This could be used to do custom formatting of the stack trace in a way
that isn't compatible with how we use it. So we disable it while we use
it.
In theory we could call this ourselves with the result of our stack.
It would be a lot of extra production code though. My personal opinion
is that this should always be done server side instead of on the client.
We could expose a custom parser that converts it and passes it through
prepareStackTrace as structured data. That way it's external and doesn't
have to be built-in to React.
We currently use the stack to dedupe warnings in a couple of places.
This is a very heavy weight way of computing that a warning doesn't need
to be fired.
This uses parent component name as a heuristic for deduping. It's not
perfect but as soon as you fix one you'll uncover the next. It might be a
little annoying but having many logs is also annoying.
We now have no special cases for stacks. The only thing that uses stacks in
dev is the console.error and dev tools. This means that we could
externalize this completely to an console.error patching module and drop
it from being built-in to react.
The only prod/dev behavior is the one we pass to error boundaries or the
error we throw if you don't have an error boundary.
* Remove priority field from tracing
* Remove DebugTracing mode from new reconciler (temporarily)
* Run DebugTracing tests in the *other* variant so it's no on for new reconciler
* DevTools console override handles new component stack format
DevTools does not attempt to mimic the default browser console format for its component stacks but it does properly detect the new format for Chrome, Firefox, and Safari.
* Detect double stacks in the new format in tests
* Remove unnecessary uses of getStackByFiberInDevAndProd
These all execute in the right execution context already.
* Set the debug fiber around the cases that don't have an execution context
* Remove stack detection in our console log overrides
We never pass custom stacks as part of the args anymore.
* Bonus: Don't append getStackAddendum to invariants
We print component stacks for every error anyway so this is just duplicate
information.
* Upgrade fbjs-scripts
This script takes into account the NODE_ENV as part of jest cache keys.
This avoids flaky tests since we depend on different transforms in prod
and dev.
* Upgrade Fresh test to Babel 7 transform
* test: Add failing case for dangerouslySetInnerHtml=undefined
* fix: skip dangerouslySetInnerHtml warning if it's undefined
* test: add similar test that should trigger the warning
* chore: Remove redundant nullish check
* Poke yarn_test_www_variant which timed out
* test: Add smaller test for innerHTML=string to innerHTML=undefined
* Fix incorrect unmounted state update warning
We detach fibers (which nulls the field) when we commit a deletion, so any state updates scheduled between that point and when we eventually flush passive effect destroys won't have a way to check if there is a pending passive unmount effect scheduled for its alternate unless we also explicitly track this for both the current and the alternate.
This commit adds a new DEV-only effect type, `PendingPassiveUnmountDev`, to handle this case.
* Failing test for #18657
* Remove incorrect priority check
I think this was just poor factoring on my part in #18411. Honestly it
doesn't make much sense to me, but my best guess is that I must have
thought that when `baseTime > currentChildExpirationTime`, the function
would fall through to the
`currentChildExpirationTime < renderExpirationTime` branch below.
Really I think just made an oopsie.
Regardless, this logic is galaxy brainéd. A goal of the Lanes refactor
I'm working on is to make these types of checks -- is there remaining
work in this tree? -- a lot easier to think about. Hopefully.
* Move renderer `act` to work loop
* Delete `flushSuspenseFallbacksInTests`
This was meant to be a temporary hack to unblock the `act` work, but it
quickly spread throughout our tests.
What it's meant to do is force fallbacks to flush inside `act` even in
Concurrent Mode. It does this by wrapping the `setTimeout` call in a
check to see if it's in an `act` context. If so, it skips the delay and
immediately commits the fallback.
Really this is only meant for our internal React tests that need to
incrementally render. Nobody outside our team (and Relay) needs to do
that, yet. Even if/when we do support that, it may or may not be with
the same `flushAndYield` pattern we use internally.
However, even for our internal purposes, the behavior isn't right
because a really common reason we flush work incrementally is to make
assertions on the "suspended" state, before the fallback has committed.
There's no way to do that from inside `act` with the behavior of this
flag, because it causes the fallback to immediately commit. This has led
us to *not* use `act` in a lot of our tests, or to write code that
doesn't match what would actually happen in a real environment.
What we really want is for the fallbacks to be flushed at the *end` of
the `act` scope. Not within it.
This only affects the noop and test renderer versions of `act`, which
are implemented inside the reconciler. Whereas `ReactTestUtils.act` is
implemented in "userspace" for backwards compatibility. This is fine
because we didn't have any DOM Suspense tests that relied on this flag;
they all use test renderer or noop.
In the future, we'll probably want to move always use the reconciler
implementation of `act`. It will not affect the prod bundle, because we
currently only plan to support `act` in dev. Though we still haven't
completely figured that out. However, regardless of whether we support a
production `act` for users, we'll still need to write internal React
tests in production mode. For that use case, we'll likely add our own
internal version of `act` that assumes a mock Scheduler and might rely
on hacks that don't 100% align up with the public one.
* Migrate conditional tests to gate pragma
I searched through the codebase for this pattern:
```js
describe('test suite', () => {
if (!__EXPERIMENTAL__) { // or some other condition
test("empty test so Jest doesn't complain", () => {});
return;
}
// Unless we're in experimental mode, none of the tests in this block
// will run.
})
```
and converted them to the `@gate` pragma instead.
The reason this pattern isn't preferred is because you end up disabling
more tests than you need to.
* Add flag for www release channels
Using a heuristic where I check a flag that is known to only be enabled
in www. I left a TODO to instead set the release channel explicitly in
each test config.
* Add more edge cases to fixture
Also adjust some expectations. I think the column should ideally be 1 but varies.
The Example row is one line off because it throws on the hook but should ideally be the component.
Similarly class components with constructors may have the line in the constructor.
* Account for the construct call taking a stack frame
We do this by first searching for the first different frame, then find
the same frames and then find the first different frame again.
* Throw controls
Otherwise they don't get a stack frame associated with them in IE.
* Protect against generating stacks failing
Errors while generating stacks will bubble to the root. Since this technique
is a bit sketchy, we should probably protect against it.
* Don't construct the thing that throws
Instead, we pass the prototype as the "this". It's new every time anyway.
* Implement component stack extraction hack
* Normalize errors in tests
This drops the requirement to include owner to pass the test.
* Special case tests
* Add destructuring to force toObject which throws before the side-effects
This ensures that we don't double call yieldValue or advanceTime in tests.
Ideally we could use empty destructuring but ES lint doesn't like it.
* Cache the result in DEV
In DEV it's somewhat likely that we'll see many logs that add component
stacks. This could be slow so we cache the results of previous components.
* Fixture
* Add Reflect to lint
* Log if out of range.
* Fix special case when the function call throws in V8
In V8 we need to ignore the first line. Normally we would never get there
because the stacks would differ before that, but the stacks are the same if
we end up throwing at the same place as the control.
* Remove unnecessary workInProgress line
* Mutate workInProgress instead of returning
We were ambivalent about this before.
* Make handleError a void method too
Sebastian Markbåge
Brian Vaughn
Nick Reiley
Dominic Gannaway
Naman Goel
Sebastian Silbermann
Nicolas Gallagher
Andrew Clark
Dan Abramov
Boris Serdiuk
Thomas Brown
BetaSu
Chris Dobson