It used to be that in `__DEV__` we wrapped this `renderWithHooks`,
`checkDidRenderIdHook` pair in calls to `setIsRendering()`. However,
that dev-only bookkeeping was removed in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29206 leaving this redundant
check which runs identical code in dev and in prod.
## Test Plan
* Manually confirm both cases are the same
* GitHub CI tests
We use the Update flag to track if a View Transition had any mutations
or relayout. Unlike the other usage of it, this is just temporary state
during the commit phase.
Normally the flags gets used in the render phase and we reset it when we
rerender but in the case of "nested" updates, those trees didn't update.
We're only looking for relayouts. So we need to manually reset it before
we start using it.
We probably shouldn't abuse the Update flag for this and instead use
something like temporary state on ViewTransitionState.
This lets us write them early in the render phase.
This should be safe because even if we write them deeply, then they
still can't be wrapped by a element because then they'd no longer be in
the document scope anymore. They end up flat in the body and so when we
search the content we'll discover them.
## Summary
This fixes how we map priorities between Fabric and the React
reconciler. At the moment, we're only considering default and discrete
priorities, when there's a larger range of priorities available.
In Fabric, we'll test supporting additional priorities soon. For that
test to do something useful, we need the new priorities to be mapped to
reconciler priorities correctly, which is what this change is done.
> [!IMPORTANT]
> At the moment, this is a no-op because Fabric is only reporting
default and discrete event priorities.
## How did you test this change?
Will test e2e on React Native on top of
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/50627
The changes are gated in React Native, so we'll use that feature flag to
test this.
Stacked on #32838.
We don't always type the Props of built-ins. This adds typing for most
of the built-ins.
When we did type them, we used to put it in the `ReactFiber...Component`
files but any public API like this can be implemented in other renderers
too such as Fizz. So I moved them to `shared/ReactTypes` which is where
we put other public API types (that are not already built-in to Flow).
That way Fizz can import them and assert properly when it accesses the
props.
This rule currently has a few false positives, so let's disable it for
now (just in the eslint rule, it's still enabled in the compiler) while
we iterate on it.
Uses `&` for Activity as opposed to `$` for Suspense. This will be used
to delimitate which nodes we can skip hydrating.
This isn't used on the client yet. It's just a noop on the client
because it's just an unknown comment. This just adds the SSR parts.
Activity is a client component, but you should still be able to import
it and render it from a Server Component. Same as what we do with other
types like Suspense and ViewTransition.
Even if the `enableSuspenseyImages` flag is off.
Started View Transitions already wait for Suspensey Fonts and this is
another Suspensey feature that is even more important for View
Transitions - even though we eventually want it all the time. So this
uses `<ViewTransition>` as an early opt-in for that tree into Suspensey
Images, which we can ship in a minor.
If you're doing an update inside a ViewTransition then we're eligible to
start a ViewTransition in any Transition that might suspend. Even if
that doesn't end up animating after all, we still consider it Suspensey.
We could try to suspend inside the startViewTransition but that's not
how it would work with `enableSuspenseyImages` on and we can't do that
for startGestureTransition.
Even so we still need some opt-in to trigger the Suspense fallback even
before we know whether we'll animate or not. So the simple solution is
just that `<ViewTransition>` opts in the whole subtree into Suspensey
Images in general.
In this PR I disable `enableSuspenseyImages` in experimental so that we
can instead test the path that only enables it inside `<ViewTransition>`
tree since that's the path that would next graduate to a minor.
Behind the `enableSrcObject` flag. This is revisiting a variant of what
was discussed in #11163.
Instead of supporting the [`srcObject`
property](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMediaElement/srcObject)
as a separate name, this adds an overload of `src` to allow objects to
be passed. The DOM needs to add separate properties for the object forms
since you read back but it doesn't make sense for React's write-only API
to do that. Similar to how we'll like add an overload for
`popoverTarget` instead of calling it `popoverTargetElement` and how
`style` accepts an object and it's not `styleObject={{...}}`.
There are a number of reason to revisit this.
- It's just way more convenient to have this built-in and it makes
conceptual sense. We typically support declarative APIs and polyfill
them when necessary.
- RSC supports Blobs and by having it built-in you don't need a Client
Component wrapper to render it where as doing it with effects would
require more complex wrappers. By picking Blobs over base64,
client-navigations can use the more optimized binary encoding in the RSC
protocol.
- The timing aspect of coordinating it with Suspensey images and image
decoding is a bit tricky to get right because if you set it in an effect
it's too late because you've already rendered it.
- SSR gets complicated when done in user space because you have to
handle both branches. Likely with `useSyncExternalStore`.
- By having it built-in we could optimize the payloads shared between
RSC payloads embedded in the HTML and data URLs.
This does not support objects for `<source src>` nor `<img srcset>`.
Those don't really have equivalents in the DOM neither. They're mainly
for picking an option when you don't know programmatically. However, for
this use case you're really better off picking a variant before
generating the blobs.
We may support Response objects in the future too as per
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/49
When `startTime` still has its initial value of `-1.1` we must not call
`logComponentMount`. This can occur when rendering a `'next/dynamic'`
component with `{ssr: false}` in a client component, for example.
Unfortunately, I didn't manage to reproduce this scenario in a unit
test.
Safari has a bug where if you put a block element inside an inline
element and the inline element has a `view-transition-name` assigned it
finds it as duplicate names.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290923
This adds a warning if we detect this scenario in dev mode.
For the case where it renders into a single block, we can model this by
making the parent either `block` or `inline-block` automatically to fix
the issue. So we do that to automatically cover simple cases like
`<a><div>...</div></a>`. This unfortunately causes layout/styling thrash
so we might want to delete it once the bug has been fixed in enough
Safari versions.
Found a bug that occurs during a specific combination of very subtle
implementation details.
It occurs sometimes (not always) when 1) a transition is scheduled
during a popstate event, and 2) as a result, a new value is passed to an
already-mounted useDeferredValue hook.
The fix is relatively straightforward, and I found it almost
immediately; it took a bit longer to figure out exactly how the scenario
occurred in production and create a test case to simulate it.
Rather than couple the test to the implementation details, I've chosen
to keep it as high-level as possible so that it doesn't break if the
details change. In the future, it might not be trigger the exact set of
internal circumstances anymore, but it could be useful for catching
similar bugs because it represents a realistic real world situation —
namely, switching tabs repeatedly in an app that uses useDeferredValue.
We've known we've wanted this for many years and most of the
implementation was already done for Suspensey CSS. This waits to commit
until images have decoded by default or up to 500ms timeout (same as
suspensey fonts).
It only applies to Transitions, Retries (Suspense), Gesture Transitions
(flag) and Idle (doesn't exist). Sync updates just commit immediately.
`<img loading="lazy" src="..." />` opts out since you explicitly want it
to load lazily in that case.
`<img onLoad={...} src="..." />` also opts out since that implies you're
ok with managing your own reveal.
In the future, we may add an opt in e.g. `<img blocking="render"
src="..." />` that opts into longer timeouts and re-suspends even sync
updates. Perhaps also triggering error boundaries on errors.
The rollout for this would have to go in a major and we may have to
relax the default timeout to not delay too much by default. However, we
can also make this part of `enableViewTransition` so that if you opt-in
by using View Transitions then those animations will suspend on images.
That we could ship in a minor.
Stacked on #32815.
To be able to differentiate mounted subtrees from updated subtrees. This
adds a yellow entry above the component subtree that mounted. This is
added both to the render phase, mutation effect phase, layout effect
phase and passive effect phase.
<img width="962" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-03 at 10 41 02 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13777347-07e8-458c-9127-8675ef08b54f"
/>
Ideally we could probably give an annotation to the component instead of
adding a whole other line which is also a color that's kind of
distracting. However, not all components are included and keeping track
of which one is the first one below is kind of annoying. Adding a marker
to all components is kind of noisy. So this is a compromise. It's only
one per depth so it won't make it too deep even on larger trees.
If this is an unmount, those are added to the mutation effect phase for
the layout unmounts and passive unmount effect phase. Since these never
have a render, they're not in the render phase.
<img width="1010" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-03 at 11 05 57 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ab39f27e-13be-4281-94fa-9391bb293fd2"
/>
For showing / hiding `<Activity>` the terminology "Reconnect" and
"Disconnect" is used instead.
This fixes two bugs with commit phase effect tracking.
I missed, or messed up the rebase for, deletion effects when a subtree
was deleted and for passive disconnects when a subtree was hidden.
The other bug is that when I started using self time
(componentEffectDuration) for color and for determining whether to
bother logging an entry, I didn't consider that the component with
effects can have children which end up resetting this duration before we
log. Which lead to most effects not having their components logged since
they almost always have children.
We don't necessarily have to push/pop but we have to store at least one
thing on the stack unfortunately. That's because we have to do the
actual log after the children to get the right end time. So might as
well use the push/pop strategy like the rest of them.
Native only. Displays the native tag for Native Host components inside a
badge, when user inspects the component.
Only displaying will be supported for now, because in order to get
native tags indexable, they should be part of the bridge operations,
which is technically a breaking change that requires significantly more
time investment.
The text will only be shown when user hovers over the badge.
Rename "Suspended" commit to "Suspended on CSS" since that's the only
reason for this particular branch. This will not hold true because with
suspended images and with view transitions those can also be the reason.
So in the future we need to add those.
Only log "Blocked" in the components track if we yield for 3ms or
longer. It's common to have like 1-2ms yield times for various reasons
going on which is not worth the noise to consider "blocking".
Rename "Blocked" to "Update" in the Blocking/Transition tracks. This is
when a setState happens and with stack traces it's where you should look
for the stack trace of the setState. So we want to indicate that this is
the "Update".
I only added the "Blocked" part if we're blocked for more than 5ms
before we can start rendering - indicating that some other track was
working at the same time and preventing us from rendering.
This can happen for example if you have duplicate names in the "old"
state. This errors the transition before the updateCallback is invoked
so we haven't yet applied mutations etc.
This runs through those phases after the error to get us back to a
consistent state.
The problem with setting both `children` or `dangerouslySetInnerHTML`
and also using a ref on a DOM node to either manually append children or
using it as a Container for `createRoot` or `createPortal` is that it's
ambiguous which children should win. Ideally you use one of the four
options to control children. Meaning that ideally you always use a leaf
container for refs like this.
Unfortunately it's very common to use a React owned thing with children
as a Container of a Portal. For example `document.body` can have both
regular React children and be used as a Portal container. This isn't
really fully supported and has some undefined behavior like relative
order isn't guaranteed but still very common.
It is extra bad if the children are a `string`/`number` or if
`dangerouslySetInnerHTML` is set. Because then when ever that reactively
updates it'll clear out any manually added DOM nodes. When this happens
isn't guaranteed. It's always happening as far as the reactivity is
concerned. See https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/31600
Therefore, we should warn for this specific pattern. This still allows
non-text children as a compromise even though that behavior is also
somewhat undefined.
Stacked on #32793.
This is meant to model the intended semantics of `addTransitionType`
better. The previous hack just consumed all transition types when any
root committed so it could steal them from other roots. Really each root
should get its own set. Really each transition lane should get its own
set.
We can't implement the full ideal semantics yet because 1) we currently
entangle transition lanes 2) we lack `AsyncContext` on the client so for
async actions we can't associate a `addTransitionType` call to a
specific `startTransition`.
This starts by modeling Transition Types to be stored on the Transition
instance. Conceptually they belong to the Transition instance of that
`startTransition` they belong to. That instance is otherwise mostly just
used for Transition Tracing but it makes sense that those would be able
to be passed the Transition Types for that specific instance.
Nested `startTransition` need to get entangled. So that this
`addTransitionType` can be associated with the `setState`:
```js
startTransition(() => {
startTransition(() => {
addTransitionType(...)
});
setState(...);
});
```
Ideally we'd probably just use the same Transition instance itself since
these are conceptually all part of one entangled one. But transition
tracing uses multiple names and start times. Unclear what we want to do
with that. So I kept separate instances but shared `types` set.
Next I collect the types added during a `startTransition` to any root
scheduled with a Transition. This should really be collected one set per
Transition lane in a `LaneMap`. In fact, the information would already
be there if Transition Tracing was always enabled because it tracks all
Transition instances per lane. For now I just keep track of one set for
all Transition lanes. Maybe we should only add it if a `setState` was
done on this root in this particular `startTransition` call rather
having already scheduled any Transition earlier.
While async transitions are entangled, we don't know if there will be a
startTransition+setState on a new root in the future. Therefore, we
collect all transition types while this is happening and if a new root
gets startTransition+setState they get added to that root.
```js
startTransition(async () => {
addTransitionType(...)
await ...;
setState(...);
});
```
Stacked on #32792.
It's tricky to associate a specific `addTransitionType` call to a
specific `startTransition` call because we don't have `AsyncContext` in
browsers yet. However, we can keep track if there are any async
transitions running at all, and if not, warn. This should cover most
cases.
This also errors when inside a React render which might be a legit way
to associate a Transition Type to a specific render (e.g. based on props
changing) but we want to be a more conservative about allowing that yet.
If we wanted to support calling it in render, we might want to set which
Transition object is currently rendering but it's still tricky if the
render has `async function` components. So it might at least be
restricted to sync components (like Hooks).
Stacked on #32788.
Normally we track `addTransitionType` globally because of the async gap
that can happen in Actions where we lack AsyncContext to associate it
with a particular Transition. This unfortunately also means it's
possible to call outside of `startTransition` which is something we want
to warn for.
We need to be able to distinguish whether `addTransitionType` is for a
regular Transition or a Gesture Transition though.
Since `startGestureTransition` is only synchronous we can track it
within that execution scope and move it to a separate set. Since we know
for sure which call owns it we can properly associate it with that
specific provider's `ScheduledGesture`.
This does not yet handle calling `addTransitionType` inside the render
phase of a gesture. That would currently still be associated with the
next Transition instead.
When different animations in a View Transition have different durations,
we shouldn't stretch them out to run the full range of swipe. Because
then they wouldn't line up the same way as when played using plain time.
This adjusts the range start/end to be what it would've been when played
by time. Except since we are playing animations in reverse, the
animation-delay is actually applied from the range end and then the
duration from there to get closer to the start.
Reverse the range if the original animation was reversed.
Interestingly, the range it takes can be adjusted by what is in the
viewport since if a long duration animation is excluded then everything
else adjusts too.
I left some todos too. We really should also handle if the original
animation has multiple iterations. Currently we only play those once.
Stacked on #32785.
This is now replaced by `startGestureTransition` added in #32785.
I also renamed the flag from `enableSwipeTransition` to
`enableGestureTransition` to correspond to the new name.
Stacked on #32783. This will replace [the `useSwipeTransition`
API](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32373).
Instead, of a special Hook, you can make updates to `useOptimistic`
Hooks within the `startGestureTransition` scope.
```
import {unstable_startGestureTransition as startGestureTransition} from 'react';
const cancel = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimistic(...);
}, options);
```
There are some downsides to this like you can't define two directions as
once and there's no "standard" direction protocol. It's instead up to
libraries to come up with their own conventions (although we can suggest
some).
The convention is still that a gesture recognizer has two props `action`
and `gesture`. The `gesture` prop is a Gesture concept which now behaves
more like an Action but 1) it can't be async 2) it shouldn't have
side-effects. For example you can't call `setState()` in it except on
`useOptimistic` since those can be reverted if needed. The `action` is
invoked with whatever side-effects you want after the gesture fulfills.
This is isomorphic and not associated with a specific renderer nor root
so it's a bit more complicated.
To implement this I unify with the `ReactSharedInternal.T` property to
contain a regular Transition or a Gesture Transition (the `gesture`
field). The benefit of this unification means that every time we
override this based on some scope like entering `flushSync` we also
override the `startGestureTransition` scope. We just have to be careful
when we read it to check the `gesture` field to know which one it is.
(E.g. I error for setState / requestFormReset.)
The other thing that's unique is the `cancel` return value to know when
to stop the gesture. That cancellation is no longer associated with any
particular Hook. It's more associated with the scope of the
`startGestureTransition`. Since the schedule of whether a particular
gesture has rendered or committed is associated with a root, we need to
somehow associate any scheduled gestures with a root.
We could track which roots we update inside the scope but instead, I
went with a model where I check all the roots and see if there's a
scheduled gesture matching the timeline. This means that you could
"retain" a gesture across roots. Meaning this wouldn't cancel until both
are cancelled:
```
const cancelA = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimisticOnRootA(...);
}, options);
const cancelB = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimisticOnRootB(...);
}, options);
```
It's more like it's a global transition than associated with the roots
that were updated.
Optimistic updates mostly just work but I now associate them with a
specific "ScheduledGesture" instance since we can only render one at a
time and so if it's not the current one, we leave it for later.
Clean up of optimistic updates is now lazy rather than when we cancel.
Allowing the cancel closure not to have to be associated with each
particular update.
This is some overdue refactoring. The two types never made sense. It
also should be defined by isomorphic since it defines how it should be
used by renderers rather than isomorphic depending on Fiber.
Clean up hidden classes to be consistent.
Fix missing name due to wrong types. I choose not to invoke the
transition tracing callbacks if there's no name since the name is
required there.
This was a template for the 19 beta. Since 19 has been stable for a
while now, we can clean this up. Any bug report for React 19 should use
the standard bug report template.
Portals and `<ViewTransition>` are tricky because they leave the React
tree. You might think of a Portal's container conceptually as also being
part of a React tree but that's not quite how they're modeled today.
They're more like their own roots. So instead, of trying to find a
conceptual place in the React tree we treat Portals as their own root.
We have two ways of tracking whether an update to a ViewTransition
boundary has occurred. Either a DOM mutation has happened within it, or
a resize of a child has caused it to potentially relayout its parent.
Normally that just follows the tree structure of React, but not when
it's a Portal.
When it's a Portal we don't know which DOM parent it might have
affected. For all we know it's at the root (and in fact, in most cases
that's where Portals go).
With this PR we mark the root as having been affected by a mutation or
resize. This means that the whole document will animate and we can't
optimize away from it. This ensures that a mutation to the root of a
Portal doesn't go unanimated with other things are animating such as its
parent.
You can regain this optimization by adding a `<ViewTransition>` boundary
directly inside the Portal itself so it owns its own animation. If that
DOM node is also absolutely positioned it doesn't leak.
Conversely this also means that a mutation inside a Portal doesn't
affect its React parent so it won't trigger its parent's animation if
this was the only thing animating. That could be unfortunate if this
container is actually inside the same React parent. However, because
this would have been an update we would've marked it for "maybe
animating" and updates can't only get their animations cancelled if the
root is cancelled, in practice this will actually animate anyway.
Accidentally broke this when migrating our test runner to use the
bundled build https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32758
The fix is pretty simple. File watcher should listen for changes in
`packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler` instead of `cwd`, which is now
`packages/snap`.
From what we can see, `build-info.json` is a vestigal file that we were
previously including in builds but are no longer since 2022 (see
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/23257, which removes
`build-info.json` which would have broken
scripts/release/build-release-locally-commands/add-build-info-json.js).
Since this file is no longer built, instead of looking it up we default
to the `version` that was passed in as an argument to
scripts/release/prepare-release-from-npm.js. Since `version` is what is
pulled from npm, there should only be 1 consistent version for all the
packages that are pulled. Therefore, only 1 version (eg canary) needs to
be replaced to the new stable version.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32778).
* __->__ #32778
* #32777
Lauren Tan
Jordan Eldredge
Sebastian Markbåge
Rubén Norte
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
michael faith
Andrew Clark
Hendrik Liebau
Jason Zhang
Ruslan Lesiutin
Matt Carroll
Jack Pope
Matt Carroll
mofeiZ