Fix grammar issue in TS9025 diagnostic message (#60136)

This commit is contained in:
Joost Koehoorn
2024-10-07 11:12:47 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent b845fd2434
commit 44331b9fa3
4 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -7058,7 +7058,7 @@
"category": "Error",
"code": 9023
},
"Declaration emit for this parameter requires implicitly adding undefined to it's type. This is not supported with --isolatedDeclarations.": {
"Declaration emit for this parameter requires implicitly adding undefined to its type. This is not supported with --isolatedDeclarations.": {
"category": "Error",
"code": 9025
},
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ export function createGetIsolatedDeclarationErrors(resolver: EmitResolver): (nod
return createExpressionError(node.initializer);
}
const message = addUndefined ?
Diagnostics.Declaration_emit_for_this_parameter_requires_implicitly_adding_undefined_to_it_s_type_This_is_not_supported_with_isolatedDeclarations :
Diagnostics.Declaration_emit_for_this_parameter_requires_implicitly_adding_undefined_to_its_type_This_is_not_supported_with_isolatedDeclarations :
errorByDeclarationKind[node.kind];
const diag = createDiagnosticForNode(node, message);
const targetStr = getTextOfNode(node.name, /*includeTrivia*/ false);
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ const errorCodes = [
Diagnostics.Default_exports_can_t_be_inferred_with_isolatedDeclarations.code,
Diagnostics.Only_const_arrays_can_be_inferred_with_isolatedDeclarations.code,
Diagnostics.Assigning_properties_to_functions_without_declaring_them_is_not_supported_with_isolatedDeclarations_Add_an_explicit_declaration_for_the_properties_assigned_to_this_function.code,
Diagnostics.Declaration_emit_for_this_parameter_requires_implicitly_adding_undefined_to_it_s_type_This_is_not_supported_with_isolatedDeclarations.code,
Diagnostics.Declaration_emit_for_this_parameter_requires_implicitly_adding_undefined_to_its_type_This_is_not_supported_with_isolatedDeclarations.code,
Diagnostics.Type_containing_private_name_0_can_t_be_used_with_isolatedDeclarations.code,
Diagnostics.Add_satisfies_and_a_type_assertion_to_this_expression_satisfies_T_as_T_to_make_the_type_explicit.code,
];