12 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub 280ff6fed2 [Flight] Add Web Stream support to the Flight Client in Node (#33473)
This effectively lets us consume Web Streams in a Node build. In fact
the Node entry point is now just adding Node stream APIs.

For the client, this is simple because the configs are not actually
stream type specific. The server is a little trickier.
2025-06-06 17:14:15 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub 82f3684c63 Revert Node Web Streams (#33472)
Reverts #33457, #33456 and #33442.

There are too many issues with wrappers, lazy init, stateful modules,
duplicate instantiation of async_hooks and duplication of code.

Instead, we'll just do a wrapper polyfill that uses Node Streams
internally.

I kept the client indirection files that I added for consistency with
the server though.
2025-06-06 16:26:36 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub e8d15fa19e [Flight] Build node-webstreams version of bundled webpack server (#33456)
Follow up to #33442. This is the bundled version.

To keep type check passes from exploding and the maintainance of the
annoying `paths: []` list small, this doesn't add this to flow type
checks. We might miss some config but every combination should already
be covered by other one passes.

I also don't add any jest tests because to test these double export
entry points we need conditional importing to cover builds and
non-builds which turns out to be difficult for the Flight builds so
these aren't covered by any basic build tests.

This approach is what I'm going for, for the other bundlers too.
2025-06-06 11:07:15 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub a5110b22f0 [Flight] Add a Node.js Web Streams bundle for unbundled client/server for Webpack (#33442)
Like #33441 but for Flight.

This is just one of the many combinations needed. I'm just starting with
one.
2025-06-05 14:29:02 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub e81fcfe3f2 [Flight] Expose registerServerReference from the client builds (#32534)
This is used to register Server References that exist in the current
environment but also exists in the server it might call into. Such as a
remote server.

If the value comes from the remote server in the first place then this
is called automatically to ensure that you can pass a reference back to
where it came from - even if the `serverModuleMap` option is used. This
was already the case when `serverModuleMap` wasn't passed. This is how
you can pass server references back to the server. However, when we
added `serverModuleMap` that pass was skipped because we were getting
real functions instead of proxies.

For functions that wasn't yet passed from the remote server to the
current server, we can register them eagerly just like we do for
`import('/server').registerServerReference()`. You can now also do this
with `import('/client').registerServerReference()`. We could make them
shared so you only have to do this once but it might not be possible to
pass to the remote server and the remote server might not even be the
same RSC renderer. Therefore I split them. It's up to the compiler
whether it should do that or not. It has to know that any function you
might call might be able to receive it. This is currently global to a
specific RSC renderer.
2025-03-05 22:16:56 -05:00
Hendrik LiebauandGitHub 2dc5bebd46 Fix error handling in resolveClientReference (#31332)
When a React Server Consumer Manifest does not include an entry for a
client reference ID, we must not try to look up the export name (or
`'*'`) for the client reference. Otherwise this will fail with
`TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading '...')` instead
of the custom error we intended to throw.
2024-10-23 08:36:40 -07:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub 69d4b800a6 [Flight] Support Async Modules in Server References (#31313)
This is required to support for example top level await in a "use
server" module or dependency of a "use server".
2024-10-21 14:52:10 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub 22b2b1a05a [Flight] Add serverModuleMap option for mapping ServerReferences (#31300)
Stacked on #31299.

We already have an option for resolving Client References to other
Client References when consuming an RSC payload on the server.

This lets you resolve Server References on the consuming side when the
environment where you're consuming the RSC payload also has access to
those Server References. Basically they becomes like Client References
for this consumer but for another consumer they wouldn't be.
2024-10-19 21:10:25 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub 39a7730b13 Rename SSRManifest to ServerConsumerManifest (#31299)
This config is more generally applicable to all server-side Flight
Clients and not just SSR.
2024-10-19 20:45:20 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub 99c056abb0 [Flight] Allow aborting encodeReply (#31106)
Allow aborting encoding arguments to a Server Action if a Promise
doesn't resolve. That way at least part of the arguments can be used on
the receiving side. This leaves it unresolved in the stream rather than
encoding an error.

This should error on the receiving side when the stream closes but it
doesn't right now in the Edge/Browser versions because closing happens
immediately before we've had a chance to call `.then()` so the Chunks
are still in pending state. This is an existing bug also in
FlightClient.
2024-10-01 14:28:51 -04:00
Sebastian MarkbågeandGitHub 2283d7204c [Flight] Inject Client Into DevTools (#30910)
Stacked on #30906.

Injects the Flight Client into the DevTools hook if it `supportsFlight`.
This only injects in DEV. We could inject it in prod too but so far the
only feature this exposes is only available in DEV anyway. I also only
call `injectIntoDevTools` in the browser builds since we don't really
support DevTools on the server anyway.

The main purpose of this for now is so that DevTools can track the
Server Component owner of replayed logs. This lets us add owner stacks
where `console.createTask` is not natively supported (like Firefox). It
also lets us associate the log with the Server Component in the
Component tree #30905.
2024-09-09 15:11:57 -04:00
Josh StoryandGitHub 8b08ee08a1 [Flight] reorganize code for forked entrypoints (#30702)
This commit updates the file locations and bulid configurations for
flight in preparation for new static entrypoints. This follows a
structure similar to Fizz which has a unified build but exports methods
from different top level entrypoints. This PR doesn't actually add the
new top level entrypoints however, that will arrive in a later update.
2024-08-14 18:10:40 -07:00