Updates useFormState to allow a sync function to be passed as an action.
A form action is almost always async, because it needs to talk to the
server. But since we support client-side actions, too, there's no reason
we can't allow sync actions, too.
I originally chose not to allow them to keep the implementation simpler
but it's not really that much more complicated because we already
support this for actions passed to startTransition. So now it's
consistent: anywhere an action is accepted, a sync client function is a
valid input.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Changes `before before` to `before` in error messages.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
I want to improve error logs
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
We only allow plain objects that can be faithfully serialized and
deserialized through JSON to pass through the serialization boundary.
It's a bit too expensive to do all the possible checks in production so
we do most checks in DEV, so it's still possible to pass an object in
production by mistake. This is currently exaggerated by frameworks
because the logs on the server aren't visible enough. Even so, it's
possible to do a mistake without testing it in DEV or just testing a
conditional branch. That might have security implications if that object
wasn't supposed to be passed.
We can't rely on only checking if the prototype is `Object.prototype`
because that wouldn't work with cross-realm objects which is
unfortunate. However, if it isn't, we can check wether it has exactly
one prototype on the chain which would catch the common error of passing
a class instance.
Adds a second argument to useDeferredValue called initialValue:
```js
const value = useDeferredValue(finalValue, initialValue);
```
During the initial render of a component, useDeferredValue will return
initialValue. Once that render finishes, it will spawn an additional
render to switch to finalValue.
This same sequence should occur whenever the hook is hidden and revealed
again, i.e. by a Suspense or Activity, though this part is not yet
implemented.
When initialValue is not provided, useDeferredValue has no effect during
initial render, but during an update, it will remain on the previous
value, then spawn an additional render to switch to the new value. (This
is the same behavior that exists today.)
During SSR, initialValue is always used, if provided.
This feature is currently behind an experimental flag. We plan to ship
it in a non-breaking release.
## Summary
Currently when cloning nodes in Fabric, we reset a node's children on
each clone, and then repeatedly call appendChild to restore the previous
list of children (even if it was quasi-identical to before). This causes
unnecessary invalidation of the layout state in Fabric's ShadowNode data
(which in turn may require additional yoga clones) and extra JSI calls.
This PR adds a feature flag to pass in the children as part of the clone
call, so Fabric always has a complete view of the node that's being
mutated.
This feature flag requires matching changes in the react-native repo:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/39817
## How did you test this change?
Unit test added demonstrates the new behaviour
```
yarn test -r www-modern ReactFabric-test
yarn test ReactFabric-test.internal
```
Tested a manual sync into React Native and verified core surfaces render
correctly.
Upgrades the stability of Server Actions from experimental to canary.
- Turns on enableAsyncActions and enableFormActions
- Removes "experimental_" prefix from useOptimistic, useFormStatus, and
useFormState
This lets a registered object or value be "tainted", which we block from
crossing the serialization boundary. It's only allowed to stay
in-memory.
This is an extra layer of protection against mistakes of transferring
data from a data access layer to a client. It doesn't provide perfect
protection, because it doesn't trace through derived values and
substrings. So it shouldn't be used as the only security layer but more
layers are better.
`taintObjectReference` is for specific object instances, not any nested
objects or values inside that object. It's useful to avoid specific
objects from getting passed as is. It ensures that you don't
accidentally leak values in a specific context. It can be for security
reasons like tokens, privacy reasons like personal data or performance
reasons like avoiding passing large objects over the wire.
It might be privacy violation to leak the age of a specific user, but
the number itself isn't blocked in any other context. As soon as the
value is extracted and passed specifically without the object, it can
therefore leak.
`taintUniqueValue` is useful for high entropy values such as hashes,
tokens or crypto keys that are very unique values. In that case it can
be useful to taint the actual primitive values themselves. These can be
encoded as a string, bigint or typed array. We don't currently check for
this value in a substring or inside other typed arrays.
Since values can be created from different sources they don't just
follow garbage collection. In this case an additional object must be
provided that defines the life time of this value for how long it should
be blocked. It can be `globalThis` for essentially forever, but that
risks leaking memory for ever when you're dealing with dynamic values
like reading a token from a database. So in that case the idea is that
you pass the object that might end up in cache.
A request is the only thing that is expected to do any work. The
principle is that you can derive values from out of a tainted
entry during a request. Including stashing it in a per request cache.
What you can't do is store a derived value in a global module level
cache. At least not without also tainting the object.
## Summary
This is part of an effort to align the event loop in React Native with
its behavior on the Web. In this case, we're going to test enabling
microtasks in React Native (Fabric) and we need React to schedule work
using microtasks if available there. This just adds a feature flag to
configure that behavior at runtime.
## How did you test this change?
* Reviewed the generated code, which looks ok.
* Did a manual sync of this PR to Meta's internal infra and tested it
with my changes to enable microtasks in RN/Hermes.
As agreed, we're removing Server Context. This was never official
documented.
We've found that it's not that useful in practice. Often the better
options are:
- Read things off the url or global scope like params or cookies.
- Use the module system for global dependency injection.
- Use `React.cache()` to dedupe multiple things instead of computing
once and passing down.
There are still legit use cases for Server Context but you have to be
very careful not to pass any large data, so in generally we recommend
against it anyway.
Yes, prop drilling is annoying but it's not impossible for the cases
this is needed. I would personally always pick it over Server Context
anyway.
Semantically, Server Context also blocks object deduping due to how it
plays out with Server Components that can't be deduped. This is much
more important feature.
Since it's already in canary along with the rest of RSC, we're adding a
warning for a few versions before removing completely to help migration.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Story <josh.c.story@gmail.com>
During an MPA form submission, useFormState should only reuse the form
state if same action is passed both times. (We also compare the key
paths.)
We compare the identity of the inner closure function, disregarding the
value of the bound arguments. That way you can pass an inline Server
Action closure:
```js
function FormContainer({maxLength}) {
function submitAction(prevState, formData) {
'use server'
if (formData.get('field').length > maxLength) {
return { errorMsg: 'Too many characters' };
}
// ...
}
return <Form submitAction={submitAction} />
}
```
If a Server Action is passed to useFormState, the action may be
submitted before it has hydrated. This will trigger a full page
(MPA-style) navigation. We can transfer the form state to the next page
by comparing the key path of the hook instance.
`ReactServerDOMServer.decodeFormState` is used by the server to extract
the form state from the submitted action. This value can then be passed
as an option when rendering the new page. It must be passed during both
SSR and hydration.
```js
const boundAction = await decodeAction(formData, serverManifest);
const result = await boundAction();
const formState = decodeFormState(result, formData, serverManifest);
// SSR
const response = createFromReadableStream(<App />);
const ssrStream = await renderToReadableStream(response, { formState })
// Hydration
hydrateRoot(container, <App />, { formState });
```
If the `formState` option is omitted, then the state won't be
transferred to the next page. However, it must be passed in both places,
or in neither; misconfiguring will result in a hydration mismatch.
(The `formState` option is currently prefixed with `experimental_`)
This adds an experimental `unstable_postpone(reason)` API.
Currently we don't have a way to model effectively an Infinite Promise.
I.e. something that suspends but never resolves. The reason this is
useful is because you might have something else that unblocks it later.
E.g. by updating in place later, or by client rendering.
On the client this works to model as an Infinite Promise (in fact,
that's what this implementation does). However, in Fizz and Flight that
doesn't work because the stream needs to end at some point. We don't
have any way of knowing that we're suspended on infinite promises. It's
not enough to tag the promises because you could await those and thus
creating new promises. The only way we really have to signal this
through a series of indirections like async functions, is by throwing.
It's not 100% safe because these values can be caught but it's the best
we can do.
Effectively `postpone(reason)` behaves like a built-in [Catch
Boundary](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26854). It's like
`raise(Postpone, reason)` except it's built-in so it needs to be able to
be encoded and caught by Suspense boundaries.
In Flight and Fizz these behave pretty much the same as errors. Flight
just forwards it to retrigger on the client. In Fizz they just trigger
client rendering which itself might just postpone again or fill in the
value. The difference is how they get logged.
In Flight and Fizz they log to `onPostpone(reason)` instead of
`onError(error)`. This log is meant to help find deopts on the server
like finding places where you fall back to client rendering. The reason
that you pass in is for that purpose to help the reason for any deopts.
I do track the stack trace in DEV but I don't currently expose it to
`onPostpone`. This seems like a limitation. It might be better to expose
the Postpone object which is an Error object but that's more of an
implementation detail. I could also pass it as a second argument.
On the client after hydration they don't get passed to
`onRecoverableError`. There's no global `onPostpone` API to capture
postponed things on the client just like there's no `onError`. At that
point it's just assumed to be intentional. It doesn't have any `digest`
or reason passed to the client since it's not logged.
There are some hacky solutions that currently just tries to reuse as
much of the existing code as possible but should be more properly
implemented.
- Fiber is currently just converting it to a fake Promise object so that
it behaves like an infinite Promise.
- Fizz is encoding the magic digest string `"POSTPONE"` in the HTML so
we know to ignore it but it should probably just be something neater
that doesn't share namespace with digests.
Next I plan on using this in the `/static` entry points for additional
features.
Why "postpone"? It's basically a synonym to "defer" but we plan on using
"defer" for other purposes and it's overloaded anyway.
## Summary
This was not exposed as a dynamic flag in the build for facebook www. By
adding it, we'll be able to roll this out incrementally before cleaning
up this code altogether.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn build`
Before changes, `disableSchedulerTimeoutInWorkLoop` flag is not included
in ReactDOM-* build output for facebook www. Afterwards, it is included.
Adds a development warning to complement the error introduced by
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27019.
We can detect and warn about async client components by checking the
prototype of the function. This won't work for environments where async
functions are transpiled, but for native async functions, it allows us
to log an earlier warning during development, including in cases that
don't trigger the infinite loop guard added in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27019. It does not supersede the
infinite loop guard, though, because that mechanism also prevents the
app from crashing.
I also added a warning for calling a hook inside an async function. This
one fires even during a transition. We could add a corresponding warning
to Flight, since hooks are not allowed in async Server Components,
either. (Though in both environments, this is better handled by a lint
rule.)
This uses the same mechanism as [large
strings](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26932) to encode chunks
of length based binary data in the RSC payload behind a flag.
I introduce a new BinaryChunk type that's specific to each stream and
ways to convert into it. That's because we sometimes need all chunks to
be Uint8Array for the output, even if the source is another array buffer
view, and sometimes we need to clone it before transferring.
Each type of typed array is its own row tag. This lets us ensure that
the instance is directly in the right format in the cached entry instead
of creating a wrapper at each reference. Ideally this is also how
Map/Set should work but those are lazy which complicates that approach a
bit.
We assume both server and client use little-endian for now. If we want
to support other modes, we'd convert it to/from little-endian so that
the transfer protocol is always little-endian. That way the common
clients can be the fastest possible.
So far this only implements Server to Client. Still need to implement
Client to Server for parity.
NOTE: This is the first time we make RSC effectively a binary format.
This is not compatible with existing SSR techniques which serialize the
stream as unicode in the HTML. To be compatible, those implementations
would have to use base64 or something like that. Which is what we'll do
when we move this technique to be built-in to Fizz.
## Summary
This PR cleans up `useMutableSource`. This has been blocked by a
remaining dependency internally at Meta, but that has now been deleted.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn flow
yarn lint
yarn test --prod
```
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
We are upgrading React 17 codebase to React18, and `StrictMode` has been
great for surfacing potential production bugs on React18 for class
components. There are non-trivial number of test failures caused by
double `useEffect` in StrictMode. To prioritize surfacing and fixing
issues that will break in production now, we need a flag to turn off
double `useEffect` for now in StrictMode temporarily. This is a
Meta-only hack for rolling out `createRoot` and we will fast follow to
remove it and use full strict mode.
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
jest
## Overview
Does a few things:
- Renames `enableSyncDefaultUpdates` to
`forceConcurrentByDefaultForTesting`
- Changes the way it's used so it's dead-code eliminated separate from
`allowConcurrentByDefault`
- Deletes a bunch of the gated code
The gates that are deleted are unnecessary now. We were keeping them
when we originally thought we would come back to being concurrent by
default. But we've shifted and now sync-by default is the desired
behavior long term, so there's no need to keep all these forked tests
around.
I'll follow up to delete more of the forked behavior if possible.
Ideally we wouldn't need this flag even if we're still using
`allowConcurrentByDefault`.
Just a small upgrade to keep us current and remove unused suppressions
(probably fixed by some upgrade since).
- `*` is no longer allowed and has been an alias for `any` for a while
now.
Usually we don't have to do this since we only set these in the loop but
the ReactCustomFormAction props are optional so they might be undefined.
Also moved it to a general type since it's a semi-public API.
useMemoCache wasn't previously supported in the DevTools, so any attempt
to inspect a component using the hook would result in a
`dispatcher.useMemoCache is not a function (it is undefined)` error.
This is enabled in the canary channels, but because it's relatively
untested, we'll disable it at Meta until they're ready to start trying
it out. It can change some behavior even if you don't intentionally
start using the API.
The reason it's not a dynamic flag is that it affects the external Fizz
runtime, which currently can't read flags at runtime.
InvokeGuardedCallback is now implemented with the browser fork done at
error-time rather than module-load-time. Originally it also tried to
freeze the window/document references to avoid mismatches in prototype
chains when testing React in different documents however we have since
updated our tests to not do this and it was a test only feature so I
removed it.
This puts the change introduced by #26611 behind a flag until Meta is
able to roll it out. Disabling the flag reverts back to the old
behavior, where retries are throttled if there's still data remaining in
the tree, but not if all the data has finished loading.
The new behavior is still enabled in the public builds.
- substr is Annex B
- substring silently flips its arguments if they're in the "wrong order", which is confusing
- slice is better than sliced bread (no pun intended) and also it works the same way on Arrays so there's less to remember
---
> I'd be down to just lint and enforce a single form just for the potential compression savings by using a repeated string.
_Originally posted by @sebmarkbage in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26663#discussion_r1170455401_
This lets you pass a function to `<form action={...}>` or `<button
formAction={...}>` or `<input type="submit formAction={...}>`. This will
behave basically like a `javascript:` URL except not quite implemented
that way. This is a convenience for the `onSubmit={e => {
e.preventDefault(); const fromData = new FormData(e.target); ... }`
pattern.
You can still implement a custom `onSubmit` handler and if it calls
`preventDefault`, it won't invoke the action, just like it would if you
used a full page form navigation or javascript urls. It behaves just
like a navigation and we might implement it with the Navigation API in
the future.
Currently this is just a synchronous function but in a follow up this
will accept async functions, handle pending states and handle errors.
This is implemented by setting `javascript:` URLs, but these only exist
to trigger an error message if something goes wrong instead of
navigating away. Like if you called `stopPropagation` to prevent React
from handling it or if you called `form.submit()` instead of
`form.requestSubmit()` which by-passes the `submit` event. If CSP is
used to ban `javascript:` urls, those will trigger errors when these
URLs are invoked which would be a different error message but it's still
there to notify the user that something went wrong in the plumbing.
Next up is improving the SSR state with action replaying and progressive
enhancement.
Implements initial (client-only) support for async actions behind a
flag. This is an experimental feature and the design isn't completely
finalized but we're getting closer. It will be layered alongside other
features we're working on, so it may not feel complete when considered
in isolation.
The basic description is you can pass an async function to
`startTransition` and all the transition updates that are scheduled
inside that async function will be grouped together. The `isPending`
flag will be set to true immediately, and only set back to false once
the async action has completed (as well as all the updates that it
triggers).
The ideal behavior would be that all updates spawned by the async action
are automatically inferred and grouped together; however, doing this
properly requires the upcoming (stage 2) Async Context API, which is not
yet implemented by browsers. In the meantime, we will fake this by
grouping together all transition updates that occur until the async
function has terminated. This can lead to overgrouping between unrelated
actions, which is not wrong per se, just not ideal.
If the `useTransition` hook is removed from the UI before an async
action has completed — for example, if the user navigates to a new page
— subsequent transitions will no longer be grouped with together with
that action.
Another consequence of the lack of Async Context is that if you call
`setState` inside an action but after an `await`, it must be wrapped in
`startTransition` in order to be grouped properly. If we didn't require
this, then there would be no way to distinguish action updates from
urgent updates caused by user input, too. This is an unfortunate footgun
but we can likely detect the most common mistakes using a lint rule.
Once Async Context lands in browsers, we can start warning in dev if we
detect an update that hasn't been wrapped in `startTransition`. Then,
longer term, once the feature is ubiquitous, we can rely on it for real
and allow you to call `setState` without the additional wrapper.
Things that are _not_ yet implemented in this PR, but will be added as
follow ups:
- Support for non-hook form of `startTransition`
- Canceling the async action scope if the `useTransition` hook is
deleted from the UI
- Anything related to server actions
This removes the concept of `prepareUpdate()`, behind a flag.
React Native already does everything in the commit phase, but generates
a temporary update payload before applying it.
React Fabric does it both in the render phase. Now it just moves it to a
single host config.
For DOM I forked updateProperties into one that does diffing and
updating in one pass vs just applying a pre-diffed updatePayload.
There are a few downsides of this approach:
- If only "children" has changed, we end up scheduling an update to be
done in the commit phase. Since we traverse through it anyway, it's
probably not much extra.
- It does more work in the commit phase so for a large tree that is
mostly unchanged, it'll stall longer.
- It does some extra work for special cases since that work happens if
anything has changed. We no longer have a deep bailout.
- The special cases now have to each replicate the "clean up old props"
loop, leading to extra code.
The benefit is that this doesn't allocate temporary extra objects
(possibly multiple per element if the array has to resize). It's less
work overall. It also gives us an option to reuse this function for a
sync render optimization.
Another benefit is that if we do the loop in the commit phase I can do
further optimizations by reading all props that I need for special cases
in that loop instead of polymorphic reads from props. This is what I'd
like to do in future refactors that would be stacked on top of this
change.
This reverts commit b2ae9ddb3b.
While the feature flag is fully rolled out, these tests are also testing
behavior set with an unstable flag on root, which for now we want to
preserve.
Not sure if there's a better way then adding a dynamic feature flag to
the www build?
When React receives new input (via `setState`, a Suspense promise
resolution, and so on), it needs to ensure there's a rendering task
associated with the update. Most of this happens
`ensureRootIsScheduled`.
If a single event contains multiple updates, we end up running the
scheduling code once per update. But this is wasteful because we really
only need to run it once, at the end of the event (or in the case of
flushSync, at the end of the scope function's execution).
So this PR moves the scheduling logic to happen in a microtask instead.
In some cases, we will force it run earlier than that, like for
`flushSync`, but since updates are batched by default, it will almost
always happen in the microtask. Even for discrete updates.
In production, this should have no observable behavior difference. In a
testing environment that uses `act`, this should also not have a
behavior difference because React will push these tasks to an internal
`act` queue.
However, tests that do not use `act` and do not simulate an actual
production environment (like an e2e test) may be affected. For example,
before this change, if a test were to call `setState` outside of `act`
and then immediately call `jest.runAllTimers()`, the update would be
synchronously applied. After this change, that will no longer work
because the rendering task (a timer, in this case) isn't scheduled until
after the microtask queue has run.
I don't expect this to be an issue in practice because most people do
not write their tests this way. They either use `act`, or they write
e2e-style tests.
The biggest exception has been... our own internal test suite. Until
recently, many of our tests were written in a way that accidentally
relied on the updates being scheduled synchronously. Over the past few
weeks, @tyao1 and I have gradually converted the test suite to use a new
set of testing helpers that are resilient to this implementation detail.
(There are also some old Relay tests that were written in the style of
React's internal test suite. Those will need to be fixed, too.)
The larger motivation behind this change, aside from a minor performance
improvement, is we intend to use this new microtask to perform
additional logic that doesn't yet exist. Like inferring the priority of
a custom event.
This flag is already enabled everywhere except for www, which is blocked
by a few tests that assert on the old behavior. Once www is ready, I'll
land this.
This is a change to some undefined behavior that we though we would do
at one point but decided not to roll out. It's already disabled
everywhere, so this just deletes the branch from the implementation and
the tests.
Added an explicit type to all $FlowFixMe suppressions to reduce
over-suppressions of new errors that might be caused on the same lines.
Also removes suppressions that aren't used (e.g. in a `@noflow` file as
they're purely misleading)
Test Plan:
yarn flow-ci
Today if something suspends, React will continue rendering the siblings
of that component.
Our original rationale for prerendering the siblings of a suspended
component was to initiate any lazy fetches that they might contain. This
was when we were more bullish about lazy fetching being a good idea some
of the time (when combined with prefetching), as opposed to our latest
thinking, which is that it's almost always a bad idea.
Another rationale for the original behavior was that the render was I/O
bound, anyway, so we might as do some extra work in the meantime. But
this was before we had the concept of instant loading states: when
navigating to a new screen, it's better to show a loading state as soon
as you can (often a skeleton UI), rather than delay the transition.
(There are still cases where we block the render, when a suitable
loading state is not available; it's just not _all_ cases where
something suspends.) So the biggest issue with our existing
implementation is that the prerendering of the siblings happens within
the same render pass as the one that suspended — _before_ the loading
state appears.
What we should do instead is immediately unwind the stack as soon as
something suspends, to unblock the loading state.
If we want to preserve the ability to prerender the siblings, what we
could do is schedule special render pass immediately after the fallback
is displayed. This is likely what we'll do in the future. However, in
the new implementation of `use`, there's another reason we don't
prerender siblings: so we can preserve the state of the stack when
something suspends, and resume where we left of when the promise
resolves without replaying the parents. The only way to do this
currently is to suspend the entire work loop. Fiber does not currently
support rendering multiple siblings in "parallel". Once you move onto
the next sibling, the stack of the previous sibling is discarded and
cannot be restored. We do plan to implement this feature, but it will
require a not-insignificant refactor.
Given that lazy data fetching is already bad for performance, the best
trade off for now seems to be to disable prerendering of siblings. This
gives us the best performance characteristics when you're following best
practices (i.e. hoist data fetches to Server Components or route
loaders), at the expense of making an already bad pattern a bit worse.
Later, when we implement resumable context stacks, we can reenable
sibling prerendering. Though even then the use case will mostly be to
prerender the CPU-bound work, not lazy fetches.
I'm trying to get rid of all meta programming in the module scope so
that closure can do a better job figuring out cyclic dependencies and
ability to reorder.
This is converting a lot of the patterns that assign functions
conditionally to using function declarations instead.
```
let fn;
if (__DEV__) {
fn = function() {
...
};
}
```
->
```
function fn() {
if (__DEV__) {
...
}
}
```
This doesn't need its own set of flags. We use things like `__PROFILE__`
in the regular feature flags file to fork for the `react-dom/profiling`
build so we can do the same here if needed but I don't think we actually
need to fork this anywhere as far as I can tell.
We disallow empty strings for `href` and `src` since they're common
mistakes that end up loading the current page as a preload, image or
link. We also disallow it for `action`. You have to pass `null` which is
the same.
However, for `formAction` passing `null` is not the same as passing
empty string. Passing empty string overrides the form's action to be the
current page even if the form's action was set to something else.
There's no easy way to express the same thing `#` show up in the user
visible URLs and `?` clears the search params.
Since this is also not a common mistake, we can just allow this.
Andrew Clark
Asan Azimkulov
Sebastian Markbåge
Pieter De Baets
Rubén Norte
Sophie Alpert
Noah Lemen
Tianyu Yao
Ricky
Jan Kassens
lauren
Josh Story
Samuel Susla