Summary:
This PR fixes an edge case where `prepare_hermes_workspace` job was using a commit to build hermes but `build_hermes_macos` was using a different one. This resulted in cache poisoning where subsequent jobs thoughts to be using a version of Hermes while the restored cache was loading a different one.
<img width="1440" alt="Screenshot 2022-08-03 at 06 26 14" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11162307/182570809-5c6d9323-c3fb-4834-952f-7d07b99c4880.png">
This PR simplifies the flow, creating a single `.hermesversion` file in the `prepare_hermes_workspace` workspace and using that file as key for all the caches.
## Changelog
[iOS] [Changed] - upload test result as artifact
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34329
Test Plan:
CircleCI is now green and all the caches are using the same file to create the checksum.
We can verify that by looking at the `Save cache`/`Restore cache` commands related to Hermes. (In the workflow, their hash is always `B1NEL0P0OKhQYtk8DE150bXSoGrdWUweedHKmqNqnjo`)
Also, we removed completely the code that could create a version misalignment.
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D38382895
Pulled By: cipolleschi
fbshipit-source-id: 5f5501a7ef313eb56abda336716b24b486a34a1f
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34034.
The FlatList doesn't call renderItem on nullish values when numColumns > 1, but it does when numColumns is not set (or equals 1).
I think the behavior should be consistent, so I updated the code so renderItems is called for every items.
I believe the condition `item != null` was here to make sure renderItem isn't called for index outside of data range, so I replaced it with `itemIndex < data.length`.
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/wiki/Changelog
-->
[General] [Fixed] - Fix FlatList not calling render items for nullish values when numColumns > 1
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34205
Test Plan:
- I added a failing test corresponding to the issue, and the test now succeeds.
- I used the same code as in the test on a newly initialized app on RN 0.69 and made sure renderItem was called for every items as expected.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D38185103
Pulled By: lunaleaps
fbshipit-source-id: 4baa55caef9574c91c43c047f9e419016ceb39db
Summary:
Changelog:
[Android][Fixed] - Fix regression when setting shadow node properties.
Also simplified the corresponding macros to avoid using lambdas altogether, as they are not required.
Note that this **does not** modify any constexpr-related semantics of the existing code, as the main constexpr macro, `CONSTEXPR_RAW_PROPS_KEY_HASH` evaluation result is still contstexpr value, and the other ones already involved non-const parts (see my comments).
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D38356411
fbshipit-source-id: 22c330d3425c8aed36693f4652f1b257d2dc96be
Summary:
Some custom logic is applied to workaround a platform bug where velocity may be incorrect on Android P. [The bug in question](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/112385925) appears to have been fixed before Android `Q` was released, so we shouldn't *need* to apply the workaround on other versions.
As described in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34226 the workaround can adversely affect certain scroll behaviors, which can easily be reproduced when you briefly scroll one direction then quickly fling the opposite direction (see the video in the linked ticket).
This PR changes the workaround to *only* be applied on Android P, in order to avoid causing weird scroll behavior on versions that are not actually affected by the bug the workaround is working around.
## Changelog
```
[Android] [Fixed] - Fix occasionally incorrect ScrollView fling behavior
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34233
Test Plan:
- Repro the strange fling behavior in the current version (See video attached in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34226)
- Verify that the string fling behavior is fixed with this patch
- Verify that fling behavior still works as expected on Android versions affected by the [original bug](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/112385925), and those immediately following it (to verify that the bug being worked around was, in fact, fixed as expected).
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D38287277
Pulled By: ryancat
fbshipit-source-id: 2c786872c4d41655b3849bb92e02f1f16c663b41
Summary:
This PR runs eslint in PR using Danger.
## Changelog
[General] [Changed] - Run ESLint in CI
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34305
Test Plan:
1. Add a JS lint error in the package/react-native-codegen package.
2. Observe the CI task post a message with the errors
3. Fix the errors
4. Observe the CI task report completion with no errors
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D38315268
Pulled By: cipolleschi
fbshipit-source-id: 9984402ee427dd62d47dd716f73c030e6d0f7b5e
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
`_createViewToken()` is called during state changes. Use explicit props passed in.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Thread props to _createViewToken()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38294339
fbshipit-source-id: dc215e267f126a3789742c14c35479f509822710
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
`_onCellFocusCapture()` derives state from existing state, so it should be wrapped in a state updater to compare against the latest value in the batch.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Use correct form of setState() in _onCellFocusCapture()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293583
fbshipit-source-id: 1d0e5152e6c1757408e39dff225e07accc5ee49f
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
Use supplied props in `_keyExtractor()`, which is used to map between frame index and identity.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Thread props to _keyExtractor()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293586
fbshipit-source-id: e50823bacdf45adad3b8b655d66d305a1762e9b8
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
This forwards props to `__getFrameMetricsApprox()` and `_getFrameMetrics()` . This is called in a variery of places, so we need to pass `FrameMetricProps` through more places, and update public/test usage.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Thread props to __getFrameMetrics()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293591
fbshipit-source-id: c1499d722b69eb4b5953124ee8b8c3d15e912d93
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
Use passed props in `computeWindowedRenderLimits()`, which is called during a state update.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Thread props to computeWindowedRenderLimits()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293588
fbshipit-source-id: 1330a003c1354bbd63c0b7b33a013e85e96fdc64
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
Change `_updateViewableItems()` to accept an explicit set of props, and a CellRenderMask, instead of using `this.props` and `this.state`. The eventual sink are the `_getFrameMetric*` functions, so a minimal projection of props is added that we can pass through to it.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Changed] - Move Props to VirtualizedListProps
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293587
fbshipit-source-id: 164fd4af7c370d905af53b0e9aafb3592d8659cc
Summary:
Fix macro errors for Windows. Current syntax breaks the build of the React Common project on Windows because the ({...}) syntax is not supported; must be replaced with lambda expressions.
Resolves https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34090
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://reactnative.dev/contributing/changelogs-in-pull-requests
-->
[General] [Fixed] - Fix macro errors for Windows.
lyahdav JoshuaGross
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34299
Test Plan: Build on react-native-windows repo. Tested in RNW app.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D38272966
Pulled By: NickGerleman
fbshipit-source-id: e76eac11cde173ef49465d01d793c593017f2ab7
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
Remove `this.props` usage during state update where we can just use the props directly.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Remove _isVirtualizationDisabled()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293589
fbshipit-source-id: af18f867fc880d5363134fe0d6f985efaf8be6c5
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
This moves public VirtualizedList types to a new file, shared between both `VirtualizedList`, and `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. This allows us to make public interface changes in a single place.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Changed] - Move Props to VirtualizedListProps
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293585
fbshipit-source-id: 344d94466a2741ee67eb5754de5506eb3e265c5b
Summary:
This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change.
## Diff Summary
Replace usages of `this.state` and `this.props` where we are already passed the newer revision of the state we want.
## Stack Summary
`VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc.
From: https://reactjs.org/docs/state-and-lifecycle.html#state-updates-may-be-asynchronous
---
> React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
```
// Wrong
this.setState({
counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment,
});
```
> To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
```
// Correct
this.setState((state, props) => ({
counter: state.counter + props.increment
}));
```
---
`_updateCellsToRender()` transitively calls many functions which will read directly from `this.props` or `this.state` instead of the value passed by the state updater. This intermittently fires invariant violations, when there is a mismatch.
This diff migrates all usages of `props` and `state` during state update to the values provied in `setState()`. To prevent future mismatch, and to provide better clarity on when it is safe to use `this.props`, `this.state`, I overrode `setState` to fire an invariant violation if it is accessed when it is unsafe to:
{F756963772}
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Remove bad usage in _adjustCellsAroundViewport()
Reviewed By: genkikondo
Differential Revision: D38293584
fbshipit-source-id: 807f36600d2fd82c87205195dd61956785bdbd2c
Summary:
This diff fixes the bug T127619309 by exit early during calculateTransformedFrames if currentShadowNode cannot be casted
This is a bug that fired in fb4a but we didn't have a way to reproduce locally.
We are going to release this and enable feature flag with a MC
changelog: [internal] internal
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D38280674
fbshipit-source-id: 1c42c17678d8473564e4075a78d3c688efed1a23
Summary:
While doing some testing with cipolleschi on React Native 0.70.0 we realized that custom Java Package is not properly propagated when invoking codegen for external libraries.
This PR fixes it.
## Changelog
[Internal] - Introduce findPackageJsonFile to address issue with GenerateCodegenArtifactsTaskTest
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34321
Test Plan: Added JUnit tests + Tested locally with cipolleschi
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D38314770
Pulled By: cortinico
fbshipit-source-id: ec2de1ba59ffc8fb0644f422521ced642b38d2c7
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34307
There are unreleased changes on eslint-config-react-native-community, I'm bumping the version for this package so we can publish it.
Changelog:
[General] [Changed] - Bump eslint-config-react-native-community
Reviewed By: dmitryrykun
Differential Revision: D38279512
fbshipit-source-id: 46492f7e99d31c0a5917d41726ecc20fada1582f
Summary:
Calculation of TransformedFrames was a method introduced by D37994809 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/64528e5faa445907b8287b412c344f30c20fca61) to fix rendering of inverted flat lists.
We found that this operation is crashing in fb4a causing the UBN T127619309
This diff creates a feature flag to disable the calculation of TransformedFrames in Layoutable ShadowNodes. **The goal of this diff is to revert the behavior introduced by D37994809 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/64528e5faa445907b8287b412c344f30c20fca61)**
The featureFlag is disabled in fb4a and enabled in react AR (because ReactAr apps relies on the calculation of TransformedFrames and these apps are not affected)
The root cause of the bug will be fixed by D38280674 (which still requires more testing and investigation)
changelog: [internal] internal
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D38286857
fbshipit-source-id: 721cd0554ae6a6b369b3f8dbb584160a270d0f18
Summary:
This change adds the following methods to jsi::BigInt
* [static] fromInt64(value): creates a jsi::BigInt from a signed 64-bit value
* [static] fromUint64(value): creates a jsi::BigInt from an unsigned 64-bit value
* [static] strictEquals(a, b): return a === b, a and b are BigInts
* asInt64(): truncates the BigInt to a single signed 64-bit integer; throws a JSIException if the truncation is lossy.
* getInt64(): truncates the BigInt to a single signed 64-bit integer
* isInt64(): returns true if the BigInt can be truncated losslessly to an int64_t
* asUint64(): truncates the BigInt to a single unsigned 64-bit integer; throws a JSIException if the truncation is lossy.
* getUint64(): truncates the BigInt to a single unsigned 64-bit integer
* isUint64(): returns true if the BigInt can be truncated losslessly to an uint64_t
* toString(radix): converts the BigInt to a string representing the number in the given radix.
A lossy truncation is one that yields a result from which the BigInt cannot be reconstructed from, i.e.,
* BigInt::fromInt64(b.toInt64()) !== b
* BigInt::fromUint64(b.toUint64()) !== b
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: kodafb
Differential Revision: D37909139
fbshipit-source-id: 172848024f8367aed73cc602f38cde22f03cac8f
Summary:
The `codegenConfig` unified configuration for New Architecture on Android relies on the Gradle plugin finding the package.json correctly. Currently we use the `root` folder to resolve the package.json. This works fine when invoking the codegen for the app module, but it doesn't work well when invoking the codegen for modules.
This extends the algo to make sure we first, look for a `package.json` in `..` and fallback to the one in the root if not found.
## Changelog
[Internal] - Improve package.json search mechanism for codegenConfig support
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34298
Test Plan: It's hard to write a unit test for this as it's inside a lambda, I'll look into doing this though. I've tested this on RNNewArchitectureApp and it works fine.
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D38249663
Pulled By: cortinico
fbshipit-source-id: 3cfd6a31e9f75d7b19b15f77bbd5131af42be9d3
Summary:
While I was working on rewriting `react-native-slider` to Fabric I found a weird bug that prevented the slider to be set as disabled (to be exact: call the method `slider.setEnabled(false)`. As it turned out the `accessibilityState` (with value: `accessibilityState={{disabled: true}}` prop occurred after the `enabled={false}` prop that I was passing to the slider, which lead to both of this props overwrite each other.
Handling of `accessibilityState` props inside view leads to always overwriting the enabled prop to true (even if we explicitly set it to `{disabled: false}`.
Workaround for this was to reorder the props, so that the `accesibilityState` occur before `disabled`, but I think it's better to not set `view.setEnabled(true)` if we are passing a disabled property.
## Changelog
[Android] [Fixed] - Fix accessibilityState overwriting view's disabled state on Android
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34287
Test Plan:
Change order of props inside native component implementation (that `disabled` occurs before `accesibilityState`). For example: `Libraries/Components/Slider/Slider.js`
<details>
<summary>Video showing the bug in RNTester (using Switch component)</summary>
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/52801365/181287547-964f50e2-55dc-450f-b413-0d1c14d4bb83.mp4
</details>
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D38209232
Pulled By: dmitryrykun
fbshipit-source-id: 93d423716f89b45251be9d5aefcf01f7bd776f2c
Summary: Changelog: [General][Changed] - `eslint-plugin-specs` package has prepack hook that changes `PACKAGE_USAGE` variable of `react-native-modules.js` to `true`. This changed file is can then be published to NPM, but should not be committed to the repo. This diff adds postpack hook that reverts the change, so we do not have to do it manually.
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D38244367
fbshipit-source-id: 818dbdea82e7e4b89094b3e27ae2d63b9e736659
Summary:
I've realized that the gradle plugin is currently looking at `.js` files for task re-execution. This means that, while the *.ts would still be considered when the codegen is invoked, an edit on one of those file, won't retrigger the codegen on Android.
This change fixes it so that we consider both `*.ts` and `*.js` files.
## Changelog
[Android] [Fixed] - Make sure *.ts files are considered for task avoidance in the Gradle Plugin
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34296
Test Plan: Tests are attached.
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D38246125
Pulled By: cortinico
fbshipit-source-id: 80efcc9ef747c598ca040d65b25d270593c8aed2
Summary:
VirtualizedList state is represented in terms of [first, last] ranges, where it is possible to express a zero-cell range by having [n, n-1]. This includes some awkward examples, like [0, -1] being valid.
CellRenderMask assumes `addCells` is called with at least one cell, with VirtualizedList previously guarding against adding the no cell case. This guard is present for adding main cell regions, but not for `_initialRenderRegion()`, which can be overridden to have a zero length as well.
This moves the `CellRenderMask` to be permissive of zero-length cell regions, and removes the caller guard.
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Allow empty cell ranges in CellRenderMask
Reviewed By: rshest
Differential Revision: D38184444
fbshipit-source-id: d2dadfdd9628b24f894126d63b1eb93f6387b877
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34120
The new React Native architecture doesn't check `needsCustomLayoutForChildren` so it wrongly positions native views on Android. In https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34120 there are videos comparing the positioning of a native action view in the old and the new architecture.
This PR passes the parent tag to the `updateLayout` method of the `SurfaceMountingManager`. The `SurfaceMountingManager` calls `needsCustomLayoutForChildren` on the parent view manager (copied the code from the `NativeViewHierarchyManager` in the old architecture).
**NOTE** - I wasn't sure where to get the parent shadow view from so I've put in my best guesses where I could and left it as `{}` otherwise.
## Changelog
[Android] [Fixed] - Migrate `needsCustomLayoutForChildren` check to the new architecture
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34254
Test Plan:
I checked the fix in the repro from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34165. Here is a video of the action view closing using the native button that is now visible in the new architecture.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1761227/180607896-35bf477f-4552-4b8a-8e09-9e8c49122c0c.mov
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D38153924
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: e2c77fa70d725a33ce73fe4a615f6d884312580c
Summary:
The current `test-manual-e2e.sh` script is broken on Android + Hermes + New App Template.
This commit fixes it. Specifically:
- There is no need to generate Maven Artifacts for RN Tester, as RN Tester consumes them from source.
- There is instead a need to generate Maven Artifacts for New App Template, as they need to be included inside the NPM package.
- The `:ReactAndroid:hermes-engine:installArchives` task needs to invoked to also generate the Hermes-engine .aar for bundling.
## Changelog
[Internal] - Fix test-manual-e2e on Android/Hermes for New App Template
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34294
Test Plan: I've tested this against the `0.70-stable` branch and I was able to run an App from the New Template properly.
Reviewed By: dmitryrykun
Differential Revision: D38239238
Pulled By: cortinico
fbshipit-source-id: b3d95bad21515b12a91e29147e70ba8323896660
Summary:
Existing code may pass negative values for `initialScrollIndex`, which the previous implemnentation handled gracefully. Handle the case gracefully in VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL as well.
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Gracefully handle negative initialScrollIndex in VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL
Reviewed By: rshest
Differential Revision: D38183625
fbshipit-source-id: 9aea91c4cf3ce2190d769f34ce728a109efc88d4
Summary:
If FlatList is passed non-array data it will return `undefined` as the result of `getItemCount()` to VirtualizedList. This change makes it return `0` instead, to signify there are no valid items to attempt to accces.
There are a set of invariants on properties passed to FlatList, to curb incorrect types at runtime, but there is existing code which runs into the condition.
Changelog:
[Internal][Fixed] - Guard FlatList getItemCount() against non-array data
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D38198351
fbshipit-source-id: 9efd0df7eeeba17078e2c838d470c4b0d621b9a0
Summary:
VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL has a different flow signature from VirtualizedList. This does not cause an error in unit tests, which are untyped, but prevents injecting VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL via the current API from flowtype. This diff updates the injection interface to allow a more relaxed type, validating safety at runtime.
Changelog:
[Internal][Changed] - Allow injecting looser VirtualizedList
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D38143682
fbshipit-source-id: 054bbc5092823f4e4413d69d3d72a7ecdd71a6a2
Summary:
Implements most of systrace using androidx.tracing, this makes it usable using Android Studio profiler systrace.
## Changelog
[Android] [Added] - Improve OSS systrace
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34252
Test Plan:
Run a systrace in Android Studio for RN Tester and make sure RN specific sections are there.
<img width="1263" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2677334/180593493-fc087b4a-2253-43e1-b246-bed3e7bba7ac.png">
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D38116890
Pulled By: dmitryrykun
fbshipit-source-id: 744bedbf9ad4004488340a5b4e93d936d9a1e582
Summary:
Flow and TypeScript are two very similar programming languages. They are both recognizable as inputs for turbo module codegen. It is reasonable to require equivalent Flow and TypeScript turbo module definition generates the same output.
I add some test cases to ensure this. Glad that no functional inconsistency is found here.
## Changelog
[General] [Changed] - codegen: ensure equivalent Flow and TypeScript TM definition generates the same output
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34251
Test Plan: `yarn jest` passed in `packages/react-native-codegen`
Reviewed By: dmitryrykun
Differential Revision: D38116756
Pulled By: cipolleschi
fbshipit-source-id: 476adbd171a35813923f2020c826d21b1fc2eeed
Summary:
cherry-pick changes from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/34214 to main. because the `react_native_pods.rb` on main is quite different from 0.69, i have separated pr for the change.
## Changelog
[iOS] [Fixed] - Fix React-bridging headers import not found
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34271
Test Plan: RNTester + pod install and verify pod targets to have `React-bridging` in header search paths.
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D38122074
Pulled By: dmitryrykun
fbshipit-source-id: 64569abbfa3a684f0d6b84c9e3222bfc9a171061
Summary:
I've noticed that `BackHandler.removeEventListener()` performs two same `indexOf()` calls on an array that is not changing. By removing extra `indexOf` we can slightly improve time complexity of `BackHandler.removeEventListener()` from O(2n) to O(n)
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://reactnative.dev/contributing/changelogs-in-pull-requests
-->
[Android] [Fixed] - Remove extra indexOf call in BackHandler.removeEventListener
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34281
Test Plan:
1. Add the following code to any function component
```javascript
BackHandler.addEventListener('hardwareBackPress', () => true).remove();
```
2. Press on hardware back button
Expected result: Application closes
Reviewed By: dmitryrykun
Differential Revision: D38198510
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: eab6a57689a536623138a4b3ebddbf9ba87d281f
Summary:
At the moment we are having a bug that whenever we hit a "Done" button in an input field, a value is not submitted back, so the users cannot complete their work. Here is an example:
https://pxl.cl/28xFq
To fix it, we call a textInputShouldSubmitOnReturn method on Accessory button click.
Changelog
[IOS][Fixed] - Fix keyboard accessory button not triggering onSubmitEditing
Reviewed By: dmitryrykun
Differential Revision: D38152974
fbshipit-source-id: fc026dffd641966cd3d342d95a56c43c71008036
Summary:
The removeEventListener method has been removed from AccessibilityInfo and Linking in this PR: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/33580, so I believe we can remove it from the mocks.
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://reactnative.dev/contributing/changelogs-in-pull-requests
-->
[Internal] [Removed] - Remove removeEventListener from AccessibilityInfo and Linking mocks
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34260
Test Plan: I executed jest and everything is still green.
Reviewed By: dmitryrykun
Differential Revision: D38198653
Pulled By: GijsWeterings
fbshipit-source-id: 72d10ca54cd505d7c76e7531c9df718b1a9b9ed1
Summary:
# This Change
https://github.com/react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals/pull/335 discussed a set of problems with VirtualizedList and focus. These were seen as severe externally for a11y on desktop. The issues center on users of keyboard and accessibility tools, where users expect to be able to move focus in an uninterrupted loop.
The design and implementation evolved to be a bit more general, and without any API-surface behavior changes. It was implemented and rolled out externally as a series of changes. The remaining changes that were not upstreamed into RN are rolled into https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/32646
This diff brings this change into the repo, as a separate copy of VirtualizedList, to measure its impact to guardrail metrics, without yet making it the default implementation. The intention is for this to be temporary, until there is confidence the implementation is correct.
## List Implementation (more on GitHub)
This change makes it possible to synchronously move native focus to arbitrary items in a VirtualizedList. This is implemented by switching component state to a sparse bitset. This was previously implemented and upstreamed as `CellRenderMask`.
A usage of this is added, to keep the last focused item rendered. This allows the focus loop to remain unbroken, when scrolling away, or tab loops which leave/re-enter the list.
VirtualizedList tracks the last focused cell through the capture phase of `onFocus`. It will keep the cell, and a viewport above and below the last focused cell rendered, to allow movement to it without blanking (without using too much memory).
## Experimentation Implementation
A mechanism is added to gate the change via VirtualizedListInjection, mirroring the approach taken for Switch with D27381306 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/683b825b327e7fa71e87e3d613cb9acd37c24288).
It allows VirtualizedList to delegate to a global override. It has a slight penalty to needing to import both modules, but means code which imports VirtualizedList directly is affected the changes.
Changelog:
[Internal][Added] - Add VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL (CellRenderMask Usage)
Reviewed By: lunaleaps
Differential Revision: D38020408
fbshipit-source-id: ad0aaa6791f3f4455e3068502a2841f3ffb40b41
Summary:
This change is in preparation of adding a separate `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL` component.
Both the original, and experimental lists use `VirtualizedListContext`, which itself references back to the VirtualizedList class type. VirtualizedList private methods are currently included in the type system, and are called in other VirtualizedList code (see https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/b2f871a6fa9c92dd0712055384b9eca6d828e37d). This prevents Flow from seeing the two classes are compatible if "private" methods change.
My first attempt was to parameterize the context, to allow both `VirtualizedList`, and `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL` to use the same code without sacrificing type safety or adding further duplication. This added more complexity than it is worth, so I am instead loosening the type on VirtualizedListContext to pass around a more generic handle.
Changelog:
[Internal][Changed] - Allow VirtualizedListContext to support different component type
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D38017086
fbshipit-source-id: 91e8f6ab2591d3ae9b7f9263711b4a39b78f68e0
Summary:
Bumping main to latest version of CLI available; in particular, we want to ensure to propagate this fix https://github.com/react-native-community/cli/pull/1655.
After merging, we'll cherry-pick in the `0.70-stable` branch.
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://reactnative.dev/contributing/changelogs-in-pull-requests
-->
[General] [Changed] - bump CLI to v9.0.0-alpha.5
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/34275
Test Plan: CI
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D38151383
Pulled By: dmitryrykun
fbshipit-source-id: afdafb496a159ad766dd322a4aab4bda6146edf0
Riccardo Cipolleschi
fabriziobertoglio1987
Antoine Doubovetzky
Ruslan Shestopalyuk
Daniel Leong
Nick Gerleman
Carmi Grushko
Dark Knight
Chiara Mooney
David Vacca
Michał Pierzchała
Nicola Corti
LeoTM
John Porto
Alex Hunt
Oskar Kwaśniewski
Dmitry Rykun
Marshall Roch
Matt Blagden
Graham Mendick
Janic Duplessis
Zihan Chen (MSFT)
Kudo Chien
Vitalii T
Oleh Malanchuk
Lorenzo Sciandra
