Enable more validations to help catch bad patterns, but only in the linter. These rules are already enabled by default in the compiler _if_ violations could produce unsafe output.
We currently throw away the Error once we've used to the owner stack of
a Fiber once. This maybe helps a bit with memory and redoing it but we
really don't expect most Fibers to hit this at all. It's not very hot.
If we throw away the Error, then we can't use native debugger protocols
to inspect the native stack. Instead, we'd have to maintain a url to
resource map indefinitely like what Chrome DevTools does to map a url to
a resource. Technically it's not even technically correct since the file
path might not be reversible and could in theory conflict.
This adds a "Code Editor" pane for the Chrome extension in the bottom
right corner of the "Sources" panel. If you end up getting linked to the
"Sources" panel from stack traces in console, performance tab, stacks in
React Component tab like the one added in #33954 basically everywhere
there's a link to source code. Then going from there to open in a code
editor should be more convenient. This adds a button to open the current
file.
<img width="1387" height="389" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 10 22
19 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe01f84c-83c2-4639-9b64-4af1a90c3f7d"
/>
This only makes sense in the extensions since in standalone it needs to
always open by default in an editor. Unfortunately Firefox doesn't
support extending the Sources panel.
Chrome is also a bit buggy where it doesn't send a selection update
event when you switch tabs in the Sources panel. Only when the actual
cursor position changes. This means that the link can be lagging behind
sometimes. We also have some general bugs where if React DevTools loses
connection it can break the UI which includes this pane too.
This has a small inline configuration too so that it's discoverable:
<img width="559" height="143" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 10 22 42 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1270bda8-ce10-4f9d-9fcb-080c0198366a"
/>
<img width="527" height="123" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 10 22 30 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/45848c95-afd8-495f-a7cf-eb2f46e698f2"
/>
Since we can't add a separate link to open-in-editor or open-in-sources
everywhere I plan on adding an option to open in editor by default in a
follow up. That option needs to be even more discoverable.
I moved the configuration from the Components settings to the General
settings since this is now a much more general features for opening
links to resources in all types of panes.
<img width="673" height="311" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 10 22 57 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea2c0871-942c-4b55-a362-025835d2c2bd"
/>
If a `file:///` path is specified as the url of a file, like after
source mapping into an ESM file, then we should be able to open it in a
code editor.
In RSC and other stacks now we use a lot of `ReactFunctionLocation` type
to represent the location of a function. I.e. the location of the
beginning of the function (the enclosing line/col) that is represented
by the "Source" of the function. This is also what the parent Component
Stacks represents.
As opposed to `ReactCallSite` which is what normal stack traces and
owner stacks represent. I.e. the line/column number of the callsite into
the next function.
We can start sharing more code by using the `ReactFunctionLocation` type
to represent the component source location and it also helps clarify
which ones are function locations and which ones are callsites as we
start adding more stack traces (e.g. for async debug info and owner
stack traces).
This makes it so you can click the source location itself to view the
source. This is similar styling as the link to jump to function props
like events and actions. We're going to need a lot more linkifying to
jump to various source locations. Also, I always was trying to click
this file anyway.
Hover state:
<img width="485" height="382" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-21 at 4 36 10 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1f0f8f8c-6866-4e62-ab84-1fb5ba012986"
/>
We need a "value" to represent the I/O that was loaded. We don't
normally actually use the Promise at the callsite that started the I/O
because that's usually deep inside internals. Instead we override the
value of the I/O entry with the Promise that was first awaited in user
space. This means that you could potentially have different values
depending on if multiple things await the same I/O. We just take one of
them. (Maybe we should actually just write the first user space awaited
Promise as the I/O entry? This might instead have other implications
like less deduping.)
When you pass a Promise forward, we may skip the awaits that happened in
earlier components because they're not part of the currently rendering
component. That's mainly for the stack and time stamps though. The value
is still probably conceptually the best value because it represents the
I/O value as far user space is concerned.
This writes the I/O early with the first await we find in user space
even if we're not going to use that particular await for the stack.
If you pass a promise to a client component to be rendered `<Client
promise={promise} />` then there's an internal await inside Flight.
There might also be user space awaits but those awaits may already have
happened before we render this component. Conceptually they were part of
the parent component and not this component. It's tricky to attribute
which await should be used for the stack in this case.
If we can't find an await we can use the JSX callsite as the stack
frame.
However, we don't want to do this for simple cases like if you return a
non-native Promise from a Server Component. Since that would now use the
stack of the thing that rendered the Server Component which is worse
than the stack of the I/O. To fix this, I update the
`debugOwner`/`debugTask`/`debugStack` when we start rendering inside the
Server Component. Conceptually these represent the "parent" component
and is used for errors referring to the parent like when we serialize
client component props the parent is the JSX of the client component.
However, when we're directly inside the Server Component we don't have a
callsite of the parent really. Conceptually it would be the return call
of the Server Component. This might negatively affect other types of
errors but I think this is ok since this feature mainly exists for the
case when you enter the child JSX.
This resolves an outstanding issue where it was possible for debug info
and console logs to become out of order if they up blocked. E.g. by a
future reference or a client reference that hasn't loaded yet. Such as
if you console.log a client reference followed by one that doesn't. This
encodes the order similar to how the stream chunks work.
This also blocks the main chunk from resolving until the last debug info
has fully loaded, including future references and client references.
This also ensures that we could send some of that data in a different
stream, since then it can come out of order.
We already do this with `"new Promise"` and `"Promise.then"`. There are
also many helpers that both create promises and awaits other promises
inside of it like `Promise.all`.
The way this is filtered is different from just filtering out all
anonymous stacks since they're used to determine where the boundary is
between ignore listed and user space.
Ideally we'd cover more wrappers that are internal to Promise libraries.
This fixes displaying incorrect component render entries on a timeline,
when we are reconnecting passive effects.
### Before
<img width="2318" height="1127" alt="1"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b6b2824-d2de-43a3-8615-2c45d67c3668"
/>
The cloned nodes will persist original `actualStartTime`, when these
were first mounted. When we "replay", the end time will be "now" or
whatever the actual start time of the sibling. Depending on when this is
being recorded, the diff between end and start could be tens of seconds
and doesn't represent what React was doing.
We shouldn't log these entries at all.
### After
We are only logging newly finished renders, but could potentially loose
renders that never commit.
## Summary
The `TSAsExpression` and `TSNonNullExpression` nodes are supported by
`lowerExpression()` but `isReorderableExpression()` does not check if
they can be reordered. This PR updates `isReorderableExpression()` to
handle these two node types by adding cases that fall through to the
existing `TypeCastExpression` case.
We ran `react-compiler-healthcheck` at scale on several of our repos and
found dozens of `` (BuildHIR::node.lowerReorderableExpression)
Expression type `TSAsExpression` cannot be safely reordered`` errors and
a handful for `TSNonNullExpression`.
## How did you test this change?
In this case I added two fixture tests
React Elements reference debug data (their stack and owner) in the debug
channel. If the debug channel isn't wired up this can block the client
from resolving.
We can infer that if there's no debug channel wired up and the reference
wasn't emitted before the element, then it's probably because it's in
the debug channel. So we can skip it.
This should also apply to debug chunks but they're not yet blocking
until #33665 lands.
Summary:
useEffectEvent is meant to be used specifically in combination with
useEffect, and using
the feature in arbitrary closures can lead to surprising reactivity
semantics. In order to
minimize risk in the experimental rollout, we are going to restrict its
usage to being
called directly inside an effect or another useEffectEvent, effectively
enforcing the function
coloring statically. Without an effect system this is the best we can
do.
This lets us pass a writable on the server side and readable on the
client side to send debug info through a separate channel so that it
doesn't interfere with the main payload as much. The main payload refers
to chunks defined in the debug info which means it's still blocked on it
though. This ensures that the debug data has loaded by the time the
value is rendered so that the next step can forward the data.
This will be a bit fragile to race conditions until #33665 lands.
Another follow up needed is the ability to skip the debug channel on the
receiving side. Right now it'll block forever if you don't provide one
since we're blocking on the debug data.
When postponing the root we encode the segment Id into the postponed
state but we should really be reseting it to zero so we can restart the
counter from the beginning when the resume is actually just a re-render.
This also no longer assigns the root segment id based on the postponed
state when resuming the root for the same reason. In the future we may
use the embedded replay segment id if we implement resuming the root
without re-rendering everything but that is not yet implemented or
planned.
import, export, and TS namespace statements can only be used at the
top-level of a module, which is enforced by parsers already. Here we add
a backup validation of that. As of this PR, we now have only major
statement type (class declarations) listed as a todo.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33748).
* #33753
* #33752
* #33751
* #33750
* __->__ #33748
Supports inline enum declarations in both Flow and TS by treating the
node as pass-through (enums can't capture values mutably). Related, this
PR extends the set of type-related declarations that we ignore.
Previously we threw a todo for things like DeclareClass or
DeclareVariable, but these are type related and can simply be dropped
just like we dropped TypeAlias.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33747).
* #33753
* #33752
* #33751
* #33750
* #33748
* __->__ #33747
In playground it's helpful to show all errors, even those that don't
completely abort compilation. For example, to help demonstrate that the
compiler catches things like setState in effects. This detects these
errors and ensures we show them.
This is the same as we do for currently rendering tasks. They get
effectively sync aborted when the listener is invoked.
We potentially miss out on some debug info in that case but that would
only apply to any entries inside the stream which doesn't really have
their own debug info anyway.
Follow up to #33736.
If we need to save on CPU/memory pressure, we can instead just pray and
hope that a Promise doesn't get garbage collected before we need to read
it.
This can cause fragile access to the Promise value in devtools
especially if it's a slow and pressured render.
Basically, you'd have to hope that GC doesn't run after the inner await
finishes its microtask callback and before the resolution of the
component being rendered is invoked.
If we have the ability to lazy load Promise values, i.e. if we have a
debug channel, then we should always use it for Promises that aren't
already resolved and instrumented.
There's little downside to this since they're async anyway.
This also lets us avoid adding `.then()` listeners too early. E.g. if
adding the listener would have side-effect. This avoids covering up
"unhandled rejection" errors. Since if we listen to a promise eagerly,
including reject listeners, we'd have marked that Promise's rejection as
handled where as maybe it wouldn't have been otherwise.
In this mode we can also indefinitely wait for the Promise to resolve
instead of just waiting a microtask for it to resolve.
We use the stack of a Promise as the start of the I/O instead of the
actual I/O since that can symbolize the start of the operation even if
the actual I/O is batched, deduped or pooled. It can also group multiple
I/O operations into one.
We want the deepest possible Promise since otherwise it would just be
the Component's Promise.
However, we don't really need deeper than the boundary between first
party and third party. We can't just take the outer most that has third
party things on the stack though because third party can have callbacks
into first party and then we want the inner one. So we take the inner
most Promise that depends on I/O that has a first party stack on it.
The realization is that for the purposes of determining whether we have
a first party stack we need to ignore async stack frames. They can
appear on the stack when we resume third party code inside a resumption
frame of a first party stack.
<img width="832" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 6 34 25 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1636f980-be4c-4340-ad49-8d2b31953436"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Sebbie Silbermann <sebastian.silbermann@vercel.com>
We don't really need to retain a reference to whatever Promise another
Promise was created in. Only awaits need to retain both their trigger
and their previous context.
When we know that the object that we pass in is immediately parsed, then
we know it couldn't have been reified into a unstructured stack yet. In
this path we assume that we'll trigger `Error.prepareStackTrace`.
Since we know that nobody else will read the stack after us, we can skip
generating a string stack and just return empty. We can also skip
caching.
If we're about to defer an object, then we shouldn't store a reference
to it because then we can end up deduping by referring to the deferred
string. If in a different context, we should still be able to emit the
object.
We currently inline IIFEs by creating a temporary and a labeled block w
the original code. The original return statements turn into an
assignment to the temporary and break out of the label. However, many
cases of IIFEs are due to inlining of manual `useMemo()`, and these
cases often have only a single return statement. Here, the output is
cleaner if we avoid the temporary and label - so that's what we do in
this PR.
Note that the most complex part of the change is actually around
ValidatePreserveExistingMemo - we have some logic to track the IIFE
temporary reassignmetns which needs to be updated to handle the simpler
version of inlining.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33726).
* __->__ #33726
* #33725
This is an optimized version of @asmjmp0's fix in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/31940. When we merge consecutive
blocks we need to take care to rewrite later phis whose operands will
now be different blocks due to merging. Rather than iterate all the
blocks on each merge as in #31940, we can do a single iteration over all
the phis at the end to fix them up.
Note: this is a redo of #31959
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33725).
* #33726
* __->__ #33725
This is a compromise because there can be a lot of Promise instances
created. They're useful because they generally provide a better stack
when batching/pooled connections are used.
This restores stack collection for I/O nodes so we have something to
fallback on if there's no owner.
That way we can at least get a name or something out of I/O that was
spawned outside a render but mostly avoids collecting starting I/O
outside of render.
Because the object limit is unfortunately depth first due to limitations
of JSON stringify, we need to ensure that things we really don't want
outlined are first in the enumeration order.
We add the stack length to the object limit to ensure that the stack
frames aren't outlined. In console all the user space arguments are at
the end of the args. In server component props, the props are at the end
of the properties of the element.
For the `value` of I/O we had it before the stack so it could steal the
limit from the stack. The fix is to put it at the end.
We unnecessarily render the preamble in a task. This updates the
implementation to perform this render inline.
Testing this is tricky because one of the only ways you could assert
this was even happening is based on how things error if you abort while
rendering the root.
While adding a test for this I discovered that not all abortable tasks
report errors when aborted during a normal render. I've asserted the
current behavior and will address the other issue at another time and
updated the assertion later as necessary
When a debug channel is available, we now allow objects to be lazily
requested though the debug channel and only then will the server send
it.
The client will actually eagerly ask for the next level of objects once
it parses its payload. That way those objects have likely loaded by the
time you actually expand that deep e.g. in the console repl. This is
needed since the console repl is synchronous when you ask it to invoke
getters.
Each level is lazily parsed which means that we don't parse the next
level even though we eagerly loaded it. We parse it once the getter is
invoked (in Chrome DevTools you have to click a little `(...)` to invoke
the getter). When the getter is invoked, the chunk is initialized and
parsed. This then causes the next level to be asked for through the
debug channel. Ensuring that if you expand one more level you can do so
synchronously.
Currently debug chunks are eagerly parsed, which means that if you have
things like server component props that are lazy they can end up being
immediately asked for, but I'm trying to move to make the debug chunks
lazy.
We need to optimize the collection of debug info for dev mode. This is
an incredibly hot path since it instruments all I/O and Promises in the
app.
These optimizations focus primarily on the collection of stack traces.
They are expensive to collect because we need to eagerly collect the
stacks since they can otherwise cause memory leaks. We also need to do
some of the processing of them up front. We also end up only using a few
of them in the end but we don't know which ones we'll use.
The first compromise here is that I now only collect the stacks of
"awaits" if they were in a specific request's render. In some cases it's
useful to collect them even outside of this if they're part of a
sequence that started early. I still collect stacks for the created
Promises outside of this though which can still provide some context.
The other optimization to awaits, is that since we'll only use the inner
most one that had an await directly in userspace, we can stop collecting
stacks on a chain of awaits after we find one. This requires a quick
filter on a single callsite to determine. Since we now only collect
stacks from awaits that belongs to a specific Request we can use that
request's specific filter option. Technically this might not be quite
correct if that same thing ends up deduped across Requests but that's an
edge case.
Additionally, I now stop collecting stack for I/O nodes. They're almost
always superseded by the Promise that wraps them anyway. Even if you
write mostly Promise free code, you'll likely end up with a Promise at
the root of the component eventually anyway and then you end up using
its stack anyway. You have to really contort the code to end up with
zero Promises at which point it's not very useful anyway. At best it's
maybe mostly useful for giving a name to the I/O when the rest is just
stuff like `new Promise`.
However, a possible alternative optimization could be to *only* collect
the stack of spawned I/O and not the stack of Promises. The issue with
Promises (not awaits) is that we never know what will end up resolving
them in the end when they're created so we have to always eagerly
collect stacks. This could be an issue when you have a lot of
abstractions that end up not actually be related to I/O at all. The
issue with collecting stacks only for I/O is that the actual I/O can be
pooled or batched so you end up not having the stack when the conceptual
start of each operation within the batch started. Which is why I decided
to keep the Promise stack.
Joe Savona
Sebastian Markbåge
Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann
Jordan Brown
Rubén Norte
Ruslan Lesiutin
Jack Pope
Henry Q. Dineen
Josh Story
Joseph Savona
Ricky