Summary:
This makes the setState usage logic much more robust. We no longer rely on identifierName.
Now we track when a setState is loaded into a new promoted identifier variable and track this in a map `setStateLoaded` map.
For other types of instructions we consider the setState to be being used. In this case we record its usage into the `setStateUsages` map.
Test Plan:
We expect no changes in behavior for the current tests
Summary:
Revamped the derivationCache graph.
This fixes a bunch of bugs where sometimes we fail to track from which props/state we derived values from.
Also, it is more intuitive and allows us to easily implement a Data Flow Tree.
We can print this tree which gives insight on how the data is derived and should facilitate error resolution in complicated components
Test Plan:
Added a test case where we were failing to track derivations. Also updated the test cases with the new error containing the data flow tree
Summary:
This makes the setState usage logic much more robust. We no longer rely on identifierName.
Now we track when a setState is loaded into a new promoted identifier variable and track this in a map `setStateLoaded` map.
For other types of instructions we consider the setState to be being used. In this case we record its usage into the `setStateUsages` map.
Test Plan:
We expect no changes in behavior for the current tests
Summary:
Revamped the derivationCache graph.
This fixes a bunch of bugs where sometimes we fail to track from which props/state we derived values from.
Also, it is more intuitive and allows us to easily implement a Data Flow Tree.
We can print this tree which gives insight on how the data is derived and should facilitate error resolution in complicated components
Test Plan:
Added a test case where we were failing to track derivations. Also updated the test cases with the new error containing the data flow tree
Summary:
With this we are now comparing a snapshot of the derivationCache with the new changes every time we are done recording the derivations happening in the HIR.
We have to do this after recording everything since we still do some mutations on the cache when recording mutations.
Test Plan:
Test the following in playground:
```
// @validateNoDerivedComputationsInEffects_exp
function Component({ value }) {
const [checked, setChecked] = useState('');
useEffect(() => {
setChecked(value === '' ? [] : value.split(','));
}, [value]);
return (
<div>{checked}</div>
)
}
```
This no longer causes an infinite loop.
Added a test case in the next PR in the stack
When a longer function or expression is identified as the source of an
error, we currently print the entire expression in our error message.
This is because we delegate to a Babel helper to print codeframes. Here,
we add some checking and abbreviate the result if it spans too many
lines.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
Supersedes #34951
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Fix the runtime error with named imports and make the last remaining
[Are The Types
Wrong?](https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=eslint-plugin-react-hooks%400.0.0-experimental-6b344c7c-20251022)
error with `eslint-plugin-react-hooks` go away, thanks to the hint from
Andrew Branch:
- https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34801#issuecomment-3433478810
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
I tried adding this to `node_modules` and it fixed the failures when
importing named imports like `import { configs, meta, rules } from
'eslint-plugin-react-hooks'`:
```bash
➜ eslint-config-upleveled git:(renovate/react-monorepo) pnpm eslint . --max-warnings 0
Oops! Something went wrong! :(
ESLint: 9.37.0
file:///Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/index.js:13
import reactHooks, { configs } from 'eslint-plugin-react-hooks';
^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Named export 'configs' not found. The requested module 'eslint-plugin-react-hooks' is a CommonJS module, which may not support all module.exports as named exports.
CommonJS modules can always be imported via the default export, for example using:
import pkg from 'eslint-plugin-react-hooks';
const { configs } = pkg;
at ModuleJob._instantiate (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:228:21)
at async ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:335:5)
at async onImport.tracePromise.__proto__ (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:647:26)
at async dynamicImportConfig (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:186:17)
at async loadConfigFile (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:276:9)
at async ConfigLoader.calculateConfigArray (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:589:23)
at async #calculateConfigArray (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:743:23)
at async directoryFilter (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/eslint/eslint-helpers.js:309:5)
at async NodeHfs.<anonymous> (file:///Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/@humanfs+core@0.19.1/node_modules/@humanfs/core/src/hfs.js:586:29)
at async NodeHfs.walk (file:///Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/@humanfs+core@0.19.1/node_modules/@humanfs/core/src/hfs.js:614:3)
➜ eslint-config-upleveled git:(renovate/react-monorepo) pnpm eslint . --max-warnings 0
➜ eslint-config-upleveled git:(renovate/react-monorepo) # no error
```
The named imports identifiers `configs`, `meta`, and `rules` also
contain values, as a sanity check:
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/34951#issuecomment-3433555636
cc @poteto
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Fix the runtime error with named imports and make the last remaining
[Are The Types
Wrong?](https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=eslint-plugin-react-hooks%400.0.0-experimental-6b344c7c-20251022)
error with `eslint-plugin-react-hooks` go away, thanks to the hint from
@andrewbranch:
- https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34801#issuecomment-3433478810
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
I tried adding this to `node_modules` and it fixed the failures when
importing named imports like `import { configs, meta, rules } from
'eslint-plugin-react-hooks'`:
```bash
➜ eslint-config-upleveled git:(renovate/react-monorepo) pnpm eslint . --max-warnings 0
Oops! Something went wrong! :(
ESLint: 9.37.0
file:///Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/index.js:13
import reactHooks, { configs } from 'eslint-plugin-react-hooks';
^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Named export 'configs' not found. The requested module 'eslint-plugin-react-hooks' is a CommonJS module, which may not support all module.exports as named exports.
CommonJS modules can always be imported via the default export, for example using:
import pkg from 'eslint-plugin-react-hooks';
const { configs } = pkg;
at ModuleJob._instantiate (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:228:21)
at async ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:335:5)
at async onImport.tracePromise.__proto__ (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:647:26)
at async dynamicImportConfig (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:186:17)
at async loadConfigFile (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:276:9)
at async ConfigLoader.calculateConfigArray (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:589:23)
at async #calculateConfigArray (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/config/config-loader.js:743:23)
at async directoryFilter (/Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/eslint@9.37.0/node_modules/eslint/lib/eslint/eslint-helpers.js:309:5)
at async NodeHfs.<anonymous> (file:///Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/@humanfs+core@0.19.1/node_modules/@humanfs/core/src/hfs.js:586:29)
at async NodeHfs.walk (file:///Users/k/p/eslint-config-upleveled/node_modules/.pnpm/@humanfs+core@0.19.1/node_modules/@humanfs/core/src/hfs.js:614:3)
➜ eslint-config-upleveled git:(renovate/react-monorepo) pnpm eslint . --max-warnings 0
➜ eslint-config-upleveled git:(renovate/react-monorepo) # no error
```
The named imports identifiers `configs`, `meta`, and `rules` also
contain values, as a sanity check:
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/34951#issuecomment-3433555636
cc @poteto
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Resolve the type error with the types, according to [Are the types
wrong?](https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=eslint-plugin-react-hooks%407.0.0),
as an additional
- Last attempt: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/34746
- Original issue: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34745
## How did you test this change?
I edited `node_modules/eslint-plugin-react-hooks/index.d.ts` in my
`"module": "Node16"` + `"type": "module"` project and my error went
away:
- https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34801#issuecomment-3433053067
cc @poteto @michaelfaith @andrewbranch
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
Summary:
Change error and update snapshots
The error now mentions what values are causing the issue which should provide better context on how to fix the issue
Summary:
If the setter is used both inside and outside the effect then usually the solution is more complex and requires hoisting state up to a parent component since we can't just remove the local state.
To do this, we now have 2 caches that track setState usages (not just calls) since if the effect is passed as an argument or called outside the effect the solution gets more complex which we are trying to avoid for now
Summary:
Global function calls can introduce unexpected side effects, for this first iteration we are bailing out the validation when we encounter one.
Local function calls remain
Jorge Cabiedes Acosta
Jorge Cabiedes
Joseph Savona
lauren
Timothy Lau
Karl Horky