Summary:
When using the `login-password` prompt type, there is a TypeScript type mismatch issue. The `callbackOrButtons` parameter returns an object with `{login: string, password: string}` structure, but this type variation is not properly included in the **AlertType** type definition. This causes TypeScript to show type errors when using callback functions that expect credentials in the format `(credentials: {login: string, password: string}) => void`.
## Changelog:
- [General] [Fixed] Add missing type variation `{login: string, password: string}` to **AlertType** type definition to properly support `login-password` prompt callbacks
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49757
Test Plan: This change is purely type-related and doesn't affect runtime behavior.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D70797036
Pulled By: alanleedev
fbshipit-source-id: 8e27a39f0c8f49083730c683b41b69173715bd68
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/48703
## Motivation
Modernising the react-native codebase to allow for ingestion by modern Flow tooling
## This diff
- Updates files in Libraries/Alert and Libraries/ActionSheetIOS to use `export` syntax
- `export default` for qualified objects, many `export` statements for collections (determined by how it's imported)
- Appends `.default` to requires of the changed files.
- Updates Jest mocks of the related modules
- Updates the public API snapshot (intented breaking change)
Changelog:
[General][Breaking] - Files inside `Libraries/Alert` and `Libraries/ActionSheetIOS` use `export` syntax, which requires the addition of `.default` when imported with the CJS `require` syntax.
Differential Revision: D68210738
fbshipit-source-id: a984034b165908f75485f2bad33fcccadd865494
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/42402
Now that we have 2 top level directories for JS files in the `react-native` package, we need to choose where to put the native module and native component specs, because our current infra only supports a single directory.
The options we had are:
1. Keep specs in the current directory (`Libraries`). This is a problem because it encourages us to keep adding modules in this "deprecated" directory.
2. Move specs to the new `src` directory. This requires moving the current files, but from now only we can create new specs in a private directory.
3. Modify the infra to allow multiple directories. This changes the public API for something it's likely only going to be used here.
In this PR I went for option 2) because it's the most future-proof, even though it requires a little bit more work now. I created a script to automatically copy all the specs for modules and components to `src/private/specs/components` and `src/private/specs/modules`, and changed their current locations to serve as a proxy for the new location (to avoid breaking a potentially public API).
`src/private/specs` isn't meant to be their final location. We should probably still colocate native module/component specs with the rest of their code, but we can do so when we move the code from `Libraries` to `src/private`.
Changelog: [internal]
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D52919566
fbshipit-source-id: 6de8a2d2b6077e4f884386567721c6bd2b88a5d3
Tim Yung
Alex Hunt
Sam Zhou
Dawid Bartczak
Jakub Piasecki
Rubén Norte
Iwo Plaza
Himanshi Goyal
Luna Wei
Ruslan Lesiutin