Nathan Harris
e81f9546d1
Motivation:
The SSWG has identified a fast approaching reality of namespace clashes in SPM within the ecosystem and has proposed a rule on names that `NIORedis` no longer complies with.
Modifications:
All references to `NIORedis` have been switched to `RedisNIO` as this module name is unique (at least within GitHub's public repositories).
The goals for this name are as follows:
1. To indicate that this is a Redis client library that is built with SwiftNIO
2. That it is a lower level library, as it directly exposes SwiftNIO as an implementation detail
2a. The idea being that a higher level library (`Redis`) will be used, and to "go one level deeper" in the stack, you append the "deeper" `NIO` postfix
3. It follows a naming pattern adopted by Vapor who has expressed their desire to adopt this library as their Redis implementation
Result:
A repository, package name, and module name that are unique across GitHub's public repositories that achives the goals outlined above.
2.9 KiB
Code of Conduct
To be a truly great community, RedisNIO needs to welcome developers from all walks of life, with different backgrounds, and with a wide range of experience. A diverse and friendly community will have more great ideas, more unique perspectives, and produce more great code. We will work diligently to make the RedisNIO community welcoming to everyone.
To give clarity of what is expected of our members, RedisNIO has adopted the code of conduct defined by contributor-covenant.org. This document is used across many open source communities, and we think it articulates our values well. The full text is copied below:
Contributor Code of Conduct v1.3
As contributors and maintainers of this project, and in the interest of fostering an open and welcoming community, we pledge to respect all people who contribute through reporting issues, posting feature requests, updating documentation, submitting pull requests or patches, and other activities.
We are committed to making participation in this project a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of level of experience, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, personal appearance, body size, race, ethnicity, age, religion, or nationality.
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
- The use of sexualized language or imagery
- Personal attacks
- Trolling or insulting/derogatory comments
- Public or private harassment
- Publishing other’s private information, such as physical or electronic addresses, without explicit permission
- Other unethical or unprofessional conduct
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.
By adopting this Code of Conduct, project maintainers commit themselves to fairly and consistently applying these principles to every aspect of managing this project. Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct may be permanently removed from the project team.
This code of conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces when an individual is representing the project or its community.
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by contacting a project maintainer. All complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. Maintainers are obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
This policy is adapted from the Contributor Code of Conduct version 1.3.0.