Our runtime results are still bogus, but so far this tweak let's the llm
use the tools a little more intelligently.
example:
---
```js
import React from 'react';
function App() {
const [count, setCount] = React.useState(0);
const [data, setData] = React.useState([]);
React.useEffect(() => {
const processData = () => {
console.log("Processing data...");
const newData = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {
newData.push({ id: i, value: Math.random() * count });
}
return newData;
};
const processedData = processData();
setData(processedData);
}, [count]);
return (
<div>
<p>Count: {count}</p>
<p>Data Length: {data.length}</p>
<ul>
{data.slice(0, 5).map((item) => (
<li key={item.id}>Item {item.id}: {item.value.toFixed(2)}</li>
))}
</ul>
</div>
);
};
```
why is this component slow? use the react tools to figure this out.
> I'll analyze why this component is slow using the React tools. Let's
first evaluate the performance of the original code.
>
[review-react-runtime ...]
>
> The performance measurement tool timed out, which is a strong
indication of just how severe the performance issue is in this
component. Let's now try to compile the code to see if React Compiler
can identify any issues:
>
[compile...]
>
> Now I understand the issue. Let's analyze why this component > is
extremely slow:
> Main Performance Issues:
>
> Massive Data Processing: The component is trying to create an array
with a billion (1,000,000,000) objects in the processData function. This
is an enormous amount of data that will:
>
> Consume massive amounts of memory
> Take an extremely long time to process
> Likely crash the browser
>
>
> Unnecessary Recalculation: The effect depends on [count], meaning
every time the count changes, it will reprocess this enormous dataset.
> Inefficient Data Handling: Even though only 5 items are displayed, the
component processes a billion items.
>
> Let's fix these issues:
>
[compile...]
>
> Now let's check if our modified code performs better:
>
[review-react-runtime...]
>
> Excellent! The performance has dramatically improved. Now let's check
the React documentation to make sure we're following the best practices:
>
[query-react-dev-docs...]
(hit the maximum length conversation limit because i'm on a free plan)
Since we use esbuild we need to correctly move dependencies that are
required at runtime into `dependencies` and other packages that are only
used in development in to `devDependencies`. This ensures the correct
packages are included in the build.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33101).
* #33085
* #33084
* #33083
* #33082
* __->__ #33101
We weren't treating terminal operands as eligible for memoization in PruneNonEscapingScopes, which meant that they could end up un-memoized. Terminal operands can also be compound ReactiveValues like SequenceExpressions, so part of the fix is to make sure we don't just recurse into compound values but record the full aliasing information we would for top-level instructions.
Still WIP, this needs to handle terminals other than for..of.
ghstack-source-id: 09a2923051
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/33062
## Summary
Fix babel presets, and add a bit more context to the tool so that it is
more reliable
## How did you test this change?
Manually tested the mcp integrated with claude desktop
```js
function Component() {
useEffect(() => {
let hasCleanedUp = false;
document.addEventListener(..., () => hasCleanedUp ? foo() : bar());
// effect return values shouldn't be typed as frozen
return () => {
hasCleanedUp = true;
}
};
}
```
### Problem
`PruneHoistedContexts` currently strips hoisted declarations and
rewrites the first `StoreContext` reassignment to a declaration. For
example, in the following example, instruction 0 is removed while a
synthetic `DeclareContext let` is inserted before instruction 1.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted
let x = 4;
x = 5;
// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 4
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```
Currently, we don't account for `DeclareContext let`. As a result, we're
rewriting to insert duplicate declarations.
```js
// source
const cb = () => x; // reference that causes x to be hoisted
let x;
x = 5;
// React Compiler IR
[0] DeclareContext HoistedLet 'x'
...
[1] DeclareContext Let 'x'
[2] StoreContext reassign 'x' = 5
```
### Solution
Instead of always lowering context variables to a DeclareContext
followed by a StoreContext reassign, we can keep `kind: 'Const' | 'Let'
| 'Reassign' | etc` on StoreContext.
Pros:
- retain more information in HIR, so we can codegen easily `const` and
`let` context variable declarations back
- pruning hoisted `DeclareContext` instructions is simple.
Cons:
- passes are more verbose as we need to check for both `DeclareContext`
and `StoreContext` declarations
~(note: also see alternative implementation in
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32745)~
### Testing
Context variables are tricky. I synced and diffed changes in a large
meta codebase and feel pretty confident about landing this. About 0.01%
of compiled files changed. Among these changes, ~25% were [direct
bugfixes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800029094).
The [other
changes](https://www.internalfb.com/phabricator/paste/view/P1800028575)
were primarily due to changed (corrected) mutable ranges from
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/33047. I tried to represent most
interesting changes in new test fixtures
`
Fixes an edge case in React Compiler's effects inference model.
Returned values should only be typed as 'frozen' if they are (1) local
and (2) not a function expression which may capture and mutate this
function's outer context. See test fixtures for details
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33047).
* #32765
* #32747
* __->__ #33047
## Summary
Add a way for the agent to get some data on the performance of react
code
## How did you test this change?
Tested function independently and directly with claude desktop app
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <sebastian.silbermann@vercel.com>
When effect dependencies cannot be inferred due to memoization-related
bailouts or unexpected mutable ranges (which currently often have to do
with writes to refs), fall back to traversing the effect lambda itself.
This fallback uses the same logic as PropagateScopeDependencies:
1. Collect a sidemap of loads and property loads
2. Find hoistable accesses from the control flow graph. Note that here,
we currently take into account the mutable ranges of instructions (see
`mutate-after-useeffect-granular-access` fixture)
3. Collect the set of property paths accessed by the effect
4. Merge to get the set of minimal dependencies
Inferred effect dependencies and inlined jsx (both experimental
features) rely on `InferReactivePlaces` to determine their dependencies.
Since adding type inference for phi nodes
(https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/30796), we have been incorrectly
inferring stable-typed value blocks (e.g. `props.cond ? setState1 :
setState2`) as non-reactive. This fix patches InferReactivePlaces
instead of adding a new pass since we want non-reactivity propagated
correctly
Previously the CompileSuccess event would emit first before CompileSkip,
so the lsp's codelens would incorrectly flag skipped components/hooks
(via 'use no memo') as being optimized.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33012).
* __->__ #33012
* #33011
* #33010
Adds a new codeaction event in the compiler and handler in forgive. This
allows you to remove a dependency array when you're editing a range that
is within an autodep eligible function.
Co-authored-by: Jordan Brown <jmbrown@meta.com>
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/33000).
* #33002
* #33001
* __->__ #33000
Co-authored-by: Jordan Brown <jmbrown@meta.com>
Summary: We landed on not including fire functions in dep arrays. They
aren't needed because all values returned from the useFire hook call
will read from the same ref. The linter will error if you include a
fired function in an explicit dep array.
Test Plan: yarn snap --watch
--
This rule currently has a few false positives, so let's disable it for
now (just in the eslint rule, it's still enabled in the compiler) while
we iterate on it.
Accidentally broke this when migrating our test runner to use the
bundled build https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32758
The fix is pretty simple. File watcher should listen for changes in
`packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler` instead of `cwd`, which is now
`packages/snap`.
Jorge Cabiedes
Jorge Cabiedes Acosta
lauren
Joe Savona
mofeiZ
