Following the instructions in the compiler/docs/DEVELOPMENT_GUIDE.md, we are stuck on the command `yarn snap --watch` because it calls readTestFilter even though the filter option is not enabled.
Use some clever git diffing to ignore lines that only change the
`@generated` header. We can't do this for the version string because the
version string can be embedded in lines with other changes, but this
header is always on one line.
This information is available in the regular stack but since that's
hidden behind an expando and our appended stack to logs is not hidden,
it hides the most important frames like the name of the current
component.
This is closer to what happens to the native stack.
We only include stacks if they're within a ReactFiberCallUserSpace call
frame. This should be most that have a current fiber but this is
critical to filtering out most React frames if the regular node_modules
filter doesn't work.
Most React warnings fire during the rendering phase and not inside a
user space function but some do like hooks warnings and setState in
render. This feature is more important if we port this to React DevTools
appending stacks to all logs where it's likely to originate from inside
a component and you want the line within that component to immediately
part of the visible stack.
One thing that kind sucks is that we don't have a reliable way to
exclude React internal stack frames. We filter node_modules but it might
not match. For other cases I try hard to only track the stack frame at
the root of React (e.g. immediately inside createElement) until the
ReactFiberCallUserSpace so we don't need the filtering to work. In this
case it's hard to achieve the same thing though. This is easier in RDT
because we have the start/end line and parsing of stack traces so we can
use that to exclude internals but that's a lot of code/complexity for
shipping within the library.
For example in Safari:
<img width="590" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 6 15 27 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/2820c8c0-8a03-42e9-8678-8348f66b051a">
Ideally warnOnUseFormStateInDev and useFormState wouldn't be included
since they're React internals. Before this change, the Counter.js line
also wasn't included though which points to exactly where the error is
within the user code.
(Note Server Components have V8 formatted lines and Client Components
have JSC formatted lines.)
RC releases are a special kind of prerelease build because unlike
canaries we shouldn't publish new RCs from any commit on `main`, only
when we intentionally bump the RC number. But they are still prerelases
— like canary and experimental releases, they should use exact version
numbers in their dependencies (no ^).
We only need to generate these builds during the RC phase, i.e. when the
canary channel label is set to "rc".
Example of resulting package.json output:
```json
{
"name": "react-dom",
"version": "19.0.0-rc.0",
"dependencies": {
"scheduler": "0.25.0-rc.0"
},
"peerDependencies": {
"react": "19.0.0-rc.0"
}
}
```
https://react-builds.vercel.app/prs/29736/files/oss-stable-rc/react-dom/package.json
Based on
- #29694
---
If an action in the useActionState queue errors, we shouldn't run any
subsequent actions. The contract of useActionState is that the actions
run in sequence, and that one action can assume that all previous
actions have completed successfully.
For example, in a shopping cart UI, you might dispatch an "Add to cart"
action followed by a "Checkout" action. If the "Add to cart" action
errors, the "Checkout" action should not run.
An implication of this change is that once useActionState falls into an
error state, the only way to recover is to reset the component tree,
i.e. by unmounting and remounting. The way to customize the error
handling behavior is to wrap the action body in a try/catch.
Mini-refactor of useActionState to only wrap the action in a transition
context if the dispatch is called during a transition. Conceptually, the
action starts as soon as the dispatch is called, even if the action is
queued until earlier ones finish.
We will also warn if an async action is dispatched outside of a
transition, since that is almost certainly a mistake. Ideally we would
automatically upgrade these to a transition, but we don't have a great
way to tell if the action is async until after it's already run.
Host Components can exist as four semantic types
1. regular Components (Vanilla obv)
2. singleton Components
2. hoistable components
3. resources
Each of these component types have their own rules related to mounting
and reconciliation however they are not direclty modeled as their own
unique fiber type. This is partly for code size but also because
reconciling the inner type of these components would be in a very hot
path in fiber creation and reconciliation and it's just not practical to
do this logic check here.
Right now we have three Fiber types used to implement these 4 concepts
but we probably need to reconsider the model and think of Host
Components as a single fiber type with an inner implementation. Once we
do this we can regularize things like transitioning between a resource
and a regular component or a singleton and a hoistable instance. The
cases where these transitions happen today aren't particularly common
but they can be observed and currently the handling of these transitions
is incomplete at best and buggy at worst. The most egregious case is the
link type. This can be a regular component (stylesheet without
precedence) a hoistable component (non stylesheet link tags) or a
resource (stylesheet with a precedence) and if you have a single jsx
slot that tries to reconcile transitions between these types it just
doesn't work well.
This commit adds an error for when a Hoistable goes from Instance to
Resource. Currently this is only possible for `<link>` elements going to
and from stylesheets with precedence. Hopefully we'll be able to remove
this error and implement as an inner type before we encounter new
categories for the Hoistable types
detecting type shifting to and from regular components is harder to do
efficiently because we don't want to reevaluate the type on every update
for host components which is currently not required and would add
overhead to a very hot path
singletons can't really type shift in their one practical implementation
(DOM) so they are only a problem in theroy not practice
Requires https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29706
The strategy here is to:
- Checkout the builds/facebook-www branch
- Read the current sync'd VERSION
- Checkout out main and sync new build
- sed/{new version string}/{old version string}
- Run git status, skip sync if clean
- Otherwise, sed/{old version string}/{new version string} and push
commit
This means that:
- We're using the real version strings from the builds
- We are checking the last commit on the branch for the real last
version
- We're skipping any commits that won't result in changes
- ???
- Profit!
This lets you click a stack frame on the client and see the Server
source code inline.
<img width="871" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-01 at 11 44 24 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/581281ce-0dce-40c0-a084-4a6d53ba1682">
<img width="840" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-01 at 11 43 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/00dc77af-07c1-4389-9ae0-cf1f45199efb">
We could do some logic on the server that sends a source map url for
every stack frame in the RSC payload. That would make the client
potentially config free. However regardless we need the config to
describe what url scheme to use since that’s not built in to the bundler
config. In practice you likely have a common pattern for your source
maps so no need to send data over and over when we can just have a
simple function configured on the client.
The server must return a source map, even if the file is not actually
compiled since the fake file is still compiled.
The source mapping strategy can be one of two models depending on if the
server’s stack traces (`new Error().stack`) are source mapped back to
the original (`—enable-source-maps`) or represents the location in
compiled code (like in the browser).
If it represents the location in compiled code it’s actually easier. You
just serve the source map generated for that file by the tooling.
If it is already source mapped it has to generate a source map where
everything points to the same location (as if not compiled) ideally with
a segment per logical ast node.
Eslint rules should never throw, so if we fail to parse with Babel or
Hermes, we should just ignore the error. This should fix issues such as
trying to run the eslint rule on non tsx|ts|jsx|js files, Hermes parser
not supporting certain JS syntax, etc.
I didn't add a test for this as our eslint-rule-tester config uses
hermes-eslint parser, so it wasn't possible to add a top level await as
it would crash hermes-eslint before our rule was triggered. Similarly I
couldn't add a test for non-JS files as it would not be parseable by
hermes-eslint.
Fixes#29107
ghstack-source-id: 60afcdb89a
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29631
When a component suspends with `use`, we switch to the "re-render"
dispatcher during the subsequent render attempt, so that we can reuse
the work from the initial attempt. However, once we run out of hooks
from the previous attempt, we should switch back to the regular "update"
dispatcher.
This is conceptually the same fix as the one introduced in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26232. That fix only accounted
for initial mount, but the useTransition regression test added in
f82973302b3f490ec120c3b102e8c3792452dfc9 illustrates that we need to
handle updates, too.
The issue affects more than just useTransition but because most of the
behavior between the "re-render" and "update" dispatchers is the same
it's hard to contrive other scenarios in a test, which is probably why
it took so long for someone to notice.
Closes#28923 and #29209
---------
Co-authored-by: eps1lon <sebastian.silbermann@vercel.com>
Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers).
I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed!
ghstack-source-id: aed5f7edda
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29658
Summary: This PR expands the analysis from the previous in the stack in order to also capture when a value can incorrectly change within a single render, rather than just changing between two renders. In the case where dependencies have changed and so a new value is being computed, we now compute the value twice and compare the results. This would, for example, catch when we call Math.random() in render.
The generated code is a little convoluted, because we don't want to have to traverse the generated code and substitute variable names with new ones. Instead, we save the initial value to the cache as normal, then run the computation block again and compare the resulting values to the cached ones. Then, to make sure that the cached values are identical to the computed ones, we reassign the cached values into the output variables.
ghstack-source-id: d0f11a4cb2
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29657
Summary: jmbrown215 recently had an observation that the arguments to useState/useRef are only used when a component renders for the first time, and never afterwards. We can skip more computation that we previously could, with reactive blocks that previously recomputed values when inputs changed now only ever computing them on the first render.
ghstack-source-id: 5d044ef787
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29653
Summary: The essential assumption of the compiler is that if the inputs to a computation have not changed, then the output should not change either--computation that the compiler optimizes is idempotent.
This is, of course, known to be false in practice, because this property rests on requirements (the Rules of React) that are loosely enforced at best. When rolling out the compiler to a codebase that might have rules of react violations, how should developers debug any issues that arise?
This diff attempts one approach to that: when the option is set, rather than simply skipping computation when dependencies haven't changed, we will *still perform the computation*, but will then use a runtime function to compare the original value and the resultant value. The runtime function can be customized, but the idea is that it will perform a structural equality check on the values, and if the values aren't structurally equal, we can report an error, including information about what file and what variable was to blame.
This assists in debugging by narrowing down what specific computation is responsible for a difference in behavior between the uncompiled code and the program after compilation.
ghstack-source-id: 50dad3dacf
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29656
Summary: This adds a debugging mode to the compiler that simply adds a `|| true` to the guard on all memoization blocks, which results in the generated code never using memoized values and always recomputing them. This is designed as a validation tool for the compiler's correctness--every program *should* behave exactly the same with this option enabled as it would with it disabled, and so any difference in behavior should be investigated as either a compiler bug or a pipeline issue.
(We add `|| true` rather than dropping the conditional block entirely because we still want to exercise the guard tests, in case the guards themselves are the source of an error, like reading a property from undefined in a guard.)
ghstack-source-id: 955a47ec16
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29655
Summary: This adds a compiler option to not drop existing manual memoization and leaving useMemo/useCallback in the generated source. Why do we need this, given that we also have options to validate or ensure that existing memoization is preserved? It's because later diffs on this stack are designed to alter the behavior of the memoization that the compiler emits, in order to detect rules of react violations and debug issues. We don't want to change the behavior of user-level memoization, however, since doing so would be altering the semantics of the user's program in an unacceptable way.
ghstack-source-id: 89dccdec9c
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29654
This lets any element created from the server, to bottom out with a
client "owner" which is the creator of the Flight request. This could be
a Server Action being invoked or a router.
This is similar to how a client element bottoms out in the creator of
the root element without an owner. E.g. where the root app element was
created.
Without this, we inherit the task of whatever is currently executing
when we're parsing which can be misleading.
Before:
<img width="507" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-30 at 12 06 57 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/e234db7e-67f7-404c-958a-5c5500ffdf1f">
After:
<img width="555" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-30 at 4 59 04 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/8ba6acb4-2ffd-49d4-bd44-08228ad4200e">
The before/after doesn't show much of a difference here but that's just
because our Flight parsing loop is an async, which maybe it shouldn't be
because it can be unnecessarily deep, and it creates a hidden line for
every loop. That's what the `Promise.then` is. If the element is lazily
initialized it's worse because we can end up in an unrelated render task
as the owner - although that's its own problem.
We're getting a ton of issues filed using the blank template, for
example these airline support tickets:
https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/29678
I think someone somewhere is linking to our issues with pre-filled
content. This fixes it by forcing a template to be used.
When defining a displayName on forwardRef/memo we forward that name to
the inner function.
We used to use displayName for this but in #29206 I switched this to use
`"name"`. That's because V8 doesn't use displayName, it only uses the
overridden name in stack traces. This is the only thing covered by our
tests for component stacks.
However, I realized that Safari only uses displayName and not the name.
So this sets both.
## Summary
In https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29088, the validation logic
for `React.Children` inspected whether `mappedChild` — the return value
of the map callback — has a valid `key`. However, this deviates from
existing behavior which only warns if the original `child` is missing a
required `key`.
This fixes false positive `key` validation warnings when using
`React.Children`, by validating the original `child` instead of
`mappedChild`.
This is a more general fix that expands upon my previous fix in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29662.
## How did you test this change?
```
$ yarn test ReactChildren-test.js
```
Follow up to https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29632.
It's possible for `eval` to throw such as if we're in a CSP environment.
This is non-essential debug information. We can still proceed to create
a fake stack entry. It'll still have the right name. It just won't have
the right line/col number nor source url/source map. It might also be
ignored listed since it's inside Flight.
We have three kinds of stacks that we send in the RSC protocol:
- The stack trace where a replayed `console.log` was called on the
server.
- The JSX callsite that created a Server Component which then later
called another component.
- The JSX callsite that created a Host or Client Component.
These stack frames disappear in native stacks on the client since
they're executed on the server. This evals a fake file which only has
one call in it on the same line/column as the server. Then we call
through these fake modules to "replay" the callstack. We then replay the
`console.log` within this stack, or call `console.createTask` in this
stack to recreate the stack.
The main concern with this approach is the performance. It adds
significant cost to create all these eval:ed functions but it should
eventually balance out.
This doesn't yet apply source maps to these. With source maps it'll be
able to show the server source code when clicking the links.
I don't love how these appear.
- Because we haven't yet initialized the client module we don't have the
name of the client component we're about to render yet which leads to
the `<...>` task name.
- The `(async)` suffix Chrome adds is still a problem.
- The VMxxxx prefix is used to disambiguate which is noisy. Might be
helped by source maps.
- The continuation of the async stacks end up rooted somewhere in the
bootstrapping of the app. This might be ok when the bootstrapping ends
up ignore listed but it's kind of a problem that you can't clear the
async stack.
<img width="927" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-28 at 11 58 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/1c9d32ce-e671-47c8-9d18-9fab3bffabd0">
<img width="431" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-28 at 11 58 07 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/52f57518-bbed-400e-952d-6650835ac6b6">
<img width="327" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-28 at 11 58 31 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/d311a639-79a1-457f-9a46-4f3298d07e65">
<img width="817" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-28 at 11 59 12 PM"
src="https://github.com/facebook/react/assets/63648/3aefd356-acf4-4daa-bdbf-b8c8345f6d4b">
Partially reverts https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/28593.
While rolling out RDT 5.2.0, I've observed some issues on React Native
side: hooks inspection for some complex hook trees, like in
AnimatedView, were broken. After some debugging, I've noticed a
difference between what is in frame's source.
The difference is in the top-most frame, where with V8 it will correctly
pick up the `Type` as `Proxy` in `hookStack`, but for Hermes it will be
`Object`. This means that for React Native this top most frame is
skipped, since sources are identical.
Here I am reverting back to the previous logic, where we check each
frame if its a part of the wrapper, but also updated `isReactWrapper`
function to have an explicit case for `useFormStatus` support.
## Summary
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29088 introduced a regression
triggering this warning when rendering flattened positional children:
> Each child in a list should have a unique "key" prop.
The specific scenario that triggers this is when rendering multiple
positional children (which do not require unique `key` props) after
flattening them with one of the `React.Children` utilities (e.g.
`React.Children.toArray`).
The refactored logic in `React.Children` incorrectly drops the
`element._store.validated` property in `__DEV__`. This diff fixes the
bug and introduces a unit test to prevent future regressions.
## How did you test this change?
```
$ yarn test ReactChildren-test.js
```
## Summary
This PR add tests for `ReactNativeAttributePayloadFabric.js`.
It introduces `ReactNativeAttributePayloadFabric-test.internal.js`,
which is a copy-paste of `ReactNativeAttributePayload-test.internal.js`.
On top of that, there is a bunch of new test cases for the
`ReactNativeAttributePayloadFabric.create` function.
## How did you test this change?
```
yarn test packages/react-native-renderer
```
## Summary
Resolves#29622
## How did you test this change?
I verified the implementation using the test.
Note:
This PR was done without waiting for approval in #29622, so feel free to
just close it.
We were missing a check that ObjectMethods are not getters or setters. In our experience this is pretty rare within React components and hooks themselves, so let's start with a todo.
Closes#29586
ghstack-source-id: 03c6cce9a9
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29592
Fixes https://x.com/raibima/status/1794395807216738792
The issue is that if you pass a global-modifying function as prop to JSX, we currently report that it's invalid to modify a global during rendering. The problem is that we don't really know when/if the child component will actually call that function prop. It would be against the rules to call the function during render, but it's totally fine to call it during an event handler or from a useEffect.
Since we don't know at the call-site how the child will use the function, we should allow such calls. In the future we could improve this in a few ways:
* For all functions that modify globals, codegen an assertion or warning into the function that fires if it's called "during render". We'd have to precisely define what "during render" is, but this would at least help developers catch this dynamically.
* Use the type system to distinguish "event/effect" and "render" functions to help developers avoid accidentally mutating globals during render.
ghstack-source-id: 4aba4e6d21
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29591
- Moves the file as it needs to be in root git directory
- Removes now unreachable commits due to repo merge
- Add run prettier commit c998bb1ed4 to ignored revs
ghstack-source-id: d9dfa7099f
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29630
This was missed in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29038 when
unifying the "owner" abstractions, causing `findNodeHandle` to warn even
outside of `render()` invocations.
user's pipeline
When the user app has a babel.config file that is missing the compiler,
strange things happen as babel does some strange merging of options from
the user's config and in various callsites like in our eslint rule and
healthcheck script. To minimize odd behavior, we default to not reading
the user's babel.config
Fixes#29135
ghstack-source-id: d6fdc43c5c
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29211
After this is merged, I'll add it to .git-blame-ignore-revs. I can't do
it now as the hash will change after ghstack lands this stack.
ghstack-source-id: 054ca869b7
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/29214