React transpiles some of its own `console.error` calls into a helper
that appends component stacks to those calls. However, this doesn't
cover user space `console.error` calls - which includes React helpers
that React has moved into third parties like createClass and prop-types.
The idea is that any user space component can add a warning just like
React can which is why React DevTools adds them too if they don't
already exist. Having them appended in both places is tricky because now
you have to know whether to remove them from React's logs.
Similarly it's often common for server-side frameworks to forget to
cover the `console.error` logs from other sources since React DevTools
isn't active there. However, it's also annoying to get component stacks
clogging the terminal - depending on where the log came from.
In the future `console.createTask()` will cover this use case natively
and when available we don't append them at all.
The new strategy relies on either:
- React DevTools existing to add them to React logs as well as third
parties.
- `console.createTask` being supported and surfaced.
- A third party framework showing the component stack either in an Error
Dialog or appended to terminal output.
For a third party to be able to implement this they need to be able to
get the component stack. To get the component stack from within a
`console.error` call you need to use the `React.captureOwnerStack()`
helper which is only available in `enableOwnerStacks` flag. However,
it's possible to polyfill with parent stacks using internals as a stop
gap. There's a question of whether React 19 should just go out with
`enableOwnerStacks` to expose this but regardless I think it's best it
doesn't include component stacks from the runtime for consistency.
In practice it's not really a regression though because typically either
of the other options exists and error dialogs don't implement
`console.error` overrides anyway yet. SSR terminals might miss them but
they'd only have them in DEV warnings to begin with an a subset of React
warnings. Typically those are either going to happen on the client
anyway or replayed.
Our tests are written to assert that component stacks work in various
scenarios all over the place. To ensure that this keeps working I
implement a "polyfill" that is similar to that expected a server
framework might do - in `assertConsoleErrorDev` and `toErrorDev`.
This PR doesn't yet change www or RN since they have their own forks of
consoleWithStackDev for now.
Use the same normalizeCodeLocInfo that we use everywhere else.
We should actually test the component stack itself. Not just that it
exists. This was causing false passes.
However, the logic was also wrong before because it wouldn't always
strip out the last line so wouldn't accurately normalize it. Leading to
false failures as well.
When we replay logs we badge them with e.g. `[Server]`. That way it's
easy to identify that the source of the log actually happened on the
Server (RSC). However, when we threw an error we didn't have any such
thing. The error was rethrown on the client and then handled just like
any other client error.
This transfers the `environmentName` in DEV to our restored Error
"sub-class" (conceptually) along with `digest`. That way you can read
`error.environmentName` to print this in your own UI.
I also updated our default for `onCaughtError` (and `onError` in Fizz)
to use the `printToConsole` helper that the Flight Client uses to log it
with the badge format. So by default you get the same experience as
console.error for caught errors:
<img width="810" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-10 at 9 25 12 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/8490fedc-09f6-4286-9332-fbe6b0faa2d3">
<img width="815" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-10 at 9 39 30 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/bdcfc554-504a-4b1d-82bf-b717e74975ac">
Unfortunately I can't do the same thing for `onUncaughtError` nor
`onRecoverableError` because they use `reportError` which doesn't have
custom formatting (unless we also prevented default on window.onerror).
However maybe that's ok because 1) you should always have an error
boundary 2) it's not likely that an RSC error can actually recover
because it's not going to be rendered again so shouldn't really happen
outside some parent conditionally rendering maybe.
The other problem with this approach is that the default is no longer
trivial - so reimplementing the default in user space is trickier and
ideally we shouldn't expose our default to be called.
## Summary
```js
assertConsoleErrorDev([
['Hello', {withoutStack: true}]
])
```
now errors with a helpful diff message if the message mismatched. See
first commit for previous behavior.
## How did you test this change?
- `yarn test --watch
packages/internal-test-utils/__tests__/ReactInternalTestUtils-test.js`
Fixes issue where if the first letter of the expected string appeared
anywhere in actual message, the assertion would pass, leading to false
negatives. We should check the entire expected string.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ricky <rickhanlonii@gmail.com>
## Overview
**Internal React repo tests only**
Depends on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/28710
Adds three new assertions:
- `assertConsoleLogDev`
- `assertConsoleWarnDev`
- `assertConsoleErrorDev`
These will replace this pattern:
```js
await expect(async () => {
await expect(async () => {
await act(() => {
root.render(<Fail />)
});
}).toThrow();
}).toWarnDev('Warning');
```
With this:
```js
await expect(async () => {
await act(() => {
root.render(<Fail />)
});
}).toThrow();
assertConsoleWarnDev('Warning');
```
It works similar to our other `assertLog` matchers which clear the log
and assert on it, failing the tests if the log is not asserted before
the test ends.
## Diffs
There are a few improvements I also added including better log diffs and
more logging.
When there's a failure, the output will look something like:
<img width="655" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-03 at 11 50 08 AM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/2440089/0c4bf1b2-5f63-4204-8af3-09e0c2d752ad">
Check out the test suite for snapshots of all the failures we may log.
Moving this to `internal-test-utils` so I can add helpers in the next PR
for:
- assertLogDev
- assertWarnDev
- assertErrorDev
Which will be exported from `internal-test-utils`. This isn't strictly
necessary, but it makes the factoring nicer, so internal-test-until
doesn't need to depend on `scripts/jest`.
Ricky
Sebastian Markbåge
Sebastian Silbermann
Andrew Clark