Summary:
## Problem
Many of our NativeModules are TurboModule-compatible. All our TurboModules currently use the bridge to require other NativeModules/TurboModules. As we migrate more surfaces to Venice, this lookup in many of these TurboModules will break, because the bridge will be nil.
## Initial Solution
We migrate all these TurboModules over to the turboModuleRegistry. In FBiOS, this will work because all NativeModules are TurboModule-compatible, and should [have the turboModuleRegistry attached to them by the TurboModuleManager](https://fburl.com/diffusion/d747fbc3). However, this solution has a few problems:
- If the TurboModule is used within a TurboModule-disabled app, it will break, because turboModuleRegistry will be nil on the module. Therefore, this solution isn't portable/flexible across apps.
- Longer term, we should deprecate synthesize bridge inside NativeModules. With this approach, we can't remove the synthesize bridge = bridge call from the NativeModule.
## Suggested Solution
Both NativeModules and TurboModules will be given access to an `RCTModuleRegistry` object. The RCTModuleRegistry object will use the TurboModuleManager when available and the Bridge when available to query for NativeModules and TurboModules. Otherwise, it'll just return nil.
When we do a lookup via this RCTModuleRegistry:
- In Venice, the bridge will be nil, so we won't search the bridge.
- In FBiOS, the bridge and the TurboModuleManager will be non-nil, so we'll first search the bridge, and then the TurboModuleManager.
- In standalone apps, the TurboModuleManager will be nil, so we'll only do a lookup on the bridge.
Long story short, RCTModuleRegistry will do the right thing in all scenarios.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D25412847
fbshipit-source-id: 13f41276158d90c68ab4925e518d71a2f369c210
Ramanpreet Nara