Summary:
The new C++ Differ has been validated on Android and iOS. Delete the old code path.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D28904330
fbshipit-source-id: 2e0d8682f6b2a79f9758ed8b7b92809060835815
Summary:
Changes in following diffs will be gated by this feature flag.
The differ in the new file is copied from the current stable implementation and will not be modified until it's deleted.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D27775698
fbshipit-source-id: 03d9518ffd2b1f25712386c56a38bd2b4d839fc2
Summary:
See react_native_assert.{h,cpp}. Because of the BUCK+Android issue where NDEBUG is always defined, we use react_native_assert instead of assert to enable xplat asserts in debug/dev mode.
This migrates most of the codebase, but probably not 100%. The goal is to increase assertion coverage on Android, not to get to 100% (yet).
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D26562866
fbshipit-source-id: a7bf2055b973e1d3650ed8d68a6d02d556604af9
Summary:
Before this change, `mountingOverrideDelegate` was proxied via `Scheduler::startSurface` and `ShadowTree::ShadowTree` constructor down to `MountingCordinator`. Now we set it on the `MountingCoordinator` directly.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D26049076
fbshipit-source-id: 7f1ecf2c8b6f264a7e59d19881464fe529c53d30
Summary:
After fixing `calculateShadowViewMutationsForNewTree` I realized that it will be even better to test Stacking Context and mutation instructions infra using both functions: `calculateShadowViewMutationsForNewTree` (used for testing) and the Differentiator itself. This diff implements it.
Now we have two similarly working functions with different implementations that we can use for testing Differentiator and other parts of the infra.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D25576922
fbshipit-source-id: 7922e9ebfb9d6ef1792566554ba0c4a14f835ae2
Summary:
The "reparenting differ" has been the default differ for several months; ship it by removing config and the old differ.
Some functions can't be deleted yet because unit testing relies on it heavily; this can be refactored in the future if we care a lot.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D25257205
fbshipit-source-id: 6f1dcc490bb1efe3d12506addf5f0843ca48c5c6
Summary:
Currently, MountingCoordinator's RN_SHADOW_TREE_INTROSPECTION code will crash often because it assumes there is always a "new" tree to compare the old tree to. In the LayoutAnimations context this is not always the case - in fact, the majority of the time, LayoutAnimations is producing mutations for animation without a "new" tree.
Just check that the tree exists before trying to print it.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D23747289
fbshipit-source-id: a1ba22aeae32ed8915a53bc33cdc199e8ce5128a
Summary:
In MountingCoordinator override mode (used in LayoutAnimations) we must set the start and end `diff` time when no real diff happens, otherwise we will hit an assert in telemetry later.
I also ensure that the TransactionNumber is incremented in that case.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D23746684
fbshipit-source-id: b1fe3864e453fdba89d43cc827bd37434abf7a4d
Summary:
The implementation of this class is too complex for the purpose it serves. Making it simpler will make the code simpler and faster.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D23725688
fbshipit-source-id: 5e1ecddb0dd3c4c4f94786e2ba0af9b67e7426ce
Summary:
Shadow tree introspection was disabled for a while, now we need it back working. This diff also restructures the logic of `MountingCoordinator::pullTransaction()` splitting it into two sections, first one for the base case and the second for the overriding case.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D23374948
fbshipit-source-id: 0b5f1c598975bceb3dcb6a0eaee67ff58ef9dda1
Summary:
Just renaming, nothing more.
The idea of MountingTelemetry already grown to something bigger than just mounting telemetry, so we are renaming it.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D23374947
fbshipit-source-id: f60ce38b75d1ce77498b84688e59598314c69a78
Summary:
# Summary
In previous diffs earlier in 2020, we made changes to detect and optimize reordering of views when the order of views changed underneath the same parent.
However, until now we have ignored reparenting and there's evidence of issues because of that. Because Fabric flattens views more aggressively, reparenting is also marginally more likely to happen.
This diff introduces a very general Reparenting detection. It will work with view flattening/unflattening, as well as tree grafting - subtrees moved to entirely different parts of the tree, not just a single
parent disappearing or reappearing because of flattening/unflattening.
There is also another consideration: previously, we were generating strictly too many Create+Delete operations that were redundant and could cause consistency issues, crashes, or bugs on platforms that do not handle that gracefully -
especially since the ordering of the Create+Delete is not guaranteed (a reparented view could be created "first" and then the differ could later issue a "delete" for the same view).
Intuition behind how it works: we know the cases where we can detect reparenting: it's when nodes are *not* matched up with another node from the other tree, and we're either trying to delete an entire subtree, or create an entire subtree. For perf reasons, we generate whatever set of operations comes first (say, we generate all the Delete and Remove instructions) and take note in the `ReparentingMetadata` data-structure that Delete and/or Remove have been performed for each tag (if ordering is different, we do the same for Create+Insert if those come first). Then if we later detect a corresponding subtree creation/deletion, we don't generate those mutations and we mark the previous mutations for deletion. This incurs some map lookup cost, but this is only wasteful for commits where a large tree is deleted and a large tree is created, without reparenting.
We may be able to improve perf further for certain edge-cases in the future.
# Why can't we solve this in JS?
Two things:
1. We certainly can avoid reparenting situations in JS, but it's trickier than before because of Fabric's view flattening logic - product engineers would have to think much harder about how to prevent reparenting in the general case.
2. In the case of specific views like BottomSheet that may crash if they're reparented, the solution is to make sure that the BottomSheet and the first child of the BottomSheet is never memoized, so that lifecycle functions and render are called more often; and that in every render, the BottomSheet manually clones its child, so that when the Views are recreated, the child of the BottomSheet has a tag and is an entirely different instance. This is certainly possible to do but feels like an onerous requirement for product teams, and it could be challenging to track down every specific BottomSheet that is memoized and/or hoist them higher in the view hierarchy so they're not reparented as often.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D23123575
fbshipit-source-id: 2fa7e1f026f87b6f0c60cad469a3ba85cdc234de
Summary:
This diff moves fabric C++ code from ReactCommon/fabric to ReactCommon/react/renderer
As part of this diff I also refactored components, codegen and callsites on CatalystApp, FB4A and venice
Script: P137350694
changelog: [internal] internal refactor
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D22852139
fbshipit-source-id: f85310ba858b6afd81abfd9cbe6d70b28eca7415
Joshua Gross
Valentin Shergin
David Vacca