Follow up to #32656.
Remove touchAction from SwipeRecognizer. I was under the wrong
impression that this was only the touch-action applied to this
particular element, but that parents would still win but in fact this
blocks the parent from scrolling in the other direction. By specifying a
fixed direction it also blocked rage-swiping in the other direction
early on.
Disable pointer-events on view-transition so that the scroll can be hit.
This means that touches hit below the items animating above. This allows
swiping to happen again before momentum scroll has finished. Previously
they were ignored. This only works as long as the SwipeRecognizer is
itself not animating. This means you can now rage-swipe in both
directions quickly.
DiffTrain build for [c2a1961747](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/c2a196174763e0b4f16ed1c512ed4442b062395e)
DiffTrain build for [646835fb59](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/646835fb59f9ad8557b9f3641515697c153e3faa)
Follow up to #32656.
Remove touchAction from SwipeRecognizer. I was under the wrong
impression that this was only the touch-action applied to this
particular element, but that parents would still win but in fact this
blocks the parent from scrolling in the other direction. By specifying a
fixed direction it also blocked rage-swiping in the other direction
early on.
Disable pointer-events on view-transition so that the scroll can be hit.
This means that touches hit below the items animating above. This allows
swiping to happen again before momentum scroll has finished. Previously
they were ignored. This only works as long as the SwipeRecognizer is
itself not animating. This means you can now rage-swipe in both
directions quickly.
DiffTrain build for [c2a1961747](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/c2a196174763e0b4f16ed1c512ed4442b062395e)
This does the same thing for that we did
for in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32612/commits/e3cbaffef05c7b476c07f7495e06788a9503e636.
If a boundary hasn't mutated and didn't change in size, we mark it for
cancellation. Otherwise we add names to it. The different from the
CommitViewTransition path is that the old names are added to the
clones so this is the first time the new names.
Now we also cancel any boundaries that were unchanged. So now the root
no longer animates. We still have to clone them. There are other
optimizations that can avoid cloning but once we've done all the layouts
we can still cancel the running animation and let them just be the
regular content if they didn't change. Just like the regular
fire-and-forget path.
This also fixes the measurement so that we measure clones by adjusting
their position back into the viewport.
This actually surfaces a bug in Safari that was already in #32612. It
turns out that the old names aren't picked up for some reason and so in
Safari they looked more like a cross-fade than what #32612 was supposed
to fix. However, now that bug is even more apparent because they
actually just disappear in Safari. I'm not sure what that bug is but
it's unrelated to this PR so will fix that separately.
DiffTrain build for [3c3696d554](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/3c3696d5548c8a67f2332fd78332b9366abaf2f9)
ViewTransition uses the algorithm to auto-assign names. This
ensures that we could animate between SSR content and client content by
ensuring that the names line up.
However, I missed that we need to bump the id (materialize it) when we
do that. This is what function components do if they use one or more
. This caused duplicate names when two ViewTransitions were
nested without any siblings since they would share name.
DiffTrain build for [9fde224a53](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/9fde224a53693101a4d15e038d6db37e7a3596ff)
Follow-up to #31850. We want to build using the original commit SHA, not
the merge commit that GitHub Actions creates behind the scenes. We were
already checking out the correct commit object, but the COMMIT_SHA
artifact was still pointing to the merge commit.
This should fix the sizebot links to point to working URLs, too.
DiffTrain build for [9320a0139d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/9320a0139df876509c8ebb6f6fd950a6690bd5d9)
This implements `observeUsing(observer)` and `unobserverUsing(observer)`
on fragment instances. IntersectionObservers and ResizeObservers can be
passed to observe each host child of the fragment. This is the
equivalent to calling `observer.observe(child)` or
`observer.unobserve(child)` for each child target.
Just like the addEventListener, the observer is held on the fragment
instance and applied to any newly mounted child. So you can do things
like wrap a paginated list in a fragment and have each child
automatically observed as they commit in.
Unlike, the event listeners though, we don't `unobserve` when a child is
removed. If a removed child is currently intersecting, the observer
callback will be called when it is removed with an empty rect. This lets
you track all the currently intersecting elements by setting state from
the observer callback and either adding or removing them from your list
depending on the intersecting state. If you want to track the removal of
items offscreen, you'd have to maintain that state separately and append
intersecting data to it in the observer callback. This is what the
fixture example does.
There could be more convenient ways of managing the state of multiple
child intersections, but basic examples are able to be modeled with the
simple implementation. Let's see how the usage goes as we integrate this
with more advanced loggers and other features.
For now you can only attach one observer to an instance. This could
change based on usage but the fragments are composable and could be
stacked as one way to apply multiple observers to the same elements.
In practice, one pattern we expect to enable is more composable logging
such as
```javascript
function Feed({ items }) {
return (
<ImpressionLogger>
{items.map((item) => (
<FeedItem />
))}
</ImpressionLogger>
);
}
```
where `ImpressionLogger` would set up the IntersectionObserver using a
fragment ref with the required business logic and various components
could layer it wherever the logging is needed. Currently most callsites
use a hook form, which can require wiring up refs through the tree and
merging refs for multiple loggers.
DiffTrain build for [cd28a946d5](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/cd28a946d57695a025581c0ff851bde08ea6ca27)
This PR separates Activity to it's own element type separate from
Offscreen. The goal is to allow us to add Activity element boundary
semantics during hydration similar to Suspense semantics, without
impacting the Offscreen behavior in suspended children.
DiffTrain build for [1a191701fe](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/1a191701fe5000098d23328b2ea9d70457fea1f8)
There's two ways to find updated View Transitions.
One is the "commit/measureNestedViewTransitions" pass which is used to
find things in unchanged subtrees. This can only lead to the relayout
case since there's can't possibly be any mutations in the subtree. This
is only triggered when none of the direct siblings have any mutations at
all.
The other case is "commit/measureUpdateViewTransition" which is for a
ViewTransition that itself has mutations scheduled inside of it which
leads to the "update" case.
However, there's a case between these two cases. When a direct sibling
has a mutation but there's also a ViewTransition exactly at the same
level. In that case we can't bail out on the whole set of children so we
won't trigger the "nested" case. Previously we also didn't trigger the
"commit/measureUpdateViewTransition" case because we first checked if
that had any mutations inside of it at all. This leads to neither case
picking up this boundary.
We could check if the ViewTransition itself has any mutations inside and
if not trigger the nested path.
There's a simpler way though. Because
`commit/measureUpdateViewTransition` is actually just optimistic. The
flags are pessimistic and we don't know for sure if there will actually
be a mutation until we've traversed the tree. It can sometimes lead to
the "relayout" case. So we can just use that same path, knowing that
it'll just lead to the layout pass. Therefore it's safe to just remove
this check.
DiffTrain build for [17d274dc12](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/17d274dc127400b31379a1b26c5be53599c36aa5)
This is a nit but a Config should not have to know anything about the
internals of Fibers. Ideally it shouldn't even access them but we have
some cases where we need pointers back in like for this fragment.
The way we've typically abstracted this is using the
`ReactFiberTreeReflection` helper that's in the `react-reconciler`. Such
as in the event system.
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/f3c956006a90dc68210bd3e19497d10fb9b028d3/packages/react-dom-bindings/src/events/ReactDOMEventListener.js#L22-L26
We sometimes cheat but we really should clean this up such that a
`Fiber` is actually an opaque type to the Configs and it can never dot
into it without using a helper.
So this just moves `traverseFragmentInstanceChildren` to
ReactFiberTreeReflection so that the ConfigDOM doesn't ever dot into its
fields itself. It just passes the Fiber through back into the
react-reconciler. I had to add a wrapper to read the `.child` to avoid
that being assumed too. I also noticed that FragmentInstanceType is not
actually passed through so that argument is unnecessary.
DiffTrain build for [6b5d9fd316](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/6b5d9fd3166eb58b469fb23f7b96972b184c0218)
Stacked on #32599 and #32611.
This is able to reuse the code from CommitViewTransitions for "enter",
"shared" and "layout". The difference is that for "enter"/"shared" in
the "new" phase we pass in the deletions.
For "layout" of nested boundaries we just need to measure the clones at
the same time we measure the original nodes since we haven't measured
them in a previous phase in the current approach.
With these updates, things move around more like expected in the fixture
because we're now applying the appropriate pairs to trigger individual
animations instead of just the full document cross-fade.
The "update" phase is a little more complicated and is coming soon.
DiffTrain build for [2c560374d6](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/2c560374d6276c51cfeeff7af39628058c155a13)
Stacked on #32578.
We need to apply view-transition-names to the clones that we create in
the "old" phase for the ViewTransition boundaries that should activate.
Finding pairs is a little trickier than in
ReactFiberCommitViewTransitions. Normally we collect all name
"insertions" in the `accumulateSuspenseyCommit` phase before we even
commit. Then in the snapshot do we visit all "deletions" and since we
already collected all the insertions we know immediately if the deletion
had a pair and should therefore get a "name" assigned to activate the
boundary. For ReactFiberApplyGesture we need to assign names to
"insertions" since it's in reverse but we don't already have a map of
deletions. Therefore we need to first visit all deletions.
Instead of doing that in a completely separate pass, we instead visit
deletions in the same pass to find pairs. Since this is in the same pass
we might visit insertions before deletions or vice versa depending on
document order. However, we can deal with this by applying the name to
the insertion when we find the deletion if we've already made the clones
at that point.
Applying names to pure exits, updates or nested (relayout) is a bit more
straight-forward.
DiffTrain build for [2e385738a4](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/2e385738a4dfd1554c146f6313b1530a09b5ce78)
Stacked on #32585 and #32605.
This adds more loops for the phases of "Apply Gesture". It doesn't
implement the interesting bit yet like adding view-transition-names and
measurements. I'll do that in a separate PR to keep reviewing easier.
The three phases of this approach is roughly:
- Clone and apply names to the "old" state.
- Inside startViewTransition: Apply names to the "new" state. Measure
both the "old" and "new" state to know whether to cancel some of them.
Delete the clones which will include all the "old" names.
- After startViewTransition: Restore "new" names back to no
view-transition-name.
Since we don't have any other Effects in these phases we have a bit more
flexibility and we can avoid extra phases that traverse the tree. I've
tried to avoid any additional passes.
An interesting consequence of this approach is that we could measure
both the "old" and "new" state before `startViewTransition`. This would
be more efficient because we wouldn't need to take View Transition
snapshots of parts of the tree that won't actually animate. However,
that would require an extra pass and force layout earlier. It would also
have different semantics from the fire-and-forget View Transitions
because we could optimize better which can be visible. It would also not
account for any late mutations. So I decided to instead let the layout
be computed by painting as usual and then measure both "old" and "new"
inside the startViewTransition instead. Then canceling anything that
doesn't animate to keep it consistent.
Unfortunately, though there's not a lot of code sharing possible in
these phases because the strategy is so different with the cloning and
because the animation is performed in reverse. The "finishedWork" Fiber
represents the "old" state and the "current" Fiber represents the "new"
state.
The most complicated phase is the cloning. I actually ended up having to
make a very different pattern from the other phases and CommitWork in
general. Because we have to clone as we go and also do other things like
apply names and finding pairs, it has more phases. I ended up with an
approach that uses three different loops. The outer one for updated
trees, one for inserted trees that don't need cloning (doesn't include
reappearing offscreen) and one for not updated trees that still need
cloning. Inside each loop it can also be in different phases which I
track with the `visitPhase` enum - this pattern is kind of new.
Additionally, we need to measure the cloned nodes after we've applied
mutations to them and we have to wait until the whole tree is inserted.
We don't have a reference to these DOM elements in the Fiber tree since
that still refers to the original ones. We need to store the cloned
elements somewhere. So I added a temporary field on the
ViewTransitionState to keep track of any clones owned by that
ViewTransition.
When we deep clone an unchanged subtree we don't have DOM element
instances. It wouldn't be quite safe to try to find them from the tree
structure. So we need to avoid the deep clones if we might need DOM
elements. Therefore we keep traversing in the case where we need to find
nested ViewTransition boundaries that are either potentially affected by
layout or a "pair".
For the other two phases the pattern there's a lot of code duplication
since it's slightly different from the commit ones but they at least
follow the same pattern. For the restore phase I was actually able to
reuse most of the code.
I don't love how much code this is.
DiffTrain build for [c4a3b92e09](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/c4a3b92e098cf1896939758e7419cbdb0e2f0cf4)
Traverse program after running compiler transform to find untransformed
references to compiler features (e.g. `inferEffectDeps`, `fire`).
Hard error to fail the babel pipeline when the compiler fails to
transform these features to give predictable runtime semantics.
Untransformed calls to functions like `fire` will throw at runtime
anyways, so let's fail the build to catch these earlier.
Note that with this fails the build *regardless of panicThreshold*
DiffTrain build for [5398b71158](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/5398b7115847e87c0053aa719728d8dd1a635ccd)
Removes `EnvironmentConfig.enableMinimalTransformsForRetry` in favor of
`run` parameters. This is a minimal difference but lets us explicitly
opt out certain compiler passes based on mode parameters, instead of
environment configurations
Retry flags don't really make sense to have in `EnvironmentConfig`
anyways as the config is user-facing API, while retrying is a compiler
implementation detail.
(per @josephsavona's feedback
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32164#issuecomment-2608616479)
> Re the "hacky" framing of this in the PR title: I think this is fine.
I can see having something like a compilation or output mode that we use
when running the pipeline. Rather than changing environment settings
when we re-run, various passes could take effect based on the
combination of the mode + env flags. The modes might be:
>
> * Full: transform, validate, memoize. This is the default today.
> * Transform: Along the lines of the backup mode in this PR. Only
applies transforms that do not require following the rules of React,
like `fire()`.
> * Validate: This could be used for ESLint.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32511).
* #32512
* __->__ #32511
DiffTrain build for [7939d92fcc](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/7939d92fcc95ad5ee719c38272eaef14a3750fc0)
This change fixes a coverage hole in rolling out with `gating`. Prior to
this PR, configuring `gating` causes React Compiler to bail out of
optimizing some functions.
This means that it's not entirely safe to cutover from `gating` enabled
for all users (i.e. rolled out 100%) to removing the `gating` config
altogether, as new functions may be opted into compilation when they
stop bailing out due to gating-specific logic.
This is technically slightly slower due to the additional function
indirection. An alternative approach is to recommend running a codemod
to insert `use no memo`s on currently-bailing out functions before
removing the`gating` config.
---
Tested [internally](
https://fburl.com/diff/q982ovua) by enabling on a page that previously
had a few hundred bailouts due to gating + hoisted function declarations
and (1) clicking around locally and (2) running a bunch of e2e tests
DiffTrain build for [d92e5713be](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/d92e5713be2dc78f467c31fce4a1e5c84a74e4e6)
Reduce false positive bailouts by using the same
`isReferencedIdentifier` logic that the compiler also uses for
determining context variables and a function's own hoisted declarations.
Details:
Previously, we counted every babel identifier as a reference. This is
problematic because babel counts most string symbols as an identifier.
```js
print(x); // x is an identifier as expected
obj.x // x is.. also an identifier here
{x: 2} // x is also an identifier here
```
This PR adds a check for `isReferencedIdentifier`. Note that only
non-lval
references pass this check. This should be fine as we don't need to
hoist function declarations before writes to the same lvalue (which
should error in strict mode anyways)
```js
print(x); // isReferencedIdentifier(x) -> true
obj.x // isReferencedIdentifier(x) -> false
{x: 2} // isReferencedIdentifier(x) -> false
x = 2 // isReferencedIdentifier(x) -> false
```
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32596).
* __->__ #32596
* #32595
* #32594
* #32593
* #32522
* #32521
DiffTrain build for [f457d0b4c6](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/f457d0b4c6dd70c10acb9c93c7d01c80d8e23b92)
- Add `at`, `indexOf`, and `includes`
- Optimize MixedReadOnly which is currently only used by hook return
values. Hook return values are typed as Frozen, this change propagates
that to return values of aliasing function calls (such as `at`). One
potential issue is that developers may pass
`enableAssumeHooksFollowRulesOfReact:false` and set
`transitiveMixedData`, expecting their transitive mixed data to be
mutable. This is a bit of an edge case and already doesn't have clear
semantics.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32594).
* #32596
* #32595
* __->__ #32594
* #32593
* #32522
* #32521
DiffTrain build for [89a46a57df](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/89a46a57df3a3cc309fff937794341ab215e01e9)
## Summary
Right now, `react-compiler-healthcheck` flags `mobx` as a "known
incompatible library". But it's not precisely *MobX* that's
incompatible. It's the observer HOC that comes from `mobx-react` and
`mobx-react-lite`.
I've been working on
[mst-use-observable](https://github.com/coolsoftwaretyler/mst-use-observable),
which makes MobX-State-Tree compatible with the compiler. However,
projects that use `mobx-state-tree` and `mst-use-observable` will still
depend on `mobx` as a dependency.
And there [have been efforts in the past to write a hook for
observability](https://github.com/mobxjs/mobx/discussions/2566). So it's
possible that MobX could become compatible, so long as authors access it
with a hook, rather than the HOC.
I would like to propose updating the health check to be a little more
precise and flag the HOC dependencies, rather than MobX itself.
Thanks in advance for your consideration!
## How did you test this change?
`npx react-compiler-healthcheck` shouldn't flag on `mobx` in
dependencies, but will for `mobx-react-lite` and `mobx-react`.
Test suites, formatting, linting, all passed.
---------
Co-authored-by: lauren <poteto@users.noreply.github.com>
DiffTrain build for [ef06b54f8d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/ef06b54f8d1d9818806e221974c8b64efbbfda0d)
This change merges the `react-compiler` rule from
`eslint-plugin-react-compiler` into the `eslint-plugin-react-hooks`
plugin. In order to do the move in a way that keeps commit history with
the moved files, but also no remove them from their origin until a
future cleanup change can be done, I did the `git mv` first, and then
recreated the files that were moved in their original places, as a
separate commit. Unfortunately GH shows the moved files as new instead
of the ones that are truly new. But in the IDE and `git blame`, commit
history is intact with the moved files.
Since this change adds new dependencies, and one of those dependencies
has a higher `engines` declaration for `node` than what the plugin
currently has, this is technically a breaking change and will have to go
out as part of a major release.
### Related Changes
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32458
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauren Tan <poteto@users.noreply.github.com>
DiffTrain build for [5ccfcd17ff](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/5ccfcd17ffa0adf9e7f5ba7fbf48e6bf6a4eb67e)
*This API is experimental and subject to change or removal.*
This PR is an alternative to
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32421 based on feedback:
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32421#pullrequestreview-2625382015
. The difference here is that we traverse from the Fragment's fiber at
operation time instead of keeping a set of children on the
`FragmentInstance`. We still need to handle newly added or removed child
nodes to apply event listeners and observers, so we treat those updates
as effects.
**Fragment Refs**
This PR extends React's Fragment component to accept a `ref` prop. The
Fragment's ref will attach to a custom host instance, which will provide
an Element-like API for working with the Fragment's host parent and host
children.
Here I've implemented `addEventListener`, `removeEventListener`, and
`focus` to get started but we'll be iterating on this by adding
additional APIs in future PRs. This sets up the mechanism to attach refs
and perform operations on children. The FragmentInstance is implemented
in `react-dom` here but is planned for Fabric as well.
The API works by targeting the first level of host children and proxying
Element-like APIs to allow developers to manage groups of elements or
elements that cannot be easily accessed such as from a third-party
library or deep in a tree of Functional Component wrappers.
```javascript
import {Fragment, useRef} from 'react';
const fragmentRef = useRef(null);
<Fragment ref={fragmentRef}>
<div id="A" />
<Wrapper>
<div id="B">
<div id="C" />
</div>
</Wrapper>
<div id="D" />
</Fragment>
```
In this case, calling `fragmentRef.current.addEventListener()` would
apply an event listener to `A`, `B`, and `D`. `C` is skipped because it
is nested under the first level of Host Component. If another Host
Component was appended as a sibling to `A`, `B`, or `D`, the event
listener would be applied to that element as well and any other APIs
would also affect the newly added child.
This is an implementation of the basic feature as a starting point for
feedback and further iteration.
DiffTrain build for [6aa8254bb7](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/6aa8254bb7353fe3096289edc669cf168e9fd190)
Enabling feature detection of early DOM features in a framework is
reckless. I'm not judging other frameworks (but also a little bit).
Because if you do something like `if (moveBefore) moveBefore(a, b) else
insertBefore(a, b)` like we do and then the implementation has to change
there are still too many websites out there that it becomes impossible
to change it. It would break the web. It would instead have to change to
a different name. That's what happened with `contains` -> `includes`.
Counter to popular belief it didn't have anything to do with patching
prototypes. Therefore, ideally frameworks shouldn't start rely on it
until there's two implementations so that there's time for feedback.
That's why we didn't immediately enable this even in experimental.
However, at this point there's probably enough feature detection and it
has shipped long enough in Chrome that it's unlikely to be able to
change at this point.
We can enable it now. For now just in `@experimental` to see if we can
flush out issues with it before bringing it to stable.
DiffTrain build for [696950aa69](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/696950aa69e3f2ef0d720c82705e02b532904d70)
Otherwise these can survive into the next View Transition and cause
havoc to that transition.
This was appearing as a flash in Safari in the fixture when going from
A->B. This triggers a View Transition and at the same time the scroll
position updates in an effect. That fires a scroll event which starts a
gesture. This shouldn't really happen and the SwipeRecognizer should
ideally ignore those but it's good to surface edge cases. That gesture
is blocked on the View Transition finishing and then immediately after
it starts a gesture View Transition. That gesture then picked up the
former Animation from the previous transition which caused issues. This
PR fixes that flash.
DiffTrain build for [a8c2bbdabf](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/a8c2bbdabf561a53b7908c2b341815e64840e8ca)
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
This PR fixes asserts when `passChildrenWhenCloningPersistedNodes` is
enabled for React Native and OffscreenComponent child rendering unhides
host components.
Discussions around possible fixes for the asserts seen in React Native
suggested changing the way we handle hiding/unhiding host components by
updating the fiber state with the hidden host component instead of
submitting a hidden clone Fabric and keeping the original as the current
fiber.
Implementing this fix would require holding onto the original styling of
the hidden host component. The reconciler updates the styling by adding
`display: none` to hide the contents. If the original host component was
already hidden, the renderer would lose that information and remove the
styling when showing the contents again.
To reduce the changes required to make
`passChildrenWhenCloningPersistedNodes` work, this PR falls back to the
original cloning method when OffscreenComponents are part of the
children needed to be added back. This effectively resolve the asserts
triggered by the feature in RN and improves overall performance.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
This fix was tested by enabling `passChildrenWhenCloningPersistedNodes`
in an app built with React Native that had a repro for triggering the
asserts. The asserts do not occur anymore when using the changes in this
PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nick <lefever@meta.com>
DiffTrain build for [cc680065c3](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/cc680065c33739cc4c8cd2e8a67312b0c16a6ccc)
This is really the essence mechanism of the `useSwipeTransition`
feature.
We don't want to immediately switch to the destination state when
starting a gesture. The effects remain mounted on the current state. We
want the current state to be "live". This is important to for example
allow a video to keeping playing while starting a swipe (think
TikTok/Reels) and not stop until you've committed the action. The only
thing that can be live is the "new" state. Therefore we treat the
destination as the "old" state and perform a reverse animation from
there.
Ideally we could apply the old state to the DOM tree, take a snapshot
and then revert it back in the mutation of `startViewTransition`.
Unfortunately, the way `startViewTransition` was designed it always
paints one frame of the "old" state which would lead this to cause a
flicker.
To work around this, we need to create a clone of any View Transition
boundary that might be mutated and then render that offscreen. That way
we can render the "current" state on screen and the "destination" state
offscreen for the screenshots. Being mutated can be either due to React
doing a DOM mutation or if a child boundary resizes that causes the
parent to relayout. We don't have to do this for insertions or deletions
since they only appear on one side.
The worst case scenario is that we have to clone the whole root. That's
what this first PR implements. We clone the container and if it's not
absolutely positioned, we position it on top of the current one. If the
container is `document` or `<html>` we instead clone the `<body>` tag
since it's the only one we can insert a duplicate of. If the container
is deep in the tree we clone just that even though technically we should
probably clone the whole document in that case. We just keep the impact
smaller. Ideally though we'd never hit this case. In fact, if we clone
the document we issue a warning (always for now) since you probably
should optimize this. In the future I intend to add optimizations when
affected View Transition boundaries are absolutely positioned since they
cannot possibly relayout the parent. This would be the ideal way to use
this feature most efficiently but it still works without it.
Since we render the "old" state outside the viewport, we need to then
adjust the animation to put it back into the viewport. This is the
trickiest part to get right while still preserving any customization of
the View Transitions done using CSS. This current approach reapplies all
the animations with adjusted keyframes.
In the case of an "exit" the pseudo-element itself is positioned outside
the viewport but since we can't programmatically update the style of the
pseudo-element itself we instead adjust all the keyframes to put it back
into the viewport. If there is no animation on the group we add one.
In the case of an "update" the pseudo-element is positioned on the new
state which is already inside the viewport. However, the auto-generated
animation of the group has a starting keyframe that starts outside the
viewport. In this case we need to adjust that keyframe.
In the future I might explore a technique that inserts stylesheets
instead of mutating the animations. It might be simpler. But whatever
hacks work to maximize the compatibility is best.
DiffTrain build for [e9252bcdcc](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/e9252bcdccf7f8f691081e4d48ca47657bc723f9)
mofeiZ
rickhanlonii
josephsavona
poteto
sebmarkbage
jackpope
acdliteandacdlite
rickhanloniiandrickhanlonii
jackpopeandjackpope
sebmarkbageandsebmarkbage
mofeiZandmofeiZ
potetoandpoteto
eps1lonandeps1lon