features → feature
> There is nothing "bad" about using state or lifecycle hooks in components. Like any powerful feature**s**, they should be used in moderation, but we have no intention to remove them.
I can’t explain the exact grammatical principle this violates, but it sounds wrong to my native English ears that “feature” is plural here. Another way to check if the grammar sounds right is to change the order of the clauses: ”They should be used in moderation, like any powerful feature“ sounds right, whereas “They should be used in moderation, like any powerful features” does not.
* Added flow to PR template
* Added record-tests step to PR template and contribution docs
* Updated order of PR checks
(cherry picked from commit bfd5b1878e)
* Fix typo in Proposing a Change section in how-to-contribute.md
Not sure if it was actually intended or was a typo but changed 'If you intend to change to the public API' --> 'If you intend to make a change to the public API'
* Simplify
* fix broken links to outdated code
* another broken links to outdated code
* update hash commit & folder structure to current
(cherry picked from commit b847226ec4)
* Add more to Codebase Overview
* WIP
* Start a reconciler overview
* Add a few more sections
* todo
* WIP
* Finish it
* Whitespace
* Minor tweaks
* Minor tweaks
JustinandAndrew Clark
Dan AbramovandAndrew Clark
Andrew ClarkandBrandon Dail
Prayag VermaandDan Abramov
Ragnar Þór ValgeirssonandDan Abramov
Jack CrossandBrandon Dail
Richie ThomasandBrandon Dail
Joel SequeiraandDan Abramov
Brian VaughnandDan Abramov
Shuhei Kagawaandtomocchino
Guilherme Oenningandtomocchino
Lee SanghyeonandDan Abramov
Piper ChesterandDan Abramov
Phil QuinnandDan Abramov
CT WuandDan Abramov
Kevin LackerandDan Abramov
Alex BabkovandDan Abramov
Aesop WolfandDan Abramov
Steve MaoandDan Abramov
Ivan ZotovandPaul O’Shannessy