* Move Flight DOM to Webpack Specific Packagee
We'll have Webpack specific coupling so we need to ensure that it can be
versioned separately from various Webpack versions. We'll also have builds
for other bundlers in the future.
* Move to peerDep
* Move DOM Flight Tests
* Merge ReactFlightIntegration into ReactFlightDOM
This was an integration test. We can add to it.
* Fix fixture paths
* Rename ReactFlightStreamer -> ReactFlightServer
* Unify Browser/Node stream tests into one file and use the client reader
* Defer to the actual ReactDOM for HTML rendering for now
This will need to use a variant of Fizz to do inline SSR in Flight.
However, I don't want to build the whole impl right now but also don't
want to exclude the use case yet. So I outsource it to the existing
renderer. Ofc, this doesn't work with Suspense atm.
* Change demo to server
* Expose client in package.json
* Reorganize tests
We don't want unit tests but instead test how both server and clients work
together. So this merges server/client test files.
* Fill in the client implementation a bit
* Use new client in fixture
* Add Promise/Uint8Array to lint rule
I'll probably end up deleting these deps later but they're here for now.
* Add Flight Build and Unify HostFormat Config between Flight and Fizz
* Add basic resolution of models
* Add basic Flight fixture
Demonstrates the streaming protocol.
* Rename to flight-server to distinguish from the client parts
* Add Flight Client package and entry point
* Fix fixture
`yarn build` defaults to building in experimental mode. To opt-out, set
the `RELEASE_CHANNEL` environment variable to `stable`. This is the same
as what we do when running tests via `yarn test`, to make local
development easier.
* Don't bother including `unstable_` in error
The method names don't get stripped out of the production bundles
because they are passed as arguments to the error decoder.
Let's just always use the unprefixed APIs in the messages.
* Set up experimental builds
The experimental builds are packaged exactly like builds in the stable
release channel: same file structure, entry points, and npm package
names. The goal is to match what will eventually be released in stable
as closely as possible, but with additional features turned on.
Versioning and Releasing
------------------------
The experimental builds will be published to the same registry and
package names as the stable ones. However, they will be versioned using
a separate scheme. Instead of semver versions, experimental releases
will receive arbitrary version strings based on their content hashes.
The motivation is to thwart attempts to use a version range to match
against future experimental releases. The only way to install or depend
on an experimental release is to refer to the specific version number.
Building
--------
I did not use the existing feature flag infra to configure the
experimental builds. The reason is because feature flags are designed
to configure a single package. They're not designed to generate multiple
forks of the same package; for each set of feature flags, you must
create a separate package configuration.
Instead, I've added a new build dimension called the **release
channel**. By default, builds use the **stable** channel. There's
also an **experimental** release channel. We have the option to add more
in the future.
There are now two dimensions per artifact: build type (production,
development, or profiling), and release channel (stable or
experimental). These are separate dimensions because they are
combinatorial: there are stable and experimental production builds,
stable and experimental developmenet builds, and so on.
You can add something to an experimental build by gating on
`__EXPERIMENTAL__`, similar to how we use `__DEV__`. Anything inside
these branches will be excluded from the stable builds.
This gives us a low effort way to add experimental behavior in any
package without setting up feature flags or configuring a new package.
* Rename lowPriorityWarning to lowPriorityWarningWithoutStack
This maintains parity with the other warning-like functions.
* Duplicate the toWarnDev tests to test toLowPriorityWarnDev
* Make a lowPriorityWarning version of warning.js
* Extract both variants in print-warning
Avoids parsing lowPriorityWarning.js itself as the way it forwards the
call to lowPriorityWarningWithoutStack is not analyzable.
This implements 'usePress' in user-space as a combination of 'useKeyboard' and 'useTap'. The existing 'usePress' API is preserved for now. The previous 'usePress' implementation is moved to 'PressLegacy'.
* Add trusted types to react on client side
* Implement changes according to review
* Remove support for trusted URLs, change TrustedTypes to trustedTypes
* Add support for deprecated trusted URLs
* Apply PR suggesstions
* Warn only once, remove forgotten check, put it behind a flag
* Move comment
* Fix PR comments
* Fix html toString concatenation
* Fix forgotten else branch
* Fix PR comments
This is a partial replacement for the 'Press' responder:
1. `useTap` is scoped to pointers (no keyboard support). Our current thinking is
that "responders" should be limited to working with pointers, and that they can
be combined with 'useKeyboard' in user-space. For example, we might create a
'usePress' hook in user-space that combines 'useTap' with 'useKeyboard' to react
to both pointers and keyboard interactions.
2. `useTap` cancels the gesture once the pointer moves over an element that is
not within the responder target's subtree. This differs from `usePress` (and
React Native), where the gesture remains active after the pointer exits the
target's subtree and is restarted once the pointer reenters. One of the
drawbacks with the `usePress` behavior is that it requires repeatedly measuring
DOM elements (which can cause jank) to perform hit region tests. `useTap` avoids
doing this and relies on `document.elementFromPoint` only to support the
TouchEvent fallbacks.
3. `useTap` calls `onTapUpdate` when the active gesture's state changes,
`onTapEnd` when the gesture successfully completes. and `onTapCancel` when it
fails. There is no `onTap` callback. `usePress` did not explicitly report back
when the gesture failed, and product developers were confused about the
difference between `onPress` and `onPressEnd`.
4. `useTap` explicitly separates the PointerEvent implementation from the
MouseEvent/TouchEvent fallback.
5. `useTap` has better unit test coverage . All pointer types and the fallback
environment are tested. The shape of the gesture state object is also defined
and tested.
* Revert "Revert "[Scheduler] Profiling features (#16145)" (#16392)"
This reverts commit 4ba1412305.
* Fix copy paste mistake
* Remove init path dependency on ArrayBuffer
* Add a regression test for cancelling multiple tasks
* Prevent deopt from adding isQueued later
* Remove pop() calls that were added for profiling
* Verify that Suspend/Unsuspend events match up in tests
This currently breaks tests.
* Treat Suspend and Resume as exiting and entering work loop
Their definitions used to be more fuzzy. For example, Suspend didn't always fire on exit, and sometimes fired when we did _not_ exit (such as at task enqueue).
I chatted to Boone, and he's saying treating Suspend and Resume as strictly exiting and entering the loop is fine for their use case.
* Revert "Prevent deopt from adding isQueued later"
This reverts commit 9c30b0b695.
Unnecessary because GCC
* Start counter with 1
* Group exports into unstable_Profiling namespace
* No catch in PROD codepath
* No label TODO
* No null checks
* [Scheduler] Mark user-timing events
Marks when Scheduler starts and stops running a task. Also marks when
a task is initially scheduled, and when Scheduler is waiting for a
callback, which can't be inferred from a sample-based JavaScript CPU
profile alone.
The plan is to use the user-timing events to build a Scheduler profiler
that shows how the lifetime of tasks interact with each other and
with unscheduled main thread work.
The test suite works by printing an text representation of a
Scheduler flamegraph.
* Expose shared array buffer with profiling info
Array contains
- the priority Scheduler is currently running
- the size of the queue
- the id of the currently running task
* Replace user-timing calls with event log
Events are written to an array buffer using a custom instruction format.
For now, this is only meant to be used during page start up, before the
profiler worker has a chance to start up. Once the worker is ready, call
`stopLoggingProfilerEvents` to return the log up to that point, then
send the array buffer to the worker.
Then switch to the sampling based approach.
* Record the current run ID
Each synchronous block of Scheduler work is given a unique run ID. This
is different than a task ID because a single task will have more than
one run if it yields with a continuation.
Upgraded from Babel 6 to Babel 7.
The only significant change seems to be the way `@babel/plugin-transform-classes` handles classes differently from `babel-plugin-transform-es2015-classes`. In regular mode, the former injects a `_createClass` function that increases the bundle size, and in the latter it removes the safeguard checks. However, this is okay because we don't all classes in new features, and we want to deprecate class usage in the future in the react repo.
Co-authored-by: Luna Ruan <luna@fb.com>
Co-authored-by: Abdul Rauf <abdulraufmujahid@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maksim Markelov <maks-markel@mail.ru>
Laura González
Sebastian Markbåge
Eli White
Dan Abramov
Andrew Clark
Dominic Gannaway
Joshua Gross
Jessica Franco
Ricky
Nicolas Gallagher
Emanuel Tesař
Bas Peeters
Brian Vaughn
lunaruan
Ashwin Ramaswami