Summary:
ReactSoftException makes it seem like the class is an Exception, when it's actually a logger. This rename I think is more appropriate.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D30251735
fbshipit-source-id: 550bd543388e698774ec31753200bd3f722d8c17
Summary:
Support RCTModernEventEmitter +RCTEventEmitter in an Event class(es). This improves perf in Fabric. Migrate any constructor callsites to the new constructor and deprecate the previous one.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26054856
fbshipit-source-id: 228cc08a624e793aff4caf36e1df8285f3b3519d
Summary:
In https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/0b63c9464872fed9ff3eb388e32850f2f8c69561, I shipped "Early ViewCommand Dispatch" everywhere but didn't provide a good summary in the commit message.
Here it is:
The "Early ViewCommand Dispatch" experiment was a success, leading to improved UI responsiveness and fewer overall crashes.
Ship to all Fabric and non-Fabric users, and clean up the code a bit.
# Context: what?
ViewCommands are now used in React Native to do things like scroll ScrollViews to a certain position; focus or blur a TextInput; control the value of controlled TextInputs; and much more. These used to be done using setNativeProps, but we're moving everything to ViewCommands, and most of that migration has already finished.
# Context: Why?
Because Fabric does not support setNativeProps, there has been an effort to move all setNativeProps callsites to ViewCommands. Since these callsites are in JS where we can't tell if we're running in Paper or Fabric, both Paper and Fabric callsites are being migrated (mostly already done) to ViewCommands. One such example is Android TextInput, which has been using ViewCommands instead of setNativeProps for several months.
This migration was largely without issues, except TheSavior and I noticed early on that certain things were just... slower with ViewCommands. It was definitely noticeable, but we determined it to be acceptable and moved on.
Recently, it became clear to me that the perf regression may not be acceptable, but there might be an "easy" solution.
# Why are ViewCommands slower than SetNativeProps?
So, a couple things. SetNativeProps on Paper would actually cause a layout pass; the same is not true for ViewCommands, so they should actually be much faster. But they're not! The reason is that ViewCommands are treated as regular mount items, and they are queued up /after/ all other mount items. That means if you're trying to interact with the UI while some part of it is updating, your ViewCommands must wait for portions of the screen to finish rendering before they execute.
In some cases, those views may even disappear before the ViewCommand executes, causing increased exceptions as well as speed degredations.
# Proposal
This experiment that ran with successful results was: to execute ViewCommands /before/ all other types of mount instructions (by maintaining a separate queue). That means if you tap on a TextInput to focus it while the screen is doing some heavy rendering, the next time the UIManager executes a batch of instructions, it will execute the focus operation out-of-order, at the very beginning. From a user perspective this is actually quite noticeable, and works much better than the older behavior.
# Why it's Not That Dangerous
* Is it possible that we'll execute instructions after the corresponding view has disappeared? This was already possible, and is actually less likely now, since it's more likely that the ViewCommand will execute before the Delete instructions executes.
* Is it possible we'll execute instructions BEFORE the view is created? Yes, this is possible and I actually found a repro for it. My solution: allow ViewCommands to be retried, exactly once. If they throw an exception the first time, we requeue which will cause the command to be executed after the current batch of mount items. Interestingly, this seems to be unnecessary in Fabric, so the logic there is a bit simpler (probably because on Android we do view preallocation under Fabric, so views are created way before they're inserted into the view hierarchy, and apparently before ViewCommands have a chance to execute).
* ViewCommands are already an imperative feature that exists outside of the normal React commit cycle. So they're already dangerous. This doesn't change that, but it does make dangerous code *faster*, so that's good.
Changelog: [Android][Changed] ViewCommands on Android now execute earlier, as a perf optimization.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D22343648
fbshipit-source-id: 310d94977ac8ca3140ee8aa272272f660efafa36
Summary:
Early ViewCommand dispatch: ship the experiment everywhere on Android.
Since ViewCommands are totally divorced from the commit cycle currently, and since they are inherently unsafe, we can create a separate queue for them
and retry them if they fail with a specific category of exceptions.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D22173050
fbshipit-source-id: 494b7c6b5dfd2aec8ba77ae35d0d58d4d727b9b4
Summary:
This is the codemod portion of the parent diff.
I modified all call-sites to `ReactContext.getNativeModule` to do a null check on the returned NativeModule.
Changelog:
[Android][Fixed] - Check if NativeModules returned from CatalystInstanceImpl.getNativeModule are null before using them.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D21272028
fbshipit-source-id: 6bd16c6bf30605f2dfdf4c481352063712965342
Summary:
Instead of just blindly retrying all ViewCommands if they fail - which could be dangerous, since it's arbitrary imperative commands we'd be executing twice, potentially with bad app state - we only retry if the ViewCommand throws a "RetryableMountingLayerException".
Changelog: [Internal] Optimization to ViewCommands
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D20529985
fbshipit-source-id: 0217b43f4bf92442bcc7ca48c8ae2b9a9e543dc9
Summary:
ViewCommands are sort of like setNativeProps updates, in that they're direct manipulations of Views on-screen that don't go through the normal
commit/diff process that other UI updates do. This is an MVP that shows how we can do this in non-Fabric RN.
Changelog: [Internal] experiment, allow ViewCommands to be executed before other types of UIOperations
Reviewed By: axe-fb, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D20378633
fbshipit-source-id: 5f3c54d3c84b4e4f7cb060a9505b20b0e5b7afed
Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
# Context Timeline
* ~March 2019 landed D14529038 (I'll be referring to this as "index adjustment fix")
which attempted to fix a reproducible issue with layout animations: P127130177, see Spencer's diff for more context: D14245985
* May 2019 I realized that "index adjustment fix" has a bug in it and attempted to fix with D15485132, but was eventually reverted because of other crashes
* Just recently have been getting tasks related to crashes that are attempting to either remove or add a view that is out of bounds which is caused by invalid index because of the "index adjustment fix".
# What is this diff doing?
I'm removing the "index adjustment fix" because I found that the original layout animation repro, P127130177, no longer repros on latest master with the "index adjustment fix" reverted.
Additionally, I've found a consistent crash in (RN bookmark > Sample Integration App > Relay Sample Friends) of a bad view deletion because of the "index adjustment fix"
Removing the index adjustment fix may have effects elsewhere but it seems better to remove this and go back to what layout animations was doing a year ago than to continue on in this half-baked state.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D20323928
fbshipit-source-id: ba4a222915add00e98a9936ba2a8efc4006fb8e3
Summary:
The commit and batch points are just showing up as points in scuba relativity which isn't very useful - we want to know how long they take as well, so make them ranges.
Also adds view creation and update counts as annotations which can be handy for debugging regressions.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, axe-fb
Differential Revision: D17083058
fbshipit-source-id: dd29d12731734252930c9a4424bddbb98a8acccf
Summary:
This diff migrates the usages Nullable and NonNull annotations to AndroidX instead of javax.
The purpose of this change is to bring consistency in the annotations used by the core of RN
Reviewed By: makovkastar
Differential Revision: D16054504
fbshipit-source-id: 21d888854da088d2a14615a90d4dc058e5286b91
Summary:
This diff formats the Java class files inside xplat/js/react-native-github. Since google-java-format was enabled in D16071401 we want to codemode the existing code so that users don't have to deal with formatter lint noise at diff-time.
```arc f --paths-cmd 'hg files -I "**/*.java"'```
drop-conflicts
Reviewed By: cpojer
Differential Revision: D16071725
fbshipit-source-id: fc6e3852e45742c109f0c5ac4065d64201c74204
Summary:
Right now JS triggers a view manager command with the following code:
```
UIManager.dispatchViewManagerCommand(
ReactNative.findNodeHandle(this),
UIManager.getViewManagerConfig('RCTView').Commands.hotspotUpdate,
[destX || 0, destY || 0],
);
```
As we want to get rid of calls to UIManager, we need to stop looking for the integer defined in native from JavaScript. We will be changing methods like this to be:
```
UIManager.dispatchViewManagerCommand(
ReactNative.findNodeHandle(this),
'hotspotUpdate',
[destX || 0, destY || 0],
);
```
We need to support ints and Strings to be backwards compatible, but ints will be deprecated.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D15955444
fbshipit-source-id: d1c488975ae03404f8f851a7035b58a90ed34163
Summary: We've identified a couple of remaining issues that need to be re-tested before we can ship this more broadly.
Reviewed By: fred2028
Differential Revision: D14775730
fbshipit-source-id: 22402149066c5fbe72c36fcf7f547d63feaf5241
Summary: All animations are scheduled by the UIManager while it processes a batch of changes, so we can just wait to see what the longest animation is and cancel+reschedule the callback.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14656733
fbshipit-source-id: 4cbbb7e741219cd43f511f2ce750c53c30e2b2ca
Summary: This code was shipped as part of the initial open-source release but was never used.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D14649389
fbshipit-source-id: 0c068ca69b91d275008f4a7af77a23a4f1470c18
Summary:
[Android] [Fixed] - LayoutAnimations cause invalid view operations
The dating team has found a consistent repro where following an order of steps will get you the following exception:
https://lookaside.facebook.com/intern/pixelcloudnew/asset/?id=2113362972287761
The exception is due to the fact that the following operation
`delete child tag 17 from parent tag 481 which is located at index 2`
cannot be performed because parent tag 481 only has 2 children.. and they also happen to not have the tag 17 as a child. Somehow the operations and the tree they act upon are out of sync.
RN receives operations from React via the native module `UIManagerModule`. The operations use tags (an identifier for a view) and indices to determine what view is updated. These operations (grouped together as a batch) are then passed to the UI thread where we perform them on the platform views.
LayoutAnimations are implemented per batch in RN. When LayoutAnimations are on, qualified view updates are animated. Because the delete operation is animated, RN doesn't remove the view from the platform view hierarchy immediately but asynchronously -- after the animation is complete. This is problematic for other view operations that rely on an index on where to insert or delete a view because during the creation of those operations, it was assumed all prior operations were performed synchronously.
This is what was occurring in the repro and there were silent view errors occurring before the exception was thrown.
This diff proposes a solution to track all pending delete operations across operations.
We introduce a map that is keyed on view tags and has a value of a sparse array that represents child index -> count of views that are pending deletion.
`{11: [0=1], 481: [2=1]}` where this would be interpreted as for index 0 under view tag 11, there is one async view deletion that has not completed and under tag 481 there is one async view deletion at index 2.
We use the map to adjust indices on add / delete operations. We also update the count when the deletion animation is complete and remove the tag from the map when it is deleted.
Regarding worst case sizing of the map => O(# of platform views rendered)
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14529038
fbshipit-source-id: 86d8982845e25a2b23d6d89ce27852fd77dbb060
Summary: SizeMonitoringFrameLayout was used to set layout contraints on the root shadow node when the native view's size changes. Since then, we introduced ways for the root node to use proper layout contraints using the root view's measure specs, which provides more accurate constraints for the root node, so SizeMonitoringFrameLayout is no longer needed. This ends up making a lot of UIManagerModule's method signatures cleaner
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9565720
fbshipit-source-id: c569cd15991a09987cc01e89612dc9193ad99b45
Summary: I want the same instrumentation we did for the JS thread for the NM thread. This diff adds thread cpu time.
Reviewed By: alexeylang
Differential Revision: D13328876
fbshipit-source-id: 7b310956c52907ffbd881f864e1f8e774853d7f5
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
There are multiple UI thread passes during the layout process. The first is with all of the operations from React (createView, manageChildren, etc). The second is during onCollectExtraUpdates after the layout pass, when things like Text need to be precomputed before later being sent over to the views.
The onLayoutUpdateListener needs to run AFTER onCollectExtraUpdates operations are executed, so this is now queued up in the UIViewOperationQueue
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9416260
fbshipit-source-id: d1a4eaf38a4f6c82d41def34ffb94d303e8f50d4
Summary:
In native Android apps, like the YouTube app, context menus are closed when the device orientation changes.
In React Native apps instead, when having a [PopupMenu](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/widget/PopupMenu.html) open and rotating the device, the PopupMenu is not dismissed and appears in a wrong position on the screen.
This PR exposes a `dismissPopupMenu` method to allow the application to dismiss any open PopupMenu:
```(javascript)
UIManager.dismissPopupMenu()
```
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15636
Differential Revision: D6837663
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 7b0f4f04341129ad45c703a50897e17d93651974
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
The showPopup method has an error callback. For some reason, it is asserting in case the wrong tagId is passed instead of calling the error callback on Android.
Pass not existing tagId to showPopup method and make sure it is receiving an error in js instead of crashing in native on Android.
[ANDROID] [MINOR] showPopup method calls error callback instead of crashing on errors.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17550
Differential Revision: D6776014
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 1d97b762818d1591018fd43556eb41c3fb491eb9
Summary:
👋 Hello! Thanks for react-native, it’s a great project.
I was digging into the Android implementation in _ReactAndroid_ and noticed a couple typos in the documentation. I went through and tried to fix all the typos I could find using [aspell](http://aspell.net).
Not applicable: these changes are only to comments, and CI should be skipped.
[ANDROID][ENHANCEMENT][*] - Correct comment and docblock typos
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17049
Differential Revision: D6472182
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 7e62cab118609596b483d1cf16c3abf651d6753b
Summary:
Rebased version of #12842 that was reverted because of failing fb internal tests.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15919
Differential Revision: D5823956
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 4ece19a403f5ebbe4829c4c26696ea0575ab1d0e
Summary:
I don't remember exactly where we talked about this but LayoutAnimation on Android is pretty stable now so there's no reason to keep it behind an experimental flag anymore. The only part that is not really stable is delete animations, so what I did is remove the default delete animation that we provide in presets.
**Test plan**
Tested that layout animations work properly without any config.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12141
Differential Revision: D4494386
Pulled By: mkonicek
fbshipit-source-id: 5dd025584e35f9bff25dc299cc9ca5c5bf5f17a3
Summary:
Android API 15 still have 1.5~2.0% distribution (refer: [Dashboard - Android Developer](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/standalone_toolchain.html#creating_the_toolchain)).
React Native is a good tec but many companies cannot endure loose their consumer. [Choreographer](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/Choreographer.html) triggered UI operation is the only reason that React Native Android sdk use minSdkVersion 16, so we can use a backward solution **only in API 15**: [Handler](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/Handler.html).
In this PR, the biggest change is :
- Make core operation of ReactChoreographer to an interface: ReactUIDriver;
- Impl ReactUIDriver by Handler => UIDriverHandlerImpl, refactor ReactChoreographer to UIDriverChoreographerImpl;
- Let UIDriverFactory to choose which one impl would be in use. (Only use handler in api 15).
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12396
Reviewed By: AaaChiuuu
Differential Revision: D4588399
Pulled By: astreet
fbshipit-source-id: 76408e53664314dd926e6a553cde6bafbd37779e
Summary:
cc astreet
The goal of this PR is to enable the buck module `uimanager` to depend on `modules/core` without introducing any dependency cycles.
PR #11008 relies on this PR. PR #11008 needs `uimanager` to depend on `modules/core` so that `uimanager` can fire events using `RCTDeviceEventEmitter` which is in `modules/core`.
This PR moved a number of classes and interfaces:
- `com.facebook.react.modules.debug.DeveloperSettings` -> `com.facebook.react.modules.debug.interfaces.DeveloperSettings`
- `com.facebook.react.devsupport.DevOptionHandler` -> `com.facebook.react.devsupport.interfaces.DevOptionHandler `
- `com.facebook.react.devsupport.DevSupportManager` -> `com.facebook.react.devsupport.interfaces.DevSupportManager`
- `com.facebook.react.devsupport.DevServerHelper.PackagerStatusCallback` -> `com.facebook.react.devsupport.interfaces.PackagerStatusCallback`
- The class `com.facebook.react.devsupport.StackTraceHelper.StackFrame` was renamed to `StackFram
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/12329
Differential Revision: D4551160
Pulled By: astreet
fbshipit-source-id: 3a78443c4f30469b13ddfbdcc9bbef6af9e8381a
Ramanpreet Nara
Joshua Gross
Héctor Ramos
Luna Wei
Andres Suarez
Spencer Ahrens
David Vacca
Oleksandr Melnykov
Eli White
Pieter De Baets
Max Sherman
Andrew Chen (Eng)
miguelsm
Sophie Alpert
Sergei Dryganets
Cory Reed
Janic Duplessis
Alexey Lang
Omer Strulovich
Aaron Chiu
Fred Liu
desmondyao
Adam Comella