Updated version of #29758 removing `useFormState` since that was the
previous name for `useActionState`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hieu Do <hieudn.uh@gmail.com>
Fixes a bug found by mofeiZ in #29878. When we merge queued states, if the new state does not introduce changes relative to the queued state we should use the queued state, not the new state.
ghstack-source-id: c59f69de15
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29879
## Summary
See #29737
## How did you test this change?
As the feature requires module support and the test runner does
currently not support running tests as modules, I could only test it via
playground.
Fixes false positives where we currently disallow mutations of refs from callbacks passed to JSX, if the ref is also passed to jsx. We consider these to be mutations of "frozen" values, but refs are explicitly allowed to have interior mutability. The fix is to always allow (at leat within InferReferenceEffects) for refs to be mutated. This means we completely rely on ValidateNoRefAccessInRender to validate ref access and stop reporting false positives.
ghstack-source-id: 1a30609f5f
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29733
Summary
The dispatch function from useReducer is stable, so it is also non-reactive.
the related PR: #29665
the related comment: #29674 (comment)
I am not sure if the location of the new test file is appropriate😅.
How did you test this change?
Added the specific test compiler/packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler/src/__tests__/fixtures/compiler/useReducer-returned-dispatcher-is-non-reactive.expect.md.
Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers).
I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed!
ghstack-source-id: aed5f7edda
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29658
Fixes https://x.com/raibima/status/1794395807216738792
The issue is that if you pass a global-modifying function as prop to JSX, we currently report that it's invalid to modify a global during rendering. The problem is that we don't really know when/if the child component will actually call that function prop. It would be against the rules to call the function during render, but it's totally fine to call it during an event handler or from a useEffect.
Since we don't know at the call-site how the child will use the function, we should allow such calls. In the future we could improve this in a few ways:
* For all functions that modify globals, codegen an assertion or warning into the function that fires if it's called "during render". We'd have to precisely define what "during render" is, but this would at least help developers catch this dynamically.
* Use the type system to distinguish "event/effect" and "render" functions to help developers avoid accidentally mutating globals during render.
ghstack-source-id: 4aba4e6d21
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29591
No-op refactor to make Environment#getGlobalDeclaration() take a NonLocalBinding instead of just a name. The idea is that in subsequent PRs we can use information about the binding to resolve a type more accurately. For example, we can resolve `Array` differently if its an import or local and not the global Array. Similar for resolving local `useState` differently than the one from React.
ghstack-source-id: c8063e6fb8
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29189
We currently use `LoadGlobal` and `StoreGlobal` to represent any read (or write) of a variable defined outside the component or hook that is being compiled. This is mostly fine, but for a lot of things we want to do going forward (resolving types across modules, for example) it helps to understand the actual source of a variable.
This PR is an incremental step in that direction. We continue to use LoadGlobal/StoreGlobal, but LoadGlobal now has a `binding:NonLocalBinding` instead of just the name of the global. The NonLocalBinding type tells us whether it was an import (and which kind, the source module name etc), a module-local binding, or a true global. By keeping the LoadGlobal/StoreGlobal instructions, most code that deals with "anything not declared locally" doesn't have to care about the difference. However, code that _does_ want to know the source of the value can figure it out.
ghstack-source-id: e701d4ebc0
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29188
By default, React Compiler will skip compilation if it cannot preserve existing memoization. Ie, if the code has an existing `useMemo()` or `useCallback()` and the compiler cannot determine that it is safe to keep that memoization — or do even better — then we'll leave the code alone. The actual compilation doesn't use any hints from existing memo calls, this is purely to check and avoid regressing any specific memoization that developers may have already applied.
However, we were accidentally reporting some false-positive _validation_ errors due to the StartMemoize and FinishMemoize instructions that we emit to track where the memoization was in the source code. This is now fixed.
Fixes#29131Fixes#29132
ghstack-source-id: 9f6b8dbc50
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29154
Joseph Savona
Joe Savona
Niklas Mollenhauer
XiaoPi
Mike Vitousek