Turns out lots of people write invalid HTML all the time and no one, including your browser or React, cares. Most invalid HTML combinations don't cause magic reparented nodes; only some do. The HTML5 parsing spec (https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/syntax.html) specifies which tag combinations cause strange parsing behavior. I did my best to encode the logic here. It's more lenient than before in some cases, but more strict in others (before we didn't look at the whole stack of tags; now we warn with deeply nested `p` or `form` or `a` tags).
Eslint now allows us to use a different parser, which allows us to use
esprima-fb explicitly. This means we don't have to wait for espree to add
things like rest-param parsing. Though we do need eslint to upgrade its rules
to handle that AST.
I had hoped to enable parsing of our tests but we can't do that until we
change esprima-fb's XJS nodes to JSX.
While I was here, I also enabled the no-unused-vars rule since eslint
understands template strings. I also made the single quote enforcement
actually fail instead of just warn.
Instead of putting the shared code in a base class method, we use a wrapper
call around all invokations. That way they're free to add code before AND
after the non-shared code.
That way we ensure that component extensions don't need to implement
ReactComponentMixin and do super() calls into it. This helps to create a
tighter API for custom component extensions.
This provides the first step towards moving these methods to static
methods which allows to use a different dispatch mechanism instead of
virtual method calls. E.g. pattern matching.
Summary:
After #2570, `mountDepth` is only used to enforce that `setProps` and `replaceProps` is only invoked on the top-level component. This replaces `mountDepth` with a simpler `isTopLevel` boolean set by `ReactMount` which reduces the surface area of the internal API and removes the need to thread `mountDepth` throughout React core.
Reviewers: @sebmarkbage @zpao
Test Plan:
Ran unit tests successfully:
```
npm run jest
```
We currently have three DOM specific hooks that get injected. I move those
out to ReactComponentEnvironment. The idea is to eventually remove this
injection as the reconciler gets refactored.
There is also a BackendIDOperation which is specific to the DOM component
itself so I move this injection to be more specific to the DOMComponent.
E.g. it makes sense for it to be injectable for cross-worker DOM operations
but it doesn't make sense for ART components.
ReactTextComponent's implementation is DOM-specific; instead of flattenChildren creating the ReactTextComponent instances, ReactNativeComponent now takes care of having ReactTextComponent injected and creating the component instance. I also renamed ReactTextComponent to ReactDOMTextComponent and moved it to browser/ui/ where it belongs. ReactDOMTextComponent no longer inherits directly from ReactComponent and instead implements construct and {mount,receive,unmount}Component directly.
This diff removes `ReactTestUtils.isTextComponent` which should have previously never returned true when using public APIs.
Test Plan: jest, use ballmer-peak example.
Ben Alpert
Paul O’Shannessy
Andreas Svensson
Rick Beerendonk
Sebastian Markbage
yungsters
Jim
Ben Alpert