Summary:
## Motivation
The concept behind JSCallInvoker doesn't necessarily have to apply only to the JS thread. On Android, we need to re-use this abstraction to allow execution of async method calls on the NativeModules thread.
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D17377313
fbshipit-source-id: 3d9075cbfce0b908d800a366947cfd16a3013d1c
Summary: Just ran `arc f ReactCommon/turbomodule/core/**/*`.
Reviewed By: ejanzer
Differential Revision: D16691807
fbshipit-source-id: 3f499ffeffaae47bda550c0071c93cd7f48e2a23
Summary:
JSCallInvoker requires a `std::weak_ptr<Instance>` to create. In our C++, `CatalystInstance` is responsible for creating this `Instance` object. This `CatalystInstance` C++ initialization is separate from the `TurboModuleManager` C++ initialization. Therefore, in this diff, I made `CatalystInstance` responsible for creating the `JSCallInvoker`. It then exposes the `JSCallInvoker` using a hybrid class called `JSCallInvokerHolder`, which contains a `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` member variable. Using `CatalystInstance.getJSCallInvokerHolder()` in TurboModuleManager.java, we get a handle to this hybrid container. Then, we pass it this hybrid object to `TurboModuleManager::initHybrid`, which retrieves the `std::shared_ptr<JSCallInvoker>` from the `JavaJSCallInvokerHandler`.
There were a few cyclic dependencies, so I had to break down the buck targets:
- `CatalystInstanceImpl.java` depends on `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java`, and `TurboModuleManager.java` depends on classes that are packaged with `CatalystInstanceImpl.java`. So, I had to put `JSCallInvokerHolderImpl.java` in its own buck target.
- `CatalystInstance.cpp` depends on `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp`, and `TurboModuleManager.cpp` depends on classes that are build with `CatalystInstance.cpp`. So, I had to put `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.cpp` in its own buck target. To make things simpler, I also moved `JSCallInvoker.{cpp,h}` files into the same buck target as `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder.{cpp,h}`.
I think these steps should be enough to create the TurboModuleManager without needing a bridge:
1. Make `JSCallInvoker` an abstract base class.
2. On Android, create another derived class of `JSCallInvoker` that doesn't depend on Instance.
3. Create `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` using an instance of this new class somewhere in C++.
4. Pass this instance of `JavaJSCallInvokerHolder` to Java and use it to create/instatiate `TurboModuleManager`.
Regarding steps 1 and 2, we can also make JSCallInvoker accept a lambda.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15055511
fbshipit-source-id: 0ad72a86599819ec35d421dbee7e140959a26ab6
Summary:
* invokeMethod() ends up not useful because each platform has its own way of invoking the platform methods
* invalidate() is not necessary because there's already the destructor of each C++ class
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15187833
fbshipit-source-id: 9478ed1e6288da30c67179e03a7bc7da6043280b
Summary:
This is only the core C++ part of TurboModule - moving to github to make integration with existing NativeModules system slightly easier. Other bindings for iOS/Android are not yet ready to move.
Notes:
* TurboModules is not ready to use at the moment.
* Build configuration is not yet provided (cocoapods/.xcodeproj/gradle), just like Fabric.
* No effort was done to make this lib C++17 strictly compliant yet (there will be in the future).
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D13551211
fbshipit-source-id: cd3b458e6746ee9218451962ca65b1ad641a32db
Ramanpreet Nara
Kevin Gozali