* Remove /dist/ UMD builds
We publish UMDs to npm (and we're considering stopping even that).
This means we'll stop publishing to http://react.zpao.com/builds/master/latest/
* Update fixture paths
This is a variant of the fix in 5a0f1d. We can't rely on the primary
fiber's `childExpirationTime` field to be correct.
In this case, we can read from the Suspense boundary fiber instead.
This will include updates that exist in the fallback fiber, but that's
not a big deal; the important thing is that we don't drop updates.
* Enable prefer-const rule
Stylistically I don't like this but Closure Compiler takes advantage of
this information.
* Auto-fix lints
* Manually fix the remaining callsites
* Upgrade Closure
There are newer versions but they don't yet have corresponding releases
of google-closure-compiler-osx.
* Configure build
* Refactor ReactSymbols a bit
Provides a little better output.
`onInput` behaves the same as `onChange` for controlled inputs as far as I
know, so React should not print the following warning when `onInput` is
present.
> Failed prop type: You provided a `value` prop to a form field without an `onChange` handler. This will render a read-only field. If the field should be mutable use `defaultValue`. Otherwise, set either `onChange` or `readOnly`.
* add email input fixture to show cursor jump
* fix cursor jump in email input
Co-authored-by: Peter Potapov <dr.potapoff-peter@yandex.ru>
* add regression tests to ensure attributes are working
Co-authored-by: Peter Potapov <dr.potapoff-peter@yandex.ru>
* test(SuspenseList): Add failing test for class component
* Reset stateNode when resetWorkInProgress
This is supposed to put the Fiber into the same state as if it was just
created by child fiber reconciliation. For newly created fibers, that means
that stateNode is null.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
* Enable new passive effect behavior for FB builds
Previously this behavior was controlled by GKs. This PR updates the flags to be enabled statically. It also enables the flags in the test builds.
* Revert "ReactDOM.useEvent: enable on internal www and add inspection test (#18395)"
This reverts commit e0ab1a429d.
* Revert "ReactDOM.useEvent: Add support for experimental scopes API (#18375)"
This reverts commit a16b349745.
* ReactDOM.useEvent: Add support for experimental scopes API
* Refactor: visit CallExpression
Instead of visiting the functions and looking up to see if they're in a Hook call, visit Hook calls and look down to see if there's a callback inside. I will need this refactor so I can visit functions declared outside the call.
* Check deps when callback body is outside the Hook call
* Handle the unknown case
* Bugfix: Suspended update must finish to unhide
When we commit a fallback, we cannot unhide the content without including
the level that originally suspended. That's because the work at level
outside the boundary (i.e. everything that wasn't hidden during that
render) already committed.
* Test unblocking with a high-pri update
We store an effect pointer so we can backtrack in the effect list in some
cases. This is a stateful variable. If we interrupt a render we need to
reset it.
This field was added after the optimization was added and I didn't remember
to reset it here.
Otherwise we end up not resetting the firstEffect so it points to a stale
list. As a result children don't end up inserted like we think they were.
Then we try to remove them it errors.
It would be nicer to just get rid of the effect list and use the tree for
effects instead. Maybe we still need something for deletions tho.
React can't directly detect a memory leak, but there are some clues that warn about one. One of these clues is when an unmounted React component tries to update its state. For example, if a component forgets to remove an event listener when unmounting, that listener may be called later and try to update state, at which point React would warn about the potential leak.
Warning signals like this are more useful if they're strong. For this reason, it's good to always avoid updating state from inside of an effect's cleanup function. Even when you know there is no potential leak, React has no way to know and so it will warn anyway.
In most cases we suggest moving state updates to the useEffect() body instead (to avoid triggering the warning). This works so long as the component is updating its own state (or the state of a descendant). However this will not work when a component updates its parent state in a cleanup function. If such a component is unmounted but its parent remains mounted, the state will be incorrect. For this reason, we now avoid showing the warning if a component is updating an ancestor.
This assignment should have been deleted in #18384. It was deleted in
the other branches, but I missed this one. About to open a PR that
includes a test that covers this branch.
Luna Ruan
Hristo KanchevandBrian Vaughn
Brian Vaughn
Dan Abramov
Nick Reiley
Sebastian Markbåge
Dominic Gannaway
Andrew Clark
Gabriel McAdamsandDan Abramov
Utkarsh Kukreti
Sebastian Silbermann
Ricky
Rodrigo Graça
zefeng