* Only re-assign defaultValue if it is different
* Do not set value if it is the same
* Properly cover defaultValue
* Use coercion to be smart about value assignment
* Add explanation of loose type checks in value assignment.
* Add test coverage for setAttribute update.
* Only apply loose value check to text inputs
* Fix case where empty switches to zero
* Handle zero case in controlled input
* Correct mistake with default value assignment after rebase
* Do not assign bad input to number input
* Only trigger number input value attribute updates on blur
* Remove reference to LinkedValueUtils
* Record new fiber tests
* Add tests for blurred number input behavior
* Replace onBlur wrapper with rule in ChangeEventPlugin
* Sift down to only number inputs
* Re-record fiber tests
* Add test case for updating attribute on uncontrolled inputs. Make related correction
* Handle uncontrolled inputs, integrate fiber
* Reorder boolean to mitigate DOM checks
* Only assign value if it is different
* Add number input browser test fixtures
During the course of the number input fix, we uncovered many edge
cases. This commit adds browser test fixtures for each of those instances.
* Address edge case preventing number precision lower than 1 place
0.0 coerces to 0, however they are not the same value when doing
string comparision. This prevented controlled number inputs from
inputing the characters `0.00`.
Also adds test cases.
* Accommodate lack of IE9 number input support
IE9 does not support number inputs. Number inputs in IE9 fallback to
traditional text inputs. This means that accessing `input.value` will
report the raw text, rather than parsing a numeric value.
This commit makes the ReactDOMInput wrapper check to see if the `type`
prop has been configured to `"number"`. In those cases, it will
perform a comparison based upon `parseFloat` instead of the raw input
value.
* Remove footnotes about IE exponent issues
With the recent IE9 fix, IE properly inserts `e` when it produces an
invalid number.
* Address exception in IE9/10 ChangeEventPlugin blur event
On blur, inputs have their values assigned. This is so that number
inputs do not conduct unexpected behavior in
Chrome/Safari. Unfortunately, there are cases where the target
instance might be undefined in IE9/10, raising an exception.
* Migrate over ReactDOMInput.js number input fixes to Fiber
Also re-record tests
* Update number fixtures to use latest components
* Add number input test case for dashes and negative numbers
* Replace trailing dash test case with replace with dash
Also run prettier
* Show Source Error Addemden if __source available
* Add Parent Stack on invalid element type
* refactor to use normalizeCodeLocInfo
* Remove ( ) from addendum
- Backport change to enqueueReplaceState. Use new API instead of
enqueueCallback, which is gone in 16.
- Implement isMounted using lifecycles, so we have the option of
removing this later.
Warns when using React.createClass for the first time.
Usages of createClass in tests have been converted to plain JavaScript
classes. Tests that rely on replaceState or isMounted use
updater.enqueueReplaceState and updater.isMounted.
* Update Lifting State Up not to mix up DOM value with component state
A few weeks ago when teaching my friend, she got stuck on
`this.state.value` vs. `event.target.value`. As the documentation
talked a lot about "values", and the term value could mean three
different things (values in general, the "value" prop / DOM value of
the <input> component and the value in state/props), it was not weird
that she got a bit confused.
* Rename Lifting State Up onChange props to onTemperatureChange
This is in-line with how the temperature is provided as a prop named `temperature`
* Fix one value prop not being renamed to temperature
* Update codepen examples in Lifting state up documentation
* Update devtools state change to reflect docs change
(cherry picked from commit a190cfce29)
* Replace the header_links plugin with client-side generated anchors.
Fixesfacebook/react#4124
* Move anchor-link code into a separate script
Also adds a couple comments, for context.
(cherry picked from commit 7a878d27e3)
* Improved for a better understanding
that code shouldn't name this parameter onchange. It is so confusing for a starter of ReactJs like me. It looks like that the onChange is an common event from props.
* Update the lifting state up paragraph
I tried to write something to explain to starter programmers in react, how we lift the state up calling a method defined by the ancestor and called by the children that will affect the children element.
* Rewrite Lifting State Up
(cherry picked from commit fc362bf095)
Brian Vaughn
Nathan Hunzaker
Jirat Ki
Gaëtan Renaudeau
Maksim Shastsel
António Nuno Monteiro
Jon Bretman
Andrew Clark
William Cunningham
Adam
Dan Abramov
Dima Beznos
Sunny Ripert
Vesa Laakso
Bryan Braun
Fokke Zandbergen
Bernard Lin
Dai Nguyen
Stephie
Roman Matusevich
DanZeuss
Jiminikiz
Prayag Verma
Moacir Rosa
Dhyey Thakore
Andrew Clark