Summary:
Rebased version of #12842 that was reverted because of failing fb internal tests.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15919
Differential Revision: D5823956
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: 4ece19a403f5ebbe4829c4c26696ea0575ab1d0e
Summary:
Trivial.
That's okay that sometimes shadowNodes and views hierarchies have lack of synchonization.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D6040022
fbshipit-source-id: 6b49a82317b620b66a87441719fddcafb1f27934
Summary:
In some cases we need a way to provide some peice of data to shadow node
to improve layout (or do something similar), `setLocalData` allows to do this.
Reviewed By: AaaChiuuu
Differential Revision: D5828368
fbshipit-source-id: bf6a04f460dc7695a16269426d365b78909bc8eb
Summary:
We have to have a way to explicitly enforce the fact that some nodes cannot have Yoga child nodes.
Previously we relied on `isMeasureDefined()`, which is actually special case (so it does not cover all possible cases).
Reviewed By: AaaChiuuu
Differential Revision: D5647855
fbshipit-source-id: 59591be61ef62c61eb98748d44bb28b878f713fc
Summary:
Fixes#12591
The Android JSTouchDispatcher was using `mTargetCoordinates` when creating the TouchEvent for a move. However, these are final values which are set when the touch down is received. When the user's finger moves, it's important to be able to track the coordinates of the touch as it moves. Thus, we need to update the x,y coordinates by calling `TouchTargetHelper` on each move event.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15123
Reviewed By: achen1
Differential Revision: D5476663
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: ce79e96490f3657a13f9114fcc93e80d5fdbebaf
Summary:
<!--
Thank you for sending the PR! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes.
Help us understand your motivation by explaining why you decided to make this change.
You can learn more about contributing to React Native here: http://facebook.github.io/react-native/docs/contributing.html
Happy contributing!
-->
I was trying to typeset mathematical equations in react native. When typesetting fractions, baseline of the fraction must be aligned with the baseline of others. The baseline of fraction will vary based on size of numerator and denominator.
In yoga, we can set custom baseline function using `YogaNode.setBaselineFunction` method. If this method is exposed in `ReactShadowNode` class, it will be easy to create custom native UI modules which requires setting custom baseline.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15605
Differential Revision: D5686876
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 34d797a7ea27d5c1b9f6b9c36e469cdca3883aec
Summary:
Overview -
This PR resolves the issue described in #14606. This PR makes Text components take into account the includeFontPadding property when calculating their size.
Background -
Currently, on Android, when includeFontPadding is set to false, the React Text component does not adjust its height. This makes it difficult to lay out other components at a precise spacing relative to a Text component.
iOS calculates the height of a UILabel based on the font's descent + ascent.
Android lets you choose whether to calculate the height of a TextView based on the font's top + bottom (includeFontPadding=true) or ascent + descent (includeFontPadding=false).
In order for a text component to be the same size on iOS and Android (relative to the rest of the layout in points and dips), one should set includeFontPadding=false on Android - but the React Text component needs to take this property into account when sizing itself for this to work.
Please see this stack overflow post for a visual explanation of the difference between a font's ascent/descent and top/bottom - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27631736/meaning-of-top-ascent-baseline-descent-bottom-and-leading-in-androids-font
Testing -
Please see the attached screenshots to see the height difference of a Text component with this PR when includeFontPadding is true vs false.
The font I am using has an ascent + descent = em-size so that the height of the Text component will be equal to the font-size for a single line of text. This is to clearly show the additional height that includeFontPadding=true adds to the Text component.
For Text components that are styled in the same way,
When includeFontPadding=true, height = ~29.714 dips
When includeFontPadding=false, height= 24 dips
<img width="342" alt="includefontpaddingtrue" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1437344/27299391-3eec9de0-54fa-11e7-81d5-d0aeb40e8e27.png">
<img width="346" alt="includefontpaddingfalse" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1437344/27299401-45c95248-54fa-11e7-98d7-17dd152d3cb8.png">
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14609
Reviewed By: AaaChiuuu
Differential Revision: D5587602
Pulled By: achen1
fbshipit-source-id: 6d2f12ba72ec7462676645519cd27820279278eb
Summary:
If the z-index was updated after the initial mount, changes would not be reflected because we did not recalculate the z-index mapped child views and redraw the view. This adds code to do that and call it whenever we update z-index.
**Test plan**
Tested by reproducing the bug with 2 overlapping views that change z-index every second. Made sure it now works properly and z-index changes are reflected.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/15203
Differential Revision: D5564832
Pulled By: achen1
fbshipit-source-id: 5b6c20147211ce0b7e8954d60f8614eafe128fb4
Summary:
This is the better fix for the same issue as mentioned in PR https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14560
Certain rotateX, rotateY, scaleX and scaleY animations do not work correctly on some phones in Android 7.0.0, causing issues such as https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/14462 and https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/13522.
The issue can be fixed on JS side by setting an additional transform for perspective, eg. `{perspective: 1}` which triggers a `setCameraDistance` call in native code.
The fix in this PR always sets the camera distance on transforms, even when no perspective transform was specified. The default camera distance is set before the scale multiplication, to make sure that the value is appropriate for the phones density. The value calculates to an Android 'default' camera distance of 1280 * scale multiplier; https://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/View.html#setCameraDistance(float)
If a perspective transform is specified, this value will be used correctly still.
This fix was tested on the RNTester. Before the fix, on some devices, the FlatList example, with inverted turned on, will not display the list.
Devices that have been confirmed to have this issue:
FRD-AL10（honor 8） EMUI:5.0 android: 7.0
MHA-AL00(Mate9) EMUI:5.0 android:7.0
Huawei P10 VTR-L09, running Android 7.0
After the fix, the inverted FlatList displays correctly.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14646
Differential Revision: D5492009
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: d4da3b090a7e65df3b84e48ea32c964f4f8f7c88
Summary:
This PR fixes an issue with rotation decomposition matrix on android.
The issue can be illustrated with this sample code https://snack.expo.io/r1SHEJpVb
It surfaces when we have non-zero rotation in Y or X axis and when rotation Z is greater than 90deg or less than -90deg. In that case the decomposition code doesn't give a valid output and as a result the view gets rotated by 180deg in Z axis.
You may want to run the code linked above on android and iOS to see the difference. Basically the example app renders first image rotated only by 89deg and the next one by 91deg. As a result you should see the second view being pivoted just slightly more than the first image. Apparently on android the second image is completely flipped:
iOS:
Android:
The bug seemed to be caused by the code that decomposes the matrix into axis angles. It seems like that whole code has been overly complicated and we've been converting matrix first into quaternion just to extract angles. Whereas it is sufficient to extract angles directly from rotation matrix as described here: http://nghiaho.com/?page_id=846
This formula produces way simpler code and also gives correct result in the aforementioned case, so I decided not to debug quaternion code any further.
sidenote: New formula's y angle output range is now -90 to 90deg hence changes in tests.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/14888
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D5414006
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 2e0a68cf4b2a9e32f10f6bfff2d484867a337fa3
Summary:
Add the ability for UIManager to check if a node is an ancestor of anther one on Android like #7876 did on iOS
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/13129
Differential Revision: D4938319
Pulled By: hramos
fbshipit-source-id: abe20779be2142a1ea9ac46f52d8cd8609236419
Ramanpreet Nara
Alexey Lang
Andrew Chen (Eng)
Janic Duplessis
Valentin Shergin
Dmitry Zakharov
Aaron Chiu
David Vacca
Tomas Reimers
Brian Vaughn
Tomas Reimers
Andrew Goodale
Sreejith Krishnan R
Misha Greenberg
Janic Duplessis
Bartol Karuza
Omer Strulovich
Krzysztof Magiera
Pieter De Baets
Alexander Komissarov
yk3372
Swordsman-Inaction
