The new folder structure is organized around major packages that are expected to ship separately in some form.
`/isomorphic`
I moved classic/modern and children utils into a directory called "isomorphic" with the main export being ReactIsomorphic. This will eventually become the "react" package.
This includes all the dependencies that you might need to create a component without dependencies on the renderer/reconciler.
The rest moves into decoupled renderers.
`/renderers/dom/client` - This is the main renderer for DOM.
`/renderers/dom/server` - This is the server-side renderer for HTML strings.
`/addons` and `/test` - Same as before for now.
You're not supposed to take on a dependency inside another package.
Shared code is organized into a "shared" directory which is intended to support all the packages in that subdirectory. Meaning that once we swap to CommonJS modules, the only time you should use `..` is to target `../shared/` or `../../shared`.
E.g. `/shared/` is common utils that are used by everything.
`/renderers/shared/` is code that is shared by all renderers, such as the main reconciliation algorithm.
Shared code will likely be copied into each package rather than referenced. This allow us to have separate state and allow inlining and deadcode elimination.
This reverts an early commit that made it so that elements from two
different owner in the same slot wouldn't share state.
That behavior was helpful, and we did hit a case which was solved by this.
However, this pattern is extremely uncommon. I've yet to even find the
original case, let alone any existing cases in our codebase.
Therefore, we're dropping this to simplify elements and enable new
optimizations.
This is an anti-pattern that can be easily avoided by putting the logic
in componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate instead.
It creates a dependency on stale data inside render without enforcing
a two-pass render.
This ensures that we have a prefix that can be easily identified in logs
so that we can filter out warnings based on their prefix.
This also turns the remaining two monitorCodeUse callers into warnings.
We'll probably still use monitorCodeUse until we know if we want to
deprecate but most releases should only have warnings.
Currently we use an invariant to prevent this code pattern. That is really
aggressive for something that doesn't actually put React in a bad state. This
diff replaces invariants with warnings and makes those code paths no-ops.
This triggers a warning if you try to pass a keyed object as a child.
You now have to wrap it in React.addons.createFragment(object) which
creates a proxy (in dev) which warns if it is accessed. The purpose of
this is to make these into opaque objects so that nobody relies on its
data structure.
After that we can turn it into a different data structure such as a
ReactFragment node or an iterable of flattened ReactElements.
This diff enables setState to accept a function in addition to a state partial. If you provide a function, it will be called with the up-to-date `state, props, context` as arguments.
This enables some nicer syntax for complex setState patterns:
If setState is doing an increment and wants to guarantee atomicy, you need a function:
```
this.setState(state => ({ number: state.number + 1 }));
```
This atomicy is particularly important if setState is called multiple times in a single frame of execution as the result of complex user actions. It's a tricky bug to chase down and difficult to determine how to fix when you find it. The current pattern of reaching into _pendingState relies on an implementation detail.
In this example: props.doAction() may result in your ancestor re-rendering and providing you with new props. If setState is called directly with an object literal referencing `this.props`, it will use the *old* version of props, not the new value. Using a function solves for this case:
```
this.props.doAction();
this.setState((state, props) => ({ number: state.number * props.multiplier }));
```
enqueueCallbackInternal forgot to schedule an update.
We could rely on the implicit contract of enqueueElement to do it. However,
if we're currently outside a transaction, it'll flush synchronously. Before
we enqueue the callback. We could also enqueueCallback before we
enqueueElement, but that causes a fragile relationship between them. E.g.
enqueueElement should not need to schedule an update if it is the same
element.
Jim
Sebastian Markbage
Paul O’Shannessy
Ben Alpert
Ben Alpert
chico
Yakov Dalinchuk
Tomasz Kołodziejski
Jim
Baraa Hamodi
Maxi Ferreira
Laurent Etiemble
cpojer
Cheng Lou
Henry Zhu
Sebastian Markbåge
Matias Singers
Lee Byron
Ben Moss