Summary:
While testing 0.65, we noticed issues with hermes on iOS in the template projects
These changes create a subspec to the react-core pod so that it can access hermes header correctly.
## Changelog
Not applicable
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31559
Test Plan: I've ran e2e manual test. Tested RNTester manually also. Then tested a project inited with hermes and the default template
Reviewed By: mhorowitz
Differential Revision: D28564642
Pulled By: Huxpro
fbshipit-source-id: cfcb3363254f62a0e514ec99159b32f841ee4463
Summary:
This fixes an error where folly fails to build on Xcode 12.5, by bumping the various folly deps in RN to builds with a fix.
Next step is to commit this to 0.64 release branch
allow-large-files
Changelog: [iOS] Fix builds on Xcode 12.5
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D28071808
fbshipit-source-id: 236b66bf8294db0c76ff25b11632c1bf89525921
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
`accessibilityFrame` needs to take scrolling position into account. To fix that, we calculate the position dynamically.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D28056789
fbshipit-source-id: 3247b3e6fd64934e99563de83d163f657828e933
Summary:
Changelog: Fix possible sizing issue with DatePicker
Changing `preferredDatePickerStyle` changes size of the component without triggering re-layout of the react native screen. The fix is to make sure the size stays the same after changing the style.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D28035226
fbshipit-source-id: 2dcb50fd5ebaa0c0d01d3289c4ffa77a053cfc4a
Summary:
This intentionally leaks the static map, since it still might be accessed after static destructors are run. This is a common approach to this problem, see https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/22607 and https://github.com/facebook/componentkit/pull/906 as examples. It also sets up an autorelease pool from `RCTNativeModule::invoke` as a precaution since there's no strict guarantee one exists when it is called.
Changelog:
[iOS][Fixed] - Fix crash in RCTCoreModulesClassProvider during quit
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D27932062
fbshipit-source-id: fa75da4b78290027a762440ac6943c81b8594a57
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Current implementation of `AsynchronousEventBeat` dispatches lambdas through `RuntimeExecutor` regardless if it has done so previously.
So if `AsynchronousEventBeat::induce` is called 30 times, it will dispatch 30 lambdas.
In `AsynchronousEventBeatV2`, we make sure only single lambda is dispatched to `RuntimeExecutor` at a time.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D27940300
fbshipit-source-id: 2bad25c86315c1712b4a1da8c1d4702734cec70f
Summary:
Previously it defaults to using transparent color (iOS default), but when using `RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView` we actually manually set to `[UIColor whiteColor]`. However, if the surface is initialized via a different API, the color wasn't set. To avoid confusion and backward incompatibility, let's just set the same background color here.
We can decide in the future if the default color should be transparent instead.
Changelog: [Fixed][iOS] RCTSurfaceHostingView default background color is now consistent with RCTRootView
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D27973748
fbshipit-source-id: c506afbc5629df6647277aa2323f084773c8e760
Summary:
Adding support for DatePickerStyles on iOS13.4+
Changelog:
[iOS][Added] - Expose UIDatePickerStyles as a prop for DatePickerIOS
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D27953279
fbshipit-source-id: a35adf245147467ecbacac3770b9c50836cea468
Summary:
Adding support for DatePickerStyles on iOS13.4+
Changelog:
[iOS][Added] - Expose UIDatePickerStyles as a prop for DatePickerIOS
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D27948608
fbshipit-source-id: fcc16c630148818d9db0c9eef8363f8592b13791
Summary:
To prepare for the new architecture, introduce the following enforcement:
* Defining `RCT_NEW_ARCHITECTURE` in the build flag automatically enables violation reporting
* At runtime, call RCTEnableNewArchitectureViolationReporting() to enable/disable reporting - it takes effect with the future violations
* When violation reporting is enabled:
* RCTWarnNotAllowedForNewArchitecture(): log warning about a violation, but doesn't assert
* RCTEnforceNotAllowedForNewArchitecture(): assert when a violation happen
Also in this commit:
* Add warning when RCTRegisterModule() is called as a side effect of RCT_EXPORT_MODULE(). Many modules still need this, so we can't enforce it yet.
* Add enforcement when the bridge is initialize, because the new architecture cannot have the bridge.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D27847359
fbshipit-source-id: a8c4a8151cec3915ec707ce6b78f860af4bb0708
Summary:
CocoaPods will display a "fatal: not a git repository" when these podspecs are consumed within Facebook's internal Mercurial repository due to the reliance on `git` to obtain the current commit hash.
In these cases, the podspec is being consumed locally and the commit hash is unnecessary.
The error is removed by avoiding the use of `git` if the current working directory is not a git repository (or any of the parent directories).
Changelog:
[Internal] [iOS] - Remove CocoaPods error within Facebook's repository
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D27750974
fbshipit-source-id: 99159611c580baf5526f116948c5ff60e1c02e5c
Summary:
In order to move away from the legacy system (bridge etc), we need to decouple the new architecture assumptions from it. This flag and assertion functions will help track the runtime and report violations along the way. The goal is to have 0 violation before switching over to the pure new architecture.
Note: this is not used right now.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D27783246
fbshipit-source-id: 61f0d77c129bddcde7f24a803432f2d359c5bff3
Summary:
Log a little more information in the iOS-only assert checking that the REMOVE index is correct.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D27632457
fbshipit-source-id: 56e668dc2f22841e3cf3d838ba605d63cc7c1bad
Summary:
We're making the getTurboModule: method required for all classes that conform to RCTTurboModule.
Many of our ObjC-only and Cxx NativeModules don't implement this method. This diff implements a getTurboModule: method on all those modules that returns nullptr.
**Question:** Why is it fine to make ObjC-only NativeModules return nullptr from their getTurboModule: method?
- Because they're only accessed from ObjC, and should appear as null on the JavaScript side. Longer term, these NativeModules will also go away.
**Question:** Why is it fine to make Cxx NativeModules return nullptr from getTurboModule: method?
- Because after D27316872, the TurboModuleManager checks if the module is a CxxModule first. If it is, we do an early return, and never call the module's getTurboModule: method.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D27316871
fbshipit-source-id: bc693f2927ab3b0de24e6e9e7699390ec0f7d729
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Add support for copying text. The implementation is copied over from old React Native renderer.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D27502474
fbshipit-source-id: 0d0df583f1adc584ca47e987f06bf78c32386fcc
Summary:
Problem: In paper, there is a handy API called `[uiManager viewForReactTag:]`. Fabric does not have this mapping. The Fabric interop layer still relies on this Paper mapping.
Solution: As a workaround, re-create this mapping in the Fabric interop layer. Therefore, whenever Fabric interop layer asks a paper view manager to create a view, store a weak reference to the view in a `NSMapTable`. NSMapTable allows us to customize the strong/weak relationship. I've added a comment explaining that `RCTWeakViewHolder` only needs to be used for this special circumstance.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D27438899
fbshipit-source-id: 94663ef06479a8c863ce58b0f36d42109fa1c4f3
Summary:
Problem: In Paper rendering system, view managers are native modules that are created and retained by the bridge. Whenever rendering layer needs to create a view, it asks the bridge for the view manager. In bridgeless mode, these view managers are never created.
Solution: In bridgeless mode, let `RCTComponentData` create and retain a view manager. Having a 1:1 relationship of `RCTComponentData`:`ViewManager` is desirable, since their lifecycles should be similar. This implementation also maintains the lazy-instantiation behavior for bridgeless view managers.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D27375991
fbshipit-source-id: e76d966ba4b98972a49df1bc520b904fb2f4b3b5
Summary:
In my haste to get out D27238439 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/aca0f418baf4890b8be3c1214be70819e4b88a95), parts of it are sloppy. Nothing critical and no known bugs, but we should clean up the commented code, and add back these asserts.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D27266288
fbshipit-source-id: f242c26401dfc8851cb1ee0ef8911d19d9c1d9ae
Summary:
Picker was migrated to Fabric in stack ending in D23663596 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/8f45db3b9eba9d4805af8c48fbaa1122cb9601d4). Therefore, Picker's paper view manager is never used in Fabric through LegacyInteropLayer. This diff deletes a codepath that was created to accommodate this interop layer.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D27245596
fbshipit-source-id: e574e4aedcfef0ae639cb2aa446e27d6db5e9b94
Summary:
TextLayoutManager indirectly holds ShadowNodes, which could hold onto TextLayoutManager via a shared_ptr; so we probably have some reference cycles here.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D27238439
fbshipit-source-id: b0b65cc451891e75bafddb7a08aa34ddf86d6a35
Summary:
Fast follow to D26727461 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/34d189ae09b32261e1a2055263bd425f8a82a4c6), in bridgeless mode, `_contextContainer` doesn't have bridge, so avoid setting up `garbageCollectionTrigger`.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D27173725
fbshipit-source-id: 5530c43638c17fb03e065c11667786efe9f3ef11
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
`accessibilityElement.accessibilityFrame` returns CGRect in screen's coordinate space. Screen coordinate space changes whenever user scrolls. Therefore they have to be computed whenever on demand rather than precomputed.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D27118793
fbshipit-source-id: c48a2b9fc3f25b6ae797104371a2627193f4f79a
Summary:
`RCTDevSettings` uses the API `bridge.isInspectable` to understand if the runtime can be debugged. In bridgeless mode, let's use `RuntimeExecutor` to check the same property.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: p-sun
Differential Revision: D27095935
fbshipit-source-id: 93785774b175bd7da17269e1590b5d92eba2b0cf
Summary:
Picker was migrated off of the paper compatibility layer last year (see T75217510 and stack ending in D23663596 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/8f45db3b9eba9d4805af8c48fbaa1122cb9601d4))
WebView was deleted from RN repo a few months back.
This diffs removes both of these native components from tooling surrounding the Fabric-Paper compat layer.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D27099989
fbshipit-source-id: b6ce994fd28c4765db802cc80e8e66aec4e7a47f
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Introducing LeakChecker. A tool that checks if all native components have been cleaned up when surface is stopped.
**Known shortcomings**:
- LeakChecker is only enabled in debug builds and the existence of leaks is logged to console.
- For now, Leak Checker looks at N-1 screen. This is intentional as there is a known limitation of React that doesn't free up all shadow nodes when surface is stopped. Because of this, the use of LeakChecker is not intuitive and I'll work with React team to try to work around this.
- It doesn't help locating the leak, it only informs that leak is present. I'll be looking into ways to help locate the leak.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26727461
fbshipit-source-id: 8350190b99f24642f8e15a3c2e1d79cfaa810d3d
Summary:
If a root view is initialized with a bridge that is already loaded, then it immediately will initialize its content view with a zero size, which results in that content view's size being calculated according to its content instead of the size set on the root view after initialization. This would lead to a race condition where sometimes the content view has a smaller size than the root view.
Changelog:
[iOS][Added] - Allow RCTRootView to be initialized with a frame
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D27052637
fbshipit-source-id: 384ab3be27c92c0d84d34d49afb697882335d890
Summary:
The non-Fabric API has a `blockNativeResponder` param in setJSResponder. Make sure to pass that along in Fabric.
On Android this allows us to respect the flag and do the same thing non-Fabric was doing if `blockNativeResponder` is false. It's not clear yet what the impact is on iOS.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D27058806
fbshipit-source-id: aa5074fa46191d78f5292a93d9040ab4bb58ca66
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Creates new function `RCTInstallNativeComponentRegistryBinding` which can be called during JS setup to register JS function `__nativeComponentRegistry__hasComponent`.
Note: This diff doesn't call `RCTInstallNativeComponentRegistryBinding`.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D26946176
fbshipit-source-id: 0625b8dd6090bc9e08baa38ba60b9cbe48268184
Summary:
Live reloading has been deprecated in favor of fast refresh for years, this diff removes remaining references to it.
Changelog: [iOS] Delete deprecated "live reloading" setting
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D26983596
fbshipit-source-id: c7f86e7ec511f80e53659bccd8f40ac4f0cac27c
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
"onDismiss" event wasn't called in Fabric. This diff adds it.
Paper implementation of Modal uses `RCTEventEmitter` instead of callback to deliver the event. To align better with Paper, Fabric will follow this pattern.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D26911312
fbshipit-source-id: b0de619c5a02c3378d1f7ac3ce1b705bb5fb634d
Summary:
We need to register a root view component here synchronously because right after we start a surface, it can initiate an update that can query the root component.
This fixes an issue in Fabric Surface caused by a data race between registration of root component and concurrent call to `constraintLayout` on the main thread.
This how it happens:
1. We call `startSurface` on some background thread;
2. As a result `[RCTFabricSurface start]` schedules a lambda to the main thread that will register a root component.
3. Meanwhile some other code on the main thread changes the layout and requests the relayout of a surface.
4. Because the surface is already running, the `constraintLayout` method works as expected and schedules a mutation instruction that changes the size of the root component.
5. The mutation instruction is being delivered synchronously on the main thread and fails because the root component was not yet registered. Boom.
For now, it's not fully clear how to solve this problem properly. I suspect that the good solution would be to shift the responsibility of registering a root component to the MountingCoordinator side (so, we will have an explicit instruction prescribing creating and registering the root component). This will probably be a quite invasive change though.
For now, I think it's fine to make the block synchronous to avoid the race.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26802418
fbshipit-source-id: d49484c90d1ac61ac595caf486562fc6f4843e2f
Summary:
We want to be able to instrument touch processing delays in JS, which does not have access to systemUptime; therefore we want a UNIX timestamp, which JS has access to and can compare to the touch time.
It only matters that there is relative consistency between multiple touch events in JS, which is still the case; so this should have no impact on product code.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D26705430
fbshipit-source-id: 2acd52ae5873a44edf1e0cb126a9a6c87203d8fa
Summary:
changelog: [internal]
### When does leak happen?
Leak happens anytime a callback isn't executed inside native module, it will never get cleaned up.
Imagine a native module with method that takes onSuccess and onFail callbacks. Only one of them will be called at any time and the other one will leak.
### Why does it leak?
It leaks because when `CallbackWrapper` is created using `CallbackWrapper::createWeak`. Inside `CallbackWrapper::createWeak`, the newly created object is inserted into `LongLivedObjectCollection`. This object collection will keep it alive until `CallbackWrapper::destroy` is called, which isn't called in case closure isn't executed.
### Solution
Introduce class RCTBlockGuard which ties cleanup of resources to lifetime of the block.
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D26664173
fbshipit-source-id: 9348f7c39eb317cf1e8e5d59e77a378e5e04f3eb
Summary:
(This is the second version of the diff that includes additional checkes and syncronization around `start` and `stop` methods).
This diff migrates iOS renderer to using SurfaceHandler directly instead of calling Scheduler methods.
Major changes:
* RCTFabricSurface only stores a SurfaceHandler and platform-specific parts (such as a UIView instance and TouchHandler); all other pieces of state are stored in SurfaceHandler object.
* All the state changes initiated from RCTFabricSurface are performed via calling corresponding methods on SurfaceHandler (bypassing RCTSurfacePresenter, RCTScheduler, Scheduler, and UIManager).
* Every RCTSurfaceHandler is responsible for observing `UIContentSizeCategoryDidChangeNotification` and communicating the change down to SurfaceHandler. (Besides code simplifications it's more correct because on iOS the DPI actually depends on a particular UIScreen/UIWindow associated with UIView and *not* global for the whole app.)
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: ShikaSD
Differential Revision: D26614577
fbshipit-source-id: 428f4c4cc1ca46cd97be0413e9279e29a54807f6
Summary:
Since iOS 14 refresh control is sometimes visible when it shouldn't. It seems to happen when it is removed and added back to the window. This repros easily when using react-native-screens with react-navigation tabs. Inactive tabs are detached from the window to save resources.
Calling endRefreshing when refresh control is added to the window fixes the layout. It will also be called on first mount where it is not necessary, but should be a no-op and didn't cause any issues. I also decided to call it for all ios versions, although it is only needed on iOS 14+ to avoid forking behavior more.
## Changelog
[iOS] [Fixed] - Fix RefreshControl layout when removed from window
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31024
Test Plan:
Before:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2677334/108666197-93ea5a80-74a4-11eb-839b-8a4916967bf8.mov
After:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2677334/108666223-9ea4ef80-74a4-11eb-8489-4e5d257299c8.mov
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D26590759
Pulled By: PeteTheHeat
fbshipit-source-id: b8c06068a24446b261cbeb88ff166289724031f1
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Prevent crash when casting of state to `ImageShadowNode::ConcreteState` fails. This doesn't fix root cause of the problem but stops the app from crashing.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D26604807
fbshipit-source-id: 17a2ead56ac68e560070ed4defd364a9d1dfd1e8
Thibault Malbranche
Peter Argany
Samuel Susla
Scott Kyle
Kevin Gozali
Andy Chou
Paige Sun
Héctor Ramos
Joshua Gross
Ramanpreet Nara
generatedunixname89002005325676
Stefan Wrobel
David Biedenbach
Valentin Shergin
Janic Duplessis
