Stacked on #28458.
This doesn't actually really change the messages yet, it's just a
refactor.
Hydration warnings can be presented either as HTML or React JSX format.
If presented as HTML it makes more sense to make that a DOM specific
concept, however, I think it's actually better to present it in terms of
React JSX.
Most of the time the errors aren't going to be something messing with
them at the HTML/HTTP layer. It's because the JS code does something
different. Most of the time you're working in just React. People don't
necessarily even know what the HTML form of it looks like. So this takes
the approach that the warnings are presented in React JSX in their rich
object form.
Therefore, I'm moving the approach to yield diff data to the reconciler
but it's the reconciler that's actually printing all the warnings.
While Meta is still using legacy mode and we can't remove completely,
Meta is not using legacy hydration so we should be able to remove that.
This is just the first step. Once removed, we can vastly simplify the
DOMConfig for hydration.
This will have to be rebased when tests are upgraded.
## Overview
The error messages that say:
> ReactDOM.hydrate is no longer supported in React 18
Don't make sense in the React 19 release. Instead, they should say:
> ReactDOM.hydrate was removed in React 19.
For legacy mode, they should say:
> ReactDOM.hydrate has not been supported since React 18.
This bumps the canary versions to v19 to communicate that the next
release will be a major. Once this lands, we can start merging breaking
changes into `main`.
While investigating https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/28285 I
found a possible bug in handling Suspense and mismatches. As the tests
show, if the first sibling in a boundary suspends, and the second has a
mismatch, we will NOT show a fallback. If the first sibling is a
mismatch, and the second sibling suspends, we WILL show a fallback.
[Here's a stackbliz showing the behavior on
Canary](https://stackblitz.com/edit/stackblitz-starters-bh3snf?file=src%2Fstyle.css,public%2Findex.html,src%2Findex.tsx).
This breakage was introduced by:
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26380. Before this PR, we would
not show a fallback in either case. That PR makes it so that we don't
pre-render siblings of suspended trees, so presumably, whatever
detection we had to avoid fallbacks on mismatches, requires knowing
there's a mismatch in the tree when we suspend.
## Overview
_Depends on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/28514_
This PR adds a new React hook called `useActionState` to replace and
improve the ReactDOM `useFormState` hook.
## Motivation
This hook intends to fix some of the confusion and limitations of the
`useFormState` hook.
The `useFormState` hook is only exported from the `ReactDOM` package and
implies that it is used only for the state of `<form>` actions, similar
to `useFormStatus` (which is only for `<form>` element status). This
leads to understandable confusion about why `useFormState` does not
provide a `pending` state value like `useFormStatus` does.
The key insight is that the `useFormState` hook does not actually return
the state of any particular form at all. Instead, it returns the state
of the _action_ passed to the hook, wrapping it and returning a
trackable action to add to a form, and returning the last returned value
of the action given. In fact, `useFormState` doesn't need to be used in
a `<form>` at all.
Thus, adding a `pending` value to `useFormState` as-is would thus be
confusing because it would only return the pending state of the _action_
given, not the `<form>` the action is passed to. Even if we wanted to
tie them together, the returned `action` can be passed to multiple
forms, creating confusing and conflicting pending states during multiple
form submissions.
Additionally, since the action is not related to any particular
`<form>`, the hook can be used in any renderer - not only `react-dom`.
For example, React Native could use the hook to wrap an action, pass it
to a component that will unwrap it, and return the form result state and
pending state. It's renderer agnostic.
To fix these issues, this PR:
- Renames `useFormState` to `useActionState`
- Adds a `pending` state to the returned tuple
- Moves the hook to the `'react'` package
## Reference
The `useFormState` hook allows you to track the pending state and return
value of a function (called an "action"). The function passed can be a
plain JavaScript client function, or a bound server action to a
reference on the server. It accepts an optional `initialState` value
used for the initial render, and an optional `permalink` argument for
renderer specific pre-hydration handling (such as a URL to support
progressive hydration in `react-dom`).
Type:
```ts
function useActionState<State>(
action: (state: Awaited<State>) => State | Promise<State>,
initialState: Awaited<State>,
permalink?: string,
): [state: Awaited<State>, dispatch: () => void, boolean];
```
The hook returns a tuple with:
- `state`: the last state the action returned
- `dispatch`: the method to call to dispatch the wrapped action
- `pending`: the pending state of the action and any state updates
contained
Notably, state updates inside of the action dispatched are wrapped in a
transition to keep the page responsive while the action is completing
and the UI is updated based on the result.
## Usage
The `useActionState` hook can be used similar to `useFormState`:
```js
import { useActionState } from "react"; // not react-dom
function Form({ formAction }) {
const [state, action, isPending] = useActionState(formAction);
return (
<form action={action}>
<input type="email" name="email" disabled={isPending} />
<button type="submit" disabled={isPending}>
Submit
</button>
{state.errorMessage && <p>{state.errorMessage}</p>}
</form>
);
}
```
But it doesn't need to be used with a `<form/>` (neither did
`useFormState`, hence the confusion):
```js
import { useActionState, useRef } from "react";
function Form({ someAction }) {
const ref = useRef(null);
const [state, action, isPending] = useActionState(someAction);
async function handleSubmit() {
// See caveats below
await action({ email: ref.current.value });
}
return (
<div>
<input ref={ref} type="email" name="email" disabled={isPending} />
<button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={isPending}>
Submit
</button>
{state.errorMessage && <p>{state.errorMessage}</p>}
</div>
);
}
```
## Benefits
One of the benefits of using this hook is the automatic tracking of the
return value and pending states of the wrapped function. For example,
the above example could be accomplished via:
```js
import { useActionState, useRef } from "react";
function Form({ someAction }) {
const ref = useRef(null);
const [state, setState] = useState(null);
const [isPending, setIsPending] = useTransition();
function handleSubmit() {
startTransition(async () => {
const response = await someAction({ email: ref.current.value });
setState(response);
});
}
return (
<div>
<input ref={ref} type="email" name="email" disabled={isPending} />
<button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={isPending}>
Submit
</button>
{state.errorMessage && <p>{state.errorMessage}</p>}
</div>
);
}
```
However, this hook adds more benefits when used with render specific
elements like react-dom `<form>` elements and Server Action. With
`<form>` elements, React will automatically support replay actions on
the form if it is submitted before hydration has completed, providing a
form of partial progressive enhancement: enhancement for when javascript
is enabled but not ready.
Additionally, with the `permalink` argument and Server Actions,
frameworks can provide full progressive enhancement support, submitting
the form to the URL provided along with the FormData from the form. On
submission, the Server Action will be called during the MPA navigation,
similar to any raw HTML app, server rendered, and the result returned to
the client without any JavaScript on the client.
## Caveats
There are a few Caveats to this new hook:
**Additional state update**: Since we cannot know whether you use the
pending state value returned by the hook, the hook will always set the
`isPending` state at the beginning of the first chained action,
resulting in an additional state update similar to `useTransition`. In
the future a type-aware compiler could optimize this for when the
pending state is not accessed.
**Pending state is for the action, not the handler**: The difference is
subtle but important, the pending state begins when the return action is
dispatched and will revert back after all actions and transitions have
settled. The mechanism for this under the hook is the same as
useOptimisitic.
Concretely, what this means is that the pending state of
`useActionState` will not represent any actions or sync work performed
before dispatching the action returned by `useActionState`. Hopefully
this is obvious based on the name and shape of the API, but there may be
some temporary confusion.
As an example, let's take the above example and await another action
inside of it:
```js
import { useActionState, useRef } from "react";
function Form({ someAction, someOtherAction }) {
const ref = useRef(null);
const [state, action, isPending] = useActionState(someAction);
async function handleSubmit() {
await someOtherAction();
// The pending state does not start until this call.
await action({ email: ref.current.value });
}
return (
<div>
<input ref={ref} type="email" name="email" disabled={isPending} />
<button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={isPending}>
Submit
</button>
{state.errorMessage && <p>{state.errorMessage}</p>}
</div>
);
}
```
Since the pending state is related to the action, and not the handler or
form it's attached to, the pending state only changes when the action is
dispatched. To solve, there are two options.
First (recommended): place the other function call inside of the action
passed to `useActionState`:
```js
import { useActionState, useRef } from "react";
function Form({ someAction, someOtherAction }) {
const ref = useRef(null);
const [state, action, isPending] = useActionState(async (data) => {
// Pending state is true already.
await someOtherAction();
return someAction(data);
});
async function handleSubmit() {
// The pending state starts at this call.
await action({ email: ref.current.value });
}
return (
<div>
<input ref={ref} type="email" name="email" disabled={isPending} />
<button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={isPending}>
Submit
</button>
{state.errorMessage && <p>{state.errorMessage}</p>}
</div>
);
}
```
For greater control, you can also wrap both in a transition and use the
`isPending` state of the transition:
```js
import { useActionState, useTransition, useRef } from "react";
function Form({ someAction, someOtherAction }) {
const ref = useRef(null);
// isPending is used from the transition wrapping both action calls.
const [isPending, startTransition] = useTransition();
// isPending not used from the individual action.
const [state, action] = useActionState(someAction);
async function handleSubmit() {
startTransition(async () => {
// The transition pending state has begun.
await someOtherAction();
await action({ email: ref.current.value });
});
}
return (
<div>
<input ref={ref} type="email" name="email" disabled={isPending} />
<button onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={isPending}>
Submit
</button>
{state.errorMessage && <p>{state.errorMessage}</p>}
</div>
);
}
```
A similar technique using `useOptimistic` is preferred over using
`useTransition` directly, and is left as an exercise to the reader.
## Thanks
Thanks to @ryanflorence @mjackson @wesbos
(https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/27980#issuecomment-1960685940)
and [Allan
Lasser](https://allanlasser.com/posts/2024-01-26-avoid-using-reacts-useformstatus)
for their feedback and suggestions on `useFormStatus` hook.
Since it was first implemented renderToStaticNodeStream never correctly
set the renderer state to mark the output as static markup which means
it was functionally the same as renderToNodeStream. This change fixes
this oversight. While we are removing renderToNodeStream in a future
version we never did deprecate the static version of this API because it
has no immediate analog in the modern APIs.
A while back we implemented a heuristic that if a chunk was large it was
assumed to be produced by the render and thus was safe to stream which
results in transferring the underlying object memory. Later we ran into
an issue where a precomputed chunk grew large enough to trigger this
hueristic and it started causing renders to fail because once a second
render had occurred the precomputed chunk would not have an underlying
buffer of bytes to send and these bytes would be omitted from the
stream. We implemented a technique to detect large precomputed chunks
and we enforced that these always be cloned before writing.
Unfortunately our test coverage was not perfect and there has been for a
very long time now a usage pattern where if you complete a boundary in
one flush and then complete a boundary that has stylehsheet dependencies
in another flush you can get a large precomputed chunk that was not
being cloned to be sent twice causing streaming errors.
I've thought about why we even went with this solution in the first
place and I think it was a mistake. It relies on a dev only check to
catch paired with potentially version specific order of operations on
the streaming side. This is too unreliable. Additionally the low limit
of view size for Edge is not used in Node.js but there is not real
justification for this.
In this change I updated the view size for edge streaming to match Node
at 2048 bytes which is still relatively small and we have no data one
way or another to preference 512 over this. Then I updated the assertion
logic to error anytime a precomputed chunk exceeds the size. This
eliminates the need to clone these chunks by just making sure our view
size is always larger than the largest precomputed chunk we can possibly
write. I'm generally in favor of this for a few reasons.
First, we'll always know during testing whether we've violated the limit
as long as we exercise each stream config because the precomputed chunks
are created in module scope. Second, we can always split up large chunks
so making sure the precomptued chunk is smaller than whatever view size
we actually desire is relatively trivial.
## Overview
Adds a `pending` state to useFormState, which will be replaced by
`useActionState` in the next diff. We will keep `useFormState` around
for backwards compatibility, but functionally it will work the same as
`useActionState`, which has an `isPending` state returned.
We broke the ability to "break on uncaught exceptions" by adding a
try/catch higher up in the scheduling. We're giving up on fixing that so
we can remove the replay trick inside an event handler.
The issue with that approach is that we end up double logging a lot of
errors in DEV since they get reported to the page.
It's also a lot of complexity around this feature.
```diff
-expect(ReactTestUtils.isDOMComponent(maybeElement)).toBe(true);
+expect(maybeElement).toBeInstanceOf(Element);
```
It's not equivalent since `isDOMComponent` checks `maybeElement.nodeType
=== Element.ELEMENT_NODE && !!maybeElement.tagName` but `instanceof`
check seems sufficient here. Checking `nodeType` is mostly for
cross-realm checks and checking falsy `tagName` seems like a check
specifically for incomplete DOM implementations because tagName can't be
empty by spec I believe.
In #23176 we added a special case in completeWork for SuspenseBoundaries
if they still have trailing children. However, that misses a case
because it doesn't log a recoverable error for the hydration mismatch.
So we get an error that we rerendered.
I think this special case was done to avoid contexts getting out of
sync. I don't know why we didn't just move where the pop happens though
so that's what I did here and let the regular pass throw instead. Seems
to be pass the tests.
The idea here is that host dispatchers are not bound to renders so we
need to be able to dispatch to them at any time. This updates the
implementation to chain these dispatchers so that each renderer can
respond to the dispatch. Semantically we don't always want every
renderer to do this for instance if Fizz handles a float method we don't
want Fiber to as well so each dispatcher implementation can decide if it
makes sense to forward the call or not. For float methods server
disaptchers will handle the call if they can resolve a Request otherwise
they will forward. For client dispatchers they will handle the call and
always forward. The choice needs to be made for each dispatcher method
and may have implications on correct renderer import order. For now we
just live with the restriction that if you want to use server and client
together (such as renderToString in the browser) you need to import the
server renderer after the client renderer.
Adds a flag to disable legacy mode. Currently this flag is used to cause
legacy mode apis like render and hydrate to throw. This change also
removes render, hydrate, unmountComponentAtNode, and
unstable_renderSubtreeIntoContainer from the experiemntal entrypoint.
Right now for Meta builds this flag is off (legacy mode is still
supported). In OSS builds this flag matches __NEXT_MAJOR__ which means
it currently is on in experiemental. This means that after merging
legacy mode is effectively removed from experimental builds. While this
is a breaking change, experimental builds are not stable and users can
pin to older versions or update their use of react-dom to no longer use
legacy mode APIs.
The runtime contains a type check to determine if a user-provided ref is
a valid type — a function or object (or a string, when
`disableStringRefs` is off). This currently happens during child
reconciliation. This changes it to happen only when the ref is passed to
the component that the ref is being attached to.
This is a continuation of the "ref as prop" change — until you actually
pass a ref to a HostComponent, class, etc, ref is a normal prop that has
no special behavior.
Depends on:
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/28398
---
This removes string refs, which has been deprecated in Strict Mode for
seven years.
I've left them behind a flag for Meta, but in open source this fully
removes the feature.
If there's invalid dom nesting, there will be mismatches following but
the nesting is the most important cause of the problem.
Previously we would include the DOM nesting when rerendering thanks to
the new model of throw and recovery. However, the log would come during
the recovery phase which is after we've already logged that there was a
hydration mismatch.
People would consistently miss this log. Which is fair because you
should always look at the first log first as the most probable cause.
This ensures that we log in the hydration phase if there's a dom nesting
issue. This assumes that the consequence of nesting will appear such
that the won't have a mismatch before this. That's typically the case
because the node will move up and to be a later sibling. So as long as
that happens and we keep hydrating depth first, it should hold true.
There might be an issue if there's a suspense boundary between the nodes
we'll find discover the new child in the outer path since suspense
boundaries as breadth first.
Before:
<img width="996" alt="Screenshot 2024-02-23 at 7 34 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/af70cf7f-898b-477f-be39-13b01cfe585f">
After:
<img width="853" alt="Screenshot 2024-02-23 at 7 22 24 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/896c6348-1620-4f99-881d-b6069263925e">
Cameo: RSC stacks.
This pattern is a petpeeve of mine. I don't consider this best practice
and so most don't have these prefixes. Very inconsistent.
At best this is useless and noisey that you have to parse because the
information is also in the stack trace.
At worse these are misleading because they're highlighting something
internal (like validateDOMNesting) which even suggests an internal bug.
Even the ones public to React aren't necessarily what you called because
you might be calling a wrapper around it.
That would be properly reflected in a stack trace - which can also
properly ignore list so that the first stack you see is your callsite,
Which might be like `render()` in react-testing-library rather than
`createRoot()` for example.
This removes the remaining `propTypes` validation calls, making
declaring `propTypes` a no-op. In other words, React itself will no
longer validate the `propTypes` that you declare on your components.
In general, our recommendation is to use static type checking (e.g.
TypeScript). If you'd like to still run propTypes checks, you can do so
manually, same as you'd do outside React:
```js
import checkPropTypes from 'prop-types/checkPropTypes';
function Button(props) {
checkPropTypes(Button.propTypes, prop, 'prop', Button.name)
// ...
}
```
This could be automated as a Babel plugin if you want to keep these
checks implicit. (We will not be providing such a plugin, but someone in
community might be interested in building or maintaining one.)
Depends on:
- #28317
- #28320
---
Changes the behavior of the JSX runtime to pass through `ref` as a
normal prop, rather than plucking it from the props object and storing
on the element.
This is a breaking change since it changes the type of the receiving
component. However, most code is unaffected since it's unlikely that a
component would have attempted to access a `ref` prop, since it was not
possible to get a reference to one.
`forwardRef` _will_ still pluck `ref` from the props object, though,
since it's extremely common for users to spread the props object onto
the inner component and pass `ref` as a differently named prop. This is
for maximum compatibility with existing code — the real impact of this
change is that `forwardRef` is no longer required.
Currently, refs are resolved during child reconciliation and stored on
the fiber. As a result of this change, we can move ref resolution to
happen only much later, and only for components that actually use them.
Then we can remove the `ref` field from the Fiber type. I have not yet
done that in this step, though.
Also warn for symbols.
It's weird because for objects we throw a hard error but functions we do
a dev only check. Mainly because we have an object branch anyway.
In the object branch we have some built-ins that have bad errors like
forwardRef and memo but since they're going to become functions later, I
didn't bother updating those. Once they're functions those names will be
part of this.
Sebastian Markbåge
Ricky
Andrew Clark
Jan Kassens
Josh Story
Sebastian Silbermann
dan