Summary:
`xplat` targets add different deps based on what platform the target is being built for.
for anything using `fb_xplat`, we can put all ios supermodules in `fbobjc_labels` and all android sms in `fbandroid_labels`
There's some weirdness with python targets like `thrift_gen` in `/xplat/mobileconfig/tools/generator/gen-py/BUCK` that don't have platform-specific labels because the except_for list for `fbandroid` doesn't need the `fbsource//` prefix (see changes in `/ios/isolation/infra.mobileconfig.sm`)
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: shergin, joshleibsly
Differential Revision: D17884952
fbshipit-source-id: e245364cf515b75682990094d24f789d53b1f3f5
Summary:
First of all, seems it's the right thing to do. Fabric C++ code is cross-platfrom and should run on *all* platforms including Windows, Linux, and Mac.
While we don't have a real *production* use cases where we need compilation for desktops, having CXX target is really handy for two reasons:
* It simplifies local test running process. Instead of going to `/fbandroid/` and executing something like `buck test fbsource//xplat/js/react-native-github/ReactCommon/fabric/core:coreAndroid` (note the suffix). We can just do `buck test fbsource//xplat/js/react-native-github/ReactCommon/fabric/core:core` everywhere and it works now out of the box. Running tests with "Apple" flavor never worked for me.
* It allows creating synthetic benchmark tests (using Google Benchmark) that can be used as a rough approximation of code micro-optimizations.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D15608678
fbshipit-source-id: d2449035685dbca6ab983480f5334ec4ac11cd35
Summary: Each app may provide different impl for its runtime specific behaviors, then Fabric and other new infra can share the same config instance to configure stuffs.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D13290319
fbshipit-source-id: 30e3eeedc6ff6ef250ed233b27e38cb7c1062b55