Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
Adds react_debug dependency in Android.mk where it was missing
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26617400
fbshipit-source-id: 5ac799269b106eadd881d30490ac34bd2134a9b7
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Check for null before passing it to `EventTarget` constructor.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D26605779
fbshipit-source-id: a2773c8123d83c25736bccefe656d1def8794091
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
`shadowNodeFromValue` can return nullptr. Let's make sure it returns valid value before dispatching command.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D26605350
fbshipit-source-id: eb9a0347c95ba07fd7e9b7ddeca7e6d6011f50ad
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
### Why does the crash happen?
The crash can happen if runtime is destroyed before background executor lambda is run. Destroying a shadow node after runtime leads to a crash through the chain of ownerships.
Chain of ownership:
`ShadowNode -> ShadowNodeFamily -> EventEmitter -> EventTarget -> Pointer`
Pointer tries to call `invalidate` method on raw pointer to the runtime which is gone.
https://www.internalfb.com/intern/diffusion/FBS/browse/master/xplat/js/react-native-github/ReactCommon/jsi/jsi/jsi.h?commit=2ee3ae0c6a64&lines=335-339
To work around this, weak pointers are passed to lambda. This way the lambda is less likely to be the last owner of shadow nodes. Possibility of race still exists but it less likely to happen.
## Other solution
Alternatively, we could make sure native Runnable queue in Java is emptied as part of tear down process. We can even implement both solutions as they are semantically correct.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D26582554
fbshipit-source-id: b1b8a92237902bc4c40376176f575caa24a41a05
Summary:
See react_native_assert.{h,cpp}. Because of the BUCK+Android issue where NDEBUG is always defined, we use react_native_assert instead of assert to enable xplat asserts in debug/dev mode.
This migrates most of the codebase, but probably not 100%. The goal is to increase assertion coverage on Android, not to get to 100% (yet).
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D26562866
fbshipit-source-id: a7bf2055b973e1d3650ed8d68a6d02d556604af9
Summary:
Building ReactAndroid from source on Windows has recently hit the limitation of maximum path lengths.
At build time, during the `:ReactAndroid:buildReactNdkLib` task, the linker tries to access several of the intermediate binaries located deep in the tmp folder hierarchy, eg.
```
D:\r\ReactAndroid\build\tmp\buildReactNdkLib/local/armeabi-v7a/objs/react_render_components_progressbar/D_/r/ReactAndroid/__/ReactCommon/react/renderer/components/progressbar/android/react/renderer/components/progressbar/AndroidProgressBarMeasurementsManager.o
```
**Suggested fix:** for modules such as `react_render_components_progressbar` and `react_render_components_picker`, rename them to `rrc_progressbar` etc.
**NOTE**: this assumes that the fix from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/30535 is in place. This regression happened while https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/30535 has been pending checkin.
**Other mitigations I've tried:**
- setting [`LOCAL_SHORT_COMMANDS`](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/android_mk#local_short_commands) for the problematic modules or `APP_SHORT_COMMANDS` for the root project. Turns out those commands don't work on the NDK version RN requires, but even after manually applying a [patch ](https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/ndk/+/1126440) to my local copy of the NDK, these flags had no effect.
- moving the repo directory higher in the file system tree, and using short directory names `D:\r\...` was not enough
- creating virtual drive letters for specific long paths with the [`sust`](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/subst#examples) command is not workable, since they depend on the source folder structure, and get partly generated by the build system, which I can't plug into
- just enabling long path support on Windows is not enough, since the compiler toolchain doesn't support them.
## Changelog
<!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/wiki/Changelog
-->
[Android] [Fixed] - Fix source build on Windows machines vol. 2
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/30776
Test Plan:
Run `.\gradlew installArchives`
Before:
Now:
Differential Revision: D26194286
Pulled By: mdvacca
fbshipit-source-id: 778b5a0515148e2ace19e7902f74301831ebed94
Summary:
We still have usages of "fbsource//tools/build_defs/apple:flag_defs.bzl" in react-native-github. But this should get us closer towards not using the fbsource cell. Hopefully, this is enough to unbreak the test_docker CircleCI build.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D26289304
fbshipit-source-id: 1c6464bb84df4f82f8a797321a73a1ed324e319a
Summary:
This is a Fabric-compliant implementation of `JSResponder` feature. To make it work e2e we also need to update FabricRenderer in React repository. But before we can do this, we need to ship the native changes.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D24630027
fbshipit-source-id: 70c30e1250b554d83862956b536714704093072f
Summary:
This implements `SurfaceHandler`, a new primitive for controlling the Surface life-cycle that ensures ownership, preserves state, maintains internal invariants, and simplifies surface manipulation from the application side.
For now, all this is an unused code. The coming diff will introduce an experiment that will route all surfaceId-based APIs to SurfaceHandler-based ones.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D24290777
fbshipit-source-id: f2ff2b58e6d46e971a548f9f02113a1c783c4940
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Name `shouldCancel` is misleading. It implies the commit is cancelled and doesn't happen.
`shouldYield` expresses the intent better, because the commit's changes do eventually reach mounting layer but the current commit is rather yielding to the next one.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26126121
fbshipit-source-id: 18988f217cbc651f0010f6e2381682bdbaed8bd4
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
In theory, a commit from different surface could cancel a commit for unrelated surface. Adding surfaceId to cancellation logic assures this doesn't happen.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D26126003
fbshipit-source-id: 15b9b73f1000a2b4ae882e0a5129fe26fbb53fd2
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
This simplifies logic, there is no need to keep the counter as an ivar of UIManager.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, shergin
Differential Revision: D26125928
fbshipit-source-id: bd266586463a9f9b85d6dc189cdab19f79e3d107
Summary:
This changes how we access UIManagerBinding in Fabric code. Instead of storing a pointer to it and accessing it, now we just request it from JavaScript runtime on demand. After a week of testing, I hope we will be able to simplify retaining and referencing logic between UIManager and UIManagerBinding. The change is gated just in case to have the ability to turn this new implementation off.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D26082788
fbshipit-source-id: 211c551fe1aaba9b0bff18478e40e1e1f32e999c
Summary:
This is a small simplification of the logic we have in UIManagerBinding choosing the way to call `completeRoot`. It removes an additional check for for `sharedUIManager->backgroundExecutor_` not being empty. We don't need it because it never changes and we already have the same check several lines above.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D25953674
fbshipit-source-id: 683b3e51a792160d480551a65c40492ce28938e4
Summary:
This is the core (Cxx) Fabric implementation of sendAccessibilityEvent. No platform support is added in this diff (Android and iOS do not build yet).
See following diffs.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D25852412
fbshipit-source-id: 88b7d8e2e251183dfe7fb377a4cffbac8f458656
Summary:
While pulling in additional react-native code into react-native-windows to support fabric, I hit some bugs with the MSVC compiler. These minor changes work around those bugs and shouldn't have any functional effect on the code
## Changelog
[Internal] [Fixed] - Minor code tweaks to work around a compiler bug in MSVC.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/30696
Test Plan: Code compiles in MSVC and clang.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D25830710
Pulled By: appden
fbshipit-source-id: 796bd8191ea62fe62e09dd16cc56b8edc092297f
Summary:
This replaces the internal core implementation of `setState` with the new `updateStateWithAutorepeat` which is now the only option.
In short, `updateStateWithAutorepeat` works as `setState` with the following features:
* The state update might be performed several times until it succeeds.
* The callback is being called on every retry with actual previous data provided (can be different on every call).
* In case of a static value is provided (simple case, not lambda, the only case on Android for now), the same *new*/provided value will be used for all state updates. In this case, the state update cannot fail.
* If a callback is provided, the update operation can be canceled via returning `nullptr` from the callback.
This diff removes all mentions of the previous state update approach from the core; some other leftovers will be removed separatly.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D25695600
fbshipit-source-id: 14b3d4bad7ee69e024a9b0b9fc018f7d58bf060c
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Previous implementation of "measure" in UIManagerBinding returned 0, 0 for x and y coordinates.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D25681586
fbshipit-source-id: fa69b6d4803f083a8299e00cae8bb59932c8bf78
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
The loop inside `UIManager::getNewestCloneOfShadowNode` is unnecessary as ancestorList already has index of the children.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D25681296
fbshipit-source-id: e8fab6c6d945064b0a7e63b6fd22697054fb7ea2
Summary:
The new UIManagerCommitHook can be used to implement commit-atering features without modifying the core.
E.g. State Reconciation seems can be implemented as a coomit hook but first we will use it for a new feature called Timeline (see the coming diffs).
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D25221312
fbshipit-source-id: dbe41b475bc8b36e1780d81447ab43b32758bdff
Summary:
With the change, a new delegate method allows a receiver to alter a new (proposed) shadow tree with another tree by returning the altered tree.
We will it use in future diffs to implement Commit Hooks.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D25221313
fbshipit-source-id: 9f83577d862b713fff71fa365ce660cc1de87c84
Summary:
This fix is still a little hypothetical. We have a few different JS errors that we're seeing with bridgeless mode that seem to be caused by Fabric trying to access `__fbBatchedBridge` from C++. I think what's happening is:
1. User encounters an unrelated JS error very early in rendering a new surface (possibly while the bundle is still loading?)
2. In release builds, BridgelessReactFragment handles the error by stopping the surface and rendering a retry button (actually, the surface is stopped in a bunch of places in BaseFbReactFragment, which might be why this is popping up now - I recently refactored that class to share more of its logic in bridgeless mode)
3. Fabric stops the surface by first checking to see if the custom binding `RN$stopSurface` exists; if not, it falls back to calling the registered callable module `ReactFabric`.
I think #3 is where things are going wrong for bridgeless mode; if you call stopSurface before `RN$stopSurface` is installed (which happens when ReactFabric shim is required) then you'll fall back to the bridge version.
My solution here is to instead rely on a flag set in C++ to determine whether we're in bridgeless mode, and then check to see if the stopSurface binding has been installed. If not, we just noop - if the ReactFabric shim hasn't been required, we probably don't actually have a React surface that needs to be stopped.
At least, that's my current theory. We'll see if this actually works.
Changelog: [Fixed][iOS] Fix an issue calling stopSurface in bridgeless mode before surface is started
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D25453696
fbshipit-source-id: bff76675c43989101d0ba5ae0aba60089db230bf
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Background executor performs unnecessary operations when second `completeRoot` message from React arrives before first `completeRoot` was finished. This produces unnecessary `ShadowViewMutations`.
Mechanism:
Everytime `completeRoot` is received, before the call is dispatched on the background queue, `completeRootEventCounter_DO_NOT_USE_` is incremented.
Inside `ShadowTree::tryCommit` we check if the value has been incremented to determine if another `completeRoot` is queued.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D24419160
fbshipit-source-id: 11e19026feca01db6c8981b093a691a6b58a006f
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Fabric uses view commands instead of setNativeProps. This diff removes what's left of setNativeProps from the core.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D24309999
fbshipit-source-id: 70e54f0a984f8c36f77ba2cd59f59fc6923bc832
Summary:
Exceptions in C++ work quite differently from exceptions in other languages. To make exceptions actually work **correctly** all the code needs to be written with "exceptions in mind" (e.g., see https://www.stroustrup.com/except.pdf). In short, if the code is not "exceptions ready", throwing an exception causes memory leaks, dangling pointers, and invariant violations all over the place, which will probably cause another crashes down the road (which will be especially hard to investigate and attribute to the original issue).
Fabric Core (Layout, Props parsing, ShadowNodes management, and so on) does not use exceptions because in most (all?) the cases the exception is now recoverable. So, if a program detects some internal state invariant violation or missing some resource, *logically* it's fatal. We also don't want to pay code-size and performance tax for exception support, so that's why we don't use them. It's just not the right fit for Fabric Core.
This does not mean that exceptions don't happen though. C++ standard library can throw them... sometimes. And if our library is compiled with exceptions enabled (still the case, unfortunately), an exception can bubble to JavaScript code and losing all context down the road. And it's hard to investigate such crashes. To isolate those occasional exceptions inside C++ core we are marking all C++/JS boundaries with `noexcept` that stops the bubbling.
I hope that will give us much more informative crash reports.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D23787492
fbshipit-source-id: 0822dbf36fc680c15b02b5cd0f2d87328296b642
Summary:
This enables a new state auto repeating mechanism built-in mechanism for all state updates which we already use for CK interop. This experiment is supposed to help with T74769670 and co.
This change is gated with MC.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D23762508
fbshipit-source-id: f535513c724ace9ede570177281324eb507329c5
Summary:
Under Fabric only, we can enter an infinite layout loop where the emitted layout event oscillates between two height values that are off by a very small amount.
The cause is, in part, components that use layoutEvents to determine their dimensions: for example, using onLayout event "height" parameters to determine the height of a child. If the onLayout height changes rapidly, the child's height will change, causing another layout, ad infinitum.
This might seem like an extreme case but there are product use-cases where this is done in non-Fabric and layout stabilizes quickly. In Fabric, currently it may never stabilize.
Part of this is due to a longstanding issue that exists in Fabric and non-Fabric, that we cannot immediately fix: If in a single frame, C++ emits 100 layout events to ReactJS, ReactJS may only process 50 before committing the root. That will trigger more layout events, even though product code has only partially processed the layout events. At the next frame, the next 50 events will be processed which may again change the layout, emitting more events... etc. In most cases the tree will converge and layout values will stabilize, but in extreme cases in Fabric, it might not.
Part of this is because Fabric does not drop *stale* layout events. If 10 layout events are dispatched to the same node, it will process all 10 events in older. Non-Fabric does not have this behavior, so we're changing Fabric to drop stale events when they queue up.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D23719494
fbshipit-source-id: e44a3b3e40585b59680299db3a4efdc63cdf0de8
Summary:
We don't need a shared_ptr here and without it the code will be faster and simpler.
This change is aligned with any clone-line callbacks we have in the Core which accepts a `const &` and return `shared_ptr<>`.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D23725687
fbshipit-source-id: 1cd959f4273913175d342302e2f12752f0114768
Summary:
Previously, to get a current root shadow node for a shadow tree, we called `tryCommit` method and stole a pointer from this. That was not a very straightforward method to get things done, and most importantly we need to do this to change the shape of the ShadowTreeCommitTransaction signature (remove a shared pointer from the callback) to make it simpler, faster and allow future improvements (see the next diff).
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D23725689
fbshipit-source-id: 51950b843a0e401828b6c6a38e5e2aaaf21ec166
Summary:
This is *another* attempt to solve a failed state update problem.
Unfortunately, some applications are inherently not compatible with the "let's recommit the update on the application side in case it failed" approach. The problem is that if we call `updateState` on the application side, we miss the original event window. E.g. if we need to deliver some state update with AsyncBatched priority and if the update fails, we lose the opportunity to commit it on time. These issues can be critical for some complex use-cases as ComponentKit interop.
This diff adds implementation for `updateState` that does the work a bit differently. For all failed state updates it tres to recommit them asap using `ShadowTree::commit` and calling lambda on every attempt. With this approach the update might fail in two cases:
The node disappeared from the tree, so there is no way to update it.
The lambda returned `nullptr` indicating that the update is no longer needed.
We need this for the ComponentKit interoperability layer that is very sensitive for missing state updates.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D23603958
fbshipit-source-id: a3b8c09fb2f1c8302583aa5880b48fc0840224e3
Summary:
We need it to stop repeating to commit new shadow tree in `ShadowTree::commit` when a transaction cancels the commit.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D23603959
fbshipit-source-id: d279fb3bf4190e860740a6450595d6f2fc3117f7
Summary:
Fabric Core does not support exception safety, so technically exceptions are unrecoverable and binaries should be built without exception support.
While it's not the case, some exceptions might bubble to JavaScript realm and be caught as JavaScript exceptions. In this case, we lose the stack trace. To prevent that and to investigate one particular error we have we add this try-catch block in this diff.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D23529233
fbshipit-source-id: 7ac7fb26ac08ad26af8790172de471ac178c3a37
Summary:
This diff deletes the activityindicator buck module because these files are created by the code gen.
changelog: [internal]
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D23227860
fbshipit-source-id: 133315a44c9181be3263e0c6227884ed15487c1f
Summary:
Logbox inside bridgeless surfaces was crashing and not able to open, this diff should fix it.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D23043773
fbshipit-source-id: 6e584f97e53e626b9bfedd6dc997ba6ba8c08b8f
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Original commit changeset: 5cb78a3a75a7
In D23151218 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/dffec8bc7bee4d05b72d19b4efe4aeab980f4cd5) we switched from `ShadowTree::tryCommit` to `ShadowTree::commit` inside `UIManager::updateState`.
It fixes update state being dropped but can cause an infinite loop inside `ShadowTree::commit` because the shadow node that triggered `UIManager::updateState` can been removed before the `updateState` call is dispatched..
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D23155228
fbshipit-source-id: f3339a4e4798880972366d6f894c14a58be1b9b2
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
In D22940187 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/774dec1e17f6f250172a6d4d944121b82fa36efb) we introduced a mechanism to retry failed state updates from view layer.
The mechanism fixes an issue where state update is occasionally dropped with background executor enabled.
# Why is state dropped?
The state is dropped because with background executor enabled, it is possible to enter `ShadowTree::tryCommit` for the same tree from 2 different threads at once. One of thread changes `_rootShadowNode` causing the other commit to fail.
The code goes like this:
```
{
Lock mutex
grab reference to `rootShadowNode_` and call it `oldRootShadowNode`
Unlock mutex
}
State reconciliation
Trigger layout
`rootShadowNode_` is untouched in this section.
{
Lock mutex
Check if `oldRootShadowNode` is equal to `rootShadowNode_`, if not, return false signalling failure. Now this is what happens when
state update fails.
..... not relevant
Unlock mutex
}
..... not relevant
```
However, in D22940187 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/774dec1e17f6f250172a6d4d944121b82fa36efb), we have taken another path. Instead of retrying to commit transaction, client is informed about the failure and it is left up to them to retry. This is correct and works. But I think it is unnecessary to this retry can be done inside UIManager::updateState.
In this diff I call `ShadowTree::commit` (version with retries) in case no `stateUpdate.failureCallback` is provided.
This makes sure that we do retry if state update fails but if Android implements `stateUpdate.failureCallback`, it is left up to view layer to retry.
Eventually we might decide to converge these two approaches.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D23151218
fbshipit-source-id: 5cb78a3a75a754429a8e33bd7736e683e9ed34d4
Summary:
There are a few places where we cast JSI values to objects without much validation and without proper error logging, and in some places the crashes aren't symbolicated well. To make debugging easier in the short-term, I'm adding some additional logs.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca, RSNara
Differential Revision: D23033222
fbshipit-source-id: 9343d693a441f0af728e560a0c245bcc4eb97869
Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
Fabric's UIManager.measureInWindow didn't take viewport's offset into account. This diff fixes it by including viewport's offset in `LayoutContext`.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D23021903
fbshipit-source-id: 9106a8789d66fe19d8cb0a9378ee5bc8f2c83005
Summary:
iOS will need to be implemented separately, but the shared C++ bits are in place.
Explanation: there is currently no way for the View layer to /know/ if an UpdateState call has succeeded or failed. Generally we just assume it succeeds, but if it fails we have no way of knowing or retrying.
This can cause some UI bugs. To mitigate this, I'm introducing a "failure" notification callback mechanism. The JNI bridging for this is a little complicated to avoid passing Runnable across the JNI, but it
should be much simpler on iOS.
In development this seems to make View components much more reliable.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D22940187
fbshipit-source-id: 917f2932ae22d421f91fe8f4fca3f07dc089f820
Summary:
This diff creates the Android OSS build system for the module react/config
As part of this diff I also moved the module to react/config folder
changelog: [internal] internal
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D22877264
fbshipit-source-id: 5b3c42580d2b1d73dc0abb48bcf4ff063b2f581f
Summary:
Hook up onSuccess and onFailure callbacks to LayoutAnimations.
Note that in non-Fabric RN, onSuccess is not known to work in Android. I could not find any uses of onFailure and it's not documented, so for now, it is only called if the setup of the animation fails.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D22889352
fbshipit-source-id: 4306debb350388dd2b7a2cbfe295eb99723988e2
Summary:
This diff moves fabric C++ code from ReactCommon/fabric to ReactCommon/react/renderer
As part of this diff I also refactored components, codegen and callsites on CatalystApp, FB4A and venice
Script: P137350694
changelog: [internal] internal refactor
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D22852139
fbshipit-source-id: f85310ba858b6afd81abfd9cbe6d70b28eca7415
Andrei Shikov
Samuel Susla
Joshua Gross
Igor Klemenski
Ramanpreet Nara
Valentin Shergin
Andres Suarez
Andrew Coates
Emily Janzer
generatedunixname89002005287564
David Vacca
Lulu Wu
