* Harden tests around init/addition/update/removal of aliased attributes
I noticed some patterns weren't being tested.
* Call setValueForProperty() for null and undefined
The branching before the call is unnecessary because setValueForProperty() already
has an internal branch that delegates to deleteValueForProperty() for null and
undefined through the shouldIgnoreValue() check.
The goal is to start unifying these methods because their separation doesn't
reflect the current behavior (e.g. for unknown properties) anymore, and obscures
what actually happens with different inputs.
* Inline deleteValueForProperty() into setValueForProperty()
Now we don't read propertyInfo twice in this case.
I also dropped a few early returns. I added them a while ago when we had
Stack-only tracking of DOM operations, and some operations were being
counted twice because of how this code is structured. This isn't a problem
anymore (both because we don't track operations, and because I've just
inlined this method call).
* Inline deleteValueForAttribute() into setValueForAttribute()
The special cases for null and undefined already exist in setValueForAttribute().
* Delete some dead code
* Make setValueForAttribute() a branch of setValueForProperty()
Their naming is pretty confusing by now. For example setValueForProperty()
calls setValueForAttribute() when shouldSetAttribute() is false (!). I want
to refactor (as in, inline and then maybe factor it out differently) the relation
between them. For now, I'm consolidating the callers to use setValueForProperty().
* Make it more obvious where we skip and when we reset attributes
The naming of these methods is still very vague and conflicting in some cases.
Will need further work.
* Rewrite setValueForProperty() with early exits
This makes the flow clearer in my opinion.
* Move shouldIgnoreValue() into DOMProperty
It was previously duplicated.
It's also suspiciously similar in purpose to shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull()
so I want to see if there is a way to unify them.
* Use more specific methods for testing validity
* Unify shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull() and shouldIgnoreValue()
* Remove shouldSetAttribute()
Its naming was confusing and it was used all over the place instead of more specific checks.
Now that we only have one call site, we might as well inline and get rid of it.
* Remove unnecessary condition
* Remove another unnecessary condition
* Add Flow coverage
* Oops
* Fix lint (ESLint complains about Flow suppression)
* Fix treatment of Symbol/Function values on boolean attributes
They weren't being properly skipped because of the early return.
I added tests for this case.
* Avoid getPropertyInfo() calls
I think this PR looks worse on benchmarks because we have to read propertyInfo in different places.
Originally I tried to get rid of propertyInfo, but looks like it's important for performance after all.
So now I'm going into the opposite direction, and precompute propertyInfo as early as possible, and then just pass it around.
This way we can avoid extra lookups but keep functions nice and modular.
* Pass propertyInfo as argument to getValueForProperty()
It always exists because this function is only called for known properties.
* Make it clearer this branch is boolean-specific
I wrote this and then got confused myself.
* Memoize whether propertyInfo accepts boolean value
Since we run these checks for all booleans, might as well remember it.
* Fix a crash when numeric property is given a Symbol
* Record attribute table
The changes reflect that SSR doesn't crash with symbols anymore (and just warns, consistently with the client).
* Refactor attribute initialization
Instead of using flags, explicitly group similar attributes/properties.
* Optimization: we know built-in attributes are never invalid
* Use strict comparison
* Rename methods for clarity
* Lint nit
* Minor tweaks
* Document all the different attribute types
* Harden tests around init/addition/update/removal of aliased attributes
I noticed some patterns weren't being tested.
* Call setValueForProperty() for null and undefined
The branching before the call is unnecessary because setValueForProperty() already
has an internal branch that delegates to deleteValueForProperty() for null and
undefined through the shouldIgnoreValue() check.
The goal is to start unifying these methods because their separation doesn't
reflect the current behavior (e.g. for unknown properties) anymore, and obscures
what actually happens with different inputs.
* Inline deleteValueForProperty() into setValueForProperty()
Now we don't read propertyInfo twice in this case.
I also dropped a few early returns. I added them a while ago when we had
Stack-only tracking of DOM operations, and some operations were being
counted twice because of how this code is structured. This isn't a problem
anymore (both because we don't track operations, and because I've just
inlined this method call).
* Inline deleteValueForAttribute() into setValueForAttribute()
The special cases for null and undefined already exist in setValueForAttribute().
* Delete some dead code
* Make setValueForAttribute() a branch of setValueForProperty()
Their naming is pretty confusing by now. For example setValueForProperty()
calls setValueForAttribute() when shouldSetAttribute() is false (!). I want
to refactor (as in, inline and then maybe factor it out differently) the relation
between them. For now, I'm consolidating the callers to use setValueForProperty().
* Make it more obvious where we skip and when we reset attributes
The naming of these methods is still very vague and conflicting in some cases.
Will need further work.
* Rewrite setValueForProperty() with early exits
This makes the flow clearer in my opinion.
* Move shouldIgnoreValue() into DOMProperty
It was previously duplicated.
It's also suspiciously similar in purpose to shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull()
so I want to see if there is a way to unify them.
* Use more specific methods for testing validity
* Unify shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull() and shouldIgnoreValue()
* Remove shouldSetAttribute()
Its naming was confusing and it was used all over the place instead of more specific checks.
Now that we only have one call site, we might as well inline and get rid of it.
* Remove unnecessary condition
* Remove another unnecessary condition
* Add Flow coverage
* Oops
* Fix lint (ESLint complains about Flow suppression)
* Ensure value and defaultValue do not assign functions and symbols
* Eliminate assignProperty method from ReactDOMInput
* Restore original placement of defaultValue reservedProp
* Reduce branching. Make assignment more consistent
* Control for warnings in symbol/function tests
* Add boolean to readOnly assignments
* Tweak the tests
* Invalid value attributes should convert to an empty string
* Revert ChangeEventPlugin update. See #11746
* Format
* Replace shouldSetAttribute call with value specific type check
DOMProperty.shouldSetAttribute runs a few other checks that aren't
appropriate for determining if a value or defaultValue should be
assigned on an input. This commit replaces that call with an input
specific check.
* Remove unused import
* Eliminate unnecessary numeric equality checks (#11751)
* Eliminate unnecessary numeric equality checks
This commit changes the way numeric equality for number inputs works
such that it compares against `input.valueAsNumber`. This eliminates
quite a bit of branching around numeric equality.
* There is no need to compare valueAsNumber
* Add test cases for empty string to 0.
* Avoid implicit boolean JSX props
* Split up numeric equality test to isolate eslint disable command
* Fix typo in ReactDOMInput test
* Add todos
* Update the attribute table
I updated ReactDOMInput.synchronizeDefaultValue such that it assignes
the defaultValue property instead of the value attribute. I never
followed up on the ChangeEventPlugin's on blur behavior.
* Use defaultValue instead of setAttribute('value')
This commit replaces the method of synchronizing an input's value
attribute from using setAttribute to assigning defaultValue. This has
several benefits:
- Fixes issue where IE10+ and Edge password icon disappears (#7328)
- Fixes issue where toggling input types hides display value on dates
in Safari (unreported)
- Removes mutationMethod behaviors from DOMPropertyOperations
* initialValue in Input wrapperState is always a string
* The value property is assigned before the value attribute. Fix related tests.
* Remove initial value tests in ReactDOMInput
I added these tests after removing the `value` mutation
method. However they do not add any additional value over existing
tests.
* Improve clarity of value checks in ReactDOMInput.postMountWrapper
* Remove value and defaultValue from InputWithWrapperState type
They are already included in the type definition for HTMLInputElement
* Inline stringification of value in ReactDOMInput
Avoids eagier stringification and makes usage more consistent.
* Use consistent value/defaultValue presence in postMountHook
Other methods in ReactDOMInput check for null instead of
hasOwnProperty.
* Add missing semicolon
* Remove unused value argument in ReactDOMInput test
* Address cases where a value switches to undefined
When a controlled input value switches to undefined, it reverts back
to the initial state of the controlled input.
We didn't have test coverage for this case, so I've added two describe
blocks to cover both null and undefined.
Fixes a case where changing the name and checked value of a radio button in the same update would lead to checking the wrong radio input. Also adds a DOM test fixture for related issue.
Related issues:
https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/7630
* Convert EventPlugin{Hub,Registry} to named exports
* Convert EventPluginUtils to named exports
* Convert EventPropagators to named exports
* Convert ReactControlledComponent to named exports
* Convert ReactGenericBatching to named exports
* Convert ReactDOMComponentTree to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeComponentTree to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeRTComponentTree to named exports
* Convert FallbackCompositionState to named exports
* Convert ReactEventEmitterMixin to named exports
* Convert ReactBrowserEventEmitter to named exports
* Convert ReactNativeEventEmitter to named exports
* Convert ReactDOMEventListener to named exports
* Convert DOMMarkupOperations to named exports
* Convert DOMProperty to named exports
* Add suppression for existing Flow violation
Flow didn't see it before.
* Update sizes
* Update transforms to handle ES modules
* Update Jest to handle ES modules
* Convert react package to ES modules
* Convert react-art package to ES Modules
* Convert react-call-return package to ES Modules
* Convert react-test-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-cs-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-rt-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-noop-renderer package to ES Modules
* Convert react-dom/server to ES modules
* Convert react-dom/{client,events,test-utils} to ES modules
* Convert react-dom/shared to ES modules
* Convert react-native-renderer to ES modules
* Convert react-reconciler to ES modules
* Convert events to ES modules
* Convert shared to ES modules
* Remove CommonJS support from transforms
* Move ReactDOMFB entry point code into react-dom/src
This is clearer because we can use ES imports in it.
* Fix Rollup shim configuration to work with ESM
* Fix incorrect comment
* Exclude external imports without side effects
* Fix ReactDOM FB build
* Remove TODOs I don’t intend to fix yet
* Use relative paths in packages/react
* Use relative paths in packages/react-art
* Use relative paths in packages/react-cs
* Use relative paths in other packages
* Fix as many issues as I can
This uncovered an interesting problem where ./b from package/src/a would resolve to a different instantiation of package/src/b in Jest.
Either this is a showstopper or we can solve it by completely fobbidding remaining /src/.
* Fix all tests
It seems we can't use relative requires in tests anymore. Otherwise Jest becomes confused between real file and symlink.
https://github.com/facebook/jest/issues/3830
This seems bad... Except that we already *don't* want people to create tests that import individual source files.
All existing cases of us doing so are actually TODOs waiting to be fixed.
So perhaps this requirement isn't too bad because it makes bad code looks bad.
Of course, if we go with this, we'll have to lint against relative requires in tests.
It also makes moving things more painful.
* Prettier
* Remove @providesModule
* Fix remaining Haste imports I missed earlier
* Fix up paths to reflect new flat structure
* Fix Flow
* Fix CJS and UMD builds
* Fix FB bundles
* Fix RN bundles
* Prettier
* Fix lint
* Fix warning printing and error codes
* Fix buggy return
* Fix lint and Flow
* Use Yarn on CI
* Unbreak Jest
* Fix lint
* Fix aliased originals getting included in DEV
Shouldn't affect correctness (they were ignored) but fixes DEV size regression.
* Record sizes
* Fix weird version in package.json
* Tweak bundle labels
* Get rid of output option by introducing react-dom/server.node
* Reconciler should depend on prop-types
* Update sizes last time
* Move files and tests to more meaningful places
* Fix the build
Now that we import reconciler via react-reconciler, I needed to make a few tweaks.
* Update sizes
* Move @preventMunge directive to FB header
* Revert unintentional change
* Fix Flow coverage
I forgot to @flow-ify those files. This uncovered some issues.
* Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Like a rat in a cage
Pulling minimum wage
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, you're safer and you're wasting my time
Our records all show you were filthy but fine
But they shuttered your stores
When you opened the doors
To the cops who were bored once they'd run out of crime
Prettier, you're perfect, oh, please don't change a thing
Your mild billionaire mayor's now convinced he's a king
So the boring collect
I mean all disrespect
In the neighborhood bars I'd once dreamt I would drink
Prettier, I love you but you're freaking me out
There's a ton of the twist but we're fresh out of shout
Like a death in the hall
That you hear through your wall
Prettier, I love you but you're freaking me out
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Prettier, I love you but you're bringing me down
Like a death of the heart
Jesus, where do I start?
But you're still the one pool where I'd happily drown
And oh! Take me off your mailing list
For kids who think it still exists
Yes, for those who think it still exists
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe you're right
Maybe I'm wrong and maybe you're right
Maybe you're right, maybe I'm wrong
And just maybe you're right
And oh! Maybe mother told you true
And there'll always be somebody there for you
And you'll never be alone
But maybe she's wrong and maybe I'm right
And just maybe she's wrong
Maybe she's wrong and maybe I'm right
And if so, here's this song!
Dan Abramov
Raphael Amorim
Nathan Hunzaker
landvibe
Jason Quense
Clement Hoang