Stacked on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/30566 and whats under
it. See [this
commit](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/30596/commits/374fd737e4b0b7028afb765838db7c0e22def865).
It is mostly copying code from one place to another and updating tests.
With these changes, for every console method that we patch, there is
going to be a single applied patch:
- For `error`, `warn`, and `trace` we are patching when hook is
installed. This guarantees that component stacks are going to be
appended even if browser DevTools are not opened. We pay some price for
it, though: if user has browser DevTools closed and if at this point
some warning or error is emitted (logged), the next time user opens
browser DevTools, they are going to see `hook.js` as the source frame.
Unfortunately, ignore listing from source maps is not applied
retroactively, and I don't know if its a bug or just a design
limitations. Once browser DevTools are opened, source maps will be
loaded and ignore listing will be applied for all emitted logs in the
future.
- For `log`, `info`, `group`, `groupCollapsed` we are only patching when
React notifies React DevTools about running in StrictMode. We unpatch
the methods right after it.
The current stack is available in the native UI but that's hidden by
default so you don't see the actual current component on the stack.
This is unlike the native async stacks UI where they're all together.
So we prefix the stack with the current stack first.
<img width="279" alt="Screenshot 2024-07-22 at 10 05 13 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f568fda-6493-416d-a0be-661caf44d808">
---------
Co-authored-by: Ruslan Lesiutin <rdlesyutin@gmail.com>
Stacked on #30410.
Use "owner stacks" as the appended component stack if it is available on
the Fiber. This will only be available if the enableOwnerStacks flag is
on. Otherwise it fallback to parent stacks. In prod, there's no owner so
it's never added there.
I was going back and forth on whether to inject essentially
`captureOwnerStack` as part of the DevTools hooks or replicate the
implementation but decided to replicate the implementation.
The DevTools needs all the same information from internals to implement
owner views elsewhere in the UI anyway so we're not saving anything in
terms of the scope of internals. Additionally, we really need this
information for non-current components as well like "rendered by" views
of the currently selected component.
It can also be useful if we need to change the format after the fact
like we did for parent stacks in:
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/30289
Injecting the implementation would lock us into specifics both in terms
of what the core needs to provide and what the DevTools can use.
The implementation depends on the technique used in #30369 which tags
frames to strip out with `react-stack-bottom-frame`. That's how the
implementation knows how to materialize the error if it hasn't already.
Firefox:
<img width="487" alt="Screenshot 2024-07-21 at 11 33 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d3539b53-4578-4fdd-af25-25698b2bcc7d">
Follow up: One thing about this view is that it doesn't include the
current actual synchronous stack. When I used to append these I would
include both the real current stack and the owner stack. That's because
the owner stack doesn't include the name of the currently executing
component. I'll probably inject the current stack too in addition to the
owner stack. This is similar to how native Async Stacks are basically
just appended onto the current stack rather than its own.
## Overview
Updates `eslint-plugin-jest` and enables the recommended rules with some
turned off that are unhelpful.
The main motivations is:
a) we have a few duplicated tests, which this found an I deleted
b) making sure we don't accidentally commit skipped tests
This implements the concept of a DEV-only "owner" for Server Components.
The owner concept isn't really super useful. We barely use it anymore,
but we do have it as a concept in DevTools in a couple of cases so this
adds it for parity. However, this is mainly interesting because it could
be used to wire up future owner-based stacks.
I do this by outlining the DebugInfo for a Server Component
(ReactComponentInfo). Then I just rely on Flight deduping to refer to
that. I refer to the same thing by referential equality so that we can
associate a Server Component parent in DebugInfo with an owner.
If you suspend and replay a Server Component, we have to restore the
same owner. To do that, I did a little ugly hack and stashed it on the
thenable state object. Felt unnecessarily complicated to add a stateful
wrapper for this one dev-only case.
The owner could really be anything since it could be coming from a
different implementation. Because this is the first time we have an
owner other than Fiber, I have to fix up a bunch of places that assumes
Fiber. I mainly did the `typeof owner.tag === 'number'` to assume it's a
Fiber for now.
This also doesn't actually add it to DevTools / RN Inspector yet. I just
ignore them there for now.
Because Server Components can be async the owner isn't tracked after an
await. We need per-component AsyncLocalStorage for that. This can be
done in a follow up.
I'm a bit ambivalent about this one because it's not the main strategy
that I plan on pursuing. I plan on replacing most DEV-only specific
stacks like `console.error` stacks with a new take on owner stacks and
native stacks. The future owner stacks may or may not be exposed to
error boundaries in DEV but if they are they'd be a new errorInfo
property since they're owner based and not available in prod.
The use case in `console.error` mostly goes away in the future so this
PR is mainly for error boundaries. It doesn't hurt to have it in there
while I'm working on the better stacks though.
The `componentStack` property exposed to error boundaries is more like
production behavior similar to `new Error().stack` (which even in DEV
won't ever expose owner stacks because `console.createTask` doesn't
affect these). I'm not sure it's worth adding server components in DEV
(this PR) because then you have forked behavior between dev and prod.
However, since even in the future there won't be any other place to get
the *parent* stack, maybe this can be useful information even if it's
only dev. We could expose a third property on errorInfo that's DEV only
and parent stack but including server components. That doesn't seem
worth it over just having the stack differ in dev and prod.
I don't plan on adding line/column number to these particular stacks.
A follow up could be to add this to Fizz prerender too but only in DEV.
* Facebook -> Meta in copyright
rg --files | xargs sed -i 's#Copyright (c) Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates.#Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.#g'
* Manual tweaks
This PR cleans up the DevTools codebase by:
* Consolidating `normalizeCodeLocInfo` into one place
* Remove unused source argument in the DevTools component stacks code
This PR adds the reactVersion pragma to tests.
Tests without the reactVersion pragma won't be run if the reactVersion pragma isn't specified.
Tested each React version manually with the pragma to make sure the tests pass
This is done so that any effects scheduled by the shallow render are thrown away.
Unlike the code this was forked from (in ReactComponentStackFrame) DevTools should override the dispatcher even when DevTools is compiled in production mode, because the app itself may be in development mode and log errors/warnings.
Ruslan Lesiutin
Sebastian MarkbågeandRuslan Lesiutin
Ricky
Andrew Clark
Luna Ruan
Brian Vaughn