* Bump deps to Jest 22
* Prevent jsdom from logging intentionally thrown errors
This relies on our existing special field that we use to mute errors.
Perhaps, it would be better to instead rely on preventDefault() directly.
I outlined a possible strategy here: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/11098#issuecomment-355032539
* Update snapshots
* Mock out a method called by ReactART that now throws
* Calling .click() no longer works, dispatch event instead
* Fix incorrect SVG element creation in test
* Render SVG elements inside <svg> to avoid extra warnings
* Fix range input test to use numeric value
* Fix creating SVG element in test
* Replace brittle test that relied on jsdom behavior
The test passed in jsdom due to its implementation details.
The original intention was to test the mutation method, but it was removed a while ago.
Following @nhunzaker's suggestion, I moved the tests to ReactDOMInput and adjusted them to not rely on implementation details.
* Add a workaround for the expected extra client-side warning
This is a bit ugly but it's just two places. I think we can live with this.
* Only warn once for mismatches caused by bad attribute casing
We used to warn both about bad casing and about a mismatch.
The mismatch warning was a bit confusing. We didn't know we warned twice because jsdom didn't faithfully emulate SVG.
This changes the behavior to only leave the warning about bad casing if that's what caused the mismatch.
It also adjusts the test to have an expectation that matches the real world behavior.
* Add an expected warning per comment in the same test
* Harden tests around init/addition/update/removal of aliased attributes
I noticed some patterns weren't being tested.
* Call setValueForProperty() for null and undefined
The branching before the call is unnecessary because setValueForProperty() already
has an internal branch that delegates to deleteValueForProperty() for null and
undefined through the shouldIgnoreValue() check.
The goal is to start unifying these methods because their separation doesn't
reflect the current behavior (e.g. for unknown properties) anymore, and obscures
what actually happens with different inputs.
* Inline deleteValueForProperty() into setValueForProperty()
Now we don't read propertyInfo twice in this case.
I also dropped a few early returns. I added them a while ago when we had
Stack-only tracking of DOM operations, and some operations were being
counted twice because of how this code is structured. This isn't a problem
anymore (both because we don't track operations, and because I've just
inlined this method call).
* Inline deleteValueForAttribute() into setValueForAttribute()
The special cases for null and undefined already exist in setValueForAttribute().
* Delete some dead code
* Make setValueForAttribute() a branch of setValueForProperty()
Their naming is pretty confusing by now. For example setValueForProperty()
calls setValueForAttribute() when shouldSetAttribute() is false (!). I want
to refactor (as in, inline and then maybe factor it out differently) the relation
between them. For now, I'm consolidating the callers to use setValueForProperty().
* Make it more obvious where we skip and when we reset attributes
The naming of these methods is still very vague and conflicting in some cases.
Will need further work.
* Rewrite setValueForProperty() with early exits
This makes the flow clearer in my opinion.
* Move shouldIgnoreValue() into DOMProperty
It was previously duplicated.
It's also suspiciously similar in purpose to shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull()
so I want to see if there is a way to unify them.
* Use more specific methods for testing validity
* Unify shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull() and shouldIgnoreValue()
* Remove shouldSetAttribute()
Its naming was confusing and it was used all over the place instead of more specific checks.
Now that we only have one call site, we might as well inline and get rid of it.
* Remove unnecessary condition
* Remove another unnecessary condition
* Add Flow coverage
* Oops
* Fix lint (ESLint complains about Flow suppression)
* Fix treatment of Symbol/Function values on boolean attributes
They weren't being properly skipped because of the early return.
I added tests for this case.
* Avoid getPropertyInfo() calls
I think this PR looks worse on benchmarks because we have to read propertyInfo in different places.
Originally I tried to get rid of propertyInfo, but looks like it's important for performance after all.
So now I'm going into the opposite direction, and precompute propertyInfo as early as possible, and then just pass it around.
This way we can avoid extra lookups but keep functions nice and modular.
* Pass propertyInfo as argument to getValueForProperty()
It always exists because this function is only called for known properties.
* Make it clearer this branch is boolean-specific
I wrote this and then got confused myself.
* Memoize whether propertyInfo accepts boolean value
Since we run these checks for all booleans, might as well remember it.
* Fix a crash when numeric property is given a Symbol
* Record attribute table
The changes reflect that SSR doesn't crash with symbols anymore (and just warns, consistently with the client).
* Refactor attribute initialization
Instead of using flags, explicitly group similar attributes/properties.
* Optimization: we know built-in attributes are never invalid
* Use strict comparison
* Rename methods for clarity
* Lint nit
* Minor tweaks
* Document all the different attribute types
* Harden tests around init/addition/update/removal of aliased attributes
I noticed some patterns weren't being tested.
* Call setValueForProperty() for null and undefined
The branching before the call is unnecessary because setValueForProperty() already
has an internal branch that delegates to deleteValueForProperty() for null and
undefined through the shouldIgnoreValue() check.
The goal is to start unifying these methods because their separation doesn't
reflect the current behavior (e.g. for unknown properties) anymore, and obscures
what actually happens with different inputs.
* Inline deleteValueForProperty() into setValueForProperty()
Now we don't read propertyInfo twice in this case.
I also dropped a few early returns. I added them a while ago when we had
Stack-only tracking of DOM operations, and some operations were being
counted twice because of how this code is structured. This isn't a problem
anymore (both because we don't track operations, and because I've just
inlined this method call).
* Inline deleteValueForAttribute() into setValueForAttribute()
The special cases for null and undefined already exist in setValueForAttribute().
* Delete some dead code
* Make setValueForAttribute() a branch of setValueForProperty()
Their naming is pretty confusing by now. For example setValueForProperty()
calls setValueForAttribute() when shouldSetAttribute() is false (!). I want
to refactor (as in, inline and then maybe factor it out differently) the relation
between them. For now, I'm consolidating the callers to use setValueForProperty().
* Make it more obvious where we skip and when we reset attributes
The naming of these methods is still very vague and conflicting in some cases.
Will need further work.
* Rewrite setValueForProperty() with early exits
This makes the flow clearer in my opinion.
* Move shouldIgnoreValue() into DOMProperty
It was previously duplicated.
It's also suspiciously similar in purpose to shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull()
so I want to see if there is a way to unify them.
* Use more specific methods for testing validity
* Unify shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull() and shouldIgnoreValue()
* Remove shouldSetAttribute()
Its naming was confusing and it was used all over the place instead of more specific checks.
Now that we only have one call site, we might as well inline and get rid of it.
* Remove unnecessary condition
* Remove another unnecessary condition
* Add Flow coverage
* Oops
* Fix lint (ESLint complains about Flow suppression)
* Extract Jest config into a separate file
* Refactor Jest scripts directory structure
Introduces a more consistent naming scheme.
* Add yarn test-bundles and yarn test-prod-bundles
Only files ending with -test.public.js are opted in (so far we don't have any).
* Fix error decoding for production bundles
GCC seems to remove `new` from `new Error()` which broke our proxy.
* Build production version of react-noop-renderer
This lets us test more bundles.
* Switch to blacklist (exclude .private.js tests)
* Rename tests that are currently broken against bundles to *-test.internal.js
Some of these are using private APIs. Some have other issues.
* Add bundle tests to CI
* Split private and public ReactJSXElementValidator tests
* Remove internal deps from ReactServerRendering-test and make it public
* Only run tests directly in __tests__
This lets us share code between test files by placing them in __tests__/utils.
* Remove ExecutionEnvironment dependency from DOMServerIntegrationTest
It's not necessary since Stack.
* Split up ReactDOMServerIntegration into test suite and utilities
This enables us to further split it down. Good both for parallelization and extracting public parts.
* Split Fragment tests from other DOMServerIntegration tests
This enables them to opt other DOMServerIntegration tests into bundle testing.
* Split ReactDOMServerIntegration into different test files
It was way too slow to run all these in sequence.
* Don't reset the cache twice in DOMServerIntegration tests
We used to do this to simulate testing separate bundles.
But now we actually *do* test bundles. So there is no need for this, as it makes tests slower.
* Rename test-bundles* commands to test-build*
Also add test-prod-build as alias for test-build-prod because I keep messing them up.
* Use regenerator polyfill for react-noop
This fixes other issues and finally lets us run ReactNoop tests against a prod bundle.
* Run most Incremental tests against bundles
Now that GCC generator issue is fixed, we can do this.
I split ErrorLogging test separately because it does mocking. Other error handling tests don't need it.
* Update sizes
* Fix ReactMount test
* Enable ReactDOMComponent test
* Fix a warning issue uncovered by flat bundle testing
With flat bundles, we couldn't produce a good warning for <div onclick={}> on SSR
because it doesn't use the event system. However the issue was not visible in normal
Jest runs because the event plugins have been injected by the time the test ran.
To solve this, I am explicitly passing whether event system is available as an argument
to the hook. This makes the behavior consistent between source and bundle tests. Then
I change the tests to document the actual logic and _attempt_ to show a nice message
(e.g. we know for sure `onclick` is a bad event but we don't know the right name for it
on the server so we just say a generic message about camelCase naming convention).
Fixes a case where changing the name and checked value of a radio button in the same update would lead to checking the wrong radio input. Also adds a DOM test fixture for related issue.
Related issues:
https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/7630
* Update Flow
* Fix createElement() issue
The * type was too ambiguous. It's always a string so what's the point?
Suppression for missing Flow support for {is: ''} web component argument to createElement() didn't work for some reason.
I don't understand what the regex is testing for anyway (a task number?) so I just removed that, and suppression got fixed.
* Remove deleted $Abstract<> feature
* Expand the unsound isAsync check
Flow now errors earlier because it can't find .type on a portal.
* Add an unsafe cast for the null State in UpdateQueue
* Introduce "hydratable instance" type
The Flow error here highlighted a quirk in our typing of hydration.
React only really knows about a subset of all possible nodes that can
exist in a hydrated tree. Currently we assume that the host renderer
filters them out to be either Instance or TextInstance. We also assume
that those are different things which they might not be. E.g. it could
be fine for a renderer to render "text" as the same type as one of the
instances, with some default props.
We don't really know what it will be narrowed down to until we call
canHydrateInstance or canHydrateTextInstance. That's when the type is
truly refined.
So to solve this I use a different type for hydratable instance that is
used in that temporary stage between us reading it from the DOM and until
it gets refined by canHydrate(Text)Instance.
* Have the renderer refine Hydratable Instance to Instance or Text Instance
Currently we assume that if canHydrateInstance or canHydrateTextInstance
returns true, then the types also match up. But we don't tell that to Flow.
It just happens to work because `fiber.stateNode` is still `any`.
We could potentially use some kind of predicate typing but instead
of that I can just return null or instance from the "can" tests.
This ensures that the renderer has to do the refinement properly.
* Convert EventPlugin{Hub,Registry} to named exports
* Convert EventPluginUtils to named exports
* Convert EventPropagators to named exports
* Convert ReactControlledComponent to named exports
* Convert ReactGenericBatching to named exports
* Convert ReactDOMComponentTree to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeComponentTree to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeRTComponentTree to named exports
* Convert FallbackCompositionState to named exports
* Convert ReactEventEmitterMixin to named exports
* Convert ReactBrowserEventEmitter to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeEventEmitter to named exports
* Convert ReactDOMEventListener to named exports
* Convert DOMMarkupOperations to named exports
* Convert DOMProperty to named exports
* Add suppression for existing Flow violation
Flow didn't see it before.
* Update sizes
* Update transforms to handle ES modules
* Update Jest to handle ES modules
* Convert react package to ES modules
* Convert react-art package to ES Modules
* Convert react-call-return package to ES Modules
* Convert react-test-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-cs-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-rt-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-noop-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-dom/server to ES modules
* Convert react-dom/{client,events,test-utils} to ES modules
* Convert react-dom/shared to ES modules
* Convert react-native-renderer to ES modules
* Convert react-reconciler to ES modules
* Convert events to ES modules
* Convert shared to ES modules
* Remove CommonJS support from transforms
* Move ReactDOMFB entry point code into react-dom/src
This is clearer because we can use ES imports in it.
* Fix Rollup shim configuration to work with ESM
* Fix incorrect comment
* Exclude external imports without side effects
* Fix ReactDOM FB build
* Remove TODOs I don’t intend to fix yet
* Use relative paths in packages/react
* Use relative paths in packages/react-art
* Use relative paths in packages/react-cs
* Use relative paths in other packages
* Fix as many issues as I can
This uncovered an interesting problem where ./b from package/src/a would resolve to a different instantiation of package/src/b in Jest.
Either this is a showstopper or we can solve it by completely fobbidding remaining /src/.
* Fix all tests
It seems we can't use relative requires in tests anymore. Otherwise Jest becomes confused between real file and symlink.
https://github.com/facebook/jest/issues/3830
This seems bad... Except that we already *don't* want people to create tests that import individual source files.
All existing cases of us doing so are actually TODOs waiting to be fixed.
So perhaps this requirement isn't too bad because it makes bad code looks bad.
Of course, if we go with this, we'll have to lint against relative requires in tests.
It also makes moving things more painful.
* Prettier
* Remove @providesModule
* Fix remaining Haste imports I missed earlier
* Fix up paths to reflect new flat structure
* Fix Flow
* Fix CJS and UMD builds
* Fix FB bundles
* Fix RN bundles
* Prettier
* Fix lint
* Fix warning printing and error codes
* Fix buggy return
* Fix lint and Flow
* Use Yarn on CI
* Unbreak Jest
* Fix lint
* Fix aliased originals getting included in DEV
Shouldn't affect correctness (they were ignored) but fixes DEV size regression.
* Record sizes
* Fix weird version in package.json
* Tweak bundle labels
* Get rid of output option by introducing react-dom/server.node
* Reconciler should depend on prop-types
* Update sizes last time
* Move files and tests to more meaningful places
* Fix the build
Now that we import reconciler via react-reconciler, I needed to make a few tweaks.
* Update sizes
* Move @preventMunge directive to FB header
* Revert unintentional change
* Fix Flow coverage
I forgot to @flow-ify those files. This uncovered some issues.
* Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Like a rat in a cage
Pulling minimum wage
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, you're safer and you're wasting my time
Our records all show you were filthy but fine
But they shuttered your stores
When you opened the doors
To the cops who were bored once they'd run out of crime
Prettier, you're perfect, oh, please don't change a thing
Your mild billionaire mayor's now convinced he's a king
So the boring collect
I mean all disrespect
In the neighborhood bars I'd once dreamt I would drink
Prettier, I love you but you're freaking me out
There's a ton of the twist but we're fresh out of shout
Like a death in the hall
That you hear through your wall
Prettier, I love you but you're freaking me out
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Like a death of the heart
Jesus, where do I start?
But you're still the one pool where I'd happily drown
And oh! Take me off your mailing list
For kids who think it still exists
Yes, for those who think it still exists
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe you're right
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe you're right
Maybe you're right, maybe I'm wrong
And just maybe you're right
And oh! Maybe mother told you true
And there'll always be somebody there for you
And you'll never be alone
But maybe she's wrong and maybe I'm right
And just maybe she's wrong
Maybe she's wrong and maybe I'm right
And if so, here's this song!
Dan Abramov
Roderick Hsiao
Raphael Amorim
landvibe
Jason Quense
Sebastian Markbåge
Clement Hoang
Nic Bonetto