<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
--> The React Compiler rejected a default parameter that contains a
TSInstantiationExpression with the todo message that the expression
cannot be safely reordered. This change teaches the reorder check in
BuildHIR.ts to treat TSInstantiationExpression as reorderable. This is
safe because TypeScript instantiation only affects types and is erased
at runtime, so it has no side effects and does not change semantics.
## How did you test this change?
```
Set-Content testfilter.txt 'ts-instantiation-default-param'
yarn test --filter --update
yarn test --filter
```
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
--> I added a fixture:
>
compiler/packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler/src/__tests__/fixtures/compiler/ts-instantiation-default-param.js
Calling setState functions during render can lead to extraneous renders
or even infinite loops. We also have runtime detection for loops, but
static detection is obviously even better.
This PR adds an option to infer identifers as setState functions if both
the following conditions are met:
- The identifier is named starting with "set"
- The identifier is used as the callee of a call expression
By inferring values as SetState type, this allows our existing
ValidateNoSetStateInRender rule to flag calls during render, disallowing
examples like the following:
```js
function Component({setParentState}) {
setParentState(...);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Error: Cannot call setState in render
}
```
@stipsan found this issue where the compiler would bailout on the
`useLayoutEffect` examples in the React docs. While setState in an
effect is typically an anti-pattern due to the fact that it hurts
performance through cascading renders, the one scenario where it _is_
allowed is if the value being set flows from a ref.
The previous PR added name hints for anonymous functions, but didn't
handle the case of outlined functions. Here we do some cleanup around
function `id` and name hints:
* Make `HIRFunction.id` a ValidatedIdentifierName, which involved some
cleanup of the validation helpers
* Add `HIRFunction.nameHint: string` as a place to store the generated
name hints which are not valid identifiers
* Update Codegen to always use the `id` as the actual function name, and
only use nameHint as part of generating the object+property wrapper for
debug purposes.
This ensures we don't conflate synthesized hints with real function
names. Then, we also update OutlineFunctions to use the function name
_or_ the nameHint as the input to generating a unique identifier. This
isn't quite as nice as the object form since we lose our formatting, but
it's a simple step that gives more context to the developer than `_temp`
does.
Switching to output the object+property lookup form for outlined
functions is a bit more involved, let's do that in a follow-up.
Adds a `@enableNameAnonymousFunctions` feature to infer helpful names
for anonymous functions within components and hooks. The logic is
inspired by a custom Next.js transform, flagged to us by @eps1lon, that
does something similar. Implementing this transform within React
Compiler means that all React (Compiler) users can benefit from more
helpful names when debugging.
The idea builds on the fact that JS engines try to infer helpful names
for anonymous functions (in stack traces) when those functions are
accessed through an object property lookup:
```js
({'a[xyz]': () => {
throw new Error('hello!')
} }['a[xyz]'])()
// Stack trace:
Uncaught Error: hello!
at a[xyz] (<anonymous>:1:26) // <-- note the name here
at <anonymous>:1:60
```
The new NameAnonymousFunctions transform is gated by the above flag,
which is off by default. It attemps to infer names for functions as
follows:
First, determine a "local" name:
* Assigning a function to a named variable uses the variable name.
`const f = () => {}` gets the name "f".
* Passing the function as an argument to a function gets the name of the
function, ie `foo(() => ...)` get the name "foo()", `foo.bar(() => ...)`
gets the name "foo.bar()". Note the parenthesis to help understand that
it was part of a call.
* Passing the function to a known hook uses the name of the hook,
`useEffect(() => ...)` uses "useEffect()".
* Passing the function as a JSX prop uses the element and attr name, eg
`<div onClick={() => ...}` uses "<div>.onClick".
Second, the local name is combined with the name of the outer
component/hook, so the final names will be strings like `Component[f]`
or `useMyHook[useEffect()]`.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34410).
* #34434
* __->__ #34410
Small fix to make all descriptions consistently printed with a single
period at the end.
Ran `grep -rn "description:" packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler/src
--include="*.ts" --exclude-dir="__tests__" | grep '\.\s*["\`]'` to find
all descriptions ending in a period and manually fixed them.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34404).
* #34409
* __->__ #34404
With #34176 we now have granular lint rules created for each compiler
ErrorCategory. However, we had remnants of our old error severities
still in use which makes reporting errors quite clunky. Previously you
would need to specify both a category and severity which often ended up
being the same.
This PR moves severity definition into our rules which are generated
from our categories. For now I decided to defer "upgrading" categories
from a simple string to a sum type since we are only using severities to
map errors to eslint severity.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34401).
* #34409
* #34404
* #34403
* #34402
* __->__ #34401
A few libraries are known to be incompatible with memoization, whether
manually via `useMemo()` or via React Compiler. This puts us in a tricky
situation. On the one hand, we understand that these libraries were
developed prior to our documenting the [Rules of
React](https://react.dev/reference/rules), and their designs were the
result of trying to deliver a great experience for their users and
balance multiple priorities around DX, performance, etc. At the same
time, using these libraries with memoization — and in particular with
automatic memoization via React Compiler — can break apps by causing the
components using these APIs not to update. Concretely, the APIs have in
common that they return a function which returns different values over
time, but where the function itself does not change. Memoizing the
result on the identity of the function will mean that the value never
changes. Developers reasonable interpret this as "React Compiler broke
my code".
Of course, the best solution is to work with developers of these
libraries to address the root cause, and we're doing that. We've
previously discussed this situation with both of the respective
libraries:
* React Hook Form:
https://github.com/react-hook-form/react-hook-form/issues/11910#issuecomment-2135608761
* TanStack Table:
https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/33057#issuecomment-2840600158
and https://github.com/TanStack/table/issues/5567
In the meantime we need to make sure that React Compiler can work out of
the box as much as possible. This means teaching it about popular
libraries that cannot be memoized. We also can't silently skip
compilation, as this confuses users, so we need these error messages to
be visible to users. To that end, this PR adds:
* A flag to mark functions/hooks as incompatible
* Validation against use of such functions
* A default type provider to provide declarations for two
known-incompatible libraries
Note that Mobx is also incompatible, but the `observable()` function is
called outside of the component itself, so the compiler cannot currently
detect it. We may add validation for such APIs in the future.
Again, we really empathize with the developers of these libraries. We've
tried to word the error message non-judgementally, because we get that
it's hard! We're open to feedback about the error message, please let us
know.
In #34125 I added a hint where if you assign to the .current property of
a frozen object, we suggest naming the variable as `ref` or `-Ref`.
However, the tracking for mutations that assign to .current specifically
wasn't propagated past function expression boundaries, which meant that
the hint only showed up if you mutated the ref in the main body of the
component/hook. That's less likely to happen since most folks know not
to access refs in render. What's more likely is that you'll (correctly)
assign a ref in an effect or callback, but the compiler will throw an
error. By showing a hint in this case we can help people understand the
naming pattern.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34298).
* #34276
* __->__ #34298
We currently assume that any functions passes as props may be event
handlers or effect functions, and thus don't check for side effects such
as mutating globals. However, if a prop is a function that returns JSX
that is a sure sign that it's actually a render helper and not an event
handler or effect function. So we now emit a `Render` effect for any
prop that is a JSX-returning function, triggering all of our render
validation.
This required a small fix to InferTypes: we weren't correctly populating
the `return` type of function types during unification. I also improved
the printing of types so we can see the inferred return types.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33647).
* #33643
* #33650
* #33642
* __->__ #33647
NOTE: this is a merged version of @mofeiZ's original PR along with my
edits per offline discussion. The description is updated to reflect the
latest approach.
The key problem we're trying to solve with this PR is to allow
developers more control over the compiler's various validations. The
idea is to have a number of rules targeting a specific category of
issues, such as enforcing immutability of props/state/etc or disallowing
access to refs during render. We don't want to have to run the compiler
again for every single rule, though, so @mofeiZ added an LRU cache that
caches the full compilation output of N most recent files. The first
rule to run on a given file will cause it to get cached, and then
subsequent rules can pull from the cache, with each rule filtering down
to its specific category of errors.
For the categories, I went through and assigned a category roughly 1:1
to existing validations, and then used my judgement on some places that
felt distinct enough to warrant a separate error. Every error in the
compiler now has to supply both a severity (for legacy reasons) and a
category (for ESLint). Each category corresponds 1:1 to a ESLint rule
definition, so that the set of rules is automatically populated based on
the defined categories.
Categories include a flag for whether they should be in the recommended
set or not.
Note that as with the original version of this PR, only
eslint-plugin-react-compiler is changed. We still have to update the
main lint rule.
## Test Plan
* Created a sample project using ESLint v9 and verified that the plugin
can be configured correctly and detects errors
* Edited `fixtures/eslint-v9` and introduced errors, verified that the w
latest config changes in that fixture it correctly detects the errors
* In the sample project, confirmed that the LRU caching is correctly
caching compiler output, ie compiling files just once.
Co-authored-by: Mofei Zhang <feifei0@meta.com>
The new mutation/aliasing model significantly expands on the idea of
FunctionEffect. The type (and its usage in HIRFunction.effects) was only
necessary for the now-deleted old inference model so we can clean up
this code now.
Fixes remaining issue in #32261, where passing a previously useMemo()-d
value to `Object.entries()` makes the compiler think the value is
mutated and fail validatePreserveExistingMemo. While I was there I added
Object.keys() and Object.values() too.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34047).
* #34049
* __->__ #34047
* #34044
This currently throws an invariant which may be misleading. I checked
the ecma262 spec and used the same list of reserved words in our check.
To err on the side of being conservative, we also error when strict mode
reserved words are used.
We added the `@enableTreatRefLikeIdentifiersAsRefs` feature a while back
but never enabled it. Since then we've continued to see examples that
motivate this mode, so here we're fixing it up to prepare to enable by
default. It now works as follows:
* If we find a property load or property store where both a) the
object's name is ref-like (`ref` or `-Ref`) and b) the property is
`current`, we infer the object itself as a ref and the value of the
property as a ref value. Originally the feature only detected property
loads, not stores.
* Inferred refs are not considered stable (this is a change from the
original implementation). The only way to get a stable ref is by calling
`useRef()`. We've seen issues with assuming refs are stable.
With this change, cases like the following now correctly error:
```js
function Foo(props) {
const fooRef = props.fooRef;
fooRef.current = true;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot modify ref in render
}
```
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/34000).
* #34027
* #34026
* #34025
* #34024
* #34005
* #34006
* #34004
* #34003
* __->__ #34000
Adds a new validation pass to validate against `useMemo`s that don't
return anything. This usually indicates some kind of "useEffect"-like
code that has side effects that need to be memoized to prevent
overfiring, and is an anti-pattern.
A follow up validation could also look at the return value of `useMemo`s
to see if they are being used.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33990).
* #34022
* #34002
* #34001
* __->__ #33990
* #33989
Adds a new property to ReturnTerminals to disambiguate whether it was
explicit, implicit (arrow function expressions), or void (where it was
omitted). I will use this property in the next PR adding a new
validation pass.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33989).
* #34022
* #34002
* #34001
* #33990
* __->__ #33989
Fixes two related cases of mutation of potentially frozen values.
The first is method calls on frozen values. Previously, we modeled
unknown function calls as potentially aliasing their receiver+args into
the return value. If the receiver or argument were known to be frozen,
then we would downgrade the `Alias` effect into an `ImmutableCapture`.
However, within a function expression it's possible to call a function
using a frozen value as an argument (that gets `Alias`-ed into the
return) but where we don't have the context locally to know that the
value is frozen.
This results in cases like this:
```js
const frozen = useContext(...);
useEffect(() => {
frozen.method().property = true;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot mutate frozen value
}, [...]);
```
Within the function we would infer:
```
t0 = MethodCall ...
Create t0 = mutable
Alias t0 <- frozen
t1 = PropertyStore ...
Mutate t0
```
And then transitively infer the function expression as having a `Mutate
'frozen'` effect, which when evaluated against the outer context
(`frozen` is frozen) is an error.
The fix is to model unknown function calls as _maybe_ aliasing their
receiver/args in the return, and then considering mutations of a
maybe-aliased value to only be a conditional mutation of the source:
```
t0 = MethodCall ...
Create t0 = mutable
MaybeAlias t0 <- frozen // maybe alias now
t1 = PropertyStore ...
Mutate t0
```
Then, the `Mutate t0` turns into a `MutateConditional 'frozen'`, which
just gets ignored when we process the outer context.
The second, related fix is for known mutation of phis that may be a
frozen value. The previous inference model correctly recorded these as
errors, the new model does not. We now correctly report a validation
error for this case in the new model.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33984).
* #33993
* #33991
* __->__ #33984
This PR uses the new diagnostic type for most of the error messages
produced in our explicit validation passes (`Validation/` directory).
One of the validations produced multiple errors as a hack to showing
multiple related locations, which we can now consolidate into a single
diagnostic.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33758).
* #33981
* #33777
* #33767
* #33765
* #33760
* #33759
* __->__ #33758
Work in progress, i'm experimenting with revamping our diagnostic infra.
Starting with a better format for representing errors, with an ability
to point ot multiple locations, along with better printing of errors. Of
course, Babel still controls the printing in the majority case so this
still needs more work.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33751).
* #33981
* #33777
* #33767
* #33765
* #33760
* #33759
* #33758
* __->__ #33751
* #33752
* #33753
When destructuring, spread creates a new mutable object that _captures_
part of the original rvalue. This new value is safe to modify.
When making this change I realized that we weren't inferring array
pattern spread as creating an array (in type inference) so I also added
that here.
## Summary
The `TSAsExpression` and `TSNonNullExpression` nodes are supported by
`lowerExpression()` but `isReorderableExpression()` does not check if
they can be reordered. This PR updates `isReorderableExpression()` to
handle these two node types by adding cases that fall through to the
existing `TypeCastExpression` case.
We ran `react-compiler-healthcheck` at scale on several of our repos and
found dozens of `` (BuildHIR::node.lowerReorderableExpression)
Expression type `TSAsExpression` cannot be safely reordered`` errors and
a handful for `TSNonNullExpression`.
## How did you test this change?
In this case I added two fixture tests
import, export, and TS namespace statements can only be used at the
top-level of a module, which is enforced by parsers already. Here we add
a backup validation of that. As of this PR, we now have only major
statement type (class declarations) listed as a todo.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33748).
* #33753
* #33752
* #33751
* #33750
* __->__ #33748
Supports inline enum declarations in both Flow and TS by treating the
node as pass-through (enums can't capture values mutably). Related, this
PR extends the set of type-related declarations that we ignore.
Previously we threw a todo for things like DeclareClass or
DeclareVariable, but these are type related and can simply be dropped
just like we dropped TypeAlias.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33747).
* #33753
* #33752
* #33751
* #33750
* #33748
* __->__ #33747
We currently inline IIFEs by creating a temporary and a labeled block w
the original code. The original return statements turn into an
assignment to the temporary and break out of the label. However, many
cases of IIFEs are due to inlining of manual `useMemo()`, and these
cases often have only a single return statement. Here, the output is
cleaner if we avoid the temporary and label - so that's what we do in
this PR.
Note that the most complex part of the change is actually around
ValidatePreserveExistingMemo - we have some logic to track the IIFE
temporary reassignmetns which needs to be updated to handle the simpler
version of inlining.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33726).
* __->__ #33726
* #33725
This is an optimized version of @asmjmp0's fix in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/31940. When we merge consecutive
blocks we need to take care to rewrite later phis whose operands will
now be different blocks due to merging. Rather than iterate all the
blocks on each merge as in #31940, we can do a single iteration over all
the phis at the end to fix them up.
Note: this is a redo of #31959
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33725).
* #33726
* __->__ #33725
We now have `HIRFunction.returns: Place` as well as `returnType: Type`.
I want to add additional return information, so as a first step i'm
consolidating everything under an object at `HIRFunction.returns:
{place: Place}`. We use the type of this place as the return type. Next
step is to add more properties to this object to represent things like
the return kind.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33640).
* #33643
* #33642
* __->__ #33640
* #33625
* #33624
Substantially improves the last major known issue with the new inference
model's implementation: inferring effects of function expressions. I
knowingly used a really simple (dumb) approach in
InferFunctionExpressionAliasingEffects but it worked surprisingly well
on a ton of code. However, investigating during the sync I saw that we
the algorithm was literally running out of memory, or crashing from
arrays that exceeded the maximum capacity. We were accumluating data
flow in a way that could lead to lists of data flow captures compounding
on themselves and growing very large very quickly. Plus, we were
incorrectly recording some data flow, leading to cases where we reported
false positive "can't mutate frozen value" for example.
So I went back to the drawing board. InferMutationAliasingRanges already
builds up a data flow graph which it uses to figure out what values
would be affected by mutations of other values, and update mutable
ranges. Well, the key question that we really want to answer for
inferring a function expression's aliasing effects is which values
alias/capture where. Per the docs I wrote up, we only have to record
such aliasing _if they are observable via mutations_. So, lightbulb:
simulate mutations of the params, free variables, and return of the
function expression and see which params/free-vars would be affected!
That's what we do now, giving us precise information about which such
values alias/capture where. When the "into" is a param/context-var we
use Capture, iwhen the destination is the return we use Alias to be
conservative.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33584).
* #33626
* #33625
* #33624
* __->__ #33584
Now that we have support for defining aliasing signatures in
moduleTypeProvider, which uses string names for
receiver/args/returns/etc, we can reuse that same form for builtin
declarations. The declarations are written in the unparsed form and than
parsed/validated when registered (in the addFunction/addHook call).
This also required flushing out configs/schemas for more effect types.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33530).
* #33571
* #33558
* #33547
* #33543
* #33533
* #33532
* __->__ #33530
The previous error message was generic, because the old style function
signature didn't support a way to specify a reason alongside a freeze
effect. This meant we could only say why a value was frozen for
instructions, but not hooks which use function signatures. By defining a
new aliasing signature for custom hooks we can specify a reason and
provide a better error message.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33513).
* #33571
* #33558
* #33547
* #33543
* #33533
* #33532
* #33530
* #33526
* #33522
* #33518
* #33514
* __->__ #33513
Squashed, review-friendly version of the stack from
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/33488.
This is new version of our mutability and inference model, designed to
replace the core algorithm for determining the sets of instructions
involved in constructing a given value or set of values. The new model
replaces InferReferenceEffects, InferMutableRanges (and all of its
subcomponents), and parts of AnalyzeFunctions. The new model does not
use per-Place effect values, but in order to make this drop-in the end
_result_ of the inference adds these per-Place effects.
I'll write up a larger document on the model, first i'm doing some
housekeeping to rebase the PR.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33494).
* #33571
* #33558
* #33547
* #33543
* #33533
* #33532
* #33530
* #33526
* #33522
* #33518
* #33514
* #33513
* #33512
* #33504
* #33500
* #33497
* #33496
* #33495
* __->__ #33494
* #33572
zekiandGitHub
Joseph SavonaandGitHub
Cody OlsenandGitHub
laurenandGitHub
Jordan BrownandGitHub
Henry Q. DineenandGitHub