* Revise ESLint rules for string coercion
Currently, react uses `'' + value` to coerce mixed values to strings.
This code will throw for Temporal objects or symbols.
To make string-coercion safer and to improve user-facing error messages,
This commit adds a new ESLint rule called `safe-string-coercion`.
This rule has two modes: a production mode and a non-production mode.
* If the `isProductionUserAppCode` option is true, then `'' + value`
coercions are allowed (because they're faster, although they may
throw) and `String(value)` coercions are disallowed. Exception:
when building error messages or running DEV-only code in prod
files, `String()` should be used because it won't throw.
* If the `isProductionUserAppCode` option is false, then `'' + value`
coercions are disallowed (because they may throw, and in non-prod
code it's not worth the risk) and `String(value)` are allowed.
Production mode is used for all files which will be bundled with
developers' userland apps. Non-prod mode is used for all other React
code: tests, DEV blocks, devtools extension, etc.
In production mode, in addiiton to flagging `String(value)` calls,
the rule will also flag `'' + value` or `value + ''` coercions that may
throw. The rule is smart enough to silence itself in the following
"will never throw" cases:
* When the coercion is wrapped in a `typeof` test that restricts to safe
(non-symbol, non-object) types. Example:
if (typeof value === 'string' || typeof value === 'number') {
thisWontReport('' + value);
}
* When what's being coerced is a unary function result, because unary
functions never return an object or a symbol.
* When the coerced value is a commonly-used numeric identifier:
`i`, `idx`, or `lineNumber`.
* When the statement immeidately before the coercion is a DEV-only
call to a function from shared/CheckStringCoercion.js. This call is a
no-op in production, but in DEV it will show a console error
explaining the problem, then will throw right after a long explanatory
code comment so that debugger users will have an idea what's going on.
The check function call must be in the following format:
if (__DEV__) {
checkXxxxxStringCoercion(value);
};
Manually disabling the rule is usually not necessary because almost all
prod use of the `'' + value` pattern falls into one of the categories
above. But in the rare cases where the rule isn't smart enough to detect
safe usage (e.g. when a coercion is inside a nested ternary operator),
manually disabling the rule will be needed.
The rule should also be manually disabled in prod error handling code
where `String(value)` should be used for coercions, because it'd be
bad to throw while building an error message or stack trace!
The prod and non-prod modes have differentiated error messages to
explain how to do a proper coercion in that mode.
If a production check call is needed but is missing or incorrect
(e.g. not in a DEV block or not immediately before the coercion), then
a context-sensitive error message will be reported so that developers
can figure out what's wrong and how to fix the problem.
Because string coercions are now handled by the `safe-string-coercion`
rule, the `no-primitive-constructor` rule no longer flags `String()`
usage. It still flags `new String(value)` because that usage is almost
always a bug.
* Add DEV-only string coercion check functions
This commit adds DEV-only functions to check whether coercing
values to strings using the `'' + value` pattern will throw. If it will
throw, these functions will:
1. Display a console error with a friendly error message describing
the problem and the developer can fix it.
2. Perform the coercion, which will throw. Right before the line where
the throwing happens, there's a long code comment that will help
debugger users (or others looking at the exception call stack) figure
out what happened and how to fix the problem.
One of these check functions should be called before all string coercion
of user-provided values, except when the the coercion is guaranteed not
to throw, e.g.
* if inside a typeof check like `if (typeof value === 'string')`
* if coercing the result of a unary function like `+value` or `value++`
* if coercing a variable named in a whitelist of numeric identifiers:
`i`, `idx`, or `lineNumber`.
The new `safe-string-coercion` internal ESLint rule enforces that
these check functions are called when they are required.
Only use these check functions in production code that will be bundled
with user apps. For non-prod code (and for production error-handling
code), use `String(value)` instead which may be a little slower but will
never throw.
* Add failing tests for string coercion
Added failing tests to verify:
* That input, select, and textarea elements with value and defaultValue
set to Temporal-like objects which will throw when coerced to string
using the `'' + value` pattern.
* That text elements will throw for Temporal-like objects
* That dangerouslySetInnerHTML will *not* throw for Temporal-like
objects because this value is not cast to a string before passing to
the DOM.
* That keys that are Temporal-like objects will throw
All tests above validate the friendly error messages thrown.
* Use `String(value)` for coercion in non-prod files
This commit switches non-production code from `'' + value` (which
throws for Temporal objects and symbols) to instead use `String(value)`
which won't throw for these or other future plus-phobic types.
"Non-produciton code" includes anything not bundled into user apps:
* Tests and test utilities. Note that I didn't change legacy React
test fixtures because I assumed it was good for those files to
act just like old React, including coercion behavior.
* Build scripts
* Dev tools package - In addition to switching to `String`, I also
removed special-case code for coercing symbols which is now
unnecessary.
* Add DEV-only string coercion checks to prod files
This commit adds DEV-only function calls to to check if string coercion
using `'' + value` will throw, which it will if the value is a Temporal
object or a symbol because those types can't be added with `+`.
If it will throw, then in DEV these checks will show a console error
to help the user undertsand what went wrong and how to fix the
problem. After emitting the console error, the check functions will
retry the coercion which will throw with a call stack that's easy (or
at least easier!) to troubleshoot because the exception happens right
after a long comment explaining the issue. So whether the user is in
a debugger, looking at the browser console, or viewing the in-browser
DEV call stack, it should be easy to understand and fix the problem.
In most cases, the safe-string-coercion ESLint rule is smart enough to
detect when a coercion is safe. But in rare cases (e.g. when a coercion
is inside a ternary) this rule will have to be manually disabled.
This commit also switches error-handling code to use `String(value)`
for coercion, because it's bad to crash when you're trying to build
an error message or a call stack! Because `String()` is usually
disallowed by the `safe-string-coercion` ESLint rule in production
code, the rule must be disabled when `String()` is used.
* Remove toString of dangerouslySetInnerHTML
As far as I can tell, the toString call was added here:
https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/caae627cd557812d28d11237b34bff6c661ea8bc#diff-5574f655d491348f422bca600ff6711dR887
It was never really needed. Subsequently when we added Trusted Types,
this needed to be changed to a special call but we really should just
always let it pass through.
* Remove special casing of toString values when enableTrustedTypesIntegration
As far as I can tell, we only toString in user space because of IE8/9.
We don't really support IE8/9 anymore and by the time this flag is on,
we should be able to deprecate it.
Unless this is also an issue in IE11. I haven't tested yet.
* Add trusted types to react on client side
* Implement changes according to review
* Remove support for trusted URLs, change TrustedTypes to trustedTypes
* Add support for deprecated trusted URLs
* Apply PR suggesstions
* Warn only once, remove forgotten check, put it behind a flag
* Move comment
* Fix PR comments
* Fix html toString concatenation
* Fix forgotten else branch
* Fix PR comments
Following up on the changes I made in #13367, @gaearon suggest that
"safe" could be read as necessary for security. To avoid misleading a
reader, I'm changing the name.
A few names where discussed in the previous PR. I think `ToStringValue`
makes sense since the value itself is not a string yet but an opaque
type that can be cast to a string. For the actual string concatenation,
I've used `toString` now to avoid confusion: `toStringValueToString`
is super weird and it's namespaced anyhow.
Definitely open for suggestions here. :) I'll wait until we wrap up
#13362 and take care of rebase afterwards.
Justin Grant
Sebastian Markbåge
Krzysztof Kotowicz
Dan Abramov
Emanuel Tesař
Héctor Ramos
Philipp Spieß