Allow aborting encoding arguments to a Server Action if a Promise
doesn't resolve. That way at least part of the arguments can be used on
the receiving side. This leaves it unresolved in the stream rather than
encoding an error.
This should error on the receiving side when the stream closes but it
doesn't right now in the Edge/Browser versions because closing happens
immediately before we've had a chance to call `.then()` so the Chunks
are still in pending state. This is an existing bug also in
FlightClient.
In #26624, the ability to mark a client reference module as `async` in
the React client manifest was removed because it was not utilized by
Webpack, neither in `ReactFlightWebpackPlugin` nor in Next.js. However,
some bundlers and frameworks are sophisticated enough to properly handle
and identify async ESM modules (e.g., client component modules with
top-level `await`), most notably Turbopack in Next.js. Therefore, we
need to consider the `async` flag in the client manifest when resolving
the client reference metadata on the server. The SSR manifest cannot
override this flag, meaning that if a module is async, it must remain
async in all client environments.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/70022
Stacked on #30906.
Injects the Flight Client into the DevTools hook if it `supportsFlight`.
This only injects in DEV. We could inject it in prod too but so far the
only feature this exposes is only available in DEV anyway. I also only
call `injectIntoDevTools` in the browser builds since we don't really
support DevTools on the server anyway.
The main purpose of this for now is so that DevTools can track the
Server Component owner of replayed logs. This lets us add owner stacks
where `console.createTask` is not natively supported (like Firefox). It
also lets us associate the log with the Server Component in the
Component tree #30905.
## Summary
This PR bumps Flow all the way to the latest 0.245.2.
Most of the suppressions comes from Flow v0.239.0's change to include
undefined in the return of `Array.pop`.
I also enabled `react.custom_jsx_typing=true` and added custom jsx
typing to match the old behavior that `React.createElement` is
effectively any typed. This is necessary since various builtin
components like `React.Fragment` is actually symbol in the React repo
instead of `React.AbstractComponent<...>`. It can be made more accurate
by customizing the `React$CustomJSXFactory` type, but I will leave it to
the React team to decide.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn flow` for all the renderers
The unbundled form is just a way to show case a prototype for how an
unbundled version of RSC can work. It's not really intended for every
bundler combination to provide such a configuration.
There's no configuration of Turbopack that supports this mode atm and
possibly never will be since it's more of an integrated server/client
experience.
This removes the unbundled form and node register/loaders from the
turbopack build.
stacked on: #30731
We've refined the model of halting a prerender. Now when you abort
during a prerender we simply omit the rows that would complete the
flight render. This is analagous to prerendering in Fizz where you must
resume the prerender to actually result in errors propagating in the
postponed holes. We don't have a resume yet for flight and it's not
entirely clear how that will work however the key insight here is that
deciding whether the never resolving rows are an error or not should
really be done on the consuming side rather than in the producer.
This PR also reintroduces the logs for the abort error/postpone when
prerendering which will give you some indication that something wasn't
finished when the prerender was aborted.
This uses a similar technique to what we use to generate fake stack
frames for server components. This generates an eval:ed wrapper function
around the Server Reference proxy we create on the client. This wrapper
function gets the original `name` of the action on the server and I also
add a source map if `findSourceMapURL` is defined that points back to
the source of the server function.
For `"use server"` on the server, there's no new API. It just uses the
callsite of `registerServerReference()` on the Server. We can infer the
function name from the actual function on the server and we already have
the `findSourceMapURL` on the client receiving it.
For `"use server"` imported from the client, there's two new options
added to `createServerReference()` (in addition to the optional
[`encodeFormAction`](#27563)). These are only used in DEV mode. The
[`findSourceMapURL`](#29708) option is the same one added in #29708. We
need to pass this these references aren't created in the context of any
specific request but globally. The other weird thing about this case is
that this is actually a case where the compiled environment is the
client so any source maps are the same as for the client layer, so the
environment name here is just `"Client"`.
```diff
createServerReference(
id: string,
callServer: CallServerCallback,
encodeFormAction?: EncodeFormActionCallback,
+ findSourceMapURL?: FindSourceMapURLCallback, // DEV-only
+ functionName?: string, // DEV-only
)
```
The key is that we use the location of the
`registerServerReference()`/`createServerReference()` call as the
location of the function. A compiler can either emit those at the same
locations as the original functions or use source maps to have those
segments refer to the original location of the function (or in the case
of a re-export the original location of the re-export is also a fine
approximate). The compiled output must call these directly without a
wrapper function because the wrapper adds a stack frame. I decided
against complicated and fragile dev-only options to skip n number of
frames that would just end up in prod code. The implementation just
skips one frame - our own. Otherwise it'll just point all source mapping
to the wrapper.
We don't have a `"use server"` imported from the client implementation
in the reference implementation/fixture so it's a bit tricky to test
that. In the case of CJS on the server, we just use a runtime instead of
compiler so it's tricky to source map those appropriately. We can
implement it for ESM on the server which is the main thing we're testing
in the fixture. It's easier in a real implementation where all the
compilation is just one pass. It's a little tricky since we have to
parse and append to other source maps but I'd like to do that as a
follow up. Or maybe that's just an exercise for the reader.
You can right click an action and click "Go to Definition".
<img width="1323" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-17 at 6 04 27 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/94d379b3-8871-4671-a20d-cbf9cfbc2c6e">
For now they simply don't point to the right place but you can still
jump to the right file in the fixture:
<img width="1512" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-17 at 5 58 40 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ea5d665-e25a-44ca-9515-481dd3c5c2fe">
In Firefox/Safari given that the location doesn't exist in the source
map yet, the browser refuses to open the file. Where as Chrome does
nearest (last) line.
enableHalt turns on a mode for flight prerenders where aborts are
treated like infinitely stalled outcomes while still completing the
prerender. For regular tasks we simply serialize the slot as a promise
that never settles. For ReadableStream, Blob, and Async Iterators we
just never advance the serialization so they remain unfinished when
consumed on the client.
When enableHalt is turned on aborts of prerenders will halt rather than
error. The abort reason is forwarded to the upstream produces of the
aforementioned async iterators, blobs, and ReadableStreams. In the
future if we expose a signal that you can consume from within a render
to cancel additional work the abort reason will also be forwarded there
Prerendering in flight is similar to prerendering in Fizz. Instead of
receiving a result (the stream) immediately a promise is returned which
resolves to the stream when the prerender is complete. The promise will
reject if the flight render fatally errors otherwise it will resolve
when the render is completed or is aborted.
This commit updates the file locations and bulid configurations for
flight in preparation for new static entrypoints. This follows a
structure similar to Fizz which has a unified build but exports methods
from different top level entrypoints. This PR doesn't actually add the
new top level entrypoints however, that will arrive in a later update.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Just fixing some copy-paste typos.
## How did you test this change?
Untested.
This enables configuring the name of the requested environment.
When we currently use createTask, we start with a `"use server"`
annotation. This option basically configures that string.
I now also deal with the case when switching environments along the
owner path. If you go from `"Third Party"` to `"Server"` to `"Client"`,
it'll have a task named `"use third party"` at the root, then `"use
server"` and then finally `"use client"`.
We don't really have the concept of a Server Component making a request
during render to then create another Server Component. Really the inner
one should conceptually have the first one as its owner in that case. So
currently the inner one will always have a null owner. We could somehow
connect them in this server-to-server case.
We don't currently have a way to configure the `"use client"` option but
I figured maybe that could be inferred by the server environment that
the Flight Client is executed within.
Note: We did talk before about annotating each stack frame with the
environment. You can effectively do that manually when parsing
`rsc://React/{environment}/` from `captureOwnerStack`. However, we can't
do that natively. At least not without deeper integration. Because it's
the source map that's responsible for the actual function name of each
stack frame - not what we give it at runtime. So for the native stacks,
the task showing the change in environment is more practical.
This lets you customize the filter, for example allowing node_modules or
filter out additional functions that you don't want to include when
sending the stack to the client.
Notably this doesn't filter out Server Components out of the parent
stack. Those are just like a view of the tree by name. Not virtual stack
frames.
Defaults to true in browser builds, otherwise defaults to false. The
assumption is that the server logs will already contain a log from the
original Flight server.
We currently always replay console logs but this leads to duplicates on
the server by default when you use SSR, because the Flight Client on the
server replays the logs. This can be nice since those logs gets badged.
It can also be nice if they're running in separate servers but when
they're logging to the same stream it's annoying. Which is really the
typical set up so we should just make that the default but leave it
configurable.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
`Cannot access .then on server` is not an ideal message when you try to
await or do promise chain to the properties of client reference. The
below example will let `.then` get accessed by native code while
handling the promise chain but the access is not clearly visible in user
code.
```
import('./client-module').then((mod) => mod.Component)
```
This PR chnage the error message of module reference proxy '.then'
property to show more kinds of usage, then it can be pretty clearly for
helping users to avoid the bad usage
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
Unit test
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
This lets the environment name vary within a request by the context a
component, log or error being executed in.
A potentially different API would be something like
`setEnvironmentName()` but we'd have to extend the `ReadableStream` or
something to do that like we do for `.allReady`. As a function though it
has some expansion possibilities, e.g. we could potentially also pass
some information to it for context about what is being asked for.
If it changes before completing a task, we also emit the change so that
we have the debug info for what the environment was before entering a
component and what it was after completing it.
While most builds of Flight and Fizz schedule work in new tasks some do
execute work synchronously. While this is necessary for legacy APIs like
renderToString for modern APIs there really isn't a great reason to do
this synchronously.
We could schedule works as microtasks but we actually want to yield so
the runtime can run events and other things that will unblock additional
work before starting the next work loop.
This change updates all non-legacy uses to be async using the best
availalble macrotask scheduler.
Browser now uses postMessage
Bun uses setTimeout because while it also supports setImmediate the
scheduling is not as eager as the same API in node
the FB build also uses setTimeout
This change required a number of changes to tests which were utilizing
the sync nature of work in the Browser builds to avoid having to manage
timers and tasks. I added a patch to install MessageChannel which is
required by the browser builds and made this patched version integrate
with the Scheduler mock. This way we can effectively use `act` to flush
flight and fizz work similar to how we do this on the client.
This lets you click a stack frame on the client and see the Server
source code inline.
<img width="871" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-01 at 11 44 24 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/581281ce-0dce-40c0-a084-4a6d53ba1682">
<img width="840" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-01 at 11 43 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/00dc77af-07c1-4389-9ae0-cf1f45199efb">
We could do some logic on the server that sends a source map url for
every stack frame in the RSC payload. That would make the client
potentially config free. However regardless we need the config to
describe what url scheme to use since that’s not built in to the bundler
config. In practice you likely have a common pattern for your source
maps so no need to send data over and over when we can just have a
simple function configured on the client.
The server must return a source map, even if the file is not actually
compiled since the fake file is still compiled.
The source mapping strategy can be one of two models depending on if the
server’s stack traces (`new Error().stack`) are source mapped back to
the original (`—enable-source-maps`) or represents the location in
compiled code (like in the browser).
If it represents the location in compiled code it’s actually easier. You
just serve the source map generated for that file by the tooling.
If it is already source mapped it has to generate a source map where
everything points to the same location (as if not compiled) ideally with
a segment per logical ast node.
Stacked on #28997.
We can use the technique of referencing an object by its row + property
name path for temporary references - like we do for deduping. That way
we don't need to generate an ID for temporary references. Instead, they
can just be an opaque marker in the slot and it has the implicit ID of
the row + path.
Then we can stash all objects, even the ones that are actually available
to read on the server, as temporary references. Without adding anything
to the payload since the IDs are implicit. If the same object is
returned to the client, it can be referenced by reference instead of
serializing it back to the client. This also helps preserve object
identity.
We assume that the objects are immutable when they pass the boundary.
I'm not sure if this is worth it but with this mechanism, if you return
the `FormData` payload from a `useActionState` it doesn't have to be
serialized on the way back to the client. This is a common pattern for
having access to the last submission as "default value" to the form
fields. However you can still control it by replacing it with another
object if you want. In MPA mode, the temporary references are not
configured and so it needs to be serialized in that case. That's
required anyway for hydration purposes.
I'm not sure if people will actually use this in practice though or if
FormData will always be destructured into some other object like with a
library that turns it into typed data, and back. If so, the object
identity is lost.
This disables symbol renaming in production builds. The original
variable and function names are preserved. All other forms of
compression applied by Closure (dead code elimination, inlining, etc)
are unchanged — the final program is identical to what we were producing
before, just in a more readable form.
The motivation is to make it easier to debug React issues that only
occur in production — the same reason we decided to start shipping
sourcemaps in #28827 and #28827.
However, because most apps run their own minification step on their npm
dependencies, it's not necessary for us to minify the symbols before
publishing — it'll be handled the app, if desired.
This is the same strategy Meta has used to ship React for years. The
React build itself has unminified symbols, but they get minified as part
of Meta's regular build pipeline.
Even if an app does not minify their npm dependencies, gzip covers most
of the cost of symbol renaming anyway.
This saves us from having to ship sourcemaps, which means even apps that
don't have sourcemaps configured will be able to debug the React build
as easily as they would any other npm dependency.
In React 19 React will finally stop publishing UMD builds. This is
motivated primarily by the lack of use of UMD format and the added
complexity of maintaining build infra for these releases. Additionally
with ESM becoming more prevalent in browsers and services like esm.sh
which can host React as an ESM module there are other options for doing
script tag based react loading.
This PR removes all the UMD build configs and forks.
There are some fixtures that still have references to UMD builds however
many of them already do not work (for instance they are using legacy
features like ReactDOM.render) and rather than block the removal on
these fixtures being brought up to date we'll just move forward and fix
or removes fixtures as necessary in the future.
This is similar to #28771 but for isomorphic. We need a make over for
these dispatchers anyway so this is the first step. Also helps flush out
some internals usage that will break anyway.
It flattens the inner mutable objects onto the ReactSharedInternals.
## Summary
Fixes a type validation error introduced in newer versions of Node.js
when calling `Module.prototype._compile` in our unit tests. (I tried but
have yet to pinpoint the precise change in Node.js that introduced this
vaildation.)
The specific error that currently occurs when running unit tests with
Node.js v18.16.1:
```
TypeError: The "mod" argument must be an instance of Module. Received an instance of Object
80 |
81 | if (useServer) {
> 82 | originalCompile.apply(this, arguments);
| ^
83 |
84 | const moduleId: string = (url.pathToFileURL(filename).href: any);
85 |
```
This fixes the type validation error by mocking modules using `new
Module()` instead of plain objects.
## How did you test this change?
Ran the unit tests successfully:
```
$ node --version
v18.16.1
$ yarn test
```
This bumps the canary versions to v19 to communicate that the next
release will be a major. Once this lands, we can start merging breaking
changes into `main`.
Currently you can accidentally pass React Element to a Server Action. It
warns but in prod it actually works because we can encode the symbol and
otherwise it's mostly a plain object. It only works if you only pass
host components and no function props etc. which makes it potentially
error later. The first thing this does it just early hard error for
elements.
I made Lazy work by unwrapping though since that will be replaced by
Promises later which works.
Our protocol is not fully symmetric in that elements flow from Server ->
Client. Only the Server can resolve Components and only the client
should really be able to receive host components. It's not intended that
a Server can actually do something with them other than passing them to
the client.
In the case of a Reply, we expect the client to be stateful. It's
waiting for a response. So anything we can't serialize we can still pass
by reference to an in memory object. So I introduce the concept of a
TemporaryReferenceSet which is an opaque object that you create before
encoding the reply. This then stashes any unserializable values in this
set and encode the slot by id. When a new response from the Action then
returns we pass the same temporary set into the parser which can then
restore the objects. This lets you pass a value by reference to the
server and back into another slot.
For example it can be used to render children inside a parent tree from
a server action:
```
export async function Component({ children }) {
"use server";
return <div>{children}</div>;
}
```
(You wouldn't normally do this due to the waterfalls but for advanced
cases.)
A common scenario where this comes up accidentally today is in
`useActionState`.
```
export function action(state, formData) {
"use server";
if (errored) {
return <div>This action <strong>errored</strong></div>;
}
return null;
}
```
```
const [errors, formAction] = useActionState(action);
return <div>{errors}<div>;
```
It feels like I'm just passing the JSX from server to client. However,
because `useActionState` also sends the previous state *back* to the
server this should not actually be valid. Before this PR this actually
worked accidentally. You get a DEV warning but it used to work in prod.
Once you do something like pass a client reference it won't work tho. We
could perhaps make client references work by stashing where we got them
from but it wouldn't work with all possible JSX.
By adding temporary references to the action implementation this will
work again - on the client. It'll also be more efficient since we don't
send back the JSX content that you shouldn't introspect on the server
anyway.
However, a flaw here is that the progressive enhancement of this case
won't work because we can't use temporary references for progressive
enhancement since there's no in memory stash. What is worse is that it
won't error if you hydrate. ~It also will error late in the example
above because the first state is "undefined" so invoking the form once
works - it errors on the second attempt when it tries to send the error
state back again.~ It actually errors on the first invocation because we
need to eagerly serialize "previous state" into the form. So at least
that's better.
I think maybe the solution to this particular pattern would be to allow
JSX to serialize if you have no temporary reference set, and remember
client references so that client references can be returned back to the
server as client references. That way anything you could send from the
server could also be returned to the server. But it would only deopt to
serializing it for progressive enhancement. The consequence of that
would be that there's a lot of JSX that might accidentally seem like it
should work but it's only if you've gotten it from the server before
that it works. This would have to have pair them somehow though since
you can't take a client reference from one implementation of Flight and
use it with another.
It's possible for the same function instance to appear more than once in
the same graph or even the same file.
Currently this errors on trying to reconfigure the property but it
really doesn't matter which one wins. First or last.
Regardless there will be an entry point generated that can get them.
Alternative to #28354.
If a client reference is one of the props being describes as part of
another error, we call toString on it, which errors.
We should error explicitly when a Symbol prop is extracted.
However, pragmatically I added the toString symbol tag even though we
don't know what the real tostring will be but we also lie about the
typeof.
We can however in addition to this give it a different description
because describing this property as an object isn't quite right.
We probably could extract the export name but that's kind of renderer
specific and I just added this shared module to Fizz which doesn't have
that which is unfortunate an consequence.
For default exports we don't have a good name of what the alias was in
the receiver. Could maybe call it "default" but for now I just call it
"client".
The `reference` that is passed into `registerServerReference` can be a
plain function. It does not need to have the three additonal properties
of a `ServerRefeference`. In fact, adding these properties (plus `bind`)
is precisely what `registerServerReference` does.
There are three parts to an RSC set up:
- React
- Bundler
- Endpoints
Most customizability is in the bundler configs. We deal with those as
custom builds.
To create a full set up, you need to also configure ways to expose end
points for example to call a Server Action. That's typically not
something the bundler is responsible for even though it's responsible
for gathering the end points that needs generation. Exposing which
endpoints to generate is a responsibility for the bundler.
Typically a meta-framework is responsible for generating the end points.
There's two ways to "call" a Server Action. Through JS and through a
Form. Through JS we expose the `callServer` callback so that the
framework can call the end point.
Forms by default POST back to the current page with an action serialized
into form data, which we have a decoder helper for. However, this is not
something that React is really opinionated about just like we're not
opinionated about the protocol used by callServer.
This exposes an option to configure the encoding of the form props.
`encodeFormAction` is to the SSR is what `callServer` is to the Browser.
A Flight Server can be a consumer of a stream from another Server. In
this case the meta data is attached to debugInfo properties on lazy,
Promises, Arrays or Elements that might in turn get forwarded to the
next stream. In this case we want to forward this debug information to
the client in the stream.
I also added a DEV only `environmentName` option to the Flight Server.
This lets you name the server that is producing the debug info so that
you can trace the origin of where that component is executing. This
defaults to `"server"`. DevTools could use this for badges or different
colors.
Server Context was never documented, and has been deprecated in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27424.
This PR removes it completely, including the implementation code.
Notably, `useContext` is removed from the shared subset, so importing it
from a React Server environment would now should be a build error in
environments that are able to enforce that.
The internal file ReactSharedSubset is what the `react` module resolves
to when imported from a Server Component environment. We gave it this
name because, originally, the idea was that Server Components can access
a subset of the APIs available on the client.
However, since then, we've also added APIs that can _only_ by accessed
on the server and not the client. In other words, it's no longer a
subset, it's a slightly different overlapping set.
So this commit renames ReactSharedSubet to ReactServer and updates all
the references. This does not affect the public API, only our internal
implementation.
creating the root after closing the response can lead to a promise that
never rejects. This is not intended use of the decodeReply API but if
pathalogical cases where you pass a raw FormData into this fucntion with
no zero chunk it can hang forever. This reordering causes a connection
error instead
---------
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
I do this by simply renaming the secret export name in the "subset"
bundle and this renamed version is what the FlightServer uses.
This requires us to be more diligent about always using the correct
instance of "react" in our tests so there's a bunch of clean up for
that.
Adds a missing test assertion for Server Context deprecation.
The PR that added this warning was based on an older revision than the
PR that added the test.
stacked on #27314
Turbopack requires a different module loading strategy than Webpack and
as such this PR implements a new package `react-server-dom-turbopack`
which largely follows the `react-server-dom-webpack` but is implemented
for this new bundler
Sebastian Markbåge
Hendrik Liebau
Sam Zhou
Josh Story
Greg Brimble
Jiachi Liu
Jan Kassens
Sebastian Silbermann
Andrew Clark
Timothy Yung
dan
Ricky
