can easily be reproduced by returning a temporary reference from a
server function.
Fixes#33534
## How did you test this change?
I added a test in a new test file. I wasn't sure where else to put it.
<img width="771" height="138" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/09ffe6eb-271a-4842-a9fe-c68e17b3fb41"
/>
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
DiffTrain build for [1d163962b2](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/1d163962b21f9396d26930e31719bd8b10d9e107)
Two related changes:
* ValidateNoRefAccessInRender now allows the mergeRefs pattern, ie a
function that aggregates multiple refs into a new ref. This is the main
case where we have seen false positive no-ref-in-render errors.
* Behind `@enableTreatRefLikeIdentifiersAsRefs`, we infer values passed
as the `ref` prop to some JSX as refs.
The second change is potentially helpful for situations such as
```js
function Component({ref: parentRef}) {
const childRef = useRef(null);
const mergedRef = mergeRefs(parentRef, childRef);
useEffect(() => {
// generally accesses childRef, not mergedRef
}, []);
return <Foo ref={mergedRef} />;
}
```
Ie where you create a merged ref but don't access its `.current`
property. Without inferring `ref` props as refs, we'd fail to allow this
merge refs case.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34004).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* #34005
* #34006
* __->__ #34004
DiffTrain build for [1d7e942da7](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/1d7e942da76c794c3cbf52a8c214d90a69814a8f)
We added the `@enableTreatRefLikeIdentifiersAsRefs` feature a while back
but never enabled it. Since then we've continued to see examples that
motivate this mode, so here we're fixing it up to prepare to enable by
default. It now works as follows:
* If we find a property load or property store where both a) the
object's name is ref-like (`ref` or `-Ref`) and b) the property is
`current`, we infer the object itself as a ref and the value of the
property as a ref value. Originally the feature only detected property
loads, not stores.
* Inferred refs are not considered stable (this is a change from the
original implementation). The only way to get a stable ref is by calling
`useRef()`. We've seen issues with assuming refs are stable.
With this change, cases like the following now correctly error:
```js
function Foo(props) {
const fooRef = props.fooRef;
fooRef.current = true;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot modify ref in render
}
```
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34000).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* #34005
* #34006
* #34004
* #34003
* __->__ #34000
DiffTrain build for [85bbe39ef8](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/85bbe39ef8e24a192b5e9f2987b1babf8ce772e1)
While we want to get rid of React.lazy's special wrapper type and just
use a Promise for the type, we still have the wrapper.
However, this is still conceptually the same as a Usable in that it
should be have the same if you `use(promise)` or render a Promise as a
child or type position.
This PR makes it behave like a `use()` when we unwrap them. We could
move to a model where it actually reaches the internal of the Lazy's
Promise when it unwraps but for now I leave the lazy API signature
intact by just catching the Promise and then "use()" that.
This lets us align on the semantics with `use()` such as the suspense
yield optimization. It also lets us warn or fork based on legacy
throw-a-Promise behavior where as `React.lazy` is not deprecated.
DiffTrain build for [9be531cd37](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/9be531cd37f5558c72f7de360eb921b0074e8544)
When destructuring, spread creates a new mutable object that _captures_
part of the original rvalue. This new value is safe to modify.
When making this change I realized that we weren't inferring array
pattern spread as creating an array (in type inference) so I also added
that here.
DiffTrain build for [448f781a52](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/448f781a52d62042341d2411d1352d705ce2cbfe)
We currently throw away the Error once we've used to the owner stack of
a Fiber once. This maybe helps a bit with memory and redoing it but we
really don't expect most Fibers to hit this at all. It's not very hot.
If we throw away the Error, then we can't use native debugger protocols
to inspect the native stack. Instead, we'd have to maintain a url to
resource map indefinitely like what Chrome DevTools does to map a url to
a resource. Technically it's not even technically correct since the file
path might not be reversible and could in theory conflict.
DiffTrain build for [4f34cc4a2e](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/4f34cc4a2e1198493375867d1876509ae9771aee)
This fixes displaying incorrect component render entries on a timeline,
when we are reconnecting passive effects.
### Before
<img width="2318" height="1127" alt="1"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b6b2824-d2de-43a3-8615-2c45d67c3668"
/>
The cloned nodes will persist original `actualStartTime`, when these
were first mounted. When we "replay", the end time will be "now" or
whatever the actual start time of the sibling. Depending on when this is
being recorded, the diff between end and start could be tens of seconds
and doesn't represent what React was doing.
We shouldn't log these entries at all.
### After
We are only logging newly finished renders, but could potentially loose
renders that never commit.
DiffTrain build for [9fec565a9b](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/9fec565a9b9f78558323adff1013291cf46f7de7)
## Summary
The `TSAsExpression` and `TSNonNullExpression` nodes are supported by
`lowerExpression()` but `isReorderableExpression()` does not check if
they can be reordered. This PR updates `isReorderableExpression()` to
handle these two node types by adding cases that fall through to the
existing `TypeCastExpression` case.
We ran `react-compiler-healthcheck` at scale on several of our repos and
found dozens of `` (BuildHIR::node.lowerReorderableExpression)
Expression type `TSAsExpression` cannot be safely reordered`` errors and
a handful for `TSNonNullExpression`.
## How did you test this change?
In this case I added two fixture tests
DiffTrain build for [fe813143e2](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/fe813143e23675963f92d25fa1fb35b39db40272)
Summary:
useEffectEvent is meant to be used specifically in combination with
useEffect, and using
the feature in arbitrary closures can lead to surprising reactivity
semantics. In order to
minimize risk in the experimental rollout, we are going to restrict its
usage to being
called directly inside an effect or another useEffectEvent, effectively
enforcing the function
coloring statically. Without an effect system this is the best we can
do.
DiffTrain build for [97cdd5d3c3](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/97cdd5d3c33eda77be4f96a43f72d6916d3badbb)
eps1lon
josephsavona
kassens
poteto
jackpope
sebmarkbage
sophiebits
jbrown215
sammy-SC
hoxyq