Summary:
This diff fixes overflowInset calculation when a shadow node has transform matrix from a transfrom prop in JS. Specifically, this fixed the use case when transform directly used on a view component. When using Animated.View, it will create an invisible wrapper which will behave correctly with existing logic. This diff bring both use cases to work properly.
When a shadow node has transform on it, it will affect the overflowInset values for its parent nodes, but won't affect its own or any of its child nodes overflowInset values. This is obvious for translateX/Y case, but not for scale case. Take a look at the following case:
```
┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐
│Original Layout │ │ Translate AB │ │ Scale AB │
└────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘
─────▶ ◀───── ─────▶
┌ ─ ─ ─ ┬──────────┐─ ─ ─ ─ ┐ ┌ ─ ─ ─ ┬──────────┐─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┐ ┌ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┬──────────┐─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┐
│ A │ │ A │ │ A │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ├ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┼ ─ ─┌─────┤─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┤
─ ─ ─ ─│─ ─ ─┌───┐┼ ─ ─ ─ ─ │ │ ◀─ ─ ─ │ │AB │ ─ ─ ─▶
│ │ │AB ││ │ │ ┌ ─ ─ ┼ ─ ─ ─ ┬──┴┬ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┤ │ │ │ │ │
└─────┤ ├┘ └───────┤AB │ └────┤ │
│ │┌──┴─────────┤ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┌───┴──────────┤
││ABC │ │┌──┴─────────┐ │ │ABC │
│ │└──┬─────────┤ │ │ │ ││ABC │ │ │ │ │ │ │
┌───ABD───────┴─┐ │ │ │└──┬─────────┘ │ ▼ │ └───┬──────────┘
├─────────────┬─┘ │ │ │ │ ├───ABD───────┴─┐ │ │ │ ├────────────────┴──┐ │ │
─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─└───┘─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ▼ └─────────────┬─┘ │ ▼ │ ABD │ │
└ ┴ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┴───┴ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┘ ├────────────────┬──┘ │ │
─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┴─────┴ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─
```
For the translate case, only view A has change on the overflowInset values for `right` and `bottom`. Note that the `left` and `top` are not changed as we union before and after transform is applied.
For the scale case, similar things are happening for view A, and both `left`, `right`, and `bottom` values are increased. However, for View AB or any of its children, they only *appear* to be increased, but that is purely cosmetic as it's caused by transform. The actual values are not changed, which will later be converted during render phase to actual pixels on screen.
In summary, overflowInset is affected from child nodes transform matrix to the current node (bottom up), but not from transform matrix on the current node to child nodes (top down). So the correct way to apply transform is to make it only affect calculating `contentFrame` during layout, which collects child nodes layout information and their transforms. The `contentFrame` is then used to decide the overflowInset values for the parent node. The current transform matrix on parent node is never used as it's not affecting overflowInset for the current node or its child nodes.
This diff reflects the context above with added unit test to cover the scale and translate transform matrix.
Changelog:
[Android/IOS][Fixed] - Fixed how we calculate overflowInset with transform matrix
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D34433404
fbshipit-source-id: 0e48e4af4cfd5a6dd32a30e7667686e8ef1a7004
Summary:
The fix in this diff seems simple, but it took some time to understand why this change fixed the issue that views animated use native driver out from their parent's layout are not getting touch events.
We introduced `overflowInset` to RN Android a while back to give each shadow node extra information to cover all its children's layout. These values (left, top, right, bottom extensions from the view's own layout) help us improve hit-testing algorithm used in touch events. We could ignore all subtrees that the touch point not in their parent's overflowInset box.
However, this was not working for native animation. When `userNativeDriver` is on, all animation happens without Fabric knows anything about them. The overflowInset is out of date with the final animated layout, which caused the issue that we ignored the animated view as we thought it's not under the pointer.
Here is a playground demo (P476407654) for the issue:
https://pxl.cl/1XfPL
We've tried to fix this by passing the final animated values via `passthroughAnimatedPropExplicitValues` added in D32539976. This is a prop that will get merged into `style` prop for [animation component](https://fburl.com/code/jybzfgu5). The transform values were already applied when measuring layout in [Pressability](https://fburl.com/code/5mect2k3), which uses [LayoutableShadowNode](https://fburl.com/code/qh8fufrw). However, this is not the case for overflowInset calculation. Hence, the fix here is to apply the transform matrix in Yoga before calculating the overflowInset.
Changelog:
[Android][Fixed] - Fix overflowInset calculation by using transform values
Reviewed By: ShikaSD
Differential Revision: D33806030
fbshipit-source-id: e438618e3d6e5b0333cff9ff9919b841d73b2e9d
Summary:
Changelog: [internal]
Logger needs to be supplied to YGConfig, otherwise the app crashes when Yoga tries to log.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D30394676
fbshipit-source-id: bda464a4e43cb815c00650e1fedf43fe0a06f973
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/32042
This diff moves react_native_log out of utils to make it easier/possible to import from modules.
Changelog: [internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D30411247
fbshipit-source-id: 5482761b259600df051a88c6eff1834c882e7230
Summary:
In this diff:
1. Convert the ReactNativeLogger to c function for the future compatibility.
2. Bind the log function from Catalyst app
3. Update the call site
Changelog: [internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D30271863
fbshipit-source-id: 4c0ea704cf19f53468a3b72631353959ea999884
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31998
Overall Context: We want to add a way to log errors (e.g. mustfix, warn, etc on the server with stack trace) without crashing the app (e.g. react_native_assert crashes the app).
This diff: I am writing very simple logger functions which will get resolved at build time depending on the platforms/apps.
Changelog: [internal]
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D30174404
fbshipit-source-id: 2e5bc865dd8576c5a758c56e080a1e582a8c3ada
Summary:
Currently, React Native throws an invariant violation error when a text string or number is supplied as a child. This is undesirable because core library components should be fault-tolerant and degrade gracefully (with soft errors, if relevant).
This change will work when a change in the host configs are landed (https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/21953).
Changelog: [internal]
Reviewed By: yungsters, sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D29894182
fbshipit-source-id: 827ff299991a476b57981382d196c7ee1396ec28
Summary:
Fix warnings about implicit type truncation.
## Changelog
[Internal] [Fixed] - Fix various C++ warnings
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/31002
Test Plan:
Almost all the changes here are simply making explicit conversions which are already occurring. With the exception of a couple of constants being changed from doubles to floats.
With these changes I am able to remove a bunch of warning suppressions in react-native-windows.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D26900502
Pulled By: rozele
fbshipit-source-id: d5e415282815c2212a840a863713287bbf118c10
Summary:
For better cross-platform consistency, migrate usages of NDEBUG to REACT_NATIVE_DEBUG. See flags.h for explanation.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: PeteTheHeat
Differential Revision: D26695203
fbshipit-source-id: df09af5a62044c711368954b5e9b3a114491e2ed
Summary:
Surprisingly, it's not that trivial to pass `LayoutContrants` to `YGNodeCalculateLayout` in a way that always works. The problem is that `YGNodeCalculateLayout` does not allow expressing the constraints explicitly, so we need to pass them as `YGStyle` properties of a root node. With this approach, we unconditionally apply them as `YGStyle`s as actual values or `Undefined` value (which overrides some other values that can be previously set by calling this function or other code). We also intentionally preserve `height` and `width` values because it's a common use-case when a component explicitly specifies its size.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26583550
fbshipit-source-id: 2cd506fbdc9e6a1a8f119d09ccfd34f876a13625
Summary:
See react_native_assert.{h,cpp}. Because of the BUCK+Android issue where NDEBUG is always defined, we use react_native_assert instead of assert to enable xplat asserts in debug/dev mode.
This migrates most of the codebase, but probably not 100%. The goal is to increase assertion coverage on Android, not to get to 100% (yet).
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: RSNara
Differential Revision: D26562866
fbshipit-source-id: a7bf2055b973e1d3650ed8d68a6d02d556604af9
Summary:
In D26292378 (https://github.com/facebook/react-native/commit/81147b6f793fbc00b81501393371bb332641f4c8) we changed the way the layout constraints are specified to Yoga for measuring and layout. This is a second iteration of the change that slightly more correct and fixes other problematic cases we discovered. See also the commend in the code.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26412484
fbshipit-source-id: 06011982a63cd4d3b61ae295f9aba6f8dab6ca02
Summary:
This diff increases the severity for yoga logs to match all other logs in Fabric
changelog: [internal] internal
Differential Revision: D26315760
fbshipit-source-id: 1de3c23513ad8ce1630e3d0e3576f60608aac7de
Summary:
Instead of changing Yoga styles for a root node, now we pass available height and width to YGNodeCalculateLayout directly.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D26292378
fbshipit-source-id: f99127e1cbddc1d57e4ee116afc141cbff5054ab
Summary:
This implements the `MeasurableYogaNode` trait in `YogaLayoutableShadowNode`. We had this trait from the very beginning but never used it. Now, if the trait is specified, `YogaLayoutableShadowNode` will set the measure function for the node and dirty it during cloning.
Previously, we used (and still use) a dedicated method for setting up the measure function - `YogaLayoutableShadowNode::enableMeasurement()`. The problem with it is that to make it work we have to dirty the Yoga node every time we clone it. And the only proper way to do this in the `YogaLayoutableShadowNode` constructor because if we do it later ancestor nodes could not observe this and react to this. Therefore we have to have a trait for it.
The plan is to use it for TextInput first to fix a crash (see the next diff). After we confirm it works fine, we will replace all the usages of `enableMeasurement` with the new trait.
This diff also renames the other two yoga-related traits (to make them less verbose and look unified), adds more comments, and asserts.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: sammy-SC
Differential Revision: D25937711
fbshipit-source-id: fafbd5d62537ac09e02ffbfd56adab6d629d791d
Summary:
This implements a new ShadowNode trait that helps to propagate Yoga node `isDirty` flag down the root of the tree and clone siblings appropriately.
Several Fabric components mutate its Yoga styles after the node was cloned. In such cases, we need to mark the node as dirty after doing so. The problem with this is that the parent node and its siblings were already updated (cloned or not) based on the previous value of the `isDirty` flag. This happens because this logic is implemented in YogaLayoutableShadowNode which is a base constructor that must be called before any other logic from a subclass can run.
For now, this change enables that for SafeAreaView only (which seems to help with some junkiness issues), later we can extend the usage of this for other components if needed.
Changelog: [Internal] Fabric-specific internal change.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D24719347
fbshipit-source-id: b0d050afea5de9c470e05e1b4c9e7052e00ae949
Summary:
#changelog: [internal]
When I built ThreadStorage I didn't know about existence of `thread_local` keyword. Because it achieves the same goal, using built in c++ features is preferred over building our own.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, shergin
Differential Revision: D24380680
fbshipit-source-id: e961fc34c6d3f085fc9b918b20bb4827de0d5624
Summary:
Changelog: [Internal]
# Problem
## Step 1
JS clones a node that has size {100, 100} and changes props that cause the node to increase size to {200, 200}. JS holds pointer to this node.
Now, the size (stored in LayoutableShadowNode.layoutMetrics_) changes after Yoga layout is triggered.
However, the node gets cloned inside State Reconciliation before Yoga layout phase. The JS pointer points to a node with size {100, 100}, not to a node with size {200, 200}.
## Step 2
Again, JS clones node (with old reference, therefore gets old layoutMetrics_ with size {100, 100}) and it changes props that cause the node to decrease its size back to {100, 100}.
We go all the way to Yoga layout and looking for nodes that have been affected by the node. The node, affected by the layout because it went from {200, 200} to {100, 100}, will be evaluated as not affected. This causes onLayout event to not be fired.
# Fix
We can safely remove the frame equality check (please see below). This can be done because we already check for equality before dispatching onLayout. It happens here:
https://www.internalfb.com/intern/diffusion/FBS/browsefile/master/xplat/js/react-native-github/ReactCommon/react/renderer/components/view/ViewEventEmitter.cpp?commit=881853eb0c42625fd0812bd2652bf36fcbd614ee&lines=43
As far as I know, `affectedNodes` isn't used for anything else besides dispatching onLayout.
# Discussion
This problem manifests itself only when a node has two different sizes that it flips between. To better understand this, please watch the video in Test plan labelled "before". Notice how the text has 2 different values that it flips between.
Here is a code that was affected by it https://fburl.com/diffusion/3hwo0iy5
If you inspect it closely, you will notice that it depends on `onLayout` to return correct value to calculate offset from left.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D22999891
fbshipit-source-id: e2d0f5771c1bf3cd788e5e9da0155c92e33fb84e
Summary:
This diff creates the Android OSS build system for the module react/renderer/components/view
As part of this diff I had to remove inner folders of react/renderer/components/view
changelog: [internal] internal
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D22881703
fbshipit-source-id: afb56b4f7660d000d2abb8ade0ccb60d1adfb371
Samuel Susla
Xin Chen
Andres Suarez
Sota Ogo
Andrew Coates
Joshua Gross
Valentin Shergin
David Vacca