Summary:
Changelog: [iOS][Internal] Refactor: Migrate Logbox surface initialization to Fabric when available, in Bridge and Bridgeless modes
# Why
This diff main purpose is to add `RCTErrorNewArchitectureValidation(RCTNotAllowedInAppWideFabric)` in `RCTSurface`, to ensure Paper surfaces are never created in FBiOS.
# The Situation
Before this diff, in Bridged Fabric, `[RCTLogbox show]` initializes a Paper `RCTSurface`, [using `[RCTLogBoxView initWithWindow]`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/main/React/CoreModules/RCTLogBoxView.mm#L46))
In this diff, in Bridged and Bridgeless Fabric, `[RCTLogbox show]` initializes a Fabric `RCTFabricSurface`.
Before this diff, in Bridgeless Fabric, RCTLogBox posts a "CreateLogBoxSurface" notification to RCTInstance.
In this diff, the notification hack is replaced by the same `RCTFabricSurface` initialization above.
Behavior is the same.
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D35177311
fbshipit-source-id: 6de418af8a01f914c9a806bb8d74915015f9087a
Summary:
When starting the surface, _propagateStageChange is called. This checks the delegate to call surface:didChangeStage: on it.
When initWithSurface:sizeMeasureMode: is called after start, then the delegate will be nil and thus not be called.
This turns it around so a delegate is present for the surface to propagate its state to.
This fixes RCTContentDidAppearNotification not getting posted otherwise.
## Changelog
[iOS] [Fixed] - Post RCTContentDidAppearNotification with new arch
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/33402
Test Plan:
I found it best to set a breakpoint in XCode to where RCTContentDidAppearNotification is being posted.
Prior to the patch that breakpoint will not be called. After applying the patch, it will be called.
Reviewed By: philIip
Differential Revision: D34753329
Pulled By: ShikaSD
fbshipit-source-id: cc44a4c3a787d49e22e9d0c3a82c0f11ed281a0a
Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
these are returning bools for some reason even though no one is using the returned value. changing them to return void
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D31594241
fbshipit-source-id: 04c115b573b74996eaf2fef631eedb12c6734ea8
Summary:
## Context
In bridgeless mode, RCTRootView is actually an instance of RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView.
A lot of code that uses RCTRootView uses its RCTEventDispatcher or RCTModuleRegistry properties. Both of properties reach into the bridge, which means these APIs only work in bridge mode.
## Changes
- Give RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView access to the bridgeless RCTModuleRegistry, in bridgeless mode.
## Benefits
- This makes the RCTEventDispatcher and RCTModuleRegistry properties of RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView work in bridgeless mode. This allows us to eliminate branching in native code that uses these properties. Diffs incoming.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sshic
Differential Revision: D30753829
fbshipit-source-id: 0815f8ae5507686bd5aff20a3abc1843533bb132
Summary:
RCTBaseViewController uses RCTRootView.bridge to call RCTViewEventEmitter.emit.
## Changes
- RCTEventDispatcher now exposes a method to dispatch RCTViewEventEmitter events.
- RCTRootView (for paper), and RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView (for fabric and bridgeless mode) now exports the RCTEventDispatcher by grabbing it from the bridge
- RCTBaseViewController now uses the event dispatcher exported from RCTRootView to dispatch the RCTViewEventEmitter event.
## Benefits
- RCTBaseViewController no longer uses the bridge to dispatch RCTViewEventEmitter events
- In the future, we'll make RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView work with bridgeless mode, which'll allow us to remove the bridge/bridgeless fork in RCTBaseViewController.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D30434884
fbshipit-source-id: d961a56ac2abc08a661f8fe7c37926f219b731d0
Summary:
RCTRootVeiw exports the bridge. One reason why is to allow users of RCTRootView users to access NativeModules.
## Changes
- RCTBridge now exports the RCTModuleRegistry
- RCTRootView now exports the RCTModuleRegistry exported by the bridge
- Users of RCTRootView use the RCTModuleRegistry exported by RCTRootView to access NativeModules
## Benefits
Down the line, we'll change how RCTRootView gets the RCTModuleRegistry (i.e: it won't use the bridge in bridgeless mode).
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D30434886
fbshipit-source-id: 875fce24d2fd9ee6350f128c8612e613e61e390e
Summary:
Users of RCTRootView access the bridge from it, to see if it's nil or not.
## Changes
- Instead of exposing the bridge from RCTRootView for this use-case, we're now exposing a property on RCTRootView: hasBridge. This will be false in bridgeless mode, and true in bridge mode.
## Benefits
This takes us one step closer towards removing RCTBridge leakage through RCTRootView.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D30434885
fbshipit-source-id: 02f50e16831852b5049a626e8b08d59a90b2059a
Summary:
Previously, RCTRootView added support for minimumSize as a workaround for some initial layout use cases. Going forward, we don't need this anymore. So let's add a proxy property but log an error if anyone calls it.
Changelog: [iOS][Changed] - Proxy minimumSize to RCTSurface as a noop
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D29284227
fbshipit-source-id: 98b2dfc905c6c7e1adc03216e3a1cc3fda0a4133
Summary:
Previously it defaults to using transparent color (iOS default), but when using `RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView` we actually manually set to `[UIColor whiteColor]`. However, if the surface is initialized via a different API, the color wasn't set. To avoid confusion and backward incompatibility, let's just set the same background color here.
We can decide in the future if the default color should be transparent instead.
Changelog: [Fixed][iOS] RCTSurfaceHostingView default background color is now consistent with RCTRootView
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D27973748
fbshipit-source-id: c506afbc5629df6647277aa2323f084773c8e760
Summary:
Changes:
* RCTMountingManager got two dedicated methods that designate some external view as a Surface viewport;
* The wiring between views now happens right in `start` and `stop` methods (because there is no reason to do it later); now it's symmetrical and straightforward;
* A couple of Surface legacy statuses were removed; they are not used and do not convey useful information anyway.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D26095434
fbshipit-source-id: 37828e093a40a1ad22ad78f110c18a8f27781ba7
Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
Fabric's UIManager.measureInWindow didn't take viewport's offset into account. This diff fixes it by including viewport's offset in `LayoutContext`.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D23021903
fbshipit-source-id: 9106a8789d66fe19d8cb0a9378ee5bc8f2c83005
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
RCTSurface and RCTFabricSurface are two distinct classes that need to have the same interface otherwise the program crashes. This diff ties their interfaces through a protocol, triggering a build time error if they diverge.
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat, JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D23021837
fbshipit-source-id: 09ce345298ec2b45ac5a3fd2e0d3f5fa757a174f
Summary:
The change contains a bunch of additional asserts that verify some assumptions on which mounting relies on. Working on the previous diffs I realized that it's very easy to broke those and then spend hours trying to understand what exactly went wrong.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D22324087
fbshipit-source-id: 1152c40248885d02bde62a493a574868c3732273
Summary:
Here is why:
* It was with us from the very beginning but we never use it.
* The main purpose of this - snap-to-pixel layout - was moved to Yoga, where it should be.
* The current implementation has a bug.
* It's not really correct conceptually because the value becomes incorrect when an immutable subtree is being reused as part of a new tree.
* It over-complicates a new feature I am working on.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D22284645
fbshipit-source-id: c4c2df8d24e8fe924725b465e04e8154d097d226
Summary:
From the header of `RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView`:
This is a RCTRootView-compatible implementation of RCTSurfaceHostingView.
Use this class to replace all usages of RCTRootView in the app for easier migration
I need to do exactly this, but for a bridgeless mode callsite. This proxy class only uses the bridge for some perf logging, which we're fine with not having right now.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D21893522
fbshipit-source-id: 3547cff6143f44714e39e4104d03336010081e2e
Summary:
This is a backout of the temporary workaround.
A proper fix was landed as D19249490.
Original commit changeset: 53d19e90e080
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D19252609
fbshipit-source-id: 4a6239944440f392ef8a0e85a5038ee5f4d774f0
Summary:
This fix should stop T59424871 from bleeding. This is just an ugly workaround, I need some time to figure out a proper solution for that.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D19244682
fbshipit-source-id: 53d19e90e080d6c3816c78869826ed2ec0c982eb
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/26830 by removing version gating around `RCTUserInterfaceStyleDidChangeNotification` sent by `RCTRootView` and observing that notif for `Dimensions` changes.
Also centralizes `RCTUserInterfaceStyleDidChangeNotification` constant definition in new `RCTConstants` file.
Changelog:
[iOS] [Fixed] - `Dimensions` module now updates on initial split screen
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D18931098
fbshipit-source-id: e9784be3f544f3b10360fbc2d6ad0324273b1a8f
Summary:
A very common pattern I've seen in RN codebase:
- (instancetype) init {
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] addObserver:self ...]
}
- (void) dealloc {
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] removeObserver:self ...]
}
From Apple:
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsnotificationcenter/1413994-removeobserver?language=objc
> If your app targets iOS 9.0 and later or macOS 10.11 and later, you don't need to unregister an observer in its dealloc method.
RN targets iOS9+
Changelog: [Internal][Cleanup] Remove unneeded NSNotification center removeObserver
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D18264235
fbshipit-source-id: 684e5f5555cec96b055b13cd83daaeb393f4fac9
Summary:
* Fabric surface hosting view should emit the same event as RCTRootView
* Before emitting to JS, make sure to check if the color scheme really changed to avoid unnecessary re-render in JS
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: mdvacca, mmmulani
Differential Revision: D18100700
fbshipit-source-id: 451199beac07cdfb3833131ee429cc151391d8dd
Summary: Previously, the `_scheduler` method in `RCTSurfacePresenter` was implemented as a lazy getter. The only problem with that is that Scheduler instance might be (re)created in the middle of the hot-reloading process (e.g. external request to relayout some Surface might trigger that). Since it does not make any sense to create an empty Scheduler during the reloading process, now the Scheduler creation only happens in constructor and right after the VM is reloaded.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D17299441
fbshipit-source-id: 273451bbb03e8cdf532131adfdf3bc60c34e997e
Summary:
# What's the problem?
`RCTSurfacePresenter._scheduler` is deallocated in `RCTSurfacePresenter.handleBridgeWillReloadNotification`.
It shouldn't be used before `RCTSurfacePresenter.handleJavaScriptDidLoadNotification` is called because that's when new `RCTSurfacePresenter._batchedBridge` is created, scheduler depends on this new `RCTSurfacePresenter._batchedBridge`.
But it is, it means that it is created with the old bridge, this means that it gets deallocated right away.
First access point of old bridge is in `RCTSurfacePresenter.setMinimumSize`.
# What's the fix?
Make sure surface has correct stage before calling layout methods.
The other idea was to return early in `RCTSurfacePresenter.setMinimumSize` in case bridge isn't setup.
# Problems?
1. Following error still appears after reload
{F176556210}
2. There is a white space for a while. By white space a mean the screen stays white for a short period of time before displaying content.
Reviewed By: fkgozali, JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D16762443
fbshipit-source-id: 5a2a880b0f5345f268291c86811264f42f6058b3
Summary:
This PR reduces the number of warnings in React from 68 to 18. Mostly by marking unused variables. RNTester's warnings are more than halved.
[iOS] [Fixed] - Xcode warnings
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23553
Differential Revision: D14151339
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 8255330bf910a69a4c03051d91d7b0de3fadf2d1
Summary:
Xcode 9 has compiler settings that are more strict. This can occur if someone updates there project to use the default settings.
This patch declares the default type instead of allowing the compiler to determine it. Instead of () we now say (void) in a block call.
Motivation
It was just trying to get my project totally empty of warnings, and it has no side effects. If there are side effects, then we should fix the type and not go with empty to represent void.
Test Plan
Update project settings in Xcode. This code doesn't have any known side effects since the compiler assumes the type is void when not declared.
Release Notes
[DOCS] - Fixed potential compiler build issue on Xcode 9 after updating settings in project.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/17872
Differential Revision: D6981435
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 508ecea0f8874dc16a25f1dee6255481b309f8c2
Summary:
`RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView` surfaces are still automatically started right after the initialization to match `RCTRootView` interface, but `RCTSurfaceHostingView` must be started explicitly now. Also fixed some internal stuff so start and register are clear and distinct.
Background / initial motivation:
One tricky bit - we render the template as part of init`ing the rootView, so we don't know what the surfaceId will be before hand to register the UITemplate. Two possible solutions:
1) Require start be called explicitly after initializing the rootView, and setup the context in between.
2) Do something like "setUITemplateConfigForNextSurface" before creating the rootView, and have some hook when the surfaceId is assigned that associates the surfaceId with that "next" UITemplate stuff before.
(1) seems a lot cleaner, but it requires ever user of rootView to explicitly call start on it - how do you feel about that? Seems like we could also use that start call to decide if the initial render should be synchronous or not? start vs. startSync?
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13372914
fbshipit-source-id: 6db297870610e6c231f8a78c0dd74d584cb64910
Summary:
So, it does not start itself automatically right after instantiation.
(Classic RCTSurface still kinda start itself automatically but only because start/stop concept is not implemented for this yet.)
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D13461294
fbshipit-source-id: 05430688f69a0d9bf75d03e6d25f02ccd5d3176a
Summary: Some logic to check for surface stage should've done bitwise `&` operation instead of equality check, because we do bitwise `|` whenever we "set stage".
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D13459156
fbshipit-source-id: 94e2f5279fb1a31060beb7d6195953b25ce603c9
Summary:
The original design of RCTSurface implied that the Surface starts on initialization and stops on deallocation. Recently I realized that this not sufficient API in some cases when the application uses ARC with autorelease pools (that can postpone object deallocations, which is highly undesirable).
And that's simply handy to have those methods sometimes.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9982356
fbshipit-source-id: baa3bd24804d3708606ebd00b8795f2d5c9d4de9
Summary: We call this method in a constructor before the actual object is beeing constructed, so it's incorrect; it should be class method.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9931315
fbshipit-source-id: 304ba8e2354f3f408cfa2bf1729266525a08f951
Summary: All integration with Bridge was removed from RCTFabricSurface, now it's Surface's responsibility to start and stop JS app and register the ShadowTree in the Scheduler.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9931317
fbshipit-source-id: 55a682f0afb1c542a904e1a8570029e4690967cc
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
@public
We are moving away from using `RCTBridge` instance in public APIs to enable us using more performance solutions in the future.
This change also fixes "SwipeBack issue" caused by RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView returning nil bridge.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9094625
fbshipit-source-id: 6bde3c54773e75ca4c0b6fd908da9d7235b5c3be
Summary:
All public header files can be included from Obj-C and Swift, except RCTSurfaceSizeMeasureMode.h which contains C++ code.
Change is trivial and can be validated by review.
None.
[IOS][BUGFIX][{RCTSurfaceSizeMeasureMode.h}] - fix use of C++ syntax in an header file that could be included from Obj-C and Swift
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/18730
Differential Revision: D7550290
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 3835e2c57697a067ff94afdaeaca06bce132ef66
Summary:
The base class already implements `intrinsicContentSize` (and it's a bit more complicated that that).
(Not sure if this change anything visible.)
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7343567
fbshipit-source-id: 86f86715b0dacc3c2230289a13926f0520540089
Summary: The RCTRootView default needs to be translated during init of RCTSurfaceHostingView correctly.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D7327918
fbshipit-source-id: 67a2a42b554782b37a032cc0470d794554cc1e5a
Summary:
There are a few important states that didn't reset correctly when reloading JS:
* the RCTSurfaceStage was stuck at all bits enabled, hence no further stage change happened (even though the state "reset" to `RCTSurfaceStageBridgeDidLoad`)
* the RCTSurfaceView didn't get recreated, because the _view ivar was never cleared
* similarly, the _touchHandler ivar attached to the _view was never re-setup --> all touches after JS reload were dropped before this diff
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D7178038
fbshipit-source-id: ba49bc205f8bf43842471b7ab748cef8549ea212
Summary: When reloading JS during development, surface needs to make sure the root view gets re-registered before attempting to remount it. This fixes redbox on JS reload.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D7170416
fbshipit-source-id: c84b999d2cdc35cb9e26feef2a1e1a7ce35cfa70
Summary:
To help with migration from direct usages of RCTRootView to RCTSurfaceHostingView, RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView is added, which is simply a custom impl of RCTSurfaceHostingView, but will all RCTRootView APIs preserved. This makes it easy to do a drop-in replacement in native callsites:
```
// before:
RCTRootView *rootView = [[RCTRootView alloc] init...];
// after:
RCTRootView *rootView = (RCTRootView *)[[RCTSurfaceHostingProxyRootView alloc] init...];
```
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D7141696
fbshipit-source-id: db8c447749eaa896efaa37774a9babef132128eb
Summary:
So, all initial operations can now be done synchronously (and on the main thread).
To do so, instancitate `RCTSurface` object and call `synchronouslyWaitForStage:timeout:` method like that:
RCTSurface *surface = [[RCTSurface alloc] initWithBridge:... moduleName:... initialProperties:...];
BOOL success = [surface synchronouslyWaitForStage:RCTSurfaceStageSurfaceDidInitialMounting timeout:timeout];
or
RCTSurfaceHostingView *surfaceHostingView = [[RCTSurfaceHostingView alloc] initWithBridge:... moduleName:... initialProperties:...];
BOOL success = [surfaceHostingView.surface synchronouslyWaitForStage:RCTSurfaceStageSurfaceDidInitialMounting timeout:timeout];
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7014178
fbshipit-source-id: c3c13904a3587ff2a222fa71623c40c8f30bc8af
Summary:
See the comment in code.
If we on the main thread on registering time, we can/will break sequentiality of registering and mounting processes doing registration asynchronously.
We need this to make sync mouting eventually possible.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D7014176
fbshipit-source-id: 110ad5e5d86e3422eac15c3b1bdb29ae04acd7e6
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
