## Summary
`fastAddProperties` has shown some perf benefits when used for creating
props payload for new components. In this PR we'll try to use it for
diffing props for existing components.
It would be good enough if it simply doesn't regress perf. We'll be able
to delete the old `addProperties`, and make `fastAddProperties` the
default behaviour.
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn lint
yarn flow native
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer -r=xplat --variant=false
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer -r=xplat --variant=true
```
## Summary
We're adding support for `Document` instances in React Native (as
`ReactNativeDocument` instances) in
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49012 , which requires the
React Fabric renderer to handle its lifecycle.
This modifies the renderer to create those document instances and
associate them with the React root, and provides a new method for React
Native to access them given its containerTag / rootTag.
## How did you test this change?
Tested e2e in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49012
manually syncing these changes.
This adds an isomorphic API to add Transition Types, which represent the
cause, to the current Transition. This is currently mainly for View
Transitions but as a concept it's broader and we might expand it to more
features and object types in the future.
```js
import { unstable_addTransitionType as addTransitionType } from 'react';
startTransition(() => {
addTransitionType('my-transition-type');
setState(...);
});
```
If multiple transitions get entangled this is additive and all
Transition Types are collected. You can also add more than one type to a
Transition (hence the `add` prefix).
Transition Types are reset after each commit. Meaning that `<Suspense>`
revealing after a `startTransition` does not get any View Transition
types associated with it.
Note that the scoping rules for this is a little "wrong" in this
implementation. Ideally it would be scoped to the nearest outer
`startTransition` and grouped with any `setState` inside of it.
Including Actions. However, since we currently don't have AsyncContext
on the client, it would be too easy to drop a Transition Type if there
were no other `setState` in the same `await` task. Multiple Transitions
are entangled together anyway right now as a result. So this just tracks
a global of all pending Transition Types for the next Transition. An
inherent tricky bit with this API is that you could update multiple
roots. In that case it should ideally be associated with each root.
Transition Tracing solves this by associating a Transition with any
updates that are later collected but this suffers from the problem
mentioned above. Therefore, I just associate Transition Types with one
root - the first one to commit. Since the View Transitions across roots
are sequential anyway it kind of makes sense that only one really is the
cause and the other one is subsequent.
Transition Types can be used to apply different animations based on what
caused the Transition. You have three different ways to choose from for
how to use them:
## CSS
It integrates with [View Transition
Types](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions-2/#active-view-transition-pseudo-examples)
so you can match different animations based on CSS scopes:
```css
:root:active-view-transition-type(my-transition-type) {
&::view-transition-...(...) {
...
}
}
```
This is kind of a PITA to write though and if you have a CSS library
that provide View Transition Classes it's difficult to import those into
these scopes.
## Class per Type
This PR also adds an object-as-map form that can be passed to all
`className` properties:
```js
<ViewTransition className={{
'my-navigation-type': 'hello',
'default': 'world',
}}>
```
If multiple types match, then they're joined together. If no types match
then the special `"default"` entry is used instead. If any type has the
value `"none"` then that wins and the ViewTransition is disabled (not
assigned a name).
These can be combined with `enter`/`exit`/`update`/`layout`/`share`
props to match based on kind of trigger and Transition Type.
```js
<ViewTransition enter={{
'navigation-back': 'enter-right',
'navigation-forward': 'enter-left',
}}
exit={{
'navigation-back': 'exit-right',
'navigation-forward': 'exit-left',
}}>
```
## Events
In addition, you can also observe the types in the View Transition Event
callbacks as the second argument. That way you can pick different
imperative Animations based on the cause.
```js
<ViewTransition onUpdate={(inst, types) => {
if (types.includes('navigation-back')) {
...
} else if (types.includes('navigation-forward')) {
...
} else {
...
}
}}>
```
## Future
In the future we might expose types to `useEffect` for more general
purpose usage. This would also allow non-View Transition based
Animations such as existing libraries to use this same feature to
coordinate the same concept.
We might also allow richer objects to be passed along here. Only the
strings would apply to View Transitions but the imperative code and
effects could do something else with them.
This adds refs to View Transition that can resolve to an instance of:
```js
type ViewTransitionRef = {
name: string,
group: Animatable,
imagePair: Animatable,
old: Animatable,
new: Animatable,
}
```
Animatable is a type that has `animate(keyframes, options)` and
`getAnimations()` on it. It's the interface that exists on Element that
lets you start animations on it. These ones are like that but for the
four pseudo-elements created by the view transition.
If a name changes, then a new ref is created. That way if you hold onto
a ref during an exit animation spawned by the name change, you can keep
calling functions on it. It will keep referring to the old name rather
than the new name.
This allows imperative control over the animations instead of using CSS
for this.
```js
const viewTransition = ref.current;
const groupAnimation = viewTransition.group.animate(keyframes, options);
const imagePairAnimation = viewTransition.imagePair.animate(keyframes, options);
const oldAnimation = viewTransition.old.animate(keyframes, options);
const newAnimation = viewTransition.new.animate(keyframes, options);
```
The downside of using this API is that it doesn't work with SSR so for
SSR rendered animations they'll fallback to the CSS. You could use this
for progressive enhancement though.
Note: In this PR the ref only controls one DOM node child but there can
be more than one DOM node in the ViewTransition fragment and they are
just left to their defaults. We could try something like making the
`animate()` function apply to multiple children but that could lead to
some weird consequences and the return value would be difficult to
merge. We could try to maintain an array of Animatable that updates with
how ever many things are currently animating but that makes the API more
complicated to use for the simple case. Conceptually this should be like
a fragment so we would ideally combine the multiple children into a
single isolate if we could. Maybe one day the same name could be applied
to multiple children to create a single isolate. For now I think I'll
just leave it like this and you're really expect to just use it with one
DOM node. If you have more than one they just get the default animations
from CSS.
Using this is a little tricky due timing. In this fixture I just use a
layout effect plus rAF to get into the right timing after the
startViewTransition is ready. In the future I'll add an event that fires
when View Transitions heuristics fire with the right timing.
This allows mutations and scrolling in the layout phase to be counted
towards the mutation. This would maybe not be the case for gestures but
it is useful for fire-and-forget.
This also avoids the issue that if you resolve navigation in
useLayoutEffect that it ends up dead locked.
It also means that useLayoutEffect does not observe the scroll
restoration and in fact, the scroll restoration would win over any
manual scrolling in layout effects. For better or worse, this is more in
line with how things worked before and how it works in popstate. So it's
less of a breaking change. This does mean that we can't unify the after
mutation phase with the layout phase though.
To do this we need split out flushSpawnedWork from the flushLayoutEffect
call.
Spawned work from setState inside the layout phase is done outside and
not counted towards the transition. They're sync updates and so are not
eligible for their own View Transitions. It's also tricky to support
this since it's unclear what things like exits in that update would
mean. This work will still be able to mutate the live DOM but it's just
not eligible to trigger new transitions or adjust the target of those.
One difference between popstate is that this spawned work is after
scroll restoration. So any scrolling spawned from a second pass would
now win over scroll restoration.
Another consequence of this change is that you can't safely animate
pseudo elements in useLayoutEffect. We'll introduce a better event for
that anyway.
Stacked on #31975.
View Transitions cannot handle interruptions in that if you start a new
one before the previous one has finished, it just stops and then
restarts. It doesn't seamlessly transition into the new transition.
This is generally considered a bad thing but I actually think it's quite
good for fire-and-forget animations (gestures is another story). There
are too many examples of bad animations in fast interactions because the
scenario wasn't predicted. Like overlapping toasts or stacked layers
that look bad. The only case interrupts tend to work well is when you do
a strict reversal of an animation like returning to the page you just
left or exiting a modal just being opened. However, we're limited by the
platform even in that regard.
I think one reason interruptions have traditionally been seen as good is
because it's hard if you have a synchronous framework to not interrupt
since your application state has already moved on. We don't have that
limitation since we can suspend commits. We can do all the work to
prepare for the next commit by rendering while the animation is going
but then delay the commit until the previous one finishes.
Another technical limitation earlier animation libraries suffered from
is only have the option to either interrupt or sequence animations since
it's modeling just one change set. Like showing one toast at a time.
That's bad. We don't have that limitation because we can interrupt a
previously suspended commit and start working on a new one instead.
That's what we do for suspended transitions in general. The net effect
is that we batch the commits.
Therefore if you get multiple toasts flying in fast, they can animate as
a batch in together all at once instead of overlapping slightly or being
staggered. Interruptions (often) bad. Staggered animations bad. Batched
animations good.
This PR stashes the currently active View Transition with an expando on
the container that's animating (currently always document). This is
similar to what we do with event handlers etc. We reason we do this with
an expando is that if you have multiple Reacts on the same page they
need to wait for each other. However, one of those might also be the SSR
runtime. So this lets us wait for the SSR runtime's animations to finish
before starting client ones. This could really be a more generic name
since this should ideally be shared across frameworks. It's kind of
strange that this property doesn't already exist in the DOM given that
there can only be one. It would be useful to be able to coordinate this
across libraries.
Stacked on #31975.
This is the primary way we recommend styling your View Transitions since
it allows for reusable styling such as a CSS library specializing in
View Transitions in a way that's composable and without naming
conflicts. E.g.
```js
<ViewTransition className="enter-slide-in exit-fade-out update-cross-fade">
```
This doesn't change the HTML `class` attribute. It's not a CSS class.
Instead it assign the `view-transition-class` style prop of the
underlying DOM node while it's transitioning.
You can also just use `<div style={{viewTransitionClass: ...}}>` on the
DOM node but it's convenient to control the Transition completely from
the outside and conceptually we're transitioning the whole fragment. You
can even make Transition components that just wraps existing components.
`<RevealTransition><Component /></RevealTransition>` this way.
Since you can also have multiple wrappers for different circumstances it
allows React's heuristics to use different classes for different
scenarios. We'll likely add more options like configuring different
classes for different `types` or scenarios that can't be described by
CSS alone.
## CSS Modules
```js
import transitions from './transitions.module.css';
<ViewTransition className={transitions.bounceIn}>...</ViewTransition>
```
CSS Modules works well with this strategy because you can have globally
unique namespaces and define your transitions in the CSS modules as a
library that you can import. [As seen in the fixture
here.](https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/8b91b37bb8b4add5f3f8be5ef8f49bb23966b13b#diff-b4d9854171ffdac4d2c01be92a5eff4f8e9e761e6af953094f99ca243b054a85R11)
I did notice an unfortunate bug in how CSS Modules (at least in Webpack)
generates class names. Sometimes the `+` character is used in the hash
of the class name which is not valid for `view-transition-class` and so
it breaks. I had to rename my class names until the hash yielded
something different to work around it. Ideally that bug gets fixed soon.
## className, rly?
`className` isn't exactly the most loved property name, however, I'm
using `className` here too for consistency. Even though in this case
there's no direct equivalent DOM property name. The CSS property is
named `viewTransitionClass`, but the "viewTransition" prefix is implied
by the Component it is on in this case. For most people the fact that
this is actually a different namespace than other CSS classes doesn't
matter. You'll most just use a CSS library anyway and conceptually
you're just assigning classes the same way as `className` on a DOM node.
But if we ever rename the `class` prop then we can do that for this one
as well.
This will provide the opt-in for using [View
Transitions](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/View_Transition_API)
in React.
View Transitions only trigger for async updates like `startTransition`,
`useDeferredValue`, Actions or `<Suspense>` revealing from fallback to
content. Synchronous updates provide an opt-out but also guarantee that
they commit immediately which View Transitions can't.
There's no need to opt-in to View Transitions at the "cause" side like
event handlers or actions. They don't know what UI will change and
whether that has an animated transition described.
Conceptually the `<ViewTransition>` component is like a DOM fragment
that transitions its children in its own isolate/snapshot. The API works
by wrapping a DOM node or inner component:
```js
import {ViewTransition} from 'react';
<ViewTransition><Component /></ViewTransition>
```
The default is `name="auto"` which will automatically assign a
`view-transition-name` to the inner DOM node. That way you can add a
View Transition to a Component without controlling its DOM nodes styling
otherwise.
A difference between this and the browser's built-in
`view-transition-name: auto` is that switching the DOM nodes within the
`<ViewTransition>` component preserves the same name so this example
cross-fades between the DOM nodes instead of causing an exit and enter:
```js
<ViewTransition>{condition ? <ComponentA /> : <ComponentB />}</ViewTransition>
```
This becomes especially useful with `<Suspense>` as this example
cross-fades between Skeleton and Content:
```js
<ViewTransition>
<Suspense fallback={<Skeleton />}>
<Content />
</Suspense>
</ViewTransition>
```
Where as this example triggers an exit of the Skeleton and an enter of
the Content:
```js
<Suspense fallback={<ViewTransition><Skeleton /></ViewTransition>}>
<ViewTransition><Content /></ViewTransition>
</Suspense>
```
Managing instances and keys becomes extra important.
You can also specify an explicit `name` property for example for
animating the same conceptual item from one page onto another. However,
best practices is to property namespace these since they can easily
collide. It's also useful to add an `id` to it if available.
```js
<ViewTransition name="my-shared-view">
```
The model in general is the same as plain `view-transition-name` except
React manages a set of heuristics for when to apply it. A problem with
the naive View Transitions model is that it overly opts in every
boundary that *might* transition into transitioning. This is leads to
unfortunate effects like things floating around when unrelated updates
happen. This leads the whole document to animate which means that
nothing is clickable in the meantime. It makes it not useful for smaller
and more local transitions. Best practice is to add
`view-transition-name` only right before you're about to need to animate
the thing. This is tricky to manage globally on complex apps and is not
compositional. Instead we let React manage when a `<ViewTransition>`
"activates" and add/remove the `view-transition-name`. This is also when
React calls `startViewTransition` behind the scenes while it mutates the
DOM.
I've come up with a number of heuristics that I think will make a lot
easier to coordinate this. The principle is that only if something that
updates that particular boundary do we activate it. I hope that one day
maybe browsers will have something like these built-in and we can remove
our implementation.
A `<ViewTransition>` only activates if:
- If a mounted Component renders a `<ViewTransition>` within it outside
the first DOM node, and it is within the viewport, then that
ViewTransition activates as an "enter" animation. This avoids inner
"enter" animations trigger when the parent mounts.
- If an unmounted Component had a `<ViewTransition>` within it outside
the first DOM node, and it was within the viewport, then that
ViewTransition activates as an "exit" animation. This avoids inner
"exit" animations triggering when the parent unmounts.
- If an explicitly named `<ViewTransition name="...">` is deep within an
unmounted tree and one with the same name appears in a mounted tree at
the same time, then both are activated as a pair, but only if they're
both in the viewport. This avoids these triggering "enter" or "exit"
animations when going between parents that don't have a pair.
- If an already mounted `<ViewTransition>` is visible and a DOM
mutation, that might affect how it's painted, happens within its
children but outside any nested `<ViewTransition>`. This allows it to
"cross-fade" between its updates.
- If an already mounted `<ViewTransition>` resizes or moves as the
result of direct DOM nodes siblings changing or moving around. This
allows insertion, deletion and reorders into a list to animate all
children. It is only within one DOM node though, to avoid unrelated
changes in the parent to trigger this. If an item is outside the
viewport before and after, then it's skipped to avoid things flying
across the screen.
- If a `<ViewTransition>` boundary changes size, due to a DOM mutation
within it, then the parent activates (or the root document if there are
no more parents). This ensures that the container can cross-fade to
avoid abrupt relayout. This can be avoided by using absolutely
positioned children. When this can avoid bubbling to the root document,
whatever is not animating is still responsive to clicks during the
transition.
Conceptually each DOM node has its own default that activates the parent
`<ViewTransition>` or no transition if the parent is the root. That
means that if you add a DOM node like `<div><ViewTransition><Component
/></ViewTransition></div>` this won't trigger an "enter" animation since
it was the div that was added, not the ViewTransition. Instead, it might
cause a cross-fade of the parent ViewTransition or no transition if it
had no parent. This ensures that only explicit boundaries perform coarse
animations instead of every single node which is really the benefit of
the View Transitions model. This ends up working out well for simple
cases like switching between two pages immediately while transitioning
one floating item that appears on both pages. Because only the floating
item transitions by default.
Note that it's possible to add manual `view-transition-name` with CSS or
`style={{ viewTransitionName: 'auto' }}` that always transitions as long
as something else has a `<ViewTransition>` that activates. For example a
`<ViewTransition>` can wrap a whole page for a cross-fade but inside of
it an explicit name can be added to something to ensure it animates as a
move when something relates else changes its layout. Instead of just
cross-fading it along with the Page which would be the default.
There's more PRs coming with some optimizations, fixes and expanded
APIs. This first PR explores the above core heuristic.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
# Summary
I'm working to get the main `react-native` package parsable by modern
Flow tooling (both `flow-bundler`, `flow-api-translator`).
This diff trivially removes some redundant Flow comment syntax in
`ReactNativeTypes.js`, which fixes parsing under these newer tools.
## How did you test this change?
Files were pasted into `react-native-github` under fbsource, where Flow
validates ✅.
When you schedule a microtask from render or effect and then call
setState (or ping) from there, the "event" is the event that React
scheduled (which will be a postMessage). The event time of this new
render will be before the last render finished.
We usually clamp these but in this scenario the update doesn't happen
while a render is happening. Causing overlapping events.
Before:
<img width="1229" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 11 01 30 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9652cf3b-b358-453c-b295-1239cbb15952">
Therefore when we finalize a render we need to store the end of the last
render so when we a new update comes in later with an event time earlier
than that, we know to clamp it.
There's also a special case here where when we enter the
`RootDidNotComplete` or `RootSuspendedWithDelay` case we neither leave
the root as in progress nor commit it. Those needs to finalize too.
Really this should be modeled as a suspended track that we haven't added
yet. That's the gap between "Blocked" and "message" below.
After:
<img width="1471" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-13 at 12 31 34 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b24f994e-9055-4b10-ad29-ad9b36302ffc">
I also fixed an issue where we may log the same event name multiple
times if we're rendering more than once in the same event. In this case
I just leave a blank trace between the last commit and the next update.
I also adding ignoring of the "message" event at all in these cases when
the event is from React's scheduling itself.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
In order to adopt react 19's ref-as-prop model, Flow needs to eliminate
all the places where they are treated differently.
`React.AbstractComponent` is the worst example of this, and we need to
eliminate it.
This PR eliminates them from the react repo, and only keeps the one that
has 1 argument of props.
## How did you test this change?
yarn flow
## Summary
The React Native Renderer exports a
`__SECRET_INTERNALS_DO_NOT_USE_OR_YOU_WILL_BE_FIRED` property with a
single method that has no remaining call sites:
`computeComponentStackForErrorReporting`
This PR cleans up this unused export.
## How did you test this change?
```
$ yarn
$ yarn flow fabric
$ yarn test
```
## Summary
Creates a new `HostInstance` type for React Native, to more accurately
capture the intent most developers have when using the `NativeMethods`
type or `React.ElementRef<HostComponent<T>>`.
Since `React.ElementRef<HostComponent<T>>` is typed as
`React.AbstractComponent<T, NativeMethods>`, that means
`React.ElementRef<HostComponent<T>>` is equivalent to `NativeMethods`
which is equivalent to `HostInstance`.
## How did you test this change?
```
$ yarn
$ yarn flow fabric
```
React DevTools no longer operates with just Fibers, it now builds its
own Shadow Tree, which represents the tree on the Host (Fabric on
Native, DOM on Web).
We have to keep track of public instances for a select-to-inspect
feature. We've recently changed this logic in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/30831, and looks like we've been
incorrectly getting a public instance for Fabric case.
Not only this, turns out that all `getInspectorData...` APIs are
returning Fibers, and not public instances. I have to expose it, so that
React DevTools can correctly identify the element, which was selected.
Changes for React Native are in
[D63421463](https://www.internalfb.com/diff/D63421463)
This tracks the current window.event.timeStamp the first time we
setState or call startTransition. For either the blocking track or
transition track. We can use this to show how long we were blocked by
other events or overhead from when the user interacted until we got
called into React.
Then we track the time we start awaiting a Promise returned from
startTransition. We can use this track how long we waited on an Action
to complete before setState was called.
Then finally we track when setState was called so we can track how long
we were blocked by other word before we could actually start rendering.
For a Transition this might be blocked by Blocking React render work.
We only log these once a subsequent render actually happened. If no
render was actually scheduled, then we don't log these. E.g. if an
isomorphic Action doesn't call startTransition there's no render so we
don't log it.
We only log the first event/update/transition even if multiple are
batched into it later. If multiple Actions are entangled they're all
treated as one until an update happens. If no update happens and all
entangled actions finish, we clear the transition so that the next time
a new sequence starts we can log it.
We also clamp these (start the track later) if they were scheduled
within a render/commit. Since we share a single track we don't want to
create overlapping tracks.
The purpose of this is not to show every event/action that happens but
to show a prelude to how long we were blocked before a render started.
So you can follow the first event to commit.
<img width="674" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-20 at 1 59 58 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/151ba9e8-6b3c-4fa1-9f8d-e3602745eeb7">
I still need to add the rendering/suspended phases to the timeline which
why this screenshot has a gap.
<img width="993" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-20 at 12 50 27 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/155b6675-b78a-4a22-a32b-212c15051074">
In this case it's a Form Action which started a render into the form
which then suspended on the action. The action then caused a refresh,
which interrupts with its own update that's blocked before rendering.
Suspended roots like this is interesting because we could in theory
start working on a different root in the meantime which makes this
timeline less linear.
## Summary
This PR bumps Flow all the way to the latest 0.245.2.
Most of the suppressions comes from Flow v0.239.0's change to include
undefined in the return of `Array.pop`.
I also enabled `react.custom_jsx_typing=true` and added custom jsx
typing to match the old behavior that `React.createElement` is
effectively any typed. This is necessary since various builtin
components like `React.Fragment` is actually symbol in the React repo
instead of `React.AbstractComponent<...>`. It can be made more accurate
by customizing the `React$CustomJSXFactory` type, but I will leave it to
the React team to decide.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn flow` for all the renderers
## Summary
Flow will eventually remove the specific `React.Element` type. For most
of the code, it can be replaced with `React.MixedElement` or
`React.Node`.
When specific react elements are required, it needs to be replaced with
either `React$Element` which will trigger a `internal-type` lint error
that can be disabled project-wide, or use
`ExactReactElement_DEPRECATED`.
Fortunately in this case, this one can be replaced with just
`React.MixedElement`.
## How did you test this change?
`flow`
## Summary
As promised on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29627, this
creates a unit test for the `findNodeHandle` error that prevents
developers from calling it within render methods.
## How did you test this change?
```
$ yarn test ReactFabric-test.internal.js
```
Persistent renderers used the `Update` effect flag to check if a subtree
needs to be cloned. In some cases, that causes extra renders, such as
when a layout effect is triggered which only has an effect on the JS
side, but doesn't update the host components.
It's been a bit tricky to find the right places where this needs to be
set and I'm not 100% sure I got all the cases even though the tests
passed.
We use static dependency injection. We shouldn't use this dynamic
dependency injection we do for DevTools internals. There's also meta
programming like spreading and stuff that isn't needed.
This moves the config from `injectIntoDevTools` to the FiberConfig so it
can be statically resolved.
Closure Compiler has some trouble generating optimal code for this
anyway so ideally we'd refactor this further but at least this is better
and saves a few bytes and avoids some code paths (when minified).
There is currently a mismatch in how the persistent mode JS API and the
Fabric native code interpret `completeRoot`.
This is a short-lived experiment to see the effect of moving the Fabric
`completeRoot` call from `finalizeContainerChildren` to
`replaceContainerChildren` which in some cases does not get called.
## Summary
This PR fixes the `fastAddProperties` function. Now it nullifies a prop
if it was defined in one of the items of a style array, but then set to
`undefined` or `null` in one of the subsequent items. E.g. `style:
[{top: 0}, {top: undefined}]` should evaluate to `{top: null}`. Also
added a test case for that.
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer -r=xplat --variant=false
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer -r=xplat --variant=true
yarn flow native
```
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
Now that HostContext determination for Fabric is a DEV-only behavior, we
can move the HostContext determination to resolve from the ViewConfig
for a given type. Doing this will allow arbitrary types to register
themselves as potential parents of raw text string children. This is the
first of two diffs for react as we'll:
1. Add the new property to the ViewConfig types
2. Update React Native to include the `supportsRawText` property for
`RCTText`, `RCTVirtualText`, `AndroidTextInput`, etc.
3. Switch the behavior of react to read from the ViewConfig rather than
a static list of types.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
- yarn test
- yarn test --prod
- Pulled change into react-native, added `supportsRawText` props to
RCTText, RCTVirtualText, etc. ViewConfigs and confirmed everything type
checks.
For environments that still have legacy contexts available, this adds a
warning to make the remaining call sites easier to locate and encourage
upgrades.
The explicit mock override in this test was causing it to always run as
native-oss instead of also as xplat. This moves the test to use `//
@gate persistent` instead to run it in all persistent configs.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
In the Fabric renderer in React Native, we only use the HostContext to
issue soft errors in __DEV__ bundles when attempting to add a raw text
child to a node that may not support them. Moving the logic to set this
context to __DEV__ bundles only unblocks more expensive methods for
resolving whether a parent context supports raw text children, like
resolving this information from `getViewConfigForType`.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
yarn test (--prod)
That way we get owner stacks (native or otherwise) for `console.error`
or `console.warn` inside of them.
Since the `reportError` is also called within this context, we also get
them for errors thrown within event listeners. You'll also be able to
observe this in in the `error` event. Similar to how `onUncaughtError`
is in the scope of the instance that errored - even though
`onUncaughtError` doesn't kick in for event listeners.
Chrome (from console.createTask):
<img width="306" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-12 at 2 08 19 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/34cd9d57-0df4-44df-a470-e89a5dd1b07d">
<img width="302" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-12 at 2 03 32 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/678117b1-e03a-47d4-9989-8350212c8135">
Firefox (from React DevTools):
<img width="493" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-12 at 2 05 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/94ca224d-354a-4ec8-a886-5740bcb418e5">
(This is the parent stack since React DevTools doesn't just yet print
owner stack.)
(Firefox doesn't print the component stack for uncaught since we don't
add component stacks for "error" events from React DevTools - just
console.error. Perhaps an oversight.)
If we didn't have the synthetic event system this would kind of just
work natively in Chrome because we have this task active when we attach
the event listeners to the DOM node and async stacks just follow along
that way. In fact, if you attach a manual listener in useEffect you get
this same effect. It's just because we use event delegation that this
doesn't work.
However, if we did get rid of the synthetic event system we'd likely
still want to add a wrapper on the DOM node to set our internal current
owner so that the non-native part of the system still can observe the
active instance. That wouldn't work with manually attached listeners
though.
Basically make `console.error` and `console.warn` behave like normal -
when a component stack isn't appended. I need this because I need to be
able to print rich logs with the component stack option and to be able
to disable instrumentation completely in `console.createTask`
environments that don't need it.
Currently we can't print logs with richer objects because they're
toString:ed first. In practice, pretty much all arguments we log are
already toString:ed so it's not necessary anyway. Some might be like a
number. So it would only be a problem if some environment can't handle
proper consoles but then it's up to that environment to toString it
before logging.
The `Warning: ` prefix is historic and is both noisy and confusing. It's
mostly unnecessary since the UI surrounding `console.error` and
`console.warn` tend to have visual treatment around it anyway. However,
it's actively misleading when `console.error` gets prefixed with a
Warning that we consider an error level. There's an argument to be made
that some of our `console.error` don't make the bar for an error but
then the argument is to downgrade each of those to `console.warn` - not
to brand all our actual error logging with `Warning: `.
Apparently something needs to change in React Native before landing this
because it depends on the prefix somehow which probably doesn't make
sense already.
## Overview
Updates `eslint-plugin-jest` and enables the recommended rules with some
turned off that are unhelpful.
The main motivations is:
a) we have a few duplicated tests, which this found an I deleted
b) making sure we don't accidentally commit skipped tests
## Overview
Reverts https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26616 and implements the
suggested way instead.
This change in #26616 broken the internal sync command, which now
results in duplicated `@generated` headers. It also makes it harder to
detect changes during the diff train sync. Instead, we will check for
changes, and if there are changes sign the files and commit them to the
sync branch.
## Strategy
The new sync strategy accounts for the generated headers during the
sync:
- **Revert Version**: Revert the version strings
- **Revert @generated**: Re-sign the files (will be the same hash as
before if unchanged)
- **Check**: Check if there are changes **if not, skip**
- **Re-apply Version**: Now add back the new version string
- **Re-sign @generated**: And re-generate the headers
Then commit to branch. This ensures that if there are no changes, we'll
skip.
---------
Co-authored-by: Timothy Yung <yungsters@gmail.com>
## Summary
We currently do deep diffing for object props, and also use custom
differs, if they are defined, for props with custom attribute config.
The idea is to simply do a `===` comparison instead of all that work. We
will do less computation on the JS side, but send more data to native.
The hypothesis is that this change should be neutral in terms of
performance. If that's the case, we'll be able to get rid of custom
differs, and be one step closer to deleting view configs.
This PR adds the `enableShallowPropDiffing` feature flag to support this
experiment.
## How did you test this change?
With `enableShallowPropDiffing` hardcoded to `true`:
```
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer
```
This fails on the following test cases:
- should use the diff attribute
- should do deep diffs of Objects by default
- should skip deeply-nested changed functions
Which makes sense with this change. These test cases should be deleted
if the experiment is shipped.
## Overview
We didn't have any tests that ran in persistent mode with the xplat
feature flags (for either variant).
As a result, invalid test gating like in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29664 were not caught.
This PR adds test flavors for `ReactFeatureFlag-native-fb.js` in both
variants.
## Summary
This PR add tests for `ReactNativeAttributePayloadFabric.js`.
It introduces `ReactNativeAttributePayloadFabric-test.internal.js`,
which is a copy-paste of `ReactNativeAttributePayload-test.internal.js`.
On top of that, there is a bunch of new test cases for the
`ReactNativeAttributePayloadFabric.create` function.
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer
```
This was missed in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29038 when
unifying the "owner" abstractions, causing `findNodeHandle` to warn even
outside of `render()` invocations.
Throw an error during module initialization if the version of the
"react-dom" package does not match the version of "react".
We used to be more relaxed about this, because the "react" package
changed so infrequently. However, we now have many more features that
rely on an internal protocol between the two packages, including Hooks,
Float, and the compiler runtime. So it's important that both packages
are versioned in lockstep.
Before this change, a version mismatch would often result in a cryptic
internal error with no indication of the root cause.
Instead, we will now compare the versions during module initialization
and immediately throw an error to catch mistakes as early as possible
and provide a clear error message.
We previously had two slightly different concepts for "current fiber".
There's the "owner" which is set inside of class components in prod if
string refs are enabled, and sometimes inside function components in DEV
but not other contexts.
Then we have the "current fiber" which is only set in DEV for various
warnings but is enabled in a bunch of contexts.
This unifies them into a single "current fiber".
The concept of string refs shouldn't really exist so this should really
be a DEV only concept. In the meantime, this sets the current fiber
inside class render only in prod, however, in DEV it's now enabled in
more contexts which can affect the string refs. That was already the
case that a string ref in a Function component was only connecting to
the owner in prod. Any string ref associated with any non-class won't
work regardless so that's not an issue. The practical change here is
that an element with a string ref created inside a life-cycle associated
with a class will work in DEV but not in prod. Since we need the current
fiber to be available in more contexts in DEV for the debugging
purposes. That wouldn't affect any old code since it would have a broken
ref anyway. New code shouldn't use string refs anyway.
The other implication is that "owner" doesn't necessarily mean
"rendering" since we need the "owner" to track other debug information
like stacks - in other contexts like useEffect, life cycles, etc.
Internally we have a separate `isRendering` flag that actually means
we're rendering but even that is a very overloaded concept. So anything
that uses "owner" to imply rendering might be wrong with this change.
This is a first step to a larger refactor for tracking current rendering
information.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
Updates Suspensey instances and resources to preload even during urgent
updates and to potentially suspend.
The current implementation is unchanged for transitions but for sync
updates if there is a suspense boundary above the resource/instance it
will be rendered in fallback mode instead.
Note: This behavior is not what we want for images once we make them
suspense enabled. We will need to have forked behavior here to
distinguish between stylesheets which should never commit when not
loaded and images which should commit after a small delay
## Summary
The experiment has shown no significant performance changes. This PR
removes it.
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn flow native
yarn lint
```
## Summary
This PR makes some fixes to the `fastAddProperties` function:
- Use `if (!attributeConfig)` instead of `if (attributeConfig ===
undefined)` to account for `null`.
- If a prop has an Object `attributeConfig` with a `diff` function
defined on it, treat it as an atomic value to keep the semantics of
`diffProperties`.
## How did you test this change?
Build and run RNTester app.
## Summary
This PR introduces Fabric-only version of
`ReactNativeAttributesPayload`. It is a copy-paste of
`ReactNativeAttributesPayload.js`, and is called
`ReactNativeAttributesPayloadFabric.js`.
The idea behind this change is that certain optimizations in prop
diffing may actually be a regression on the old architecture. For
example, removing custom diffing may result in larger updateProps
payloads. Which is, I guess, fine with JSI, but might be a problem with
the bridge.
## How did you test this change?
There should be no runtime effect of this change.
## Summary
This PR introduces a faster version of the `addProperties` function.
This new function is basically the `diffProperties` with `prevProps` set
to `null`, propagated constants, and all the unreachable code paths
collapsed.
## How did you test this change?
I've tested this change with [the benchmark
app](https://github.com/react-native-community/RNNewArchitectureApp/tree/new-architecture-benchmarks)
and got ~4.4% improvement in the view creation time.
Dmytro Rykun
Rubén Norte
Sebastian Markbåge
Pieter De Baets
Ricky
Andrew Clark
Alex Hunt
Sam Zhou
Timothy Yung
Jan Kassens
Ruslan Lesiutin
Sebastian Silbermann
Eric Rozell
Josh Story