When a new child of a fragment instance is inserted, we need to notify
the instance to keep any relevant tracking up to date. For example, we
automatically observe the new child with any active
IntersectionObserver.
For mutable renderers (DOM), we reuse the existing traversal in
`commitPlacement` that does the insertions for HostComponents. Immutable
renderers (Fabric) exit this path before the traversal though, so
currently we can't notify the fragment instances.
Here I've created a separate traversal in `commitPlacement`,
specifically for immutable renders when `enableFragmentRefs` is on.
This fixes a long standing issue that controlled inputs gets out of sync
with the browser state if it's changed before we hydrate.
This resolves the issue by replaying the change events (click, input and
change) if the value has changed by the time we commit the hydration.
That way you can reflect the new value in state to bring it in sync. It
does this whether controlled or uncontrolled.
The idea is that this should be ok to replay because it's similar to the
continuous events in that it doesn't replay a sequence but only reflects
the current state of the tree.
Since this is a breaking change I added it behind
`enableHydrationChangeEvent` flag.
There is still an additional issue remaining that I intend to address in
a follow up. If a `useLayoutEffect` triggers an sync rerender on
hydration (always a bad idea) then that can rerender before we have had
a chance to replay the change events. If that renders through a input
then that input will always override the browser value with the
controlled value. Which will reset it before we've had a change to
update to the new value.
Stacked on #32862 and #32842.
This means that Activity boundaries now act as boundaries which can have
their effects mounted independently. Just like Suspense boundaries, we
hydrate the outer content first and then start hydrating the content in
an Offscreen lane. Flowing props or interacting with the content
increases the priority just like Suspense boundaries.
This skips emitting even the comments for `<Activity mode="hidden">` so
we don't hydrate those. Instead those are deferred to a later client
render.
The implementation are just forked copies of the SuspenseComponent
branches and then carefully going through each line and tweaking it.
The main interesting bit is that, unlike Suspense, Activity boundaries
don't have fallbacks so all those branches where you might commit a
suspended tree disappears. Instead, if something suspends while
hydration, we can just leave the dehydrated content in place. However,
if something does suspend during client rendering then it should bubble
up to the parent. Therefore, we have to be careful to only
pushSuspenseHandler when hydrating. That's really the main difference.
This just uses the existing basic Activity tests but I've started work
on port all of the applicable Suspense tests in SelectiveHydration-test
and PartialHydration-test to Activity versions.
Stacked on #32851 and #32900.
This implements the equivalent Configs for ActivityInstance as we have
for SuspenseInstance. These can be implemented as comments but they
don't have to be and can be implemented differently in the renderer.
This seems like a lot duplication but it's actually ends mostly just
calling the same methods underneath and the wrappers compiles out.
This doesn't leave the Activity dehydrated yet. It just hydrates into it
immediately.
Found this bug while working on Activity. There's a weird edge case when
a dehydrated Suspense boundary is a direct child of another Suspense
boundary which is hydrated but then it resuspends without forcing the
inner one to hydrate/delete.
It used to just leave that in place because hiding/unhiding didn't deal
with dehydrated fragments.
Not sure this is really worth fixing.
This does the same thing for `measureUpdateViewTransition` that we did
for `measureNestedViewTransitions` in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32612/commits/e3cbaffef05c7b476c07f7495e06788a9503e636.
If a boundary hasn't mutated and didn't change in size, we mark it for
cancellation. Otherwise we add names to it. The different from the
CommitViewTransition path is that the "old" names are added to the
clones so this is the first time the "new" names.
Now we also cancel any boundaries that were unchanged. So now the root
no longer animates. We still have to clone them. There are other
optimizations that can avoid cloning but once we've done all the layouts
we can still cancel the running animation and let them just be the
regular content if they didn't change. Just like the regular
fire-and-forget path.
This also fixes the measurement so that we measure clones by adjusting
their position back into the viewport.
This actually surfaces a bug in Safari that was already in #32612. It
turns out that the old names aren't picked up for some reason and so in
Safari they looked more like a cross-fade than what #32612 was supposed
to fix. However, now that bug is even more apparent because they
actually just disappear in Safari. I'm not sure what that bug is but
it's unrelated to this PR so will fix that separately.
*This API is experimental and subject to change or removal.*
This PR is an alternative to
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32421 based on feedback:
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32421#pullrequestreview-2625382015
. The difference here is that we traverse from the Fragment's fiber at
operation time instead of keeping a set of children on the
`FragmentInstance`. We still need to handle newly added or removed child
nodes to apply event listeners and observers, so we treat those updates
as effects.
**Fragment Refs**
This PR extends React's Fragment component to accept a `ref` prop. The
Fragment's ref will attach to a custom host instance, which will provide
an Element-like API for working with the Fragment's host parent and host
children.
Here I've implemented `addEventListener`, `removeEventListener`, and
`focus` to get started but we'll be iterating on this by adding
additional APIs in future PRs. This sets up the mechanism to attach refs
and perform operations on children. The FragmentInstance is implemented
in `react-dom` here but is planned for Fabric as well.
The API works by targeting the first level of host children and proxying
Element-like APIs to allow developers to manage groups of elements or
elements that cannot be easily accessed such as from a third-party
library or deep in a tree of Functional Component wrappers.
```javascript
import {Fragment, useRef} from 'react';
const fragmentRef = useRef(null);
<Fragment ref={fragmentRef}>
<div id="A" />
<Wrapper>
<div id="B">
<div id="C" />
</div>
</Wrapper>
<div id="D" />
</Fragment>
```
In this case, calling `fragmentRef.current.addEventListener()` would
apply an event listener to `A`, `B`, and `D`. `C` is skipped because it
is nested under the first level of Host Component. If another Host
Component was appended as a sibling to `A`, `B`, or `D`, the event
listener would be applied to that element as well and any other APIs
would also affect the newly added child.
This is an implementation of the basic feature as a starting point for
feedback and further iteration.
follow up to https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32163
This continues the work of making Suspense workable anywhere in a
react-dom tree. See the prior PRs for how we handle server rendering and
client rendering. In this change we update the hydration implementation
to be able to locate expected nodes. In particular this means hydration
understands now that the default hydration context is the document body
when the container is above the body.
One case that is unique to hydration is clearing Suspense boundaries.
When hydration fails or when the server instructs the client to recover
an errored boundary it's possible that the html, head, and body tags in
the initial document were written from a fallback or a different primary
content on the server and need to be replaced by the client render.
However these tags (and in the case of head, their content) won't be
inside the comment nodes that identify the bounds of the Suspense
boundary. And when client rendering you may not even render the same
singletons that were server rendered. So when server rendering a
boudnary which contributes to the preamble (the html, head, and body tag
openings plus the head contents) we emit a special marker comment just
before closing the boundary out. This marker encodes which parts of the
preamble this boundary owned. If we need to clear the suspense boundary
on the client we read this marker and use it to reset the appropriate
singleton state.
This is a follow up to https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32069
In the prior change I updated Fizz to allow you to render Suspense
boundaries at any level within a react-dom application by treating the
document body as the default render scope. This change updates Fiber to
provide similar semantics. Note that this update still does not deliver
hydration so unifying the Fizz and Fiber implementations in a single App
is not possible yet.
The implementation required a rework of the getHostSibling and
getHostParent algorithms. Now most HostSingletons are invisible from a
host positioning perspective. Head is special in that it is a valid host
scope so when you have Placements inside of it, it will act as the
parent. But body, and html, will not directly participate in host
positioning.
Additionally to support flipping to a fallback html, head, and body tag
in a Suspense fallback I updated the offscreen hiding/unhide logic to
pierce through singletons when lookin for matching hidable nod
boundaries anywhere (excluding hydration)
This will provide the opt-in for using [View
Transitions](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/View_Transition_API)
in React.
View Transitions only trigger for async updates like `startTransition`,
`useDeferredValue`, Actions or `<Suspense>` revealing from fallback to
content. Synchronous updates provide an opt-out but also guarantee that
they commit immediately which View Transitions can't.
There's no need to opt-in to View Transitions at the "cause" side like
event handlers or actions. They don't know what UI will change and
whether that has an animated transition described.
Conceptually the `<ViewTransition>` component is like a DOM fragment
that transitions its children in its own isolate/snapshot. The API works
by wrapping a DOM node or inner component:
```js
import {ViewTransition} from 'react';
<ViewTransition><Component /></ViewTransition>
```
The default is `name="auto"` which will automatically assign a
`view-transition-name` to the inner DOM node. That way you can add a
View Transition to a Component without controlling its DOM nodes styling
otherwise.
A difference between this and the browser's built-in
`view-transition-name: auto` is that switching the DOM nodes within the
`<ViewTransition>` component preserves the same name so this example
cross-fades between the DOM nodes instead of causing an exit and enter:
```js
<ViewTransition>{condition ? <ComponentA /> : <ComponentB />}</ViewTransition>
```
This becomes especially useful with `<Suspense>` as this example
cross-fades between Skeleton and Content:
```js
<ViewTransition>
<Suspense fallback={<Skeleton />}>
<Content />
</Suspense>
</ViewTransition>
```
Where as this example triggers an exit of the Skeleton and an enter of
the Content:
```js
<Suspense fallback={<ViewTransition><Skeleton /></ViewTransition>}>
<ViewTransition><Content /></ViewTransition>
</Suspense>
```
Managing instances and keys becomes extra important.
You can also specify an explicit `name` property for example for
animating the same conceptual item from one page onto another. However,
best practices is to property namespace these since they can easily
collide. It's also useful to add an `id` to it if available.
```js
<ViewTransition name="my-shared-view">
```
The model in general is the same as plain `view-transition-name` except
React manages a set of heuristics for when to apply it. A problem with
the naive View Transitions model is that it overly opts in every
boundary that *might* transition into transitioning. This is leads to
unfortunate effects like things floating around when unrelated updates
happen. This leads the whole document to animate which means that
nothing is clickable in the meantime. It makes it not useful for smaller
and more local transitions. Best practice is to add
`view-transition-name` only right before you're about to need to animate
the thing. This is tricky to manage globally on complex apps and is not
compositional. Instead we let React manage when a `<ViewTransition>`
"activates" and add/remove the `view-transition-name`. This is also when
React calls `startViewTransition` behind the scenes while it mutates the
DOM.
I've come up with a number of heuristics that I think will make a lot
easier to coordinate this. The principle is that only if something that
updates that particular boundary do we activate it. I hope that one day
maybe browsers will have something like these built-in and we can remove
our implementation.
A `<ViewTransition>` only activates if:
- If a mounted Component renders a `<ViewTransition>` within it outside
the first DOM node, and it is within the viewport, then that
ViewTransition activates as an "enter" animation. This avoids inner
"enter" animations trigger when the parent mounts.
- If an unmounted Component had a `<ViewTransition>` within it outside
the first DOM node, and it was within the viewport, then that
ViewTransition activates as an "exit" animation. This avoids inner
"exit" animations triggering when the parent unmounts.
- If an explicitly named `<ViewTransition name="...">` is deep within an
unmounted tree and one with the same name appears in a mounted tree at
the same time, then both are activated as a pair, but only if they're
both in the viewport. This avoids these triggering "enter" or "exit"
animations when going between parents that don't have a pair.
- If an already mounted `<ViewTransition>` is visible and a DOM
mutation, that might affect how it's painted, happens within its
children but outside any nested `<ViewTransition>`. This allows it to
"cross-fade" between its updates.
- If an already mounted `<ViewTransition>` resizes or moves as the
result of direct DOM nodes siblings changing or moving around. This
allows insertion, deletion and reorders into a list to animate all
children. It is only within one DOM node though, to avoid unrelated
changes in the parent to trigger this. If an item is outside the
viewport before and after, then it's skipped to avoid things flying
across the screen.
- If a `<ViewTransition>` boundary changes size, due to a DOM mutation
within it, then the parent activates (or the root document if there are
no more parents). This ensures that the container can cross-fade to
avoid abrupt relayout. This can be avoided by using absolutely
positioned children. When this can avoid bubbling to the root document,
whatever is not animating is still responsive to clicks during the
transition.
Conceptually each DOM node has its own default that activates the parent
`<ViewTransition>` or no transition if the parent is the root. That
means that if you add a DOM node like `<div><ViewTransition><Component
/></ViewTransition></div>` this won't trigger an "enter" animation since
it was the div that was added, not the ViewTransition. Instead, it might
cause a cross-fade of the parent ViewTransition or no transition if it
had no parent. This ensures that only explicit boundaries perform coarse
animations instead of every single node which is really the benefit of
the View Transitions model. This ends up working out well for simple
cases like switching between two pages immediately while transitioning
one floating item that appears on both pages. Because only the floating
item transitions by default.
Note that it's possible to add manual `view-transition-name` with CSS or
`style={{ viewTransitionName: 'auto' }}` that always transitions as long
as something else has a `<ViewTransition>` that activates. For example a
`<ViewTransition>` can wrap a whole page for a cross-fade but inside of
it an explicit name can be added to something to ensure it animates as a
move when something relates else changes its layout. Instead of just
cross-fading it along with the Page which would be the default.
There's more PRs coming with some optimizations, fixes and expanded
APIs. This first PR explores the above core heuristic.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
Stacked on #30881.
Move `runWithFiberInDEV` from the recursive part of the commit phase and
instead wrap each call into user space. These should really map 1:1 with
where we're using `try/catch` since that's where we're calling into user
space.
The goal of this is to avoid the extra stack frames added by
`enableOwnerStacks` in the recursive parts to avoid stack overflow. This
way we only have a couple of extra at the end of the stack instead of a
couple of extra at every depth of the tree.
This is mostly just moves and same code extracted into utility
functions.
This is to help clarify what needs to be wrapped in try/catch and
runWithFiberInDEV. I'll do the runWithFiberInDEV changes in a follow up.
This leaves ReactCommitWork mostly to do matching on the tag and the
recursive loops.
Jack Pope
Sebastian Markbåge
Josh Story
