Commit Graph
16 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Carl Vitullo 03de849af0 Make uncontrolled -> controlled warning clearer (#17070)
* Make uncontrolled -> controlled warning clearer

* Update phrasing, mirror for opposite direction

* Remove unused substitution

* Update warning tests

* Literally got these backwards, womp womp

* Rerere-fix tests
2020-04-07 23:19:56 +01:00
Dan Abramov 0b5a26a489 Rename toWarnDev -> toErrorDev, toLowPriorityWarnDev -> toWarnDev (#17605)
* Rename toWarnDev -> toErrorDev in tests

* Rename toWarnDev matcher implementation to toErrorDev

* Rename toLowPriorityWarnDev -> toWarnDev in tests and implementation
2019-12-16 12:48:16 +00:00
Nathan Hunzaker a079011f95 🔥 Stop syncing the value attribute on inputs (behind a feature flag) (#13526)
* 🔥 Stop syncing the value attribute on inputs

* Eliminate some additional checks

* Remove initialValue and initialWrapper from wrapperState flow type

* Update tests with new sync logic, reduce some operations

* Update tests, add some caveats for SSR mismatches

* Revert newline change

* Remove unused type

* Call toString to safely type string values

* Add disableInputAttributeSyncing feature flag

Reverts tests to original state, adds attribute sync feature flag,
then moves all affected tests to ReactFire-test.js.

* Revert position of types in toStringValues

* Invert flag on number input blur

* Add clarification why double blur is necessary

* Update ReactFire number cases to be more explicite about blur

* Move comments to reduce diff size

* Add comments to clarify behavior in each branch

* There is no need to assign a different checked behavior in Fire

* Use checked reference

* Format

* Avoid precomputing stringable values

* Revert getToStringValue comment

* Revert placement of undefined in getToStringValue

* Do not eagerly stringify value

* Unify Fire test cases with normal ones

* Revert toString change. Only assign unsynced values when not nully
2018-09-12 19:29:23 +01:00
Héctor Ramos b87aabdfe1 Drop the year from Facebook copyright headers and the LICENSE file. (#13593) 2018-09-07 15:11:23 -07:00
Dan Abramov 0d3fc9de10 Add regression test for #6119 2018-08-31 16:09:29 +01:00
Dan Abramov 0f050ad7cc Make regression test better 2018-08-31 15:57:02 +01:00
Dan Abramov f943423231 Add a more precise regression test for #6219 2018-08-31 15:54:39 +01:00
Nicole Levy 171e0b7d44 Fix “no onChange handler” warning to fire on falsy values ("", 0, false) too (#12628)
* throw warning for falsey `value` prop

* add nop onChange handler to tests for `value` prop

* prettier

* check for falsey checked

* fix tests for `checked` prop

* new tests for `value` prop

* test formatting

* forgot 0 (:

* test for falsey `checked` prop

* add null check

* Update ReactDOMInput-test.js

* revert unneeded change

* prettier

* Update DOMPropertyOperations-test.js

* Update ReactDOMInput-test.js

* Update ReactDOMSelect-test.js

* Fixes and tests

* Remove unnecessary changes
2018-07-17 22:46:43 +01:00
Simen Bekkhus aa85b0fd5f Upgrade to Jest 23 (#12894)
* Upgrade to Jest 23 beta

* prefer `.toHaveBeenCalledTimes`

* 23 stable
2018-05-28 23:03:15 +01:00
Airam dcc854bcc3 prevent removing attributes on custom component tags (#12702) 2018-04-28 20:52:30 +01:00
Dan Abramov d289d4b634 Update to Jest 22 (#11956)
* Bump deps to Jest 22

* Prevent jsdom from logging intentionally thrown errors

This relies on our existing special field that we use to mute errors.
Perhaps, it would be better to instead rely on preventDefault() directly.
I outlined a possible strategy here: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/11098#issuecomment-355032539

* Update snapshots

* Mock out a method called by ReactART that now throws

* Calling .click() no longer works, dispatch event instead

* Fix incorrect SVG element creation in test

* Render SVG elements inside <svg> to avoid extra warnings

* Fix range input test to use numeric value

* Fix creating SVG element in test

* Replace brittle test that relied on jsdom behavior

The test passed in jsdom due to its implementation details.

The original intention was to test the mutation method, but it was removed a while ago.

Following @nhunzaker's suggestion, I moved the tests to ReactDOMInput and adjusted them to not rely on implementation details.

* Add a workaround for the expected extra client-side warning

This is a bit ugly but it's just two places. I think we can live with this.

* Only warn once for mismatches caused by bad attribute casing

We used to warn both about bad casing and about a mismatch.
The mismatch warning was a bit confusing. We didn't know we warned twice because jsdom didn't faithfully emulate SVG.

This changes the behavior to only leave the warning about bad casing if that's what caused the mismatch.
It also adjusts the test to have an expectation that matches the real world behavior.

* Add an expected warning per comment in the same test
2018-01-04 18:57:30 +00:00
Brian Vaughn b5334a44e9 toWarnInDev matcher; throw on unexpected console.error (#11786)
* Added toWarnInDev matcher and connected to 1 test
* Added .toLowPriorityWarnDev() matcher
* Reply Jest spy with custom spy. Unregister spy after toWarnDev() so unexpected console.error/warn calls will fail tests.
* console warn/error throws immediately in tests by default (if not spied on)
* Pass-thru console message before erroring to make it easier to identify
* More robustly handle unexpected warnings within try/catch
* Error message includes remaining expected warnings in addition to unexpected warning
2018-01-02 11:06:41 -08:00
Raphael Amorim 48616e591f react-dom: convert packages/react-dom/src/__tests__ (#11776) 2017-12-05 18:29:22 +00:00
Brian Vaughn 53ab1948b5 Blacklist spyOn(). Add explicit spyOnProd() and spyOnDevAndProd() (#11691)
* Blacklist spyOn(). Add explicit spyOnProd() and spyOnDevAndProd()

* Wording tweak.

* Fixed lint no-shadow warning
2017-11-28 14:06:26 -08:00
Dan Abramov 6041f481b7 Run Jest in production mode (#11616)
* Move Jest setup files to /dev/ subdirectory

* Clone Jest /dev/ files into /prod/

* Move shared code into scripts/jest

* Move Jest config into the scripts folder

* Fix the equivalence test

It fails because the config is now passed to Jest explicitly.
But the test doesn't know about the config.

To fix this, we just run it via `yarn test` (which includes the config).
We already depend on Yarn for development anyway.

* Add yarn test-prod to run Jest with production environment

* Actually flip the production tests to run in prod environment

This produces a bunch of errors:

Test Suites: 64 failed, 58 passed, 122 total
Tests:       740 failed, 26 skipped, 1809 passed, 2575 total
Snapshots:   16 failed, 4 passed, 20 total

* Ignore expectDev() calls in production

Down from 740 to 175 failed.

Test Suites: 44 failed, 78 passed, 122 total
Tests:       175 failed, 26 skipped, 2374 passed, 2575 total
Snapshots:   16 failed, 4 passed, 20 total

* Decode errors so tests can assert on their messages

Down from 175 to 129.

Test Suites: 33 failed, 89 passed, 122 total
Tests:       129 failed, 1029 skipped, 1417 passed, 2575 total
Snapshots:   16 failed, 4 passed, 20 total

* Remove ReactDOMProduction-test

There is no need for it now. The only test that was special is moved into ReactDOM-test.

* Remove production switches from ReactErrorUtils

The tests now run in production in a separate pass.

* Add and use spyOnDev() for warnings

This ensures that by default we expect no warnings in production bundles.
If the warning *is* expected, use the regular spyOn() method.

This currently breaks all expectDev() assertions without __DEV__ blocks so we go back to:

Test Suites: 56 failed, 65 passed, 121 total
Tests:       379 failed, 1029 skipped, 1148 passed, 2556 total
Snapshots:   16 failed, 4 passed, 20 total

* Replace expectDev() with expect() in __DEV__ blocks

We started using spyOnDev() for console warnings to ensure we don't *expect* them to occur in production. As a consequence, expectDev() assertions on console.error.calls fail because console.error.calls doesn't exist. This is actually good because it would help catch accidental warnings in production.

To solve this, we are getting rid of expectDev() altogether, and instead introduce explicit expectation branches. We'd need them anyway for testing intentional behavior differences.

This commit replaces all expectDev() calls with expect() calls in __DEV__ blocks. It also removes a few unnecessary expect() checks that no warnings were produced (by also removing the corresponding spyOnDev() calls).

Some DEV-only assertions used plain expect(). Those were also moved into __DEV__ blocks.

ReactFiberErrorLogger was special because it console.error()'s in production too. So in that case I intentionally used spyOn() instead of spyOnDev(), and added extra assertions.

This gets us down to:

Test Suites: 21 failed, 100 passed, 121 total
Tests:       72 failed, 26 skipped, 2458 passed, 2556 total
Snapshots:   16 failed, 4 passed, 20 total

* Enable User Timing API for production testing

We could've disabled it, but seems like a good idea to test since we use it at FB.

* Test for explicit Object.freeze() differences between PROD and DEV

This is one of the few places where DEV and PROD behavior differs for performance reasons.
Now we explicitly test both branches.

* Run Jest via "yarn test" on CI

* Remove unused variable

* Assert different error messages

* Fix error handling tests

This logic is really complicated because of the global ReactFiberErrorLogger mock.
I understand it now, so I added TODOs for later.

It can be much simpler if we change the rest of the tests that assert uncaught errors to also assert they are logged as warnings.
Which mirrors what happens in practice anyway.

* Fix more assertions

* Change tests to document the DEV/PROD difference for state invariant

It is very likely unintentional but I don't want to change behavior in this PR.
Filed a follow up as https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/11618.

* Remove unnecessary split between DEV/PROD ref tests

* Fix more test message assertions

* Make validateDOMNesting tests DEV-only

* Fix error message assertions

* Document existing DEV/PROD message difference (possible bug)

* Change mocking assertions to be DEV-only

* Fix the error code test

* Fix more error message assertions

* Fix the last failing test due to known issue

* Run production tests on CI

* Unify configuration

* Fix coverage script

* Remove expectDev from eslintrc

* Run everything in band

We used to before, too. I just forgot to add the arguments after deleting the script.
2017-11-22 13:02:26 +00:00
Dan Abramov 313611572b Reorganize code structure (#11288)
* Move files and tests to more meaningful places

* Fix the build

Now that we import reconciler via react-reconciler, I needed to make a few tweaks.

* Update sizes

* Move @preventMunge directive to FB header

* Revert unintentional change

* Fix Flow coverage

I forgot to @flow-ify those files. This uncovered some issues.

* Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down

Like a rat in a cage
Pulling minimum wage
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down

Prettier, you're safer and you're wasting my time
Our records all show you were filthy but fine
But they shuttered your stores
When you opened the doors
To the cops who were bored once they'd run out of crime

Prettier, you're perfect, oh, please don't change a thing
Your mild billionaire mayor's now convinced he's a king
So the boring collect
I mean all disrespect
In the neighborhood bars I'd once dreamt I would drink

Prettier, I love you but you're freaking me out
There's a ton of the twist but we're fresh out of shout
Like a death in the hall
That you hear through your wall
Prettier, I love you but you're freaking me out

Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Like a death of the heart
Jesus, where do I start?
But you're still the one pool where I'd happily drown

And oh! Take me off your mailing list
For kids who think it still exists
Yes, for those who think it still exists
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe you're right
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe you're right
Maybe you're right, maybe I'm wrong
And just maybe you're right

And oh! Maybe mother told you true
And there'll always be somebody there for you
And you'll never be alone
But maybe she's wrong and maybe I'm right
And just maybe she's wrong
Maybe she's wrong and maybe I'm right
And if so, here's this song!
2017-10-19 19:50:24 +01:00